bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,166
- 47,312
Your entire shtik boils down to viscously insulting anyone you disagree with.LOL
That's perfect English.
Keep running, fucking moron.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your entire shtik boils down to viscously insulting anyone you disagree with.LOL
That's perfect English.
Keep running, fucking moron.![]()
Still looking for whether Pence can unilaterally overrule the law.No it was about an investigation by 5 SCOTUS members, 5 senators, and 5 congressmen to determine if there was fraud. It has been done before and no one were called traitors. Why didn't Congress do it when they were informed that day that 40% of voters thought there was fraud?
Counting electoral votes."What" is common sense? Your quote doesn't make that clear.
You think people are happy paying more money out of their wallets?Interesting. You want a coup because gas prices are a dollar a gallon over what you’d prefer?
An investigation would have only delayed certification or found fraud.. It was overruling nothing.Still looking for whether Pence can unilaterally overrule the law.
Where does he say that?Counting electoral votes.
Pence no longer has a future in politics. He did this to himself.Still looking for whether Pence can unilaterally overrule the law.
Yes. It’d be Pence overruling the law saying he counts the electoral votes on Jan 6th.An investigation would have only delayed certification or found fraud.. It was overruling nothing.
And he doesn’t do that wellYour entire shtik boils down to viscously insulting anyone you disagree with.
Yep, Meadows must have gotten it from the Russians.
Actually, it is a tradition not a law. Show me how that date is set in stone. I'll wait.Yes. It’d be Pence overruling the law saying he counts the electoral votes on Jan 6th.
Pence doesn’t get to do that because he can’t unilaterally overrule the law.
Well I’d like to know what demofks thought was going on? The vote wasn’t certified. So they couldn’t overturn what wasn’t done?The FBI already investigated Jan 6 and said there was no planning and no insurrection. No government officials were arrested. How can it be an insurrection when the rioters left the Capitol without even trying to take control of the government? They did not approach the white house or take any congress people prisoner. They made noise and a mess and then left.
I already referenced the law.Actually, it is a tradition not a law. Show me how that date is set in stone. I'll wait.
But he hadn’t done that, so what was the play?Yes. It’d be Pence overruling the law saying he counts the electoral votes on Jan 6th.
Pence doesn’t get to do that because he can’t unilaterally overrule the law.
What else does Pence pass on to Congress? The electoral votes. Are you dense?Where does he say that?
And if they don’t?I already referenced the law.
Here it is again.
3 USC 15.
Congress shall be in session on the sixth day of January succeeding every meeting of the electors.
It goes on in some detail.
Well nothing at that time, so what’s the play?What else does Pence pass on to Congress? The electoral votes. Are you dense?
And a precedent was set in the late 1800's that can circumvent that law.I already referenced the law.
Here it is again.
3 USC 15.
Congress shall be in session on the sixth day of January succeeding every meeting of the electors.
It goes on in some detail.
LOLOLYour entire shtik boils down to viscously insulting anyone you disagree with.
See? We aren't going to get through to these lobotomized cultists. Their high priests literally produced a powerpoint for each other on how to pull off a coup. They then followed its instructions. These cultist freaks supported it 100%. They still do.
But then they say stuff like this ^^. I wonder who they think they are fooling?