Cherry-picking examples of socialist governments failing does not prove the concept is flawed

[danielpalos]

You can't show any economy that is capitalist. Capitalism is Third World. All First World economies are Socialist and have Mixed Market economies, to Prove it.

The right wing simply has no clue of economics.

You mean nations where Drug Lords take charge?
There is no such thing as an unregulated nation, even if some of that regulation is deleterious to much of the population.

under True Capitalism, capital matters not morals or morality.

Only the right wing, never gets it.

I agree.
Now list for us nations that are 100% Capitalist.
Every nation has it’s problems.

The right wing complains about socialism. They Are the Problem, not socialism. Socialism merely requires social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price.

You have become a pin ball machine in tilt mode.
The Left Wing is bat shit crazy and I’ve never been yelled at by a Right Winger; they just walk away.

You have no argument, only ad hominems. Thanks for playing.

 

[jc456]

Capitalism’s greatest inherent flaw is that as decades pass, widening income disparity will inevitably get worse. The rich become richer, and the poor become more poor. The middle class shrinks. The only way to prevent this is with government intervention, i.e. socialism. Capitalism of course isn’t a failure - the US would not be the juggernaut it is now if it weren’t for a private market. However, that does not mean the quality of life for most won’t get worse over time.

Socialism is a very broad term. To simplify the definition, it is a concept that involves the people funding (tax revenue) and owning (utilizing) government services. This is why every nation on earth - including the US - has a socialist backbone. Any service the government provides that’s funded by tax revenue and is utilized by the people is socialism.

The definition of socialism has nothing to do with corrupt leadership in a given government. Venezuela is failing because of the country’s leadership. Socialism’s core definition has nothing to do with a dictatorship government.

Nordic countries are social democratic countries. This means more services apply the the well being of the population. These people have the best quality of life according to international polling. That is something that is diminishing in America. However, that doesn’t mean the concept is the antithesis of capitalism. Socialism can be the framework of a capitalist system. Socialism is just needed to make sure a capitalistic system provides benefit to the well being of the population as a whole.

go live there then and leave us the fk alone.,

 

[Indeependent]

You mean nations where Drug Lords take charge?
There is no such thing as an unregulated nation, even if some of that regulation is deleterious to much of the population.

under True Capitalism, capital matters not morals or morality.

Only the right wing, never gets it.

I agree.
Now list for us nations that are 100% Capitalist.
Every nation has it’s problems.

The right wing complains about socialism. They Are the Problem, not socialism. Socialism merely requires social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price.

You have become a pin ball machine in tilt mode.
The Left Wing is bat shit crazy and I’ve never been yelled at by a Right Winger; they just walk away.

You have no argument, only ad hominems. Thanks for playing.

What’s your argument?
Republicans are evil!

Democrats need the poor.
Extremes will always exists and will always need to be tempered.

 

[jc456]

What is the most powerful, wealthiest country in the world? The USA, when some socialist puke country can challenge us then talk to us about socialism.

or he can go live there and take care of his problem.

 

[danielpalos]

under True Capitalism, capital matters not morals or morality.

Only the right wing, never gets it.

I agree.
Now list for us nations that are 100% Capitalist.
Every nation has it’s problems.

The right wing complains about socialism. They Are the Problem, not socialism. Socialism merely requires social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price.

You have become a pin ball machine in tilt mode.
The Left Wing is bat shit crazy and I’ve never been yelled at by a Right Winger; they just walk away.

You have no argument, only ad hominems. Thanks for playing.

What’s your argument?
Republicans are evil!

Democrats need the poor.
Extremes will always exists and will always need to be tempered.

The right wing complains about socialism. They Are the Problem, not socialism. Socialism merely requires social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price.

 

[Indeependent]

DP...Smileys are pathetic.

 

[Indeependent]

I agree.
Now list for us nations that are 100% Capitalist.
Every nation has it’s problems.

The right wing complains about socialism. They Are the Problem, not socialism. Socialism merely requires social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price.

You have become a pin ball machine in tilt mode.
The Left Wing is bat shit crazy and I’ve never been yelled at by a Right Winger; they just walk away.

You have no argument, only ad hominems. Thanks for playing.

What’s your argument?
Republicans are evil!

Democrats need the poor.
Extremes will always exists and will always need to be tempered.

The right wing complains about socialism. They Are the Problem, not socialism. Socialism merely requires social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price.

I presume you don’t own a house.

 

[danielpalos]

DP...Smileys are pathetic.

Having nothing but fallacy, is worse.

 

[danielpalos]

The right wing complains about socialism. They Are the Problem, not socialism. Socialism merely requires social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price.

You have become a pin ball machine in tilt mode.
The Left Wing is bat shit crazy and I’ve never been yelled at by a Right Winger; they just walk away.

You have no argument, only ad hominems. Thanks for playing.

What’s your argument?
Republicans are evil!

Democrats need the poor.
Extremes will always exists and will always need to be tempered.

The right wing complains about socialism. They Are the Problem, not socialism. Socialism merely requires social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price.

I presume you don’t own a house.

I presume You don't care about Morals.

 

[Indeependent]

You have become a pin ball machine in tilt mode.
The Left Wing is bat shit crazy and I’ve never been yelled at by a Right Winger; they just walk away.

You have no argument, only ad hominems. Thanks for playing.

What’s your argument?
Republicans are evil!

Democrats need the poor.
Extremes will always exists and will always need to be tempered.

The right wing complains about socialism. They Are the Problem, not socialism. Socialism merely requires social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price.

I presume you don’t own a house.

I presume You don't care about Morals.

You are making the sweeping claim that successful people are evil.
I presume you are not successful.

 

[Wyatt earp]

I agree.
Now list for us nations that are 100% Capitalist.
Every nation has it’s problems.

The right wing complains about socialism. They Are the Problem, not socialism. Socialism merely requires social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price.

You have become a pin ball machine in tilt mode.
The Left Wing is bat shit crazy and I’ve never been yelled at by a Right Winger; they just walk away.

You have no argument, only ad hominems. Thanks for playing.

What’s your argument?
Republicans are evil!

Democrats need the poor.
Extremes will always exists and will always need to be tempered.

The right wing complains about socialism. They Are the Problem, not socialism. Socialism merely requires social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price.

You can not legislate morals never can, never will... That's why socialism only works on paper not in the real world .



.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Capitalism’s greatest inherent flaw is that as decades pass, widening income disparity will inevitably get worse. The rich become richer, and the poor become more poor. The middle class shrinks. The only way to prevent this is with government intervention, i.e. socialism. Capitalism of course isn’t a failure - the US would not be the juggernaut it is now if it weren’t for a private market. However, that does not mean the quality of life for most won’t get worse over time.

Socialism is a very broad term. To simplify the definition, it is a concept that involves the people funding (tax revenue) and owning (utilizing) government services. This is why every nation on earth - including the US - has a socialist backbone. Any service the government provides that’s funded by tax revenue and is utilized by the people is socialism.

The definition of socialism has nothing to do with corrupt leadership in a given government. Venezuela is failing because of the country’s leadership. Socialism’s core definition has nothing to do with a dictatorship government.

Nordic countries are social democratic countries. This means more services apply the the well being of the population. These people have the best quality of life according to international polling. That is something that is diminishing in America. However, that doesn’t mean the concept is the antithesis of capitalism. Socialism can be the framework of a capitalist system. Socialism is just needed to make sure a capitalistic system provides benefit to the well being of the population as a whole.

The concept and framework of Socialism looks great. The core flaw with Socialism a d why it fails when implemented: GREED. Greed for power and control which is why if you look at the decidedly Socialst economies around the world you will find a true 1 percent that locks everyone else out.... no economic mobility, no middle class. Income disparity exists in these Nations as well...,. It just does not exist among and between the masses.

America would be foolish ti pursue such a framework at the cost of Capitalism.

 

[Wry Catcher]

People are mammals.

Nowhere in nature do mammals provide for other mammals.

Elemental.

LOL





Clearly, the republican party ought to be represented by the ostrich and not the elephant.

 

[Claudette]

LMAO

As Margaret Thatcher said. "Socialism works great till you run out of other peoples money."

Socialism has never worked in any country.

The leaders become billionaires and everybody else is scrambling to survive.

Oh yeah. Billy Baloney loves socialism till he runs out of someone elses money.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

The less a person is worth in terms of productivity, creativity and accomplishment, the more they embrace socialism.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Capitalism’s greatest inherent flaw is that as decades pass, widening income disparity will inevitably get worse. The rich become richer, and the poor become more poor. The middle class shrinks. The only way to prevent this is with government intervention, i.e. socialism. Capitalism of course isn’t a failure - the US would not be the juggernaut it is now if it weren’t for a private market. However, that does not mean the quality of life for most won’t get worse over time.

Socialism is a very broad term. To simplify the definition, it is a concept that involves the people funding (tax revenue) and owning (utilizing) government services. This is why every nation on earth - including the US - has a socialist backbone. Any service the government provides that’s funded by tax revenue and is utilized by the people is socialism.

The definition of socialism has nothing to do with corrupt leadership in a given government. Venezuela is failing because of the country’s leadership. Socialism’s core definition has nothing to do with a dictatorship government.

Nordic countries are social democratic countries. This means more services apply the the well being of the population. These people have the best quality of life according to international polling. That is something that is diminishing in America. However, that doesn’t mean the concept is the antithesis of capitalism. Socialism can be the framework of a capitalist system. Socialism is just needed to make sure a capitalistic system provides benefit to the well being of the population as a whole.

The concept and framework of Socialism looks great. The core flaw with Socialism a d why it fails when implemented: GREED. Greed for power and control which is why if you look at the decidedly Socialst economies around the world you will find a true 1 percent that locks everyone else out.... no economic mobility, no middle class. Income disparity exists in these Nations as well...,. It just does not exist among and between the masses.

America would be foolish ti pursue such a framework at the cost of Capitalism.

Yup, we only basically have two options


Rich private citizens (capitalism)

Or

Rich government employees (socialism)


Pick your poison..


.

 

[Edgetho]

There has NEVER been a socialist system that didn't result in disaster.

The Nordic systems that dimocrap SCUM like to cite as examples? Not socialist.

Not even close. They are Welfare States.

Sweden is a Monarchy. So is Denmark. So is the UK. France is hardly socialist.

China is State Directed CAPITALISM

Every socialist system that has ever been tried has failed. Miserably.

The ONLY time that socialism was ever peacefully installed was in Venezuela.

There is the best example

dimocraps are stupid scum

 

[danielpalos]

You have no argument, only ad hominems. Thanks for playing.

What’s your argument?
Republicans are evil!

Democrats need the poor.
Extremes will always exists and will always need to be tempered.

The right wing complains about socialism. They Are the Problem, not socialism. Socialism merely requires social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price.

I presume you don’t own a house.

I presume You don't care about Morals.

You are making the sweeping claim that successful people are evil.
I presume you are not successful.

I am claiming capitalism requires capital morals for a market friendly price, not social morals for free.

What do you mean by "successful", on this plane of existence in Nexus 6, with Zardoz and the incorrigibles. Not much to "brag about".

 

[danielpalos]

The right wing complains about socialism. They Are the Problem, not socialism. Socialism merely requires social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price.

You have become a pin ball machine in tilt mode.
The Left Wing is bat shit crazy and I’ve never been yelled at by a Right Winger; they just walk away.

You have no argument, only ad hominems. Thanks for playing.

What’s your argument?
Republicans are evil!

Democrats need the poor.
Extremes will always exists and will always need to be tempered.

The right wing complains about socialism. They Are the Problem, not socialism. Socialism merely requires social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price.

You can not legislate morals never can, never will... That's why socialism only works on paper not in the real world .



.

The right simply doesn't care, about even Ten simple non-legislated Commandments, from a God. How, immoral is that.

 

[danielpalos]

LMAO

As Margaret Thatcher said. "Socialism works great till you run out of other peoples money."

Socialism has never worked in any country.

The leaders become billionaires and everybody else is scrambling to survive.

Oh yeah. Billy Baloney loves socialism till he runs out of someone elses money.

we have a better understanding of socialism, now. it starts with a social contract, like a Constitution.