Civil rights victory! Biden's "Ministry of Truth" collapses

I want your examples of the past two years, which you consider to be unconstitutional .


Human trafficking illegals to points all over the country in contradiction to US law. Lifting title 42 while the regime claims the pandemic is still underway. Failure to follow a court order to continue the remain in Mexico policy. All are unconstitutional because part of a presidents obligations under the Constitution is to insure the laws are faithfully executed. xiden ain't doing that.

.
 
Which side of the political isle WAS misinforming the public at high levels?

Both sides, which is kind of the point of allowing free speech. The Hunter laptop story was most certainly true to some extent. That was squashed. Did you notice the Trump Russian collusion narrative being removed from social platforms, even today after an exhaustive investigation? What about the story about having tapes of Trump getting peed on? Were those removed? How about the blatant death threats posted on social media regarding a sitting President? Anything done about that? Any "fact-checking"?

You are lost if you don't see the propaganda and misinformation that was completely overlooked by these organizations.
 
People are not asked their political inclination when asking for food stamps, etc.

They don't need to be asked. Lifelong welfare folks know exactly how they should vote and voting Demographics don't lie. The majority on long-term disability and more people on other forms of welfare vote Democrat vs Republican. You know this. Everyone knows this. You may not like to admit it, but that doesn't make it false.
 
more than you did,,
This report confirms that President Donald Trump colluded with Russia during the 2016 election. It confirms the worst suspicions about Trump’s relationship with Russia, filling in the holes left in the report from former special counsel Robert Mueller. As Trump excuses Russian President Vladimir Putin placing bounties on U.S. troops and Russia continues to interfere in our democracy to aid Trump’s reelection, this report makes clear that there is no such thing as a coincidence with Trump and Russia.

The report from the Republican-led panel details close political coordination among the Trump campaign, Wikileaks, and Russian intelligence and operatives in 2016. At the most pivotal moment of that campaign, when the Access Hollywood tape revealing President Trump’s confession of a lifetime of sexual assault, Trump’s confidante Roger Stone successfully requested that Russia’s illegally hacked materials be released immediately.

This revelation also explains why President Trump dangled a pardon for Roger Stone for months, why U.S. Attorney General William Barr gave Stone special treatment amidst an open rebellion from U.S. Department of Justice professionals, and why Trump went even further to commute Stone’s sentence as Stone was concealing these facts from federal investigators. Trump lied to law enforcement about his conversations with Stone and needed Stone to keep quiet about it. This raises serious criminal questions for both Trump and Stone to which the next administration should give full scrutiny.


 
They don't need to be asked. Lifelong welfare folks know exactly how they should vote and voting Demographics don't lie. The majority on long-term disability and more people on other forms of welfare vote Democrat vs Republican. You know this. Everyone knows this. You may not like to admit it, but that doesn't make it false.
You assume too many things without showing any evidence.

Words are cheap.

Evidence is golden.
 
This report confirms that President Donald Trump colluded with Russia during the 2016 election. It confirms the worst suspicions about Trump’s relationship with Russia, filling in the holes left in the report from former special counsel Robert Mueller. As Trump excuses Russian President Vladimir Putin placing bounties on U.S. troops and Russia continues to interfere in our democracy to aid Trump’s reelection, this report makes clear that there is no such thing as a coincidence with Trump and Russia.

The report from the Republican-led panel details close political coordination among the Trump campaign, Wikileaks, and Russian intelligence and operatives in 2016. At the most pivotal moment of that campaign, when the Access Hollywood tape revealing President Trump’s confession of a lifetime of sexual assault, Trump’s confidante Roger Stone successfully requested that Russia’s illegally hacked materials be released immediately.

This revelation also explains why President Trump dangled a pardon for Roger Stone for months, why U.S. Attorney General William Barr gave Stone special treatment amidst an open rebellion from U.S. Department of Justice professionals, and why Trump went even further to commute Stone’s sentence as Stone was concealing these facts from federal investigators. Trump lied to law enforcement about his conversations with Stone and needed Stone to keep quiet about it. This raises serious criminal questions for both Trump and Stone to which the next administration should give full scrutiny.




 
My age is your excuse to allege that there was something wrong with Hunter which does not seem to have been proven, if I am still young enough to be able to remember.

And what is your need to call this Government a regime? You do not know what regimes are and how they got to be regimes to begin with.


Please tell me you're not so ignorant to not be able to recognize sarcasm. And you running away from and deflecting from what I said is duly noted. I see you're nothing but a troll.

.
 
You assume too many things without showing any evidence.

Words are cheap.

Evidence is golden.

Google it. The lower the income the higher the likelihood of a person voting for Democrats. Newsflash...those on government assistance qualify as lower income.

How do you NOT know this?
 
The report I posted was after Mueller's and was led by Republicans.

Read it.

Do you mean from your political hit job site? Yeah, ok.

I bet I could find out when the next date we can expect Florida to be underwater from climate change on this site as well. No thanks.
 
Are you ok with Republican voters getting welfare if they need some?

Name me one country which does not help their poor with subsidies?

Americans in need do not deserve to be helped. Let us look at the history of SNAP


-------------
Who would you want to deny any help, welfare to?

------------

In the United States, millions of people face hunger and food insecurity each day. Unable to provide for themselves and their families, they turn to food assistance programs for both short and long term needs.

The USDA defines food insecurity as “a household-level economic and social condition of limited or uncertain access to adequate food” (USDA, 2019). About 40 million Americans struggle with food insecurity each year. Anumber of factors perpetuate food insecurity in the United States. Economic recession and natural disasters drastically increase the number of people with limited access to food. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic brought about social distancing measures that disrupted the daily lives of Americans and increased unemployment as businesses closed or laid off workers. These factors seriously exacerbated food insecurity (Feeding America, 2020).

A report, published by the Northwestern Institute of Policy and Research, analyzed data from COVID-19 impact surveys and concluded that food insecurity “doubled overall and tripled among those with children” (Schanzenbach and Pitts, 2020). In particular, the rates of food insecurity among Black and Hispanic Americans during the early months of the pandemic was higher than White Americans with “approximately 2 in 5 Black and Hispanic households with children” experiencing food insecurity (Schanzenbach and Pitts, 2020). The rising rates of food insecurity placed unprecedented demand on food banks. This same survey indicated that 1 in 10 people who responded to the survey interacted with food banks in the prior week (2020, Schanzenbach and Pitts).

those are unconstitutional,,
 


Cherry pick much? And with a biased source no less. That crackhead sold influence all over the world. Never registered as a foreign agent, is being investigated for tax fraud, money laundering and more. Had joint bank accounts with xiden, but hey, it all on the up and up, RIGHT? Yep, you're a toll.

.
 
Google it. The lower the income the higher the likelihood of a person voting for Democrats. Newsflash...those on government assistance qualify as lower income.

How do you NOT know this?
Identify with Democrats, yes, vote at all? No.
----------------

But a new analysis of Pew Research Center survey data collected in the fall lead-up to the 2014 midterm elections finds that at least as striking is the degree to which those who are financially insecure opt out of the political system altogether, and how that opting out disproportionately affects Democratic support.

-----
This pattern is not unique to 2014. Looking back at voting records from four years earlier, 69% of the most financially secure cast ballots in the 2010 midterm, while just 30% of the least financially secure did so1.



 
That is not what the disinformation department was about.
Of course it was

As someone pointed out the hunter biden laptop story was dismissed as disinformation

All they have to do is name the russians and the truth czar haws a free hand to after any American who says the story is real
 

Forum List

Back
Top