🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Clinton beats Trump by 6% in new ABC-WAPO poll. Terrible news for conservatives

Everything coming out of the ABC network and the Washington Post for the last 20 years has been carefully crafted to be "bad news for conservatives" but it doesn't mean it's the truth.
It worked so well in 2012.
Only a Liberal would brag about how their Liberal candidate won by lying his ass off and was aided by the Liberal media... pathetic...


("The War on Terror is over...al Qaeida is on the run....pay no attention to the 20 US embassies that were just simultaneously attacked in the ME on 9/11/12...pay no attention to the 4 dead bodies...." And we now know he was lying about ISIS and terrorism since 2010...and Liberals are proud of this SOB and their tactics....)

Is that your Sean Hannity imitation? Not bad.
wasn't Gore leading bush? How about Kerry? do you really trust polls?

The Trumpbots around here can't post polls enough when they favor Trump. Have them explain it to you.
 
Everything coming out of the ABC network and the Washington Post for the last 20 years has been carefully crafted to be "bad news for conservatives" but it doesn't mean it's the truth.
It worked so well in 2012.
Only a Liberal would brag about how their Liberal candidate won by lying his ass off and was aided by the Liberal media... pathetic...


("The War on Terror is over...al Qaeida is on the run....pay no attention to the 20 US embassies that were just simultaneously attacked in the ME on 9/11/12...pay no attention to the 4 dead bodies...." And we now know he was lying about ISIS and terrorism since 2010...and Liberals are proud of this SOB and their tactics....)

Is that your Sean Hannity imitation? Not bad.
wasn't Gore leading bush? How about Kerry? do you really trust polls?

The Trumpbots around here can't post polls enough when they favor Trump. Have them explain it to you.
I love winning.
 
Even if the polls were reversed I'd say "It's too early to tell"

Once these two get on the debate stage that is going to be the determining factor where that needle moves. Once thing is for certain, it is going to be a very very very close election with a Trump/Clinton match-up. Anyone who can claim with certainty that their candidate will easily win is delusional. It's going to be a war.

good point, debating is a very large part of a Senators job.

swinging your arms and repeating yourself ? .... not so much.
 
Even if the polls were reversed I'd say "It's too early to tell"

Once these two get on the debate stage that is going to be the determining factor where that needle moves. Once thing is for certain, it is going to be a very very very close election with a Trump/Clinton match-up. Anyone who can claim with certainty that their candidate will easily win is delusional. It's going to be a war.

good point, debating is a very large part of a Senators job.

swinging your arms and repeating yourself ? .... not so much.
when did that senator debate? Please enlighten us and show one of her debates as a senator. Just one.
 
They're the researchers in your link that was supposed to prove that Clinton is lying when she says the economy does better with a Democrat in the Whitehouse.

You are now officially arguing with yourself lol.

Obama added over $6 Trillion in new debt in less than 4 years, with the help of a DNC-controlled Congress the 1st 2 years. Obama set 'monthly', 'annual', and 'total' deficit-spending records in that time. His 1st bill was a promise-breaking nearly $1 trillion FAILED 'Stimulus' bill that contained over 7,000 pieces of DNC-Only, DNC-serving PORK, failed to prevent unemployment from going above 8% like he vowed (it went to 10.1%), and it ended up costing tax payers OVER $740,000 PER JOB Obama CLAIMED to have created / saved.

Yeah, Obama helped 'prove' Hillary's claim that the economy is SO much better under a Liberal. Check out the top economic disasters (cities) in states around the country - run by Liberals.
 
Conservatives, are you worried that the woman you most hate is favorite to beat your frontrunner? I would be if I were you, because we already knew that Sanders would trounce Trump or anyone else, but Clinton's electability against Trump was less clear. Now it is becoming increasingly likely that the Republicans will fail to take the White House for the third straight time.

Feel free to release your worry-induced frustration in this thread.
Feel free to consider the opinion worth while, no one with any sense does. Trump has about a third of the GOP that's been polled and there's been no negative ads on Hillary yet and won't until it gets to showtime.

Why are liberals so determined to declare victory already? That isn't what confident people do.
 
hillary actually has a better chance of winning IF trump wins the Republican nomination.

the GOP would have a better chance of winning if they nominate a decent candidate to lead our country.

refuse to believe that all you want ^ i like hillary and think she'd make a mighty fine president. :thup:
 
Is Hillary actually the BEST Liberals have to offer Americans?
What is it about a candidate who was kicked off a legal team for an ethics violation that gets Liberals all excited?

What is it about a failed Secretary of State that was so CLUELESS about her own agency and her employees who were in harm's way that she did not even know her lower-level managers denied additional security over 600 times to a man who finally assassinated that gets Liberals thinking, 'Now THERE is a competent, successful, dependable candidate?"

What is it about a woman notorious for lying about everything to everyone, who stooped so low as to lie to the grieving families of those she allowed to needlessly die - then lied about them, calling THEM liars - that makes Liberals believe she would ever be trustworthy or that she would never lie as President?

Why do Liberals think that a Secretary of State who protected a big donor who was violating US sanctions against Iran by running contraband to Iran could be trusted NOT to aid and abet our enemies as President, specifically after this is what she did as Sect of State?

Why are Liberals so attracted to a candidate who is under investigation by the FBI for crimes under the Espionage Act, who has proven to have put our national security at risk?

Is Hillary actually the BEST Liberals have to offer Americans? REALLY?


No, but it's

A: Her Turn

B: Better than anyone else they have
Hillary never said it is "her turn" .Don't make stuff up.
 
Is Hillary actually the BEST Liberals have to offer Americans?
What is it about a candidate who was kicked off a legal team for an ethics violation that gets Liberals all excited?

What is it about a failed Secretary of State that was so CLUELESS about her own agency and her employees who were in harm's way that she did not even know her lower-level managers denied additional security over 600 times to a man who finally assassinated that gets Liberals thinking, 'Now THERE is a competent, successful, dependable candidate?"

What is it about a woman notorious for lying about everything to everyone, who stooped so low as to lie to the grieving families of those she allowed to needlessly die - then lied about them, calling THEM liars - that makes Liberals believe she would ever be trustworthy or that she would never lie as President?

Why do Liberals think that a Secretary of State who protected a big donor who was violating US sanctions against Iran by running contraband to Iran could be trusted NOT to aid and abet our enemies as President, specifically after this is what she did as Sect of State?

Why are Liberals so attracted to a candidate who is under investigation by the FBI for crimes under the Espionage Act, who has proven to have put our national security at risk?

Is Hillary actually the BEST Liberals have to offer Americans? REALLY?


No, but it's

A: Her Turn

B: Better than anyone else they have
Hillary never said it is "her turn" .Don't make stuff up.

Hillary never said it is "her turn"

Did I say SHE said it was 'her turn'?

Don't make stuff up.
 
hillary actually has a better chance of winning IF trump wins the Republican nomination.

the GOP would have a better chance of winning if they nominate a decent candidate to lead our country.

refuse to believe that all you want ^ i like hillary and think she'd make a mighty fine president. :thup:
We're not interested in winning elections. We want the Rinos strung up by their shorthairs. Grrrrrrrrr
 
hillary actually has a better chance of winning IF trump wins the Republican nomination.

the GOP would have a better chance of winning if they nominate a decent candidate to lead our country.

refuse to believe that all you want ^ i like hillary and think she'd make a mighty fine president. :thup:

the GOP wants nothing to do with Trump. Look for them to broker a candidate and Trump to run on an independent ticket. The right splits the vote. Neither have enough power to do squat, and Clinton wins. The GOP knows this. They would rather have Clinton than Trump. The simpleton Trump supporters haven't figured it out yet, but they will.
 

Forum List

Back
Top