Zander
Platinum Member
Here's the cereal democrats eat.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wanna box of FLOTUS Flakes........with a purple gumby on the box front.
Yeah, frosted flakes are one of the tastier breakfast cereals. Too bad they renamed the cereal. When I was a kid, they were called Sugar Frosted Flakes. I don't get it, the cereal is still called Zucaritas in Mexico. Somehow it's ok for them to use sugar in the name but not for us.That's just silly. We've always had cartoon characters on cereal boxes. Let the kids enjoy their cereal. How can you have Fruity Pebbles without Fred Flinstone on the box? Same with the Frosted Flakes, my son loves them, and gets a kick out of Tony the tiger, especially when watching the commercials.Coming Soon... A Ban on Cartoon Characters on Cereal Boxes...
they're gggreeeeat!!!
Oh yes, the slippery slope argument.Then after that, we require changes to Tootsie Rolls and Snickers, right?Don't ban the cereal advertising just require that the cereal have some food value and no 55% sugar by weight doesn't count.Cereal Characters Lure Kiddies With Eye Gaze: Study - NBC News
How long until FLOTUS is all over this and asks that cartoon advertising towards kids on cereal be banned?... You think I'm kidding?...
"The researchers provided two key takeaways from their findings. One, parents should think about not taking their children down the cereal aisle. Two, manufacturers of healthier cereals could consider adding a character looking downwards to the box to make their cereal more appealing to younger consumers."
^That right there is what Liberals do before Demanding Laws.
After all, these Cereals are unhealthy and shouldn't be available to anyone in a Free Society.
We can't make good decisions for ourselves so the Gubmn't MUST step in!!!
peace...
I look forward to a healthy morning breakfast cereal.
New "Che`" -- in the bright red box.
"Breakfast of Revolucionario"
I agree with the exception of food marketed to kids.Why care? People should be allowed to eat what they want to. Why are liberals so interested in someones diet?Don't ban the cereal advertising just require that the cereal have some food value and no 55% sugar by weight doesn't count. Once the kids are sold on junk food, most parents would rather provide it to them than fight them, something the cereal manufactures count on.Cereal Characters Lure Kiddies With Eye Gaze: Study - NBC News
How long until FLOTUS is all over this and asks that cartoon advertising towards kids on cereal be banned?... You think I'm kidding?...
"The researchers provided two key takeaways from their findings. One, parents should think about not taking their children down the cereal aisle. Two, manufacturers of healthier cereals could consider adding a character looking downwards to the box to make their cereal more appealing to younger consumers."
^That right there is what Liberals do before Demanding Laws.
After all, these Cereals are unhealthy and shouldn't be available to anyone in a Free Society.
We can't make good decisions for ourselves so the Gubmn't MUST step in!!!
peace...
^Admits that he wants Law to Force Healthier Breakfasts for Children...
I bet he Voted for Obama twice.
peace...
You're both reading words that I didn't write. I didn't say anything about new laws or regulations. All I said is that it is fucking retarded for anyone to get upset at the idea of corporations putting colorful cartoon characters on boxes of healthy cereal to make kids want their parents to buy healthy cereal instead of sugary crap.KNB strongly favors governmental censorship of commercial products on the basis of --
Uncle Sam and Shrillary know best.
"Fuck that First Amendment, bitches," he might well add.
Do you assholes understand that you're actually arguing against getting kids to want to eat healthier breakfasts?
If that is what you were attempting to say, then your lack of clarity is entirely on you.
You apparently try to speak in fluent fart.
And no, you asshole. Nobody is arguing AGAINST trying to get kids to eat healthier. What I say is that it is not up to the nanny state government to decide how a company markets the sugary cereals. It is up to the parents to decide what their kids will eat.
I agree with the exception of food marketed to kids.Why care? People should be allowed to eat what they want to. Why are liberals so interested in someones diet?Don't ban the cereal advertising just require that the cereal have some food value and no 55% sugar by weight doesn't count. Once the kids are sold on junk food, most parents would rather provide it to them than fight them, something the cereal manufactures count on.
The question is "why are taxpayer resources being used for this purely political purpose"?Cereal Characters Lure Kiddies With Eye Gaze: Study - NBC News
How long until FLOTUS is all over this and asks that cartoon advertising towards kids on cereal be banned?... You think I'm kidding?...
"The researchers provided two key takeaways from their findings. One, parents should think about not taking their children down the cereal aisle. Two, manufacturers of healthier cereals could consider adding a character looking downwards to the box to make their cereal more appealing to younger consumers."
^That right there is what Liberals do before Demanding Laws.
After all, these Cereals are unhealthy and shouldn't be available to anyone in a Free Society.
We can't make good decisions for ourselves so the Gubmn't MUST step in!!!
peace...
I agree with the exception of food marketed to kids.Why care? People should be allowed to eat what they want to. Why are liberals so interested in someones diet?Don't ban the cereal advertising just require that the cereal have some food value and no 55% sugar by weight doesn't count. Once the kids are sold on junk food, most parents would rather provide it to them than fight them, something the cereal manufactures count on.
Parent's ability to make proper parental decisions as to the kids' diet may be the issue, but that's not likely to change. Parents are continuing to buy what the kids want to eat which has doubled childhood obesity and quadruped adolescent obesity in the last 30 years and that's beginning to effect the nation not just the kids and the parents.I agree with the exception of food marketed to kids.Why care? People should be allowed to eat what they want to. Why are liberals so interested in someones diet?
Marketed to kids who do not buy the breakfast cereal. The kids are the ones asking mommy and daddy to please please please get the _____[fill in the favored sugary cereal here]____ when mommy and or daddy go do the grocery shopping.
So, the cartoon on the box is not the issue. The parent's ability to make proper parental decisions as to the kids' diet IS the issue.
The government deciding how a breakfast cereal company may market its products is an issue. And its wrong. Stay the fuck out of it, government.
There's PLENTY of legitimate government work to be done. This aint it.
I agree with the exception of food marketed to kids.Why care? People should be allowed to eat what they want to. Why are liberals so interested in someones diet?Don't ban the cereal advertising just require that the cereal have some food value and no 55% sugar by weight doesn't count. Once the kids are sold on junk food, most parents would rather provide it to them than fight them, something the cereal manufactures count on.
Mm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
He said that all must lend a hand
To make this country strong again
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
He said we must be fair today
Equal work means equal pay
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
He said that we must take a stand
To make sure everyone gets a chance
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
He said red, yellow, black or white
All are equal in his sight
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
Yes!