Compared to capitalism, what has socialism and communism ever produced or manufactured?

[Soupnazi630]

Amazon is no Golden Goose

NYC doesn’t need them

These deals always workout bad for the taxpayer.
As Amazon builds up its distribution network, it’s hit on a trick long practiced by the likes of Walmart: using the federal government to help pay its workers. A new study by Policy Matters Ohio found that more than 700 Amazon employees receive food stamps, or more than 10 percent of the tech giant’s 6,000-strong workforce in the state. Some of those recipients may be part-time help, but the fact that they need federal aid to survive suggests that they would be happy to work more. “Why is this giant, successful company offering such limited pay and hours of work that many of its workers need help buying food?” asked Zach Schiller, research director at Policy Matters.

Amazon Is Thriving Thanks to Taxpayer Dollars

This stupid shit again?

If you don't like welfare, take action. Any "foodstamps" (you can tell the demagogues when they use terms 30 years out of date) workers get is due to federal and state programs.

Or are you one of those "free market" types who seeks a $15 an hour minimum wage?

Anything less than a living wage is a government subsidy for the business.

You have been proven wrong and ignorant on this in the past.

Any wage is a living wage.

Any wage is a living wage?

How about $1/hr. That's "any wage". How ya gonna do on $40 bucks a week moron...

By Living within your means you uneducated dumbass

 

[Uncensored2008]

Because we have a corrupt and perverted system of cronyism in this nation.

You mean in Trump's ADMINISTRATION

Yeah, the Solyndra scam was really bad...

Oh, wait...

 

[Uncensored2008]

Who finances any sort of socialism on this planet?

Hey moron. If you're an American you live in a socialist/capitalist hybrid nation.

And whether you realize it or not..you wouldn't want it any other way

No stupid fuck. Take a basic economics course and stop making a fool of yourself.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Clinging to the lie that Nazism is somehow different than the Stalinism they follow is vital to the Communists. In fact, the governments of Hitler and Stalin were virtually identical, as will the the government that democrats impose on an enslaved America should they gain enough power.

They were quite different: read up on the subject.

But fast-forward today, Trump now thinks he's in germany 80 years ago.

You didn't bother to read what you cited, the Wiki article confirms what I said - you Stalinists are identical to Nazis.

Let's looks at Nazis with you democrat Stalinists?

Violent hatred of non-party members?

Concentration Camps?

Violent suppression of opposition ideas?

Use of Brown Shirt type thugs?

Oppression of religion?

Totalitarian?

Violent oppression of free speech?

Newspeak is an utterly useless Bolshevik hate rag. I don't bother with them or ThinkProgress.

Wow, cool post.

180° out from reality, but cool post.

Really creep, exactly which of those do not go with both Stalinism and Nazis?

Be specific.

Oh, you're just lying - MARXIST!

You are as SPECIFICALLY out of your mid as the Coast Guard terrorist.

Friend of yours?

Great response, stupid fuck.

I notice you can't seem to point out which from my list is not a feature of both Nazism and the Stalinism you promote...

 

[Lesh]

I notice you can't seem to point out which from my list is not a feature of both Nazism and the Stalinism you promote...

"Your list" is a fantasy construct.

Tell me that you don't understand the "socialist" policies that have been in effect in this country (because of the excesses and flaws of unregulated capitalism) for 100 years.

Ya know like child labor laws...and workers rights...and on and on...

 

[Uncensored2008]

Stalinists? Nazis?

You're talking about DICTATORS

We can all agree that distators suck. Odd that you support Trump. He LOVES dictators and attacks leaders of Democratic governments

As far as Socialism

Socialism is the government ownership of the means of production.

Clearly that is not our system

Oh...some say that socialism is the ownership "or regulation" of the means of production.

Well we all agree that regulation is required. Doctors being licensed for instance is regulation. That makes it socialism. Food being manufactured in a safe manner is regulation. Clearly necessary and according to that definition...that is socialism

So what we're really saying is NOT that "SOCIALISM" is inherently bad but rather...how much socialism is required to mitigate the excesses of capitalism.

Doesn't sound nearly as scary in that more accurate context...does it.

Communism and socialism is dictatorship by definition

Marx designed it that way.

Capitalism has no such excesses to regulate.

Yep, Socialism/communism is the best incubator for an dictatorship.
I guess socialism it could be said to have good intentions?(wink* lol)… But how do they say that “the road to hell is paved with good intentions”?

The only thing is the democrats do NOT have good intentions, just listen to what they say. They TELL you that the goal is a brutal dictatorship with genocide and gulags. We just have to actually listen.

 

[Lesh]

And of note...Stalin and Hitler and all those dictators were "cults of personality"...like Putin...and to a lesser (but no less disturbing) degree...TRUMP

 

[Wry Catcher]

Stalinists? Nazis?

You're talking about DICTATORS

We can all agree that distators suck. Odd that you support Trump. He LOVES dictators and attacks leaders of Democratic governments

As far as Socialism

Socialism is the government ownership of the means of production.

Clearly that is not our system

Oh...some say that socialism is the ownership "or regulation" of the means of production.

Well we all agree that regulation is required. Doctors being licensed for instance is regulation. That makes it socialism. Food being manufactured in a safe manner is regulation. Clearly necessary and according to that definition...that is socialism

So what we're really saying is NOT that "SOCIALISM" is inherently bad but rather...how much socialism is required to mitigate the excesses of capitalism.

Doesn't sound nearly as scary in that more accurate context...does it.

Communism and socialism is dictatorship by definition

Marx designed it that way.

Capitalism has no such excesses to regulate.

You couldn't be more wrong. Capitalism is regulated or there would be monopolies, no competition and cartels like OPEC would abound.

Insider trading is a felony, and yet it abounds.

Socialism is an economic system, communism has never existed in the sense that the proletariat benefited; in fact Social Darwinism existed in both Capitalism and Communism unfettered, and has only been beaten back by activists, community organizers and the liberal movement first in the Republican Party, and since Truman, in the Democratic Party..

 

[Uncensored2008]

Friggin idiots.

Unregulated capitalism gives you boom and bust economics complete with Depressions every decade or so...sweat shops...child labor

The Gilded Age...The Victorian Age

You enjoy the benefits of "socialism" and regulation and are too stupid to realize it. Read some fucking history

Oh, well good thing you Communists never have economic collapse and depression....


{It’s hard to overstate how disastrous the reign of Hugo Chavez and his successor Nicolas Maduro has been for Venezuela. A recent series of Bloomberg articles vividly depicts the hellish, never-ending struggle for survival in Caracas, the country’s capital. Hungry children roam the streets, people are fleeing the country, health care is almost nonexistent, violence is endemic, even water is scarce. Chavez’s so-called Bolivarian revolution took a peaceful, middle-income country and transformed it into a nightmare that puts the ruinous Soviet Union of the 1980s to shame.}

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/bdp133.pdf (from a pro-Communist site. )

 

[Lesh]

Stalinists? Nazis?

You're talking about DICTATORS

We can all agree that distators suck. Odd that you support Trump. He LOVES dictators and attacks leaders of Democratic governments

As far as Socialism

Socialism is the government ownership of the means of production.

Clearly that is not our system

Oh...some say that socialism is the ownership "or regulation" of the means of production.

Well we all agree that regulation is required. Doctors being licensed for instance is regulation. That makes it socialism. Food being manufactured in a safe manner is regulation. Clearly necessary and according to that definition...that is socialism

So what we're really saying is NOT that "SOCIALISM" is inherently bad but rather...how much socialism is required to mitigate the excesses of capitalism.

Doesn't sound nearly as scary in that more accurate context...does it.

Communism and socialism is dictatorship by definition

Marx designed it that way.

Capitalism has no such excesses to regulate.

Yep, Socialism/communism is the best incubator for an dictatorship.
I guess socialism it could be said to have good intentions?(wink* lol)… But how do they say that “the road to hell is paved with good intentions”?

The only thing is the democrats do NOT have good intentions, just listen to what they say. They TELL you that the goal is a brutal dictatorship with genocide and gulags. We just have to actually listen.

"I know there are some folks that would like me to just by-pass Congress...but I can't"

And to make that NON dictatorial statement sound ominous you have to add drums and marching boots. LAME

Guess who IS doing that RIGHT THE FUCK NOW?

Yea Trump. But that bothers you...not at all

You're a hypocritical dishonest partisan fool

 

[Uncensored2008]

They were quite different: read up on the subject.

But fast-forward today, Trump now thinks he's in germany 80 years ago.

You didn't bother to read what you cited, the Wiki article confirms what I said - you Stalinists are identical to Nazis.

Let's looks at Nazis with you democrat Stalinists?

Violent hatred of non-party members?

Concentration Camps?

Violent suppression of opposition ideas?

Use of Brown Shirt type thugs?

Oppression of religion?

Totalitarian?

Violent oppression of free speech?

Newspeak is an utterly useless Bolshevik hate rag. I don't bother with them or ThinkProgress.

Wow, cool post.

180° out from reality, but cool post.

Really creep, exactly which of those do not go with both Stalinism and Nazis?

Be specific.

Oh, you're just lying - MARXIST!

You are as SPECIFICALLY out of your mid as the Coast Guard terrorist.

Friend of yours?

Lol
No doubt the guy is lunatic, But the mainstream media said the guy had a huge arsenal… That is not a huge arsenal.

Really?

So which element in my list is not a feature of both Nazism and Stalinism?

Do show how I am a "lunatic?"

 

[Uncensored2008]

I notice you can't seem to point out which from my list is not a feature of both Nazism and the Stalinism you promote...

"Your list" is a fantasy construct.

Tell me that you don't understand the "socialist" policies that have been in effect in this country (because of the excesses and flaws of unregulated capitalism) for 100 years.

Ya know like child labor laws...and workers rights...and on and on...

Kewl, now which item is not a feature of both Nazism and Stalinism?




Run some more, ignorant commie...

 

[jillian]

Most every advancement in technology, medicine, agriculture, transportation, communication, construction, energy and power, etc. this world has ever seen was conceived and developed by countries that practiced a capitalist ideology. Yet many Democrats are pushing socialism, the goal of which is communism as Lenin explained.

So what groundbreaking things have socialism/communism ever contributed to this world, aside from what they stole from capitalist countries?

So the Israelis idiota. Or the Fins. Or the Swedes.


The ignorance is insane trumpkins is astounding

Most of this country doesn’t espouse socialism. But anyone with even half a brain (I know that doesn’t include loser trumpkins) knows a combination of capitalist and socialist goals is best for any nation.

But trumpkins are morons. Now go collect your SSI.

 

[Uncensored2008]

And of note...Stalin and Hitler and all those dictators were "cults of personality"...like Putin...and to a lesser (but no less disturbing) degree...TRUMP

Or to a far greater degree, Obama who you worship as a literal god....

BTW, most of us don't really like Trump, but we like his agenda and accomplishments. Unlike you Stalinists who worship Obama as literal god.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Stalinists? Nazis?

You're talking about DICTATORS

We can all agree that distators suck. Odd that you support Trump. He LOVES dictators and attacks leaders of Democratic governments

As far as Socialism

Socialism is the government ownership of the means of production.

Clearly that is not our system

Oh...some say that socialism is the ownership "or regulation" of the means of production.

Well we all agree that regulation is required. Doctors being licensed for instance is regulation. That makes it socialism. Food being manufactured in a safe manner is regulation. Clearly necessary and according to that definition...that is socialism

So what we're really saying is NOT that "SOCIALISM" is inherently bad but rather...how much socialism is required to mitigate the excesses of capitalism.

Doesn't sound nearly as scary in that more accurate context...does it.

Communism and socialism is dictatorship by definition

Marx designed it that way.

Capitalism has no such excesses to regulate.

You couldn't be more wrong. Capitalism is regulated or there would be monopolies, no competition and cartels like OPEC would abound.

Insider trading is a felony, and yet it abounds.

Socialism is an economic system, communism has never existed in the sense that the proletariat benefited; in fact Social Darwinism existed in both Capitalism and Communism unfettered, and has only been beaten back by activists, community organizers and the liberal movement first in the Republican Party, and since Truman, in the Democratic Party..

No retard. I know you are good at busting heads and taking people's property, but you know not one fucking thing about economics. Monopolies (with the exception of natural monopoly) cannot exist without government support for them.

 

[Rustic]

You didn't bother to read what you cited, the Wiki article confirms what I said - you Stalinists are identical to Nazis.

Let's looks at Nazis with you democrat Stalinists?

Violent hatred of non-party members?

Concentration Camps?

Violent suppression of opposition ideas?

Use of Brown Shirt type thugs?

Oppression of religion?

Totalitarian?

Violent oppression of free speech?

Newspeak is an utterly useless Bolshevik hate rag. I don't bother with them or ThinkProgress.

Wow, cool post.

180° out from reality, but cool post.

Really creep, exactly which of those do not go with both Stalinism and Nazis?

Be specific.

Oh, you're just lying - MARXIST!

You are as SPECIFICALLY out of your mid as the Coast Guard terrorist.

Friend of yours?

Lol
No doubt the guy is lunatic, But the mainstream media said the guy had a huge arsenal… That is not a huge arsenal.

Really?

So which element in my list is not a feature of both Nazism and Stalinism?

Do show how I am a "lunatic?"

I meant the Navy guy

 

[Soupnazi630]

And of note...Stalin and Hitler and all those dictators were "cults of personality"...like Putin...and to a lesser (but no less disturbing) degree...TRUMP

So was Obama and hillary and Kennedy etx.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Stalinists? Nazis?

You're talking about DICTATORS

We can all agree that distators suck. Odd that you support Trump. He LOVES dictators and attacks leaders of Democratic governments

As far as Socialism

Socialism is the government ownership of the means of production.

Clearly that is not our system

Oh...some say that socialism is the ownership "or regulation" of the means of production.

Well we all agree that regulation is required. Doctors being licensed for instance is regulation. That makes it socialism. Food being manufactured in a safe manner is regulation. Clearly necessary and according to that definition...that is socialism

So what we're really saying is NOT that "SOCIALISM" is inherently bad but rather...how much socialism is required to mitigate the excesses of capitalism.

Doesn't sound nearly as scary in that more accurate context...does it.

Communism and socialism is dictatorship by definition

Marx designed it that way.

Capitalism has no such excesses to regulate.

You couldn't be more wrong. Capitalism is regulated or there would be monopolies, no competition and cartels like OPEC would abound.

Insider trading is a felony, and yet it abounds.

Socialism is an economic system, communism has never existed in the sense that the proletariat benefited; in fact Social Darwinism existed in both Capitalism and Communism unfettered, and has only been beaten back by activists, community organizers and the liberal movement first in the Republican Party, and since Truman, in the Democratic Party..

OPEC is an organization of governments not private companies.

Monopolies do not exist without government interference and protection

Socialism is not an economic system you fucking fool it is government force.

 

[Lesh]

Or to a far greater degree, Obama who you worship as a literal god....

You're projecting. That's how Republicans/Trumpers look at Trump. I do NOT see politicians that way. Ever.

BTW, most of us don't really like Trump, but we like his agenda and accomplishments.

You fuckers defend him like he was your 3 yr old child (which in many ways he is) and his agenda is no better than his personality. His accomplishments are nil.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Stalinists? Nazis?

You're talking about DICTATORS

We can all agree that distators suck. Odd that you support Trump. He LOVES dictators and attacks leaders of Democratic governments

As far as Socialism

Socialism is the government ownership of the means of production.

Clearly that is not our system

Oh...some say that socialism is the ownership "or regulation" of the means of production.

Well we all agree that regulation is required. Doctors being licensed for instance is regulation. That makes it socialism. Food being manufactured in a safe manner is regulation. Clearly necessary and according to that definition...that is socialism

So what we're really saying is NOT that "SOCIALISM" is inherently bad but rather...how much socialism is required to mitigate the excesses of capitalism.

Doesn't sound nearly as scary in that more accurate context...does it.

Communism and socialism is dictatorship by definition

Marx designed it that way.

Capitalism has no such excesses to regulate.

You couldn't be more wrong. Capitalism is regulated or there would be monopolies, no competition and cartels like OPEC would abound.

Insider trading is a felony, and yet it abounds.

Socialism is an economic system, communism has never existed in the sense that the proletariat benefited; in fact Social Darwinism existed in both Capitalism and Communism unfettered, and has only been beaten back by activists, community organizers and the liberal movement first in the Republican Party, and since Truman, in the Democratic Party..

Insider trading is not dishonest or a crime against others it is simply oro protectionist laws written to allow it to continue to happen.

It is no surprise that a socialist fucktard would support it as socialism is a dictatorial government system as opposed to an economic system .