healthmyths
Platinum Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 29,065
- 10,547
- 900
Yes, sir. Thing is, I trust that the NYT actually does that, and if they're wrong, they'll correct it.The New York Times isn't saying who their sources are, but they know who those sources are. The editors aren't going to publish stuff like that unless they've got a damned good idea it's true. That's why.This is getting worrisome. Does the man not remember saying those things? Obviously not, if he's beginning to wonder if it was his voice.
It's an unconfirmed report by an unnamed source. Why do you believe it?
The NY Times has repeatedly reported fake news. They've even been caught publishing fake news manufactured from whole cloth (google Jason Blair).
If you want to trust them at their word, you deserve to be fooled.
You should read Noam Chomsky's "Manufacturing Consent".
All news is to be distrusted unless verified and sourced.
AFTER THE DAMAGE IS DONE!!!
When a MSM like NYT KNOWN for biased exaggeration, blown out of proportion NEWS continues to rely on "reliable sources" all I have to do is refer you to this situation:
"The Washington Post, citing five people briefed on the requests who spoke on condition of anonymity"
This from the same paper that said:
But the private accounts of more than 30 officials at the White House, the Justice Department, the FBI and on Capitol Hill, as well as Trump confidants and other senior Republicans, paint a conflicting narrative centered on the president’s brewing personal animus toward Comey.
Many of those interviewed spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to candidly discuss internal deliberations.
Inside Trump’s anger and impatience — and his sudden decision to fire Comey