Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yup and you ducked responding to the substance about the topic of the thread to which you responded to weatherman AND me coming up with horseshit information non-responsive information regarding 2014 decision that was made moot by the July 20, 2016 decision. Showing exactly how much you know about the facts, Tex, you wrote this pile of steaming bullshit;My original response to you was in post #61
News flash shit for brains...the 5th Circuit Court agreed with the District Court that it violated the voting Rights Act with their decision yesterday. You just proved you don't know shit about the facts of the case. Here is a review from SCOTUS Blog about the decision;There was no hook to try to get off. And it will be appealed if the trial court try to gut the law, bet on it.
And here is how the 5th Circuit majority decision characterized it in part;Today a divided Fifth Circuit upheld the district court’s conclusion that the law “imposed excessive and disparate burdens on minority voters” who don’t have a form of identification that will meet the law’s requirements. And that, the court agreed, violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which bars any voting requirements that result in “a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen” “to vote on account of race or color.” Some of the plaintiffs in the case, for example, “faced an almost impossible bureaucratic morass when they tried to get the underlying documentation” that they needed to vote, and were then turned away at the polls. ~~Texas voter ID challenge headed to district court, rather than Supreme Court, for now? ~~
What is your excuse going to be now, Tex. As shown above, you really don't know shit about the facts of this case and are totally winging it to cover for your prior bullshiting errors! You're fucking pathetic!We do not deny that the State’s articulated objectives are legitimate state interests, as the Supreme Court has made clear. See Crawford, 553 U.S. at 191. Yet, the articulation of a legitimate interest is not a magic incantation a state can utter to avoid a finding of disparate impact. [Emphasis Added]
~~http://cdn.thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/20144647/5th-circuit-voter-id.pdf ~~
The asshole liberals force minorities to show 3 forms of ID just to get a fishing license to feed themselves AND charge them ridiculous fees for the license. That shows you how much asshole liberals care about minorities.
I agree 100%!Yup and you ducked responding to the substance about the topic of the thread to which you responded to weatherman AND me coming up with horseshit information non-responsive information regarding 2014 decision that was made moot by the July 20, 2016 decision. Showing exactly how much you know about the facts, Tex, you wrote this pile of steaming bullshit;My original response to you was in post #61
News flash shit for brains...the 5th Circuit Court agreed with the District Court that it violated the voting Rights Act with their decision yesterday. You just proved you don't know shit about the facts of the case. Here is a review from SCOTUS Blog about the decision;There was no hook to try to get off. And it will be appealed if the trial court try to gut the law, bet on it.
And here is how the 5th Circuit majority decision characterized it in part;Today a divided Fifth Circuit upheld the district court’s conclusion that the law “imposed excessive and disparate burdens on minority voters” who don’t have a form of identification that will meet the law’s requirements. And that, the court agreed, violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which bars any voting requirements that result in “a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen” “to vote on account of race or color.” Some of the plaintiffs in the case, for example, “faced an almost impossible bureaucratic morass when they tried to get the underlying documentation” that they needed to vote, and were then turned away at the polls. ~~Texas voter ID challenge headed to district court, rather than Supreme Court, for now? ~~
What is your excuse going to be now, Tex. As shown above, you really don't know shit about the facts of this case and are totally winging it to cover for your prior bullshiting errors! You're fucking pathetic!We do not deny that the State’s articulated objectives are legitimate state interests, as the Supreme Court has made clear. See Crawford, 553 U.S. at 191. Yet, the articulation of a legitimate interest is not a magic incantation a state can utter to avoid a finding of disparate impact. [Emphasis Added]
~~http://cdn.thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/20144647/5th-circuit-voter-id.pdf ~~
Texas doesn't give a fiddler's fuck about the 'sanctity of their elections'. The rate of in person voter fraud in Texas is so ludicrously, comically low that it requires a negative exponent to express.
For fuck's sake, Texas has likely EXECUTED more people in error than its found in person voter ID fraud.
No one has trouble with ID, I know, but with the type of ID and hoops to get it are the problems. Tx and WI and NC will not have those problems now.The asshole liberals force minorities to show 3 forms of ID just to get a fishing license to feed themselves AND charge them ridiculous fees for the license. That shows you how much asshole liberals care about minorities.
And they need it to get Obamacare. Since Obamacare is law and requires ID, what excuse is left for not having one? If a person has no ID, that means they have no insurance and are in violation of a federal law.
No one has trouble with ID, I know, but with the type of ID and hoops to get it are the problems. Tx and WI and NC will not have those problems now.The asshole liberals force minorities to show 3 forms of ID just to get a fishing license to feed themselves AND charge them ridiculous fees for the license. That shows you how much asshole liberals care about minorities.
And they need it to get Obamacare. Since Obamacare is law and requires ID, what excuse is left for not having one? If a person has no ID, that means they have no insurance and are in violation of a federal law.
Why show a birth certificate? Any reasonable ID should be acceptable. As late as the thirties and forties, many in the South and midwest were born at home.No one has trouble with ID, I know, but with the type of ID and hoops to get it are the problems. Tx and WI and NC will not have those problems now.The asshole liberals force minorities to show 3 forms of ID just to get a fishing license to feed themselves AND charge them ridiculous fees for the license. That shows you how much asshole liberals care about minorities.
And they need it to get Obamacare. Since Obamacare is law and requires ID, what excuse is left for not having one? If a person has no ID, that means they have no insurance and are in violation of a federal law.
A simple photo ID is the easiest and cheapest to get. There are no hoops. It's the same ID you need for the most basic things. Why does the left act like showing a birth certificate is a "hoop" to jump through? It's only a problem for someone not born in the U.S.
Yup and you ducked responding to the substance about the topic of the thread to which you responded to weatherman AND me coming up with horseshit information non-responsive information regarding 2014 decision that was made moot by the July 20, 2016 decision. Showing exactly how much you know about the facts, Tex, you wrote this pile of steaming bullshit;My original response to you was in post #61
News flash shit for brains...the 5th Circuit Court agreed with the District Court that it violated the voting Rights Act with their decision yesterday. You just proved you don't know shit about the facts of the case. Here is a review from SCOTUS Blog about the decision;There was no hook to try to get off. And it will be appealed if the trial court try to gut the law, bet on it.
And here is how the 5th Circuit majority decision characterized it in part;Today a divided Fifth Circuit upheld the district court’s conclusion that the law “imposed excessive and disparate burdens on minority voters” who don’t have a form of identification that will meet the law’s requirements. And that, the court agreed, violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which bars any voting requirements that result in “a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen” “to vote on account of race or color.” Some of the plaintiffs in the case, for example, “faced an almost impossible bureaucratic morass when they tried to get the underlying documentation” that they needed to vote, and were then turned away at the polls. ~~Texas voter ID challenge headed to district court, rather than Supreme Court, for now? ~~
What is your excuse going to be now, Tex. As shown above, you really don't know shit about the facts of this case and are totally winging it to cover for your prior bullshiting errors! You're fucking pathetic!We do not deny that the State’s articulated objectives are legitimate state interests, as the Supreme Court has made clear. See Crawford, 553 U.S. at 191. Yet, the articulation of a legitimate interest is not a magic incantation a state can utter to avoid a finding of disparate impact. [Emphasis Added]
~~http://cdn.thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/20144647/5th-circuit-voter-id.pdf ~~
Texas doesn't give a fiddler's fuck about the 'sanctity of their elections'. The rate of in person voter fraud in Texas is so ludicrously, comically low that it requires a negative exponent to express.
For fuck's sake, Texas has likely EXECUTED more people in error than its found in person voter ID fraud.
Why show a birth certificate? Any reasonable ID should be acceptable. As late as the thirties and forties, many in the South and midwest were born at home.No one has trouble with ID, I know, but with the type of ID and hoops to get it are the problems. Tx and WI and NC will not have those problems now.The asshole liberals force minorities to show 3 forms of ID just to get a fishing license to feed themselves AND charge them ridiculous fees for the license. That shows you how much asshole liberals care about minorities.
And they need it to get Obamacare. Since Obamacare is law and requires ID, what excuse is left for not having one? If a person has no ID, that means they have no insurance and are in violation of a federal law.
A simple photo ID is the easiest and cheapest to get. There are no hoops. It's the same ID you need for the most basic things. Why does the left act like showing a birth certificate is a "hoop" to jump through? It's only a problem for someone not born in the U.S.
Seventy years ago?Yup and you ducked responding to the substance about the topic of the thread to which you responded to weatherman AND me coming up with horseshit information non-responsive information regarding 2014 decision that was made moot by the July 20, 2016 decision. Showing exactly how much you know about the facts, Tex, you wrote this pile of steaming bullshit;My original response to you was in post #61
News flash shit for brains...the 5th Circuit Court agreed with the District Court that it violated the voting Rights Act with their decision yesterday. You just proved you don't know shit about the facts of the case. Here is a review from SCOTUS Blog about the decision;There was no hook to try to get off. And it will be appealed if the trial court try to gut the law, bet on it.
And here is how the 5th Circuit majority decision characterized it in part;Today a divided Fifth Circuit upheld the district court’s conclusion that the law “imposed excessive and disparate burdens on minority voters” who don’t have a form of identification that will meet the law’s requirements. And that, the court agreed, violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which bars any voting requirements that result in “a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen” “to vote on account of race or color.” Some of the plaintiffs in the case, for example, “faced an almost impossible bureaucratic morass when they tried to get the underlying documentation” that they needed to vote, and were then turned away at the polls. ~~Texas voter ID challenge headed to district court, rather than Supreme Court, for now? ~~
What is your excuse going to be now, Tex. As shown above, you really don't know shit about the facts of this case and are totally winging it to cover for your prior bullshiting errors! You're fucking pathetic!We do not deny that the State’s articulated objectives are legitimate state interests, as the Supreme Court has made clear. See Crawford, 553 U.S. at 191. Yet, the articulation of a legitimate interest is not a magic incantation a state can utter to avoid a finding of disparate impact. [Emphasis Added]
~~http://cdn.thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/20144647/5th-circuit-voter-id.pdf ~~
Texas doesn't give a fiddler's fuck about the 'sanctity of their elections'. The rate of in person voter fraud in Texas is so ludicrously, comically low that it requires a negative exponent to express.
For fuck's sake, Texas has likely EXECUTED more people in error than its found in person voter ID fraud.
Try and tell that to Coke Stevenson. If that name does not ring a bell, google it or check the name George Parr, the duke of Duvall and work from there.
Federal court will strike it down.Why show a birth certificate? Any reasonable ID should be acceptable. As late as the thirties and forties, many in the South and midwest were born at home.No one has trouble with ID, I know, but with the type of ID and hoops to get it are the problems. Tx and WI and NC will not have those problems now.The asshole liberals force minorities to show 3 forms of ID just to get a fishing license to feed themselves AND charge them ridiculous fees for the license. That shows you how much asshole liberals care about minorities.
And they need it to get Obamacare. Since Obamacare is law and requires ID, what excuse is left for not having one? If a person has no ID, that means they have no insurance and are in violation of a federal law.
A simple photo ID is the easiest and cheapest to get. There are no hoops. It's the same ID you need for the most basic things. Why does the left act like showing a birth certificate is a "hoop" to jump through? It's only a problem for someone not born in the U.S.
Articles: Voter Photo ID: North Carolina Proves it works Very Well, Indeed
North Carolina's seems to work well. Perhaps other states should copy this.
Seventy years ago?Yup and you ducked responding to the substance about the topic of the thread to which you responded to weatherman AND me coming up with horseshit information non-responsive information regarding 2014 decision that was made moot by the July 20, 2016 decision. Showing exactly how much you know about the facts, Tex, you wrote this pile of steaming bullshit;My original response to you was in post #61
News flash shit for brains...the 5th Circuit Court agreed with the District Court that it violated the voting Rights Act with their decision yesterday. You just proved you don't know shit about the facts of the case. Here is a review from SCOTUS Blog about the decision;There was no hook to try to get off. And it will be appealed if the trial court try to gut the law, bet on it.
And here is how the 5th Circuit majority decision characterized it in part;Today a divided Fifth Circuit upheld the district court’s conclusion that the law “imposed excessive and disparate burdens on minority voters” who don’t have a form of identification that will meet the law’s requirements. And that, the court agreed, violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which bars any voting requirements that result in “a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen” “to vote on account of race or color.” Some of the plaintiffs in the case, for example, “faced an almost impossible bureaucratic morass when they tried to get the underlying documentation” that they needed to vote, and were then turned away at the polls. ~~Texas voter ID challenge headed to district court, rather than Supreme Court, for now? ~~
What is your excuse going to be now, Tex. As shown above, you really don't know shit about the facts of this case and are totally winging it to cover for your prior bullshiting errors! You're fucking pathetic!We do not deny that the State’s articulated objectives are legitimate state interests, as the Supreme Court has made clear. See Crawford, 553 U.S. at 191. Yet, the articulation of a legitimate interest is not a magic incantation a state can utter to avoid a finding of disparate impact. [Emphasis Added]
~~http://cdn.thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/20144647/5th-circuit-voter-id.pdf ~~
Texas doesn't give a fiddler's fuck about the 'sanctity of their elections'. The rate of in person voter fraud in Texas is so ludicrously, comically low that it requires a negative exponent to express.
For fuck's sake, Texas has likely EXECUTED more people in error than its found in person voter ID fraud.
Try and tell that to Coke Stevenson. If that name does not ring a bell, google it or check the name George Parr, the duke of Duvall and work from there.
Everyone who voted is dead, except thirty two people.
Show us something of note in the last twenty years.
