Cracks Appearing in the Wall Surrounding Obama?

[longknife]

Another Drudge link Cher: Obama Let Us Down | Truth Revolt

[I never thought she was all that hot to start with but had a good voice. Now, she could be great in a movie about Salen]

Cher: Obama Let Us Down

Liberal self ascribed feminist Cher tweeted Thursday that she has lost trust in the government.

And now we hear that our Pop Icon Madonna actually used the N word in public!!! Is this a first – or the first time the media reports stuff like this?

Then, the San Francisco Brava Theater Center cans Maria Conchita Alonso for supporting a San Bernardino Tea Party Activist for office. So, Liberal tolerance appears once more.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Obama is there until January 2017, bud. Let's work on what we can change, which is not the elected will of We the People.

 

[Redfish]

Obama is there until January 2017, bud. Let's work on what we can change, which is not the elected will of We the People.

The elected will of We the People was changed in california twice when the people voted against gay marriage.

The way to stop Obama and his corrupt version of marxism is to eliminate the dem majority in the senate and hold the GOP majority in the house.

Make the collectivist a true lame duck for two years.

 

[JakeStarkey]

One, you have no idea what Marxism, collectivism, or socialism is really.

Two, you far righties and libertarians will have to submit to the mainstream GOP will in order to share in election victory.

Three, you can't elect candidates of your own by yourselves, and the GOP mainstream won't select your candidates.

Four, you have to go along to get along.

Five, elections have consequences: I think you would have learned that by now.

 

[aaronleland]

Cher? Is she still alive?

 

[Redfish]

One, you have no idea what Marxism, collectivism, or socialism is really.

Two, you far righties and libertarians will have to submit to the mainstream GOP will in order to share in election victory.

Three, you can't elect candidates of your own by yourselves, and the GOP mainstream won't select your candidates.

Four, you have to go along to get along.

Five, elections have consequences: I think you would have learned that by now.

Actually I do know what those terms mean, obama is a marxist collectivist, if you read his books and listen to his early speeches that is quite obvious.

mainstream GOP is a meaningless term. mainstream is the sector that gets the most votes, the old mainstream of both parties is going out of favor

yes, compromise is necessary, but compromising on your principles is not

yes, elections have consequences, 2008 and 2012 have had very bad consequences for the USA, hopefully 2014 and 2016 will reverse that negative trend.

 

[Redfish]

Cher? Is she still alive?

was she ever?

 

[NLT]

The mother of chaz bono speaks

 

[JakeStarkey]

One, you have no idea what Marxism, collectivism, or socialism is really.

Two, you far righties and libertarians will have to submit to the mainstream GOP will in order to share in election victory.

Three, you can't elect candidates of your own by yourselves, and the GOP mainstream won't select your candidates.

Four, you have to go along to get along.

Five, elections have consequences: I think you would have learned that by now.

Actually I do know what those terms mean, obama is a marxist collectivist, if you read his books and listen to his early speeches that is quite obvious.

mainstream GOP is a meaningless term. mainstream is the sector that gets the most votes, the old mainstream of both parties is going out of favor

yes, compromise is necessary, but compromising on your principles is not

yes, elections have consequences, 2008 and 2012 have had very bad consequences for the USA, hopefully 2014 and 2016 will reverse that negative trend.

You just demonstrated that you drivel meaningless wordification, podjo.

Mainstream GOP, a la the votes in Congress last October and November, are those reps who are telling the far right it is wrong, period.

2014 will be better if the far right and the far left are rejected, yes.

 

[Redfish]

One, you have no idea what Marxism, collectivism, or socialism is really.

Two, you far righties and libertarians will have to submit to the mainstream GOP will in order to share in election victory.

Three, you can't elect candidates of your own by yourselves, and the GOP mainstream won't select your candidates.

Four, you have to go along to get along.

Five, elections have consequences: I think you would have learned that by now.

Actually I do know what those terms mean, obama is a marxist collectivist, if you read his books and listen to his early speeches that is quite obvious.

mainstream GOP is a meaningless term. mainstream is the sector that gets the most votes, the old mainstream of both parties is going out of favor

yes, compromise is necessary, but compromising on your principles is not

yes, elections have consequences, 2008 and 2012 have had very bad consequences for the USA, hopefully 2014 and 2016 will reverse that negative trend.

You just demonstrated that you drivel meaningless wordification, podjo.

Mainstream GOP, a la the votes in Congress last October and November, are those reps who are telling the far right it is wrong, period.

2014 will be better if the far right and the far left are rejected, yes.

What makes you think that I, or any other conservative republican, is "far right" ?

the far right is as idiotic as the far left.

balanced budgets, limited federal govt, lower taxes, individual freedom, encouraging american business, sane foreign policy are not far right positions.

 

[aaronleland]

Cher? Is she still alive?

was she ever?

Well played.

 

[blackhawk]

Obama will be a lame duck next year so the Hollywood elite now have to find the new next big thing or person to latch onto so they can continue to appear hip and trendy in other words it's time for their Hillary worship to start.

 

[Redfish]

Obama will be a lame duck next year so the Hollywood elite now have to find the new next big thing or person to latch onto so they can continue to appear hip and trendy in other words it's time for their Hillary worship to start.

probably right. Worship an old dried up lesbian liar. Way to go hollyloonies.

 

[Antares]

One, you have no idea what Marxism, collectivism, or socialism is really.

Two, you far righties and libertarians will have to submit to the mainstream GOP will in order to share in election victory.

Three, you can't elect candidates of your own by yourselves, and the GOP mainstream won't select your candidates.

Four, you have to go along to get along.

Five, elections have consequences: I think you would have learned that by now.

Assimilate or Die, sorry Jake....no

 

[Freewill]

Actually I do know what those terms mean, obama is a marxist collectivist, if you read his books and listen to his early speeches that is quite obvious.

mainstream GOP is a meaningless term. mainstream is the sector that gets the most votes, the old mainstream of both parties is going out of favor

yes, compromise is necessary, but compromising on your principles is not

yes, elections have consequences, 2008 and 2012 have had very bad consequences for the USA, hopefully 2014 and 2016 will reverse that negative trend.

You just demonstrated that you drivel meaningless wordification, podjo.

Mainstream GOP, a la the votes in Congress last October and November, are those reps who are telling the far right it is wrong, period.

2014 will be better if the far right and the far left are rejected, yes.

What makes you think that I, or any other conservative republican, is "far right" ?

the far right is as idiotic as the far left.

balanced budgets, limited federal govt, lower taxes, individual freedom, encouraging american business, sane foreign policy are not far right positions.

Everyone is far right to Jake.

 

[williepete]

Enthusiasm on the left is like a bubble about to burst
By Michael Goodwin
Enthusiasm on the left is like a bubble about to burst | New York Post


Thanks to the recession, we all know about financial bubbles and the damage they cause. But are there such things as political bubbles? I say yes, and believe America is in the midst of one now.

The idea grows out of a book that dissects a financial bubble that popped nearly 300 years ago. In “The Great Mirror of Folly: Finance, Culture and the Crash of 1720,” three Yale professors recount how stocks in France, Britain and the Netherlands soared by 1,000 percent, then crashed.

The authors, according to a Wall Street Journal article, don’t accuse investors of being irrational. They included Isaac Newton and believed new corporate structures would protect them and that trade with the New World marked a global transformation.

In the long run, they were right. But caught up in market mania and blind faith in momentum, they dramatically overpaid for stocks.

That is common bubble behavior, but a similar mania can happen in political movements and turn them into bubbles, too.

For example, one of the book’s authors told the Journal that a clear sign of a market bubble is when investors discount all evidence that doesn’t fit their belief.

He called that a “hinge point” that leads investors to a “binary framework where anybody who disagrees with them is demonized.”

That perfectly describes the cult of Barack Obama and the bubble of liberalism he embodies.

They are built on blind faith in his personal exceptionalism, discount facts and are sustained by a demonization of doubters.

Indeed, Obama’s career is something of a faith-based movement.

Despite his lack of experience and record, he was elected on the promise that he could get government to do what it had never done before. He shaped and benefitted from a belief that this time was different, that the old rules didn’t apply.

“We are the ones we’ve been waiting for,” he said in promising a unique period in history. “We are the change that we seek.”

He persuaded enough people to buy his stock that, in hindsight, its momentum carried him beyond any reasonable explanation. That bubble is still expanding but only within the Democratic Party. Case in point is the election of far-left Mayor Bill de Blasio and Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito in New York.

A recent Clarus survey on ideological trends finds that 43 percent of Democrats now self-identify as liberal, up from 29 percent in 2000. Meanwhile, Dems who call themselves moderate declined by 8 points, from 44 percent to 36.

Based on the failure of Obama’s key policies, that rapid shift to the left isn’t rational.

Slow economic growth, high underemployment, rising national debt, bitter polarization at home and spreading global disorder show that the faith in liberalism far exceeds its actual performance.

Fortunately, most Americans get that, as reflected in the rise and fall of Obama’s standing with all voters.

His approval ratings hit about 70 percent in his first year but stood at 38 percent at the end of his fifth year. Millions of Americans concluded he is not the president they believed they were buying. In effect, they realized they overpaid.

Now they are selling and his stock is tumbling. It is down by more than 40 percent as Hope & Change has given way to incompetence and ObamaCare.

Nearing their crash, financial and political bubbles share another feature. As the Yale authors put it, the “hinge point” reflects the irrational fury of investors who try to silence nonbelievers.

That moment is upon us with liberalism’s bubble.

Dare to doubt Obama and you are demonized by him and his followers.

A recent letter from one fits the formula. After I denounced Obama’s smears of Senate Dems who opposed him on the Iran deal, reader Tom Matyas said I belonged in North Korea or China, and added: “You are apparently among the morons who believe Obama set the IRS on the Tea Party even after it has been debunked by any rational analysis and that the financial stimulus was a waste when actually it was too small, like your intellect . . . Get a life, Bozo.”

Desperate “investors” like that mean the Obama bubble is ready to pop.