Crazy Lady Alert: Pelosi Says McConnell Is a Russian ‘Accomplice.’

The Left lost it completely sometime in 2018, now it’s just pathetic watching the insane Left humiliate themselves in public.

Crazy Lady Alert: Pelosi Says McConnell Is a Russian ‘Accomplice.’
Now how would Nancy get an idea like that. It is absurd, on the face of it that Russia could have an influence of McConnell. What would the Senator from Kentucky have to gain from the relationship, that might make him look kindly on a country that has basically been our enemy since the end of world war II and aide in any designs or wishes? Well, there is this:
Russia's Rusal invests $200 million in Kentucky plant after US lifts sanctions - CNN
Your top candidate honeymooned in the Soviet Union and preaches Soviet doctrine.
And loved Fidel Castro while hating on JFK.

Perfect Dimwinger for 2020.
 
The Left lost it completely sometime in 2018, now it’s just pathetic watching the insane Left humiliate themselves in public.

Crazy Lady Alert: Pelosi Says McConnell Is a Russian ‘Accomplice.’
Everyone calls him "Moscow Mitch" for a reason Son.
Bernie Sanders Says JFK’s Opposition to the Castro Regime Made Him Want to ‘Puke’
Look!

A deflection!

It's your topic dumbass!! Stick to it!
Yeah, your crazy disproven conspiracy versus the FACTS about your Soviet loving nominee.
 
The Left lost it completely sometime in 2018, now it’s just pathetic watching the insane Left humiliate themselves in public.

Crazy Lady Alert: Pelosi Says McConnell Is a Russian ‘Accomplice.’
Now how would Nancy get an idea like that. It is absurd, on the face of it that Russia could have an influence of McConnell. What would the Senator from Kentucky have to gain from the relationship, that might make him look kindly on a country that has basically been our enemy since the end of world war II and aide in any designs or wishes? Well, there is this:
Russia's Rusal invests $200 million in Kentucky plant after US lifts sanctions - CNN

Loosen your tin foil and let some oxygen migrate up there.

410307642.jpg
Maybe. Like everybody else on here, I do not automatically trust coincidence.
 
The Left lost it completely sometime in 2018, now it’s just pathetic watching the insane Left humiliate themselves in public.

Crazy Lady Alert: Pelosi Says McConnell Is a Russian ‘Accomplice.’
Now how would Nancy get an idea like that. It is absurd, on the face of it that Russia could have an influence of McConnell. What would the Senator from Kentucky have to gain from the relationship, that might make him look kindly on a country that has basically been our enemy since the end of world war II and aide in any designs or wishes? Well, there is this:
Russia's Rusal invests $200 million in Kentucky plant after US lifts sanctions - CNN
Your top candidate honeymooned in the Soviet Union and preaches Soviet doctrine.

Took a moment to realize you were talking about Bernie Sanders. Not my top candidate. The whole "Democratic Socialist" thing is a bridge too far left. If someone tells you they are a socialist, they probably are a socialist. I think they should run on a socialist party ticket. I think there is a nation socialist party in this country. He should have run on that party, forcing voters to choose that party if they wanted that party. He is an effective campaigner, apparently in at least two states. I think Trump should have run on a different party. He doesn't reflect the republican party of the last 60 years, only a strong man top down rule by propaganda party. Not sure what you would call it, but I sure Putin would have a name for it.
 
The Left lost it completely sometime in 2018, now it’s just pathetic watching the insane Left humiliate themselves in public.

Crazy Lady Alert: Pelosi Says McConnell Is a Russian ‘Accomplice.’
Now how would Nancy get an idea like that. It is absurd, on the face of it that Russia could have an influence of McConnell. What would the Senator from Kentucky have to gain from the relationship, that might make him look kindly on a country that has basically been our enemy since the end of world war II and aide in any designs or wishes? Well, there is this:
Russia's Rusal invests $200 million in Kentucky plant after US lifts sanctions - CNN
Your top candidate honeymooned in the Soviet Union and preaches Soviet doctrine.
And loved Fidel Castro while hating on JFK.

Perfect Dimwinger for 2020.
I liked JFK. He was the only President (actually candidate at the time) I have seen in person. Good speaker. Very lucky or we might not be here on this board. There's a lot to be said for luck in a Presidential term, don't you think?
 
Page one, with a couple of exceptions has nothing to do with the Politics Forum, and IMO needs to be moved to the rubber room.
 
The Left lost it completely sometime in 2018, now it’s just pathetic watching the insane Left humiliate themselves in public.

Crazy Lady Alert: Pelosi Says McConnell Is a Russian ‘Accomplice.’
Now how would Nancy get an idea like that. It is absurd, on the face of it that Russia could have an influence of McConnell. What would the Senator from Kentucky have to gain from the relationship, that might make him look kindly on a country that has basically been our enemy since the end of world war II and aide in any designs or wishes? Well, there is this:
Russia's Rusal invests $200 million in Kentucky plant after US lifts sanctions - CNN
Your top candidate honeymooned in the Soviet Union and preaches Soviet doctrine.

Took a moment to realize you were talking about Bernie Sanders. Not my top candidate. The whole "Democratic Socialist" thing is a bridge too far left. If someone tells you they are a socialist, they probably are a socialist. I think they should run on a socialist party ticket. I think there is a nation socialist party in this country. He should have run on that party, forcing voters to choose that party if they wanted that party. He is an effective campaigner, apparently in at least two states. I think Trump should have run on a different party. He doesn't reflect the republican party of the last 60 years, only a strong man top down rule by propaganda party. Not sure what you would call it, but I sure Putin would have a name for it.

Anybody running on a Socialist ticket wouldn't stand a chance at winning anything. All it would do is syphon voters from the Democrat party guaranteeing a Republican victory. It's how we got Bill Clinton. Ross Perot stopped any potential Republican win.

So instead of making a statement, Sanders is with the Democrat party because it would be his only chance at winning anything.
 
Pelosi is right. McConnell is not know as Moscow Mitch for nothing. Just another useful idiot Trumper for the KGB to exploit.
 
The Left lost it completely sometime in 2018, now it’s just pathetic watching the insane Left humiliate themselves in public.

Crazy Lady Alert: Pelosi Says McConnell Is a Russian ‘Accomplice.’
Now how would Nancy get an idea like that. It is absurd, on the face of it that Russia could have an influence of McConnell. What would the Senator from Kentucky have to gain from the relationship, that might make him look kindly on a country that has basically been our enemy since the end of world war II and aide in any designs or wishes? Well, there is this:
Russia's Rusal invests $200 million in Kentucky plant after US lifts sanctions - CNN
Your top candidate honeymooned in the Soviet Union and preaches Soviet doctrine.

Took a moment to realize you were talking about Bernie Sanders. Not my top candidate. The whole "Democratic Socialist" thing is a bridge too far left. If someone tells you they are a socialist, they probably are a socialist. I think they should run on a socialist party ticket. I think there is a nation socialist party in this country. He should have run on that party, forcing voters to choose that party if they wanted that party. He is an effective campaigner, apparently in at least two states. I think Trump should have run on a different party. He doesn't reflect the republican party of the last 60 years, only a strong man top down rule by propaganda party. Not sure what you would call it, but I sure Putin would have a name for it.

Anybody running on a Socialist ticket wouldn't stand a chance at winning anything. All it would do is syphon voters from the Democrat party guaranteeing a Republican victory. It's how we got Bill Clinton. Ross Perot stopped any potential Republican win.

So instead of making a statement, Sanders is with the Democrat party because it would be his only chance at winning anything.
You are correct that nobody could win on a socialist ticket, but you know me somewhat by now Ray. I do not approve of intentional lying to the electorate and stealing a political party from historical founding, Democrat or Republican.
 
The Left lost it completely sometime in 2018, now it’s just pathetic watching the insane Left humiliate themselves in public.

Crazy Lady Alert: Pelosi Says McConnell Is a Russian ‘Accomplice.’
Now how would Nancy get an idea like that. It is absurd, on the face of it that Russia could have an influence of McConnell. What would the Senator from Kentucky have to gain from the relationship, that might make him look kindly on a country that has basically been our enemy since the end of world war II and aide in any designs or wishes? Well, there is this:
Russia's Rusal invests $200 million in Kentucky plant after US lifts sanctions - CNN
Your top candidate honeymooned in the Soviet Union and preaches Soviet doctrine.

Took a moment to realize you were talking about Bernie Sanders. Not my top candidate. The whole "Democratic Socialist" thing is a bridge too far left. If someone tells you they are a socialist, they probably are a socialist. I think they should run on a socialist party ticket. I think there is a nation socialist party in this country. He should have run on that party, forcing voters to choose that party if they wanted that party. He is an effective campaigner, apparently in at least two states. I think Trump should have run on a different party. He doesn't reflect the republican party of the last 60 years, only a strong man top down rule by propaganda party. Not sure what you would call it, but I sure Putin would have a name for it.

Anybody running on a Socialist ticket wouldn't stand a chance at winning anything. All it would do is syphon voters from the Democrat party guaranteeing a Republican victory. It's how we got Bill Clinton. Ross Perot stopped any potential Republican win.

So instead of making a statement, Sanders is with the Democrat party because it would be his only chance at winning anything.
You are correct that nobody could win on a socialist ticket, but you know me somewhat by now Ray. I do not approve of intentional lying to the electorate and stealing a political party from historical founding, Democrat or Republican.

Parties change with the times. The Republican party today is pretty much like the Democrat party of the 60's. They don't do it to the people, the people change the party for them. Look at the seams coming apart on the Democrat side. Three losers get the media spotlight, and all of a sudden they're running the party. The media wouldn't pay attention to them if they were not selling newspapers and filling their blogs with all kinds of conversation. But they got the attention of the Socialists of their party, and it's because of them that AOC and three have all the cards now.
 
Now how would Nancy get an idea like that. It is absurd, on the face of it that Russia could have an influence of McConnell. What would the Senator from Kentucky have to gain from the relationship, that might make him look kindly on a country that has basically been our enemy since the end of world war II and aide in any designs or wishes? Well, there is this:
Russia's Rusal invests $200 million in Kentucky plant after US lifts sanctions - CNN
Your top candidate honeymooned in the Soviet Union and preaches Soviet doctrine.

Took a moment to realize you were talking about Bernie Sanders. Not my top candidate. The whole "Democratic Socialist" thing is a bridge too far left. If someone tells you they are a socialist, they probably are a socialist. I think they should run on a socialist party ticket. I think there is a nation socialist party in this country. He should have run on that party, forcing voters to choose that party if they wanted that party. He is an effective campaigner, apparently in at least two states. I think Trump should have run on a different party. He doesn't reflect the republican party of the last 60 years, only a strong man top down rule by propaganda party. Not sure what you would call it, but I sure Putin would have a name for it.

Anybody running on a Socialist ticket wouldn't stand a chance at winning anything. All it would do is syphon voters from the Democrat party guaranteeing a Republican victory. It's how we got Bill Clinton. Ross Perot stopped any potential Republican win.

So instead of making a statement, Sanders is with the Democrat party because it would be his only chance at winning anything.
You are correct that nobody could win on a socialist ticket, but you know me somewhat by now Ray. I do not approve of intentional lying to the electorate and stealing a political party from historical founding, Democrat or Republican.

Parties change with the times. The Republican party today is pretty much like the Democrat party of the 60's. They don't do it to the people, the people change the party for them. Look at the seams coming apart on the Democrat side. Three losers get the media spotlight, and all of a sudden they're running the party. The media wouldn't pay attention to them if they were not selling newspapers and filling their blogs with all kinds of conversation. But they got the attention of the Socialists of their party, and it's because of them that AOC and three have all the cards now.

AOC makes the case, children should be seen but not heard.
 
Your top candidate honeymooned in the Soviet Union and preaches Soviet doctrine.

Took a moment to realize you were talking about Bernie Sanders. Not my top candidate. The whole "Democratic Socialist" thing is a bridge too far left. If someone tells you they are a socialist, they probably are a socialist. I think they should run on a socialist party ticket. I think there is a nation socialist party in this country. He should have run on that party, forcing voters to choose that party if they wanted that party. He is an effective campaigner, apparently in at least two states. I think Trump should have run on a different party. He doesn't reflect the republican party of the last 60 years, only a strong man top down rule by propaganda party. Not sure what you would call it, but I sure Putin would have a name for it.

Anybody running on a Socialist ticket wouldn't stand a chance at winning anything. All it would do is syphon voters from the Democrat party guaranteeing a Republican victory. It's how we got Bill Clinton. Ross Perot stopped any potential Republican win.

So instead of making a statement, Sanders is with the Democrat party because it would be his only chance at winning anything.
You are correct that nobody could win on a socialist ticket, but you know me somewhat by now Ray. I do not approve of intentional lying to the electorate and stealing a political party from historical founding, Democrat or Republican.

Parties change with the times. The Republican party today is pretty much like the Democrat party of the 60's. They don't do it to the people, the people change the party for them. Look at the seams coming apart on the Democrat side. Three losers get the media spotlight, and all of a sudden they're running the party. The media wouldn't pay attention to them if they were not selling newspapers and filling their blogs with all kinds of conversation. But they got the attention of the Socialists of their party, and it's because of them that AOC and three have all the cards now.

AOC makes the case, children should be seen but not heard.

Not to worry. From what I've read, her constituents are not happy with her, and some even embarrassed. In two years from now, if you want to see AOC, you'll have to stop at a bar and get a drink from her.
 

Forum List

Back
Top