YWC - first, wall of text again!
Second, you seem to have ignored the multiple people who have pointed out quotes by Crick which show his acceptance of evolutionary theory. You hold him up as someone helping to show your view is valid, then ignore or misread when someone points out that the man does, in fact, seem to hold with the very theory you are trying to argue against.
So he's a man with an impressive background who we should listen to when you think he is making your point. When the things he say instead oppose your point, you ignore them or pretend they say something else. And then you complain about other people not answering your questions or responding to your points?
Even if your perspective is correct, you do such a poor job of explaining/defending it, it almost doesn't matter if it is right or wrong.
I accept evolution but not macro-evolution.
The point is the guy was such an atheist even though he knows that not one DNA molecule could have come in to existence on it's own still did not want to believe in that designer of that and many DNA molecules.
It just goes to show atheist will believe anything so they don't have to believe in the creator. What a tool, he can believe on one hand there is no way it happened naturally and then turn and defend abogenesis. What credibility do some scientists possess ?
Another lie! Do you think lying is moral if it makes people believe your nonsense?