Critical Race Card

[IM2]

It does do that.

Not it actually doesn't.

 

[IM2]

All Rise!

Tonights lesson:

CRT Describes the American System Correctly

You guys argue of Critical Race Theory and don't know what it is. You claim systemic racism does not exist, Lol!. You idiots call anything that teaches complete history, or anything that tries to create racial awareness, Critical Race Theory.

First of all, CRT has been taught as a legal theory only in law schools for 40 years. Critical race theory basically says that race is a construct by whites used to further their interests. Because of this, racism is imbedded or inherent in all American institutions. Critical race theory maintains that racial inequality is the result of social, economic, and legal differences created by whites to maintain white interests.

CRT DOES NOT TEACH THAT EVERYBODY WHITE IS EVIL OR AN OPPRESSOR!

Get that through your skeetal bones right wingers.

So lets face the facts. Race is a social construct created by a guy named Carl Linnaeus in 1600 Germany.

The American system flows from a belief in scientifiv racism, which basically was started by Kant and other European thinkers of that time. That is the thinking that guided the so-called founding fathers. If you don't think so

“This unfortunate difference of color, and perhaps of faculty, is a powerful obstacle to the emancipation of these people.”-Thomas Jefferson

Now from the very beginning whites created laws to protect their interests.

Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution. It says: “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other Persons.”

The Naturalization Act of 1790. The act states: “any alien, being a free white person,” could apply for citizenship, so long as he or she lived in the United States for at least two years, and in the state where the application was filed for a minimum of one year. This law also provided that “children of citizens of the United States that may be born … out of the limits of the United States shall be considered as natural-born citizens.”

Dred Scott v. Sandford.

Donation Land Claim Act- The act took effect on September 27, 1850, granting 320 acres of federal land to white male citizens 18 years of age or older who resided on property on or before December 1, 1850. If married before December 1, 1851, a couple received an additional 320 acres in the wife’s name.

Corwin Amendment- No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.

The Homestead Acts

The Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883), were a group of five landmark cases in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments did not empower Congress to outlaw racial discrimination by private individuals.

United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876), was an important United States Supreme Court case[1] in which the Court held that the Bill of Rights did not apply to private actors or to state governments despite the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. It reversed criminal convictions for the civil rights violations committed in aid of anti-reconstruction murders. Decided during the Reconstruction Era, the case represented a major blow to federal efforts to protect the civil rights of African Americans.

Plessy v. Ferguson

Morrill Act of 1862

The National Housing Act-This law created the Federal Housing Administration or the FHA. The FHA Underwriting Manual set the guidelines real estate agents used to assess the value and creditworthiness of homes in American neighborhoods. This manual promoted racist real estate practices by defending racially restrictive covenants and segregated communities. Due to this manual, the FHA was able to establish a neighborhood grading system based purely on false racist perceptions. Redlining was the name of that grading system.

Less than 5 percent of all government guaranteed loans between the time congress passed the National Hosing Act and 1968 went to blacks. Black creditworthiness was no excuse for banks because payment of the loans were guaranteed by the federal government.

The Social Security Act of 1935 created the Social Security program, state unemployment insurance, and assistance to single women with children. Today most Americans love the program. However, when the act was signed, the law was made to exclude occupations that were mainly occupied by blacks. When President Roosevelt signed the law, approximately two thirds of the blacks in America were ineligible. So for years a majority of blacks were excluded from social security savings and could not get unemployment.

Title 4 or IV of the social security act of 1935 called for grants in aid to be provided to each state as Aid To Dependent Children. Eventually the name of the program was changed to Aid to Families with Dependent Children. This was welfare folks. Assistance for single moms with children without daddy at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded.

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 created the minimum wage and time and a half overtime pay for working over forty hours a week. Child labor was eliminated by this act. All these were good things but… In every law that was passed as part of The New Deal, Roosevelt had to make a compromise with southern representatives to get the votes he needed. In the case of the FLSA, due to pressure from southern congressmen, he decided that industries would be excluded from the regulations where the majority of workers were black. Because of this, blacks were paid less than the minimum wage.

The Servicemen’s Readjustment Act, better known as the G.I. Bill. This law provided benefits for veterans returning World War Two. This act included funds for college tuition, low-cost home loans, and unemployment insurance. As in every other program during this time southern congressmen fought passage of these laws unless there were provisions that limited access to blacks. The G.I Bill was no different.

Let me skip forward a few years

Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), was a landmark decision[1] of the US Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and Section 4(b), which contains the coverage formula that determines which jurisdictions are subject to preclearance based on their histories of discrimination in voting.[2][3]

On June 25, 2013, the Court ruled by a 5 to 4 vote that Section 4(b) was unconstitutional because the coverage formula was based on data over 40 years old, making it no longer responsive to current needs and therefore an impermissible burden on the constitutional principles of federalism and equal sovereignty of the states.[2][3] The Court did not strike down Section 5, but without Section 4(b), no jurisdiction will be subject to Section 5 preclearance unless Congress enacts a new coverage formula.[4] Some allege the ruling has made it easier for state officials to make it harder for ethnic minority voters to vote.[5]

Research shows that preclearance led to increases in minority congressional representation and minority turnout.[6][7] Five years after the ruling, nearly 1,000 U.S. polling places had closed, many of them in predominantly African-American counties.

These things and more support the premise of Critical Race Theory. If this hurts the feeling of right wing whites, well freakin tough, because those whites who are responsible for doing these things, things that have allowed whites today to have 15 times the wealth of everybody else, should not have done what they did.

 

[Lastamender]

Not it actually doesn't.

It is a Communist fairly tale for the mentally unstable.

 

[flacaltenn]

The foundational papers and treatises that formed this government from the onset proves that CRT as a theory is correct.

Only in your demented state of living in past history.. Slavery did not come to N. America in 1619. It came with the asian predecessors of the Indians. And they took slavery to extremes for thousands of years before the "the Euros" arrived.. Red skin slavery, Brown skin slavery down in Mexico and Cent America..

Slavery was a force to reckoned with by people of ALL colors. Even the whites who came as indentured servants.

And the govt foundations that were built by Euros had the tools to end it.. And they did.. All pretty rapidly in Europe and N.America.. If you look at the morals and cultures of history -- EVERY CULTURE has to deal their founding legacies. Even yours.

And until you get help for you psychosis, try not to come into conversations with a silly opinion that ignores reality. You want the fascism this nation was foundedd onn to contnue because it's to your advantage as ax white man.

You come here with a political ad that you think speaks ANY truth.. Never seen one of those. And there it is.,. Even tho I've challenged you to spend some energy, money and time to END SLAVERY NOW in the world and do something meaningful to avenge history -- all ya want to do is accuse me of wanting to bring back slavery..

That's weak.. Really weak..

What's to my advantage? THE CURRENT FUCKING BROKE-ASS GOVT run by histories most incompetent leaders?? Wait til spring and we'll see what hobbling each other to a kneeling position looks like courtesy of those racist and senile white Dems in charge..

 

[flacaltenn]

All Rise!

Tonights lesson:

CRT Describes the American System Correctly

You guys argue of Critical Race Theory and don't know what it is. You claim systemic racism does not exist, Lol!. You idiots call anything that teaches complete history, or anything that tries to create racial awareness, Critical Race Theory.

First of all, CRT has been taught as a legal theory only in law schools for 40 years. Critical race theory basically says that race is a construct by whites used to further their interests. Because of this, racism is imbedded or inherent in all American institutions. Critical race theory maintains that racial inequality is the result of social, economic, and legal differences created by whites to maintain white interests.

CRT DOES NOT TEACH THAT EVERYBODY WHITE IS EVIL OR AN OPPRESSOR!

Get that through your skeetal bones right wingers.

So lets face the facts. Race is a social construct created by a guy named Carl Linnaeus in 1600 Germany.

The American system flows from a belief in scientifiv racism, which basically was started by Kant and other European thinkers of that time. That is the thinking that guided the so-called founding fathers. If you don't think so

“This unfortunate difference of color, and perhaps of faculty, is a powerful obstacle to the emancipation of these people.”-Thomas Jefferson

Now from the very beginning whites created laws to protect their interests.

Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution. It says: “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other Persons.”

The Naturalization Act of 1790. The act states: “any alien, being a free white person,” could apply for citizenship, so long as he or she lived in the United States for at least two years, and in the state where the application was filed for a minimum of one year. This law also provided that “children of citizens of the United States that may be born … out of the limits of the United States shall be considered as natural-born citizens.”

Dred Scott v. Sandford.

Donation Land Claim Act- The act took effect on September 27, 1850, granting 320 acres of federal land to white male citizens 18 years of age or older who resided on property on or before December 1, 1850. If married before December 1, 1851, a couple received an additional 320 acres in the wife’s name.

Corwin Amendment- No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.

The Homestead Acts

The Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883), were a group of five landmark cases in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments did not empower Congress to outlaw racial discrimination by private individuals.

United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876), was an important United States Supreme Court case[1] in which the Court held that the Bill of Rights did not apply to private actors or to state governments despite the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. It reversed criminal convictions for the civil rights violations committed in aid of anti-reconstruction murders. Decided during the Reconstruction Era, the case represented a major blow to federal efforts to protect the civil rights of African Americans.

Plessy v. Ferguson

Morrill Act of 1862

The National Housing Act-This law created the Federal Housing Administration or the FHA. The FHA Underwriting Manual set the guidelines real estate agents used to assess the value and creditworthiness of homes in American neighborhoods. This manual promoted racist real estate practices by defending racially restrictive covenants and segregated communities. Due to this manual, the FHA was able to establish a neighborhood grading system based purely on false racist perceptions. Redlining was the name of that grading system.

Less than 5 percent of all government guaranteed loans between the time congress passed the National Hosing Act and 1968 went to blacks. Black creditworthiness was no excuse for banks because payment of the loans were guaranteed by the federal government.

The Social Security Act of 1935 created the Social Security program, state unemployment insurance, and assistance to single women with children. Today most Americans love the program. However, when the act was signed, the law was made to exclude occupations that were mainly occupied by blacks. When President Roosevelt signed the law, approximately two thirds of the blacks in America were ineligible. So for years a majority of blacks were excluded from social security savings and could not get unemployment.

Title 4 or IV of the social security act of 1935 called for grants in aid to be provided to each state as Aid To Dependent Children. Eventually the name of the program was changed to Aid to Families with Dependent Children. This was welfare folks. Assistance for single moms with children without daddy at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded.

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 created the minimum wage and time and a half overtime pay for working over forty hours a week. Child labor was eliminated by this act. All these were good things but… In every law that was passed as part of The New Deal, Roosevelt had to make a compromise with southern representatives to get the votes he needed. In the case of the FLSA, due to pressure from southern congressmen, he decided that industries would be excluded from the regulations where the majority of workers were black. Because of this, blacks were paid less than the minimum wage.

The Servicemen’s Readjustment Act, better known as the G.I. Bill. This law provided benefits for veterans returning World War Two. This act included funds for college tuition, low-cost home loans, and unemployment insurance. As in every other program during this time southern congressmen fought passage of these laws unless there were provisions that limited access to blacks. The G.I Bill was no different.

Let me skip forward a few years

Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), was a landmark decision[1] of the US Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and Section 4(b), which contains the coverage formula that determines which jurisdictions are subject to preclearance based on their histories of discrimination in voting.[2][3]

On June 25, 2013, the Court ruled by a 5 to 4 vote that Section 4(b) was unconstitutional because the coverage formula was based on data over 40 years old, making it no longer responsive to current needs and therefore an impermissible burden on the constitutional principles of federalism and equal sovereignty of the states.[2][3] The Court did not strike down Section 5, but without Section 4(b), no jurisdiction will be subject to Section 5 preclearance unless Congress enacts a new coverage formula.[4] Some allege the ruling has made it easier for state officials to make it harder for ethnic minority voters to vote.[5]

Research shows that preclearance led to increases in minority congressional representation and minority turnout.[6][7] Five years after the ruling, nearly 1,000 U.S. polling places had closed, many of them in predominantly African-American counties.

These things and more support the premise of Critical Race Theory. If this hurts the feeling of right wing whites, well freakin tough, because those whites who are responsible for doing these things, things that have allowed whites today to have 15 times the wealth of everybody else, should not have done what they did.

What nonsense.. You poke a few OPINIONS about CRT -- and you're mainly wrong on all of them and THEN -- you do the Time Warp back to the 18th century AGAIN...

And about Shelby vs Holder -- The ruling was correct.. Had nothing to do with polling place decisions.. Had to do with keeping the Federal boot on the neck of the South. Based on situations 40 years ago -- when your very RACIST DEMOCRATS ran the place.. So -- you don't punish in perpetuity.. You punish until there's progress and change. And ALL of those polling places are NOW integrated. And the ones in the BLACK communities are largely run BY LOCAL BLACK city governments...

 

[flacaltenn]

Critical race theory basically says that race is a construct by whites used to further their interests. Because of this, racism is imbedded or inherent in all American institutions.

That's basically what I just told you above. And BECAUSE of that belief (its not really theory -- it's opinion) The WHOLE system needs to change to a more Marxist/Communist model of TRUE EQUITY..

Whites may have used race as a construct while slavery was alive here. But NOW YOU and the Marxist segregation by race crowd own it.. Because without a race construct taking priority over EVERY OTHER HUMAN TRAIT AND QUALITY -- there couldn't BE a "Critical Race Theory" That's simplest logic there is and flies between your ears...

The whole country was on the colorblind MLK march before CRT re-birthed segregation and made EVERYTHING about race.. And nothing else..

 

[Juicin]

Ohhh that was a good ad, you already knew it was going to end in atwater before it started

tasteful quote too at the end, well chosen

Only thing that doesn't make any sense is the claim "crt is not being taught in school", it would take literally one teacher. And the National Education Association just voted in favor of CRT not long ago.

Left needs to get their story straight.

Either CRT is enlightening for all ages and should be part of any age curriculum. As the National Education Association again decided

Or it's not age appropriate and it shoudln't be in schools.

The position that CRT is not being taught but there is nothing age inapproriate about CRT is not tenable. While I don't agree with the NEA, certainly makes a lot more sense than your position and the one posited in that commercial.

 

[fncceo]

White people aint evil

Some of us are.

 

[flacaltenn]

The foundational papers and treatises that formed this government from the onset proves that CRT as a theory is correct. And until you get help for you psychosis, try not to come into conversations with a silly opinion that ignores reality. You want the fascism this nation was foundedd onn to contnue because it's to your advantage as ax white man.

Even tho the USA became racist in 1619 before there WAS a America?

You really missed out on some critical points of American history.. Like the Civil war and the Constitution and Congressional actions to REMEDY the defects of the founding..

Damn those racist Democrats who made life miserable for FREE black Americans for a hundred years AFTER the Emancipation Declaration.. But even the statue commissioned by blacks with Lincoln and the Emancipation is now RACIST right?

Brainwashed fanatics living in the past like yourself cant tolerate public statues that REMIND people how agile and flexible our system has been to right some ancient wrongs.. You must DESTROY any evidence that contradicts your narrative that nutting changed.

 

[flacaltenn]

And by removing that statue -- you're belittling all the freed men and woman who paid for and COMMISSIONED that statue.. Your own people wanted to celebrate their freedom and YOU piss on them..

 

[TNHarley]

It doesn't, but conservatives will.lie to you and say it does to get you all fired up about it.

You dont know what CRT is. Most of you dont. But you sure act like you do when you all say the same thing, "you dont know what it means!"

 

[IM2]

You can disagree all you want, but I am correct.

 

[JustAGuy1]

You can disagree all you want, but I am correct.

Sorry no, you are an inveterate liar.

 

[Crepitus]

You dont know what CRT is. Most of you dont. But you sure act like you do when you all say the same thing, "you dont know what it means!"

Why don't you explain it to us, then.

 

[marvin martian]

The right has been playing the race card. Notice how they don't call it that.

The way you chose to fight this was to vote for a guy who said he doesn't want his kids growing up in a "racial jungle" with people like you. Good job, Remus.

 

[IM2]

The way you chose to fight this was to vote for a guy who said he doesn't want his kids growing up in a "racial jungle" with people like you. Good job, Remus.

I didn't vote for Biden in 1994.

And I damn sure wasn't going to vote for the 2020 white supremacist candidate.

 

[IM2]

Why don't you explain it to us, then.

Because he doesn't know.

 

[Juicin]

I didn't vote for Biden in 1994.

And I damn sure wasn't going to vote for the 2020 white supremacist candidate.

He put his jew son in law in charge of the nation

he's not a fucking white supremacist

 

[MisterBeale]

That's basically what I just told you above. And BECAUSE of that belief (its not really theory -- it's opinion) The WHOLE system needs to change to a more Marxist/Communist model of TRUE EQUITY..

Whites may have used race as a construct while slavery was alive here. But NOW YOU and the Marxist segregation by race crowd own it.. Because without a race construct taking priority over EVERY OTHER HUMAN TRAIT AND QUALITY -- there couldn't BE a "Critical Race Theory" That's simplest logic there is and flies between your ears...

The whole country was on the colorblind MLK march before CRT re-birthed segregation and made EVERYTHING about race.. And nothing else..

Game, set, match.

Critical race theory basically says that race is a construct by whites used to further their interests.

Because without a race construct taking priority over EVERY OTHER HUMAN TRAIT AND QUALITY -- there couldn't BE a "Critical Race Theory" That's simplest logic there is and flies between your ears...

There really, is no longer, any reason to have this conversation. Or take anyone that wants to create a new world off of these ideas seriously.

For CRT folks to point out the past wrongs, and then want to impose a system thought, and economic justice to redress based on that same ideology? It proves them all to be either living in the past, or total hypocrites.

 

[marvin martian]

I didn't vote for Biden in 1994.

And I damn sure wasn't going to vote for the 2020 white supremacist candidate.

So you voted for the guy who said "you ain't black" if you don't support him? I guess that means you're black, since Joe Biden gets to decide who is and who isn't. Looks like you did vote for the white supremacist. Do you prefer Uncle Tom or Uncle Remus? LOL!