Vastator
Platinum Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 22,759
- 10,377
- 950
I’m not passing it on to only Democrats. Clearly securing the schools would come out of the tax coffers. The coffers which we all pay into. Your projection however didn’t go unnoticed. Because In reality, the only passionate proposal by the most “outraged” , is infringing on the rights of gun owners. Not a solution in which the grabbers actually have to contribute as well. That’s how we know y’all are phony.I like how you’re passing the onus of protecting children to Democrats, and so implying that nobody should expect you or other conservatives to give a shit about kids’ lives. We don't expect you to, btw. It would be a shock if you ever started.Nope. That’s the stance of the gun grabbers actually. They could do something about this right now, without constitutional problems. Yet they choose not to. Because it is they who really don’t give a shit about the kids. They care about the guns. And they have no problem using dead children as a means to go after them.So your stance is “fuck you and fuck those kids.” Hmm.When you secure the schools as diligently as the banks; get back to us. But till you’re willing to put your money, where your mouth is; you can forget the rest of us surrendering our rights, for your sense of safety...Yeah right. Actually, conservatives fighting for the rights of people to massacre children has much more of an impact.Liberals took prayer out of school, and you see what's happening.
When you come up with a prayer that can stop a bullet, feel free to wrote your congressman to require it in the curriculum. Dipshit.
At least you didn’t pretend to care by sending thiughts and prayers.
I look forward to your “thoughts and prayers” at the next gun massacre.