Democrats : ***NO EVIDENCE*** Trump Campaign Colluded with Russia

Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion

FROM MSNBC POLITICS shows to town hall meetings across the country, the overarching issue for the Democratic Party’s base since Trump’s victory has been Russia, often suffocating attention for other issues. This fixation has persisted even though it has no chance to sink the Trump presidency unless it is proven that high levels of the Trump campaign actively colluded with the Kremlin to manipulate the outcome of the U.S. election — a claim for which absolutely no evidence has thus far been presented.

The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies — just as right-wing media polemicists did after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected — that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence. And they are all waiting for the day, which they regard as inevitable and imminent, when this theory will be proven and Trump will be removed.

The latest official to throw cold water on the MSNBC-led circus is President Obama’s former acting CIA chief Michael Morell. What makes him particularly notable in this context is that Morell was one of Clinton’s most vocal CIA surrogates. In August, he not only endorsed Clinton in the pages of the New York Times but also became the first high official to explicitly accuse Trump of disloyalty, claiming, “In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.”

But on Wednesday night, Morell appeared at an intelligence community forum to “cast doubt” on “allegations that members of the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.” “On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire at all,” he said, adding, “There’s no little campfire, there’s no little candle, there’s no spark. And there’s a lot of people looking for it.”

______________---------------------------

OK Motherfuckers

Let's help OUR president do the best for the country

.


.

BULLSHIT!!!!! THE INVESTIGATIONS ARE ONGOING!!!!!


Morrel has spoken - but you have the prerogative to sit in your tepee and wait for the official announcement. He has warned you that there is nothing there.

You got your hopes up for nothing.

Learn how to kill buffaloes and fish because "your" hot meals are coming to an end.

Bwahahahahahahahahaha


.
First off, Morell is NOT an official government worker, he stopped working as a public servant in 2013 and went to work for a private security firm and has not been in our Intel community for YEARS.

Second, the reason Morell believes there is "no fire"...he specifically said was because DCI Director Clapper on the Sunday shows 2 weeks ago, said that up to January 20th when he had left the Agency, Clapper had seen no evidence of such....

and on the same programs Clapper had also said there was no way that Trump tower or trump was wire tapped.... you guys called Clapper a liar...

and Morell believes there is no fire in the collusion hypothesis, because he trusts Clapper and what Clapper said on it....NOT because he was somehow in the know from direct knowledge....

So, do you Trumpettes NOW trust Clapper?
 
Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion

FROM MSNBC POLITICS shows to town hall meetings across the country, the overarching issue for the Democratic Party’s base since Trump’s victory has been Russia, often suffocating attention for other issues. This fixation has persisted even though it has no chance to sink the Trump presidency unless it is proven that high levels of the Trump campaign actively colluded with the Kremlin to manipulate the outcome of the U.S. election — a claim for which absolutely no evidence has thus far been presented.

The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies — just as right-wing media polemicists did after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected — that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence. And they are all waiting for the day, which they regard as inevitable and imminent, when this theory will be proven and Trump will be removed.

The latest official to throw cold water on the MSNBC-led circus is President Obama’s former acting CIA chief Michael Morell. What makes him particularly notable in this context is that Morell was one of Clinton’s most vocal CIA surrogates. In August, he not only endorsed Clinton in the pages of the New York Times but also became the first high official to explicitly accuse Trump of disloyalty, claiming, “In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.”

But on Wednesday night, Morell appeared at an intelligence community forum to “cast doubt” on “allegations that members of the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.” “On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire at all,” he said, adding, “There’s no little campfire, there’s no little candle, there’s no spark. And there’s a lot of people looking for it.”

______________---------------------------

OK Motherfuckers


Let's help OUR president do the best for the country

.

Wtf OP? Are you writing for the blind, or for somebody reading from across the street? What's the deal with the 167 point type?

That said, wonderful answer to a question that nobody asked. Keep up the good work. In a normal sized font, K?
 
We don't need an announcement. As I said we can say they didn't collude as long as you make everyone believe Page, Carter, Manafort, Sessions and Stone do not exist.

Don't forget Flynn. The Flynn shit keeps getting deeper and deeper.
Did Flynn run guns to cartel leaders and terrorists?
No, but he is still a criminal...I heard on the news tonight that he broke the law by not reporting getting paid by the Russians for his Moscow visit....as an ex General...by law, it's against the law for him to receive money from govts or govt intermediaries, unless he reported it to the Army and got permission by them for the exception...but DID NOT follow the law on that.....
 
Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion

FROM MSNBC POLITICS shows to town hall meetings across the country, the overarching issue for the Democratic Party’s base since Trump’s victory has been Russia, often suffocating attention for other issues. This fixation has persisted even though it has no chance to sink the Trump presidency unless it is proven that high levels of the Trump campaign actively colluded with the Kremlin to manipulate the outcome of the U.S. election — a claim for which absolutely no evidence has thus far been presented.

The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies — just as right-wing media polemicists did after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected — that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence. And they are all waiting for the day, which they regard as inevitable and imminent, when this theory will be proven and Trump will be removed.

The latest official to throw cold water on the MSNBC-led circus is President Obama’s former acting CIA chief Michael Morell. What makes him particularly notable in this context is that Morell was one of Clinton’s most vocal CIA surrogates. In August, he not only endorsed Clinton in the pages of the New York Times but also became the first high official to explicitly accuse Trump of disloyalty, claiming, “In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.”

But on Wednesday night, Morell appeared at an intelligence community forum to “cast doubt” on “allegations that members of the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.” “On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire at all,” he said, adding, “There’s no little campfire, there’s no little candle, there’s no spark. And there’s a lot of people looking for it.”

______________---------------------------

OK Motherfuckers


Let's help OUR president do the best for the country

.

Wtf OP? Are you writing for the blind, or for somebody reading from across the street? What's the deal with the 167 point type?

That said, wonderful answer to a question that nobody asked. Keep up the good work. In a normal sized font, K?
:( sadly, I could actually read his post, without having to put my reading glasses on...it stinks, getting older with all the negative side effects that go hand in hand....
 
Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion

FROM MSNBC POLITICS shows to town hall meetings across the country, the overarching issue for the Democratic Party’s base since Trump’s victory has been Russia, often suffocating attention for other issues. This fixation has persisted even though it has no chance to sink the Trump presidency unless it is proven that high levels of the Trump campaign actively colluded with the Kremlin to manipulate the outcome of the U.S. election — a claim for which absolutely no evidence has thus far been presented.

The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies — just as right-wing media polemicists did after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected — that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence. And they are all waiting for the day, which they regard as inevitable and imminent, when this theory will be proven and Trump will be removed.

The latest official to throw cold water on the MSNBC-led circus is President Obama’s former acting CIA chief Michael Morell. What makes him particularly notable in this context is that Morell was one of Clinton’s most vocal CIA surrogates. In August, he not only endorsed Clinton in the pages of the New York Times but also became the first high official to explicitly accuse Trump of disloyalty, claiming, “In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.”

But on Wednesday night, Morell appeared at an intelligence community forum to “cast doubt” on “allegations that members of the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.” “On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire at all,” he said, adding, “There’s no little campfire, there’s no little candle, there’s no spark. And there’s a lot of people looking for it.”

______________---------------------------

OK Motherfuckers


Let's help OUR president do the best for the country

.

Wtf OP? Are you writing for the blind, or for somebody reading from across the street? What's the deal with the 167 point type?

That said, wonderful answer to a question that nobody asked. Keep up the good work. In a normal sized font, K?
:( sadly, I could actually read his post, without having to put my reading glasses on...it stinks, getting older with all the negative side effects that go hand in hand....

My eyes are pretty bad but with that one I had to get in the car and drive to the next county to read it. It's like living on a freaking billboard.
 
Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion

FROM MSNBC POLITICS shows to town hall meetings across the country, the overarching issue for the Democratic Party’s base since Trump’s victory has been Russia, often suffocating attention for other issues. This fixation has persisted even though it has no chance to sink the Trump presidency unless it is proven that high levels of the Trump campaign actively colluded with the Kremlin to manipulate the outcome of the U.S. election — a claim for which absolutely no evidence has thus far been presented.

The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies — just as right-wing media polemicists did after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected — that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence. And they are all waiting for the day, which they regard as inevitable and imminent, when this theory will be proven and Trump will be removed.

The latest official to throw cold water on the MSNBC-led circus is President Obama’s former acting CIA chief Michael Morell. What makes him particularly notable in this context is that Morell was one of Clinton’s most vocal CIA surrogates. In August, he not only endorsed Clinton in the pages of the New York Times but also became the first high official to explicitly accuse Trump of disloyalty, claiming, “In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.”

But on Wednesday night, Morell appeared at an intelligence community forum to “cast doubt” on “allegations that members of the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.” “On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire at all,” he said, adding, “There’s no little campfire, there’s no little candle, there’s no spark. And there’s a lot of people looking for it.”

______________---------------------------

OK Motherfuckers

Let's help OUR president do the best for the country

.


.

So, Trump makes stuff up, you love it. Democrats do it and you insult them. Hmmm...
 
Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion

FROM MSNBC POLITICS shows to town hall meetings across the country, the overarching issue for the Democratic Party’s base since Trump’s victory has been Russia, often suffocating attention for other issues. This fixation has persisted even though it has no chance to sink the Trump presidency unless it is proven that high levels of the Trump campaign actively colluded with the Kremlin to manipulate the outcome of the U.S. election — a claim for which absolutely no evidence has thus far been presented.

The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies — just as right-wing media polemicists did after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected — that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence. And they are all waiting for the day, which they regard as inevitable and imminent, when this theory will be proven and Trump will be removed.

The latest official to throw cold water on the MSNBC-led circus is President Obama’s former acting CIA chief Michael Morell. What makes him particularly notable in this context is that Morell was one of Clinton’s most vocal CIA surrogates. In August, he not only endorsed Clinton in the pages of the New York Times but also became the first high official to explicitly accuse Trump of disloyalty, claiming, “In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.”

But on Wednesday night, Morell appeared at an intelligence community forum to “cast doubt” on “allegations that members of the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.” “On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire at all,” he said, adding, “There’s no little campfire, there’s no little candle, there’s no spark. And there’s a lot of people looking for it.”

______________---------------------------

OK Motherfuckers

Let's help OUR president do the best for the country

.


.

So, Trump makes stuff up, you love it. Democrats do it and you insult them. Hmmm...
Really? What did Democrats make up?
 
Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion

FROM MSNBC POLITICS shows to town hall meetings across the country, the overarching issue for the Democratic Party’s base since Trump’s victory has been Russia, often suffocating attention for other issues. This fixation has persisted even though it has no chance to sink the Trump presidency unless it is proven that high levels of the Trump campaign actively colluded with the Kremlin to manipulate the outcome of the U.S. election — a claim for which absolutely no evidence has thus far been presented.

The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies — just as right-wing media polemicists did after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected — that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence. And they are all waiting for the day, which they regard as inevitable and imminent, when this theory will be proven and Trump will be removed.

The latest official to throw cold water on the MSNBC-led circus is President Obama’s former acting CIA chief Michael Morell. What makes him particularly notable in this context is that Morell was one of Clinton’s most vocal CIA surrogates. In August, he not only endorsed Clinton in the pages of the New York Times but also became the first high official to explicitly accuse Trump of disloyalty, claiming, “In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.”

But on Wednesday night, Morell appeared at an intelligence community forum to “cast doubt” on “allegations that members of the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.” “On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire at all,” he said, adding, “There’s no little campfire, there’s no little candle, there’s no spark. And there’s a lot of people looking for it.”

______________---------------------------

OK Motherfuckers

Let's help OUR president do the best for the country

.


.

So, Trump makes stuff up, you love it. Democrats do it and you insult them. Hmmm...
Really? What did Democrats make up?

Wow, it's like high school...... sorry, I don't play silly games.
 
We don't need an announcement. As I said we can say they didn't collude as long as you make everyone believe Page, Carter, Manafort, Sessions and Stone do not exist.

Don't forget Flynn. The Flynn shit keeps getting deeper and deeper.
Did Flynn run guns to cartel leaders and terrorists?
No, but he is still a criminal...I heard on the news tonight that he broke the law by not reporting getting paid by the Russians for his Moscow visit....as an ex General...by law, it's against the law for him to receive money from govts or govt intermediaries, unless he reported it to the Army and got permission by them for the exception...but DID NOT follow the law on that.....
You "heard on the news"? Where, CNN, NBC, PBS? Got a link? You know they don't always tell the truth, right? In fact, they RARELY tell the truth.
 
Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion

FROM MSNBC POLITICS shows to town hall meetings across the country, the overarching issue for the Democratic Party’s base since Trump’s victory has been Russia, often suffocating attention for other issues. This fixation has persisted even though it has no chance to sink the Trump presidency unless it is proven that high levels of the Trump campaign actively colluded with the Kremlin to manipulate the outcome of the U.S. election — a claim for which absolutely no evidence has thus far been presented.

The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies — just as right-wing media polemicists did after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected — that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence. And they are all waiting for the day, which they regard as inevitable and imminent, when this theory will be proven and Trump will be removed.

The latest official to throw cold water on the MSNBC-led circus is President Obama’s former acting CIA chief Michael Morell. What makes him particularly notable in this context is that Morell was one of Clinton’s most vocal CIA surrogates. In August, he not only endorsed Clinton in the pages of the New York Times but also became the first high official to explicitly accuse Trump of disloyalty, claiming, “In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.”

But on Wednesday night, Morell appeared at an intelligence community forum to “cast doubt” on “allegations that members of the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.” “On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire at all,” he said, adding, “There’s no little campfire, there’s no little candle, there’s no spark. And there’s a lot of people looking for it.”

______________---------------------------

OK Motherfuckers

Let's help OUR president do the best for the country

.


.



John McCain appears to have a different opinion on this.



So where are we so far:

CLEVELAND during the RNC Convention: July 2016 Trump advisers admit to meeting with Russian ambassador (after Jeff Sessions was accused of lying under oath to congress.)
USA Today. Gordon had advocated for language in the GOP platform that the Ukrainians not be armed in their battle against pro-Russian separatists, an effort was ultimately successful. But Gordon says he was simply advocating what Trump himself had expressed -- that he did not wish to see major war break out over the situation in Ukraine.
More Trump advisers disclose meeting with Russia's ambassador - CNNPolitics.com

We know that the Trump administration (5 times) denied any contact with Russians during the campaign season.
Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia

We know that Russian phone lines were tapped and out comes this information.



Jeff Sessions accused of lying under oath during his confirmation hearing. According to a source it's not unusual for member on the armed service committee to meet with Foreign ambassadors, but none of the other 13 on this committee had met with the Russian ambassador, only Sessions did twice during the campaign season.Sessions also filled out a questionaire prior to the confirmation hearing and stated that he had no contact with any Russians and signed it. Sessions then recuses himself from the Russian investigation.
Sessions recuses himself from Russia investigations - CNNPolitics.com

confirmation hearing what he would do if there was evidence anyone associated with Donald Trump’s presidential campaign had communicated with the Russians, Sessions replied that he wasn’t aware of any such “activities,” and added, “I did not have communications with the Russians.” A questionnaire he filled out for the committee also asked whether he had had contact with the Russians, to which Sessions, according to the Post, wrote, “No.”
Jeff Sessions spoke twice with Russian envoy during presidential campaign: Department of Justice

General Flynn also lied to the FBI. Stating he did not have a conversation with the Russian Ambassador regarding the new sanctions that Obama was imposing on Russia for hacking into the election. Obviously the conversation was wiretapped. Flynn gone.Over this weekend we learned that General Flynn is & has been a paid lobbyist for Turkey.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/20/world/europe/turkey-flynn-erdogan-gulen.html?_r=0
Flynn reportedly lied to FBI about sanctions talk with Russian envoy

We know that Obama ordered this investigation to be done BEFORE he left office, and that he had "preserved intelligence."

The New York times, citing former American officials, reported that these officials were concerned that the information they were gaining on the Russian meddling in the election and the possible campaign contact could be compromised with the new administration, and they wanted to set up any future investigation with the information. According to The Times, after Obama asked for an investigation into Russian tampering into the elections, officials found some "damning" evidence.
Obama administration reportedly raced to preserve intelligence on possible contact between Russians and Trump associates

Roger Stone a long time friend of Trump's and Senior campaign adviser admits to having contact with the Russian hacker of DNC databases.

Roger Stone, the flamboyant political adviser who has been connected to President Donald Trump for years, is defending his contacts with "Guccifer 2.0"-- the online persona who claims responsibility for hacking the Democratic National Committee -- as an innocuous "brief exchange" of a few direct messages that he says amount to nothing.
Trump associate plays down Twitter contact with Guccifer 2.0 - CNNPolitics.com

When people are continually lying, it's usually because they're trying to hide something.

Every week or less another shoe drops on this administration.
 
Last edited:
Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion

FROM MSNBC POLITICS shows to town hall meetings across the country, the overarching issue for the Democratic Party’s base since Trump’s victory has been Russia, often suffocating attention for other issues. This fixation has persisted even though it has no chance to sink the Trump presidency unless it is proven that high levels of the Trump campaign actively colluded with the Kremlin to manipulate the outcome of the U.S. election — a claim for which absolutely no evidence has thus far been presented.

The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies — just as right-wing media polemicists did after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected — that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence. And they are all waiting for the day, which they regard as inevitable and imminent, when this theory will be proven and Trump will be removed.

The latest official to throw cold water on the MSNBC-led circus is President Obama’s former acting CIA chief Michael Morell. What makes him particularly notable in this context is that Morell was one of Clinton’s most vocal CIA surrogates. In August, he not only endorsed Clinton in the pages of the New York Times but also became the first high official to explicitly accuse Trump of disloyalty, claiming, “In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.”

But on Wednesday night, Morell appeared at an intelligence community forum to “cast doubt” on “allegations that members of the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.” “On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire at all,” he said, adding, “There’s no little campfire, there’s no little candle, there’s no spark. And there’s a lot of people looking for it.”

______________---------------------------

OK Motherfuckers

Let's help OUR president do the best for the country

.


.



John McCain appears to have a different opinion on this.



So where are we so far:

CLEVELAND during the RNC Convention: July 2016 Trump advisers admit to meeting with Russian ambassador (after Jeff Sessions was accused of lying under oath to congress.)
USA Today. Gordon had advocated for language in the GOP platform that the Ukrainians not be armed in their battle against pro-Russian separatists, an effort was ultimately successful. But Gordon says he was simply advocating what Trump himself had expressed -- that he did not wish to see major war break out over the situation in Ukraine.
More Trump advisers disclose meeting with Russia's ambassador - CNNPolitics.com

We know that the Trump administration (5 times) denied any contact with Russians during the campaign season.
Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia

We know that Russian phone lines were tapped and out comes this information.



Jeff Sessions accused of lying under oath during his confirmation hearing. According to a source it's not unusual for member on the armed service committee to meet with Foreign ambassadors, but none of the other 13 on this committee had met with the Russian ambassador, only Sessions did twice during the campaign season.Sessions also filled out a questionaire prior to the confirmation hearing and stated that he had no contact with any Russians and signed it. Sessions then recuses himself from the Russian investigation.
Sessions recuses himself from Russia investigations - CNNPolitics.com

confirmation hearing what he would do if there was evidence anyone associated with Donald Trump’s presidential campaign had communicated with the Russians, Sessions replied that he wasn’t aware of any such “activities,” and added, “I did not have communications with the Russians.” A questionnaire he filled out for the committee also asked whether he had had contact with the Russians, to which Sessions, according to the Post, wrote, “No.”
Jeff Sessions spoke twice with Russian envoy during presidential campaign: Department of Justice

General Flynn also lied to the FBI. Stating he did not have a conversation with the Russian Ambassador regarding the new sanctions that Obama was imposing on Russia for hacking into the election. Obviously the conversation was wiretapped. Flynn gone.Over this weekend we learned that General Flynn is & has been a paid lobbyist for Turkey.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/20/world/europe/turkey-flynn-erdogan-gulen.html?_r=0
Flynn reportedly lied to FBI about sanctions talk with Russian envoy

We know that Obama ordered this investigation to be done BEFORE he left office, and that he had "preserved intelligence."

The New York times, citing former American officials, reported that these officials were concerned that the information they were gaining on the Russian meddling in the election and the possible campaign contact could be compromised with the new administration, and they wanted to set up any future investigation with the information. According to The Times, after Obama asked for an investigation into Russian tampering into the elections, officials found some "damning" evidence.
Obama administration reportedly raced to preserve intelligence on possible contact between Russians and Trump associates

Roger Stone a long time friend of Trump's and Senior campaign adviser admits to having contact with the Russian hacker of DNC databases.

Roger Stone, the flamboyant political adviser who has been connected to President Donald Trump for years, is defending his contacts with "Guccifer 2.0"-- the online persona who claims responsibility for hacking the Democratic National Committee -- as an innocuous "brief exchange" of a few direct messages that he says amount to nothing.
Trump associate plays down Twitter contact with Guccifer 2.0 - CNNPolitics.com

When people are continually lying, it's usually because they're trying to hide something.

Every week or less another shoe drops on this administration.

Ah, John McCain, the lefts most beloved back stabber. Whenever they need a Republican turncoat, he's the go to guy. Watch how much his eyes blink when he talks, a dead giveaway of a dishonest person. He's a piece of shit, and the Republicans should run him out of their party. Force the SOB to run as a damn Democrat where he would feel more at home. Fuck that guy.
 
It's weird how things to some people come immediately truer when they're said by someone high ranking in title, though not necessarily, generally in intelligence.

A man eating all his words for no evidence - hence you remember there has not been evidence that there was no connection between Russia and Trump either - does not speak about enlightenment but stinks of fear. What a coward.:eusa_snooty:
 
It's weird how things to some people come immediately truer when they're said by someone high ranking in title, though not necessarily, generally in intelligence.

A man eating all his words for no evidence - hence you remember there has not been evidence that there was no connection between Russia and Trump either - does not speak about enlightenment but stinks of fear. What a coward.:eusa_snooty:
There was no evidence of collusion. If talking to a diplomat equals collusion, we'd better start handing out the indictments of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and a whole host of other Democrats as well as Republicans. If somebody has evidence of collusion, let's see it.
 
It's weird how things to some people come immediately truer when they're said by someone high ranking in title, though not necessarily, generally in intelligence.

A man eating all his words for no evidence - hence you remember there has not been evidence that there was no connection between Russia and Trump either - does not speak about enlightenment but stinks of fear. What a coward.:eusa_snooty:
There was no evidence of collusion. If talking to a diplomat equals collusion, we'd better start handing out the indictments of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and a whole host of other Democrats as well as Republicans. If somebody has evidence of collusion, let's see it.
The unfortunate thing for people in the same line with you, is that now the accusation and demand for evidence is in the air, the minds of the people on the other side actually require evidence against the fact that there was a collusion. What I was trying to say was that there is no evidence the opposite way either which is why the subject cannot be dropped.
 
And what is about to be demanded is a lot of charges against people who support and are in the dimocrat party for espionage, and conspiracy. It does not matter that there is complete and irrefutable proof that Trump's people had no conversation with ANY Russian that involved any hacking, it has now become, "THEY talked to a Russian about a dog so they are guilty" even if they just said hello that means they talked to a Russian!!!!" No matter what they said even if it WAS nothing but talking about their grandchildren they talked to a Russian!!!" Just like with Sessions, it is just a bunch of lying twists to stop the REAL investigation into their TREASONOUS activities, but it is not going to work because we are going to flood the congressional offices with demands that the oshit team and all of the people he has in government be removed investigated and punished for their CRIMES.
 
It's weird how things to some people come immediately truer when they're said by someone high ranking in title, though not necessarily, generally in intelligence.

A man eating all his words for no evidence - hence you remember there has not been evidence that there was no connection between Russia and Trump either - does not speak about enlightenment but stinks of fear. What a coward.:eusa_snooty:
There was no evidence of collusion. If talking to a diplomat equals collusion, we'd better start handing out the indictments of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and a whole host of other Democrats as well as Republicans. If somebody has evidence of collusion, let's see it.
The unfortunate thing for people in the same line with you, is that now the accusation and demand for evidence is in the air, the minds of the people on the other side actually require evidence against the fact that there was a collusion. What I was trying to say was that there is no evidence the opposite way either which is why the subject cannot be dropped.
It will never be dropped by the left, just as "Bush stole the 2000 election" will never be dropped, even though the facts prove the claim to be false.
 
It's weird how things to some people come immediately truer when they're said by someone high ranking in title, though not necessarily, generally in intelligence.

A man eating all his words for no evidence - hence you remember there has not been evidence that there was no connection between Russia and Trump either - does not speak about enlightenment but stinks of fear. What a coward.:eusa_snooty:
There was no evidence of collusion. If talking to a diplomat equals collusion, we'd better start handing out the indictments of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and a whole host of other Democrats as well as Republicans. If somebody has evidence of collusion, let's see it.
The unfortunate thing for people in the same line with you, is that now the accusation and demand for evidence is in the air, the minds of the people on the other side actually require evidence against the fact that there was a collusion. What I was trying to say was that there is no evidence the opposite way either which is why the subject cannot be dropped.
It will never be dropped by the left, just as "Bush stole the 2000 election" will never be dropped, even though the facts prove the claim to be false.
Nobody cares about facts. It's the truth they're after. Facts can be altered, truth can't.
 
And what is about to be demanded is a lot of charges against people who support and are in the dimocrat party for espionage, and conspiracy. It does not matter that there is complete and irrefutable proof that Trump's people had no conversation with ANY Russian that involved any hacking, it has now become, "THEY talked to a Russian about a dog so they are guilty" even if they just said hello that means they talked to a Russian!!!!" No matter what they said even if it WAS nothing but talking about their grandchildren they talked to a Russian!!!" Just like with Sessions, it is just a bunch of lying twists to stop the REAL investigation into their TREASONOUS activities, but it is not going to work because we are going to flood the congressional offices with demands that the oshit team and all of the people he has in government be removed investigated and punished for their CRIMES.
Use spacing or few will finish reading that.

There can be no proof that it didn't happen. Too complicated, too many people. No evidence Trump didn't enslave himself at Putin's feet.

He's so old and he's dying in a few decades and he still has left no mark onto the world. Long ago he sold his soul in order to imagine he will be rewarded somehow. But a narcissist never rewards his flying monkeys. He throws them away when they are no longer useful and exposes himself to them out of sadistic desire to see them suffer.
 
It's been stated repeatedly by people in law enforcement, the intelligence community and both sides of the aisle that Trump wasn't wiretapped. Therefore, if Trump or his people are on tape, it's because they WERE talking to the Russians. What were they saying and why is it so embarrassing that Trump had to throw up an "Obama did it" smokescreen?
The NSA does NOT need a warrant to spy on trump. The Obama Administration could have delegated the Task to GCHQ thereby allowing federal agents to truthfully testify that they were not involved in the spying. Be that as it may, the fact is that their spying did not reveal any evidence of collusion. Otherwise former CIA chief Michael Morell would have released those transcripts to the media. He is ADMITTING that the evidence DOES NOT EXIST. Let's them move on and make America great again.
I'm sick of this pro-Russian propaganda. America is great right now, conrade!
 

Forum List

Back
Top