Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
total bull crud!Uh-oh...turns out that Hitlery created the entire "Russia stole the election for Trump" FAKE NEWS because her fragile little ego couldn't handle defeat. Like all left-wing snowflakes with a maniacal thirst for power, she felt entitled to the White House.
'Shattered' Revelation: Clinton Campaign Hatched Russian Hacking Narrative 24 Hours After Hillary's Loss
Because Hitlery Clinton and her husband Slick Willy couldn't possibly have the power, connections, and clout to get an investigation started.total bull crud!Uh-oh...turns out that Hitlery created the entire "Russia stole the election for Trump" FAKE NEWS because her fragile little ego couldn't handle defeat. Like all left-wing snowflakes with a maniacal thirst for power, she felt entitled to the White House.
'Shattered' Revelation: Clinton Campaign Hatched Russian Hacking Narrative 24 Hours After Hillary's Loss
While that is a compelling argument, it's from inside her own camp. Oops...total bull crud!
Uh-oh...turns out that Hitlery created the entire "Russia stole the election for Trump" FAKE NEWS because her fragile little ego couldn't handle defeat. Like all left-wing snowflakes with a maniacal thirst for power, she felt entitled to the White House.
'Shattered' Revelation: Clinton Campaign Hatched Russian Hacking Narrative 24 Hours After Hillary's Loss
so says the author,While that is a compelling argument, it's from inside her own camp. Oops...total bull crud!
That's funny - you spent the last 8 years proclaiming that evidence doesn't exist unless there is a conviction. You said it dozens and dozens of times. So.....where is the conviction?There is irrefutable evidence that Russia hacked the DNC
That's funny - you spent the last 8 years proclaiming that evidence doesn't exist unless there is a conviction. You said it dozens and dozens of times. So.....where is the conviction?There is irrefutable evidence that Trump used this information
Snowflake...meeting with Russia is not a crime. If it were, the entire Dumbocrat Party would be in prison right now.There is irrefutable evidence that Trump advisors met with the Russians while this was going on
Why would you insist on wasting tax payer dollars to investigate that which is not illegal? No matter what the "context" of the meetings were - it is not illegal to meet with Russia.There is irrefutable evidence that Trump advisors met with the Russians while this was going on
Until we know the context of these meetings, we need to keep investigating
Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion
FROM MSNBC POLITICS shows to town hall meetings across the country, the overarching issue for the Democratic Party’s base since Trump’s victory has been Russia, often suffocating attention for other issues. This fixation has persisted even though it has no chance to sink the Trump presidency unless it is proven that high levels of the Trump campaign actively colluded with the Kremlin to manipulate the outcome of the U.S. election — a claim for which absolutely no evidence has thus far been presented.
The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies — just as right-wing media polemicists did after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected — that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence. And they are all waiting for the day, which they regard as inevitable and imminent, when this theory will be proven and Trump will be removed.
The latest official to throw cold water on the MSNBC-led circus is President Obama’s former acting CIA chief Michael Morell. What makes him particularly notable in this context is that Morell was one of Clinton’s most vocal CIA surrogates. In August, he not only endorsed Clinton in the pages of the New York Times but also became the first high official to explicitly accuse Trump of disloyalty, claiming, “In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.”
But on Wednesday night, Morell appeared at an intelligence community forum to “cast doubt” on “allegations that members of the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.” “On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire at all,” he said, adding, “There’s no little campfire, there’s no little candle, there’s no spark. And there’s a lot of people looking for it.”
______________---------------------------
OK Motherfuckers
Let's help OUR president do the best for the country
.
.
BULLSHIT!!!!! THE INVESTIGATIONS ARE ONGOING!!!!!
No there isn't, and that makes the rest of your comments wrong as well.There is irrefutable evidence that Russia hacked the DNC
There is irrefutable evidence that Trump used this information
There is irrefutable evidence that Trump advisors met with the Russians while this was going on
Until we know the context of these meetings, we need to keep investigating
Let the grand jury decide if their is sufficient evidenceThat's funny - you spent the last 8 years proclaiming that evidence doesn't exist unless there is a conviction. You said it dozens and dozens of times. So.....where is the conviction?There is irrefutable evidence that Russia hacked the DNC
WikiLeaks was the publisher of the DNC "dump" and they adamantly denied that Russia was involved. They said the materials came from inside of the DNC camp.
In addition to that, Barack Obama adamantly stated that Russia was not our enemy, was of no concern to us, and mocked Mitt Romney for stating that Russia was our greatest geopolitical threat. Now you want to agree with Romney after Obama is no longer in office? How convenient for you.
If there were "irrefutable evidence" then there would be some convictions. So either there is no evidence at all or it's not "irrefutable".
Even Trump acknowledges they were hacked. You need to catch up on the latest GOP liesNo there isn't, and that makes the rest of your comments wrong as well.There is irrefutable evidence that Russia hacked the DNC
There is irrefutable evidence that Trump used this information
There is irrefutable evidence that Trump advisors met with the Russians while this was going on
Until we know the context of these meetings, we need to keep investigating
Treason is still illegalWhy would you insist on wasting tax payer dollars to investigate that which is not illegal? No matter what the "context" of the meetings were - it is not illegal to meet with Russia.There is irrefutable evidence that Trump advisors met with the Russians while this was going on
Until we know the context of these meetings, we need to keep investigating
Yet Hillary Clinton will never be prosecutedTreason is still illegalWhy would you insist on wasting tax payer dollars to investigate that which is not illegal? No matter what the "context" of the meetings were - it is not illegal to meet with Russia.There is irrefutable evidence that Trump advisors met with the Russians while this was going on
Until we know the context of these meetings, we need to keep investigating
