Dems floor tantrum used for campaigning is an ethics violation

Clementine

Platinum Member
Dec 18, 2011
12,919
4,825
350
Of course, they'll think it's unfair and will probably accuse the right of picking on them. Fact is that the sit-in turned into a campaign fundraiser and official resources were used, which is clearly a violation. Why does this group think they are above the law?

It's bad enough that they were throwing tantrums because their stupid bill went against the constitution and had no chance of passing. Law means nothing to these big babies.

"A conservative-leaning ethics watchdog group filed an ethics complaint on Monday against House Democrats who participated in last week’s sit-in to push for votes on gun legislation.

The Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust filed a complaint with the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) calling for an investigation into multiple Democrats

The group pointed to fundraising emails from House Democrats’ campaign arm, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) soliciting campaign donations during the sit-in. The email signed by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) implored supporters: "The Republicans refuse to lift a finger. It’s shameful. I need your help to defeat them once and for all."

Another email sent by Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) asked supporters to sign a petition in support of the sit-in and included a photo of the House floor.

House ethics rules state that lawmakers cannot use official resources — including locations in the Capitol complex — for campaign or political activities. Campaign ads, for instance, cannot be filmed or photographed in congressional offices.


"Not only do these email solicitations tied directly to official acts reflect poorly on the House of Representatives, the emails are directly contrary to the purposes and prohibitions of the Ethics Rules," Matthew Whitaker, the group’s executive director, wrote."

http://www.youngcons.com/watchdog-group-files-ethics-complaint-against-democrats-for-tantrum-on-house-floor/
 
That was really dumb.

The 94.5 votes to repeal ACA is propaganda as well and no more effetive.
 
pn8A7a1.jpg
 
That was really dumb.

The 94.5 votes to repeal ACA is propaganda as well and no more effetive.

ACA should be repealed because it's unconstitutional to force people to participate in commerce. Obama had to claim it wasn't a tax to explain why it didn't need to originate in the House, but had to claim it was a tax to have it upheld in the Supreme Court. Both lies must stand in order for it to be legal. Congress, the president, the IRS and unions wanted exempt. The people who wrote it, pushed it and shoved it through illegally know it's a piece of shit and they don't want anything to do with it.

Obama should repeal it since it's turning into a bigger disaster by the day.

You still don't get it. The bill the Dems tried to pass was unconstitutional and never should have passed. To have a tantrum because you weren't allowed to break the law is just plain fucking stupid. Then they broke more laws by using official resources to turn the sit-in into a fund raiser. Have they no shame?

It wasn't just arguing over a bill. They wanted everyone to ignore the constitution and allow government to take away rights without due process. They should lose their jobs over that shit.
 
What about the previous oil tantrum by Republicans...?

Republicans Sat In For Oil. Democrats Are Sitting In For Gun Control.


The Dems were sitting in for something that was unconstitutional. I don't expect idiots to get that.

You apparently don't know jack shit about the Constitution. Both were sit-ins on the floor of the House.

It doesn't matter where the sit-ins were, nimrod. What made it illegal when Dems did it was turning it into a fund raiser. There were pics online on fund raising sites and they used other official sources in the building, which is not allowed for any campaigning. Pay attention.
 
What about the previous oil tantrum by Republicans...?

Republicans Sat In For Oil. Democrats Are Sitting In For Gun Control.


The Dems were sitting in for something that was unconstitutional. I don't expect idiots to get that.

You apparently don't know jack shit about the Constitution. Both were sit-ins on the floor of the House.

It doesn't matter where the sit-ins were, nimrod. What made it illegal when Dems did it was turning it into a fund raiser. There were pics online on fund raising sites and they used other official sources in the building, which is not allowed for any campaigning. Pay attention.

Funny. Republicans also did fund raising based on their oil sit-in. It's legal.
 
One, ACA is constitutional: all rants against it are merely wrong and uninformed.

Two, no one is trying to take away your guns, Vigilante. However, you have no need for a recoiless rifle.

Three, fund raising is not illegal.

Constitutional?...because Roberts CHANGED it to a TAX which UNDER THE CONSTITUTION he is NOT ALLOWED to do!

Recoiless rifles are perfectly fine if not an AUTOMATIC, or for your dumb ass, an ASSAULT RIFLE!

No, fund raising is not illegal, just BOTTOM OF THE BARREL stuff we would expect from your party! Fund raise ON THE DEAD...didn't happen with OIL, assholes!

Didn't you put up your new avatar?

GETAdsm.gif
 
Democrats act like school kids protesting cafeteria food when real Americans are getting ready to go to work. Typical crybaby liberals. Hillary would have joined them but there was a danger she might sit on them with her big fat ass and crush them to death.
 

Forum List

Back
Top