Did Trump Really Say He Wanted To Protect Women From Sexual Assault? And those sniffles - wtf?

Did Trump Really Say He Wanted To Protect Women From Sexual Assault

  • Oh my gosh! Yes he did

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • Pussy Grabbing Braggart did. Yes

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • He was only joking

    Votes: 1 100.0%

  • Total voters
    1
Sorry, but it has to be shared. Does this man have any shame at all?


If you watched the address — and really, you could have, it was only about as long as it takes to microwave popcorn — you saw a 72-year-old guy squinting at the teleprompter and making rather alarming breathing sounds while reading a speech about how we need a wall to protect women who are “sexually assaulted on the dangerous trek up through Mexico.”

This is not a man who should wrap his arguments around the idea of protecting women from sexual assault. But also, gee, he sounded like Uncle Fred who you haven’t seen for a while and suddenly he shows up for Thanksgiving with weird colored hair and vacant eyes and he’s talking into his mashed potatoes.


p Opinion | Trump Hits the Wall


Do you care about the safety of the women who are lured into making that dangerous trek?

Me, I care about (a) the safety of the women who are lured into Rump in a vacant room, and (b) the level of ignorance in an ignoramus who is just now, after four years, finding out that it's not wall-jumpers who are doing the raping, any more than it's Syrian refugees who are doing the terrorizing.

Actually we're not sure he's caught up with the second one yet. Are we.

But if we ever have a call for a blame-the-victim expert, he's gotta be first-call.


Are you claiming that the stat isn't true, or are you simply mad about Trump?

What "stat" is that? :dunno:


The stat we're discussing in this thread you dishonest little twerp.
 
Sorry, but it has to be shared. Does this man have any shame at all?


If you watched the address — and really, you could have, it was only about as long as it takes to microwave popcorn — you saw a 72-year-old guy squinting at the teleprompter and making rather alarming breathing sounds while reading a speech about how we need a wall to protect women who are “sexually assaulted on the dangerous trek up through Mexico.”

This is not a man who should wrap his arguments around the idea of protecting women from sexual assault. But also, gee, he sounded like Uncle Fred who you haven’t seen for a while and suddenly he shows up for Thanksgiving with weird colored hair and vacant eyes and he’s talking into his mashed potatoes.


p Opinion | Trump Hits the Wall


Do you care about the safety of the women who are lured into making that dangerous trek?

The answer is obviously no. Liberals don't care about people at all.

They care about POWER.

This is easily illustrated.

Illegal immigration hurts poor MINORITIES and helps rich white people. Those are indisputable facts. Poor minorities are negatively affected the most by illegal immigration and rich white people benefit the most from it.

And everyone knows this is true.

Democrats do not care about poor minorities.

Leaving aside blanket personality generalizations, where did anybody bring up political parties at all?
 
Sorry, but it has to be shared. Does this man have any shame at all?


If you watched the address — and really, you could have, it was only about as long as it takes to microwave popcorn — you saw a 72-year-old guy squinting at the teleprompter and making rather alarming breathing sounds while reading a speech about how we need a wall to protect women who are “sexually assaulted on the dangerous trek up through Mexico.”

This is not a man who should wrap his arguments around the idea of protecting women from sexual assault. But also, gee, he sounded like Uncle Fred who you haven’t seen for a while and suddenly he shows up for Thanksgiving with weird colored hair and vacant eyes and he’s talking into his mashed potatoes.


p Opinion | Trump Hits the Wall


Do you care about the safety of the women who are lured into making that dangerous trek?

Me, I care about (a) the safety of the women who are lured into Rump in a vacant room, and (b) the level of ignorance in an ignoramus who is just now, after four years, finding out that it's not wall-jumpers who are doing the raping, any more than it's Syrian refugees who are doing the terrorizing.

Actually we're not sure he's caught up with the second one yet. Are we.

But if we ever have a call for a blame-the-victim expert, he's gotta be first-call.


Are you claiming that the stat isn't true, or are you simply mad about Trump?

What "stat" is that? :dunno:


The stat we're discussing in this thread you dishonest little twerp.

First he hallucinates political parties, now it's on to "stats". Neither of which tend to exist.

OK, so you don't know what you're talking about. The thing to do in that instance is not post. BUH bye now.
 
Sorry, but it has to be shared. Does this man have any shame at all?


If you watched the address — and really, you could have, it was only about as long as it takes to microwave popcorn — you saw a 72-year-old guy squinting at the teleprompter and making rather alarming breathing sounds while reading a speech about how we need a wall to protect women who are “sexually assaulted on the dangerous trek up through Mexico.”

This is not a man who should wrap his arguments around the idea of protecting women from sexual assault. But also, gee, he sounded like Uncle Fred who you haven’t seen for a while and suddenly he shows up for Thanksgiving with weird colored hair and vacant eyes and he’s talking into his mashed potatoes.


p Opinion | Trump Hits the Wall


Do you care about the safety of the women who are lured into making that dangerous trek?

Me, I care about (a) the safety of the women who are lured into Rump in a vacant room, and (b) the level of ignorance in an ignoramus who is just now, after four years, finding out that it's not wall-jumpers who are doing the raping, any more than it's Syrian refugees who are doing the terrorizing.

Actually we're not sure he's caught up with the second one yet. Are we.

But if we ever have a call for a blame-the-victim expert, he's gotta be first-call.



1. Trump was tall, very rich and famous. He was a player, not an assaulter. YOur fears are groundless.

2. Who do you think are doing the raping, and why does that make it ok?
 
Sorry, but it has to be shared. Does this man have any shame at all?


If you watched the address — and really, you could have, it was only about as long as it takes to microwave popcorn — you saw a 72-year-old guy squinting at the teleprompter and making rather alarming breathing sounds while reading a speech about how we need a wall to protect women who are “sexually assaulted on the dangerous trek up through Mexico.”

This is not a man who should wrap his arguments around the idea of protecting women from sexual assault. But also, gee, he sounded like Uncle Fred who you haven’t seen for a while and suddenly he shows up for Thanksgiving with weird colored hair and vacant eyes and he’s talking into his mashed potatoes.


p Opinion | Trump Hits the Wall


Do you care about the safety of the women who are lured into making that dangerous trek?

Me, I care about (a) the safety of the women who are lured into Rump in a vacant room, and (b) the level of ignorance in an ignoramus who is just now, after four years, finding out that it's not wall-jumpers who are doing the raping, any more than it's Syrian refugees who are doing the terrorizing.

Actually we're not sure he's caught up with the second one yet. Are we.

But if we ever have a call for a blame-the-victim expert, he's gotta be first-call.



1. Trump was tall, very rich and famous. He was a player, not an assaulter. YOur fears are groundless.

2. Who do you think are doing the raping, and why does that make it ok?

Who do you think is doing the leaping, and how does that make it legitimate argument?

Oh and "tall" huh? So now we're down to "I'm bigger than you so it's OK?"
 
Sorry, but it has to be shared. Does this man have any shame at all?


If you watched the address — and really, you could have, it was only about as long as it takes to microwave popcorn — you saw a 72-year-old guy squinting at the teleprompter and making rather alarming breathing sounds while reading a speech about how we need a wall to protect women who are “sexually assaulted on the dangerous trek up through Mexico.”

This is not a man who should wrap his arguments around the idea of protecting women from sexual assault. But also, gee, he sounded like Uncle Fred who you haven’t seen for a while and suddenly he shows up for Thanksgiving with weird colored hair and vacant eyes and he’s talking into his mashed potatoes.


p Opinion | Trump Hits the Wall


Do you care about the safety of the women who are lured into making that dangerous trek?

Me, I care about (a) the safety of the women who are lured into Rump in a vacant room, and (b) the level of ignorance in an ignoramus who is just now, after four years, finding out that it's not wall-jumpers who are doing the raping, any more than it's Syrian refugees who are doing the terrorizing.

Actually we're not sure he's caught up with the second one yet. Are we.

But if we ever have a call for a blame-the-victim expert, he's gotta be first-call.



1. Trump was tall, very rich and famous. He was a player, not an assaulter. YOur fears are groundless.

2. Who do you think are doing the raping, and why does that make it ok?

Who do you think is doing the leaping, and how does that make it legitimate argument?

Oh and "tall" huh? So now we're down to "I'm bigger than you so it's OK?"


1. I think the coyotes, ie Mexicans, and their fellow illegals are doing the raping. And it is a legit argument, because we want to stop that by closing the route.

2. Are you seriously pretending to not know that women find tall, rich, and famous attractive?
 
Sorry, but it has to be shared. Does this man have any shame at all?


If you watched the address — and really, you could have, it was only about as long as it takes to microwave popcorn — you saw a 72-year-old guy squinting at the teleprompter and making rather alarming breathing sounds while reading a speech about how we need a wall to protect women who are “sexually assaulted on the dangerous trek up through Mexico.”

This is not a man who should wrap his arguments around the idea of protecting women from sexual assault. But also, gee, he sounded like Uncle Fred who you haven’t seen for a while and suddenly he shows up for Thanksgiving with weird colored hair and vacant eyes and he’s talking into his mashed potatoes.


p Opinion | Trump Hits the Wall


Do you care about the safety of the women who are lured into making that dangerous trek?

Me, I care about (a) the safety of the women who are lured into Rump in a vacant room, and (b) the level of ignorance in an ignoramus who is just now, after four years, finding out that it's not wall-jumpers who are doing the raping, any more than it's Syrian refugees who are doing the terrorizing.

Actually we're not sure he's caught up with the second one yet. Are we.

But if we ever have a call for a blame-the-victim expert, he's gotta be first-call.



1. Trump was tall, very rich and famous. He was a player, not an assaulter. YOur fears are groundless.

2. Who do you think are doing the raping, and why does that make it ok?

Who do you think is doing the leaping, and how does that make it legitimate argument?

Oh and "tall" huh? So now we're down to "I'm bigger than you so it's OK?"


1. I think the coyotes, ie Mexicans, and their fellow illegals are doing the raping. And it is a legit argument, because we want to stop that by closing the route.

2. Are you seriously pretending to not know that women find tall, rich, and famous attractive?

You don't reed reel gud do ya. "Leaping" refers to jumping to conclusions without evidence. It has nothing to do with "raping".

Never mind, because indeed you answered as to who's doing the leaping.
 
Do you care about the safety of the women who are lured into making that dangerous trek?

Me, I care about (a) the safety of the women who are lured into Rump in a vacant room, and (b) the level of ignorance in an ignoramus who is just now, after four years, finding out that it's not wall-jumpers who are doing the raping, any more than it's Syrian refugees who are doing the terrorizing.

Actually we're not sure he's caught up with the second one yet. Are we.

But if we ever have a call for a blame-the-victim expert, he's gotta be first-call.



1. Trump was tall, very rich and famous. He was a player, not an assaulter. YOur fears are groundless.

2. Who do you think are doing the raping, and why does that make it ok?

Who do you think is doing the leaping, and how does that make it legitimate argument?

Oh and "tall" huh? So now we're down to "I'm bigger than you so it's OK?"


1. I think the coyotes, ie Mexicans, and their fellow illegals are doing the raping. And it is a legit argument, because we want to stop that by closing the route.

2. Are you seriously pretending to not know that women find tall, rich, and famous attractive?

You don't reed reel gud do ya. "Leaping" refers to jumping to conclusions without evidence. It has nothing to do with "raping".

Never mind, because indeed you answered as to who's doing the leaping.


Dude. Your post made little sense and I made my best guess as to what you were trying to say, in the context of a response to my post.
 
Almost all men who like women would want to prevent a sexual assault upon them.
So you're saying men who voter for Trump can't possibly want to prevent a sexual assault upon women? It sounds like that is what you are saying. And if so, I believe it's something to think about
 
Trump’s sexcapades are consensual, even if he has to pay for it.
Clinton is a predator and your hero. What a hypocrite!
Uhm, Trump's so-called escapades -- his unwanted pussy grabbing on unsuspecting women -- going all the way back to the 1990s -- documented in a court filing -- was never consensual
 
Almost all men who like women would want to prevent a sexual assault upon them.
So you're saying men who voter for Trump can't possibly want to prevent a sexual assault upon women? It sounds like that is what you are saying. And if so, I believe it's something to think about



ANd the lib plays stupid, to twist what his enemy actually said.


When you do that, you admit that you know you cannot refute what he actually said.


You know you are in the wrong, and yet you choose to stay in the wrong and support policies that you know are wrong.
 
Sorry, but it has to be shared. Does this man have any shame at all?


If you watched the address — and really, you could have, it was only about as long as it takes to microwave popcorn — you saw a 72-year-old guy squinting at the teleprompter and making rather alarming breathing sounds while reading a speech about how we need a wall to protect women who are “sexually assaulted on the dangerous trek up through Mexico.”

This is not a man who should wrap his arguments around the idea of protecting women from sexual assault. But also, gee, he sounded like Uncle Fred who you haven’t seen for a while and suddenly he shows up for Thanksgiving with weird colored hair and vacant eyes and he’s talking into his mashed potatoes.


p Opinion | Trump Hits the Wall
"Every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported."
Hillary Clinton
“Who is going to find out? These women are trash. Nobody’s going to believe them.”
Also Hillary Clinton on her Husbands "bimbo eruptions"
and this has to do with Trump's disgusting behavior how?
 
Trump’s sexcapades are consensual, even if he has to pay for it.
Clinton is a predator and your hero. What a hypocrite!
Uhm, Trump's so-called escapades -- his unwanted pussy grabbing on unsuspecting women -- going all the way back to the 1990s -- documented in a court filing -- was never consensual



Wow. Another lib to stupid to know what the word "let" means.


Embarrassing. For you.
 
Almost all men who like women would want to prevent a sexual assault upon them.
So you're saying men who voter for Trump can't possibly want to prevent a sexual assault upon women? It sounds like that is what you are saying. And if so, I believe it's something to think about



ANd the lib plays stupid, to twist what his enemy actually said.


When you do that, you admit that you know you cannot refute what he actually said.


You know you are in the wrong, and yet you choose to stay in the wrong and support policies that you know are wrong.
what in the world are you yacking on about? what who said?
 
Trump’s sexcapades are consensual, even if he has to pay for it.
Clinton is a predator and your hero. What a hypocrite!
Uhm, Trump's so-called escapades -- his unwanted pussy grabbing on unsuspecting women -- going all the way back to the 1990s -- documented in a court filing -- was never consensual



Wow. Another lib to stupid to know what the word "let" means.


Embarrassing. For you.
to -- too - two

talk about stupid.

you have a degree from Trump University?
 
Almost all men who like women would want to prevent a sexual assault upon them.
So you're saying men who voter for Trump can't possibly want to prevent a sexual assault upon women? It sounds like that is what you are saying. And if so, I believe it's something to think about



ANd the lib plays stupid, to twist what his enemy actually said.


When you do that, you admit that you know you cannot refute what he actually said.


You know you are in the wrong, and yet you choose to stay in the wrong and support policies that you know are wrong.
what in the world are you yacking on about? what who said?


I posted my response to what you said.

The obvious conclusion is that I was describing your behavior in how you played stupid to misrepresent what your enemy said, into a strawman.


I'd try harder to dumb it down to something you can understand, but I know from past experience that no matter how clear and simple my words and sentences are,


that once you libs are pretending to be too stupid to understand simple shit, you never break character, no matter how retarded you have to pretend to be.


That being said, I'm not saying that you are not stupid. YOu are just not as stupid as you are pretending to be.


Don't even try to twist this into a complement, libtard.
 
Trump’s sexcapades are consensual, even if he has to pay for it.
Clinton is a predator and your hero. What a hypocrite!
Uhm, Trump's so-called escapades -- his unwanted pussy grabbing on unsuspecting women -- going all the way back to the 1990s -- documented in a court filing -- was never consensual



Wow. Another lib to stupid to know what the word "let" means.


Embarrassing. For you.
to -- too - two

talk about stupid.

you have a degree from Trump University?


lol!!!! That was me being sloppy in casual conversation.


You, are pure brain damaged stupid.


let1
/let/
verb
  1. 1.
    not prevent or forbid; allow.
 

Forum List

Back
Top