Disproving G-d with science

[mskafka]

Disproving G-d with science

Science can't DISprove the truth. Those that try, are only atheists, not scientists.

Most scientists that I know, are agnostic; not necessarily atheistic.

 

[Vox]

In a few hundred more years we'll evolve to the point of intelligence too. We're only at the know-how stage right now but not actually intelligent. Isn't a sign of intelligence when we still kill our own and destroy our own habitats.

So in a few hundred years we are going to somehow 'evolve"?

Even Darwin would be amazed that such an evolutionary leap could happen in such a short time span. ...

In less than two hundred years we "evolved" from candle light, horse transportation and the pony express, to electrical everything, cars, jets, spaceships, computers, and cell phones. Evolution is picking up speed.

except he is talking about biological evolution not the technical revolution.

 

[Vox]

Uh, no it doesnt because of TIME.

time is irrelevant.

chance is ZERO or close to zero.

 

[Avatar4321]

Science cannot disprove God.

But five minutes of personal experience with the Lord can prove it to someone for Eternity. Which is precisely why those of faith should be encouraging people to seek God and to recieve their own Revelation from the Holy Spirit.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Well, maybe not disproving G-d altogether, but certainly disproving certain claims about His power, like being omnipresent.

G-d could still exist of course and simply not possess these attributes. But if we can prove G-d's power is limited and finite then G-d becomes much more likely simply an alien being whose powers are bound by the same laws of physics our technology is.

The physics double-slit experiment which shows how light particles behave as both a particle and a wave and will change the behaviour when someone looks at it would seem to suggest if G-d does exist He isn't looking at the experiment since if He were, the behaviour of light would be a constant, and not subject to change when someone else looks at the results.

Double-slit experiment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Relational interpretation

"According to the relational interpretation of quantum mechanics, first proposed by Carlo Rovelli,[41] observations such as those in the double-slit experiment result specifically from the interaction between the observer (measuring device) and the object being observed (physically interacted with), not any absolute property possessed by the object. In the case of an electron, if it is initially "observed" at a particular slit, then the observer–particle (photon–electron) interaction includes information about the electron's position. This partially constrains the particle's eventual location at the screen. If it is "observed" (measured with a photon) not at a particular slit but rather at the screen, then there is no "which path" information as part of the interaction, so the electron's "observed" position on the screen is determined strictly by its probability function. This makes the resulting pattern on the screen the same as if each individual electron had passed through both slits. It has also been suggested that space and distance themselves are relational, and that an electron can appear to be in "two places at once"—for example, at both slits—because its spatial relations to particular points on the screen remain identical from both slit locations.[42]"

And in Scripture itself, there's many occasions G-d asks where poeple are like in the Garden of Eden, and elsewhere asking people questions. If G-d knows all and sees all these indications of finite power are very curious indeed.

I have a question for you, how does the photon know it is being observed? Why does it always make a choice between the slits if a human is watching and only split itself in half and me in two places at once if no human is watching? Did you know it does that even if humans are present in the room?

By the way, omnipresent does not mean all knowing, so you can't even get that part right.