Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Biden and the NATO countries will not start WWIII, Putin could.What would happen if Putin decided to us tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine? Would Nato and the US respond in kind? Putin has been moving nuclear capable bombers to airfields in range of Ukraine. While this is being written off by US media and Washington as just scare tactics, how much faith should the American people have in the competence of the Biden Administration not to start World War Three? Once the first nuclear ordinance is deployed in Ukraine it will be like a match touched to a fuse. If Putin decides the fate of Ukraine with nuclear bombers the US will face a standoff that could spell the end of the civilized world.
EXPLAINER: How real are Putin's nuclear threats in Ukraine?
Putin raised the threat, but what are Russia's nuclear capabilities?
President Vladimir Putin says he will defend Russia's territory with every means at his disposal, and it's put the threat of nuclear war back into focus.www.abc.net.au
What happens if Putin goes nuclear in Ukraine? Biden has a choice to make
Russian forces are in retreat yet Nato still holds back for fear of what a humiliated Putin might do. But now is precisely the time to step up the pressurewww.theguardian.com
If Biden's bizarre administration pushes Putin into the use of nuclear weapons it will put the US between a rock and hard place. The US will then have to choose beween providing nukes to Ukraine and starting WW3 or backing down in the eyes of the world.
I find it unreal, that at the last G20, there was a Russian representative, meeting with leaders of the west, AND China, and they all agreed, that the ruling oligarchs, need to issue, a global digital ID, so they can eventually saddle us with vaccine passports when this WHO international health treaty is passed into force, and subverts national sovereignty in 2024.
If anyone started WW III it was Putin.
I find it unreal, that at the last G20, there was a Russian representative, meeting with leaders of the west, AND China, and they all agreed, that the ruling oligarchs, need to issue, a global digital ID, so they can eventually saddle us with vaccine passports when this WHO international health treaty is passed into force, and subverts national sovereignty in 2024.
Julia Davis (journalist) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Where Russia Fits In With Trump-Ukraine Affair
text.npr.org
The war? Is a distraction. Utterly.
Despite criticism, Russia hails 'balanced' G20 leaders' declaration
Despite criticism, Russia hails 'balanced' G20 leaders' declaration
Russia on Wednesday hailed the G20 leaders' declaration, which mentions the "immense human suffering" caused by the war in Ukraine, as a "balanced text" that Russian diplomats worked hard to influence.www.reuters.com
From someone actually living inside of Russia, monitoring the media there;
Kherson withdrawal: Views from Russian media
and deep thoughts from our podcast
Kherson withdrawal: Views from Russian media
and deep thoughts from our podcastedwardslavsquat.substack.com
"The article ends by expressing hope that the withdrawal is a trap set for the Ukrainian military, while acknowledging it may actually be part of a backroom deal between Moscow and Kiev (Washington)."
Maternal mortality in Russia tripled in 2021
Why? Take a wild guess
World leaders agree to cattle-tag the planet
Washington and Moscow put aside their differences for the greater good
World leaders agree to cattle-tag the planet
Washington and Moscow put aside their differences for the greater goodedwardslavsquat.substack.com
Multipolar World Order – Part 4
Iain Davis
Multipolar World Order – Part 4
Iain Davis Part 1 of this series looked at the various models of world order. Part 2 examined how the shift towards the multipolar world order has been led by some surprising characters. Part 3 exp…off-guardian.orgThe Wider Context of the Ukraine War
". . . There is no evidence to suggest that the war in Ukraine is, in any sense, “fake.” The political and cultural differences among the populace of Ukraine are older than the nation-state, and the current conflict is rooted in long-standing and very real tensions. People are suffering and dying, and they deserve the chance to live in peace.
Yet, beyond the specific factors that led to and have perpetuated the conflict in Ukraine, there is a wider context that also deserves discussion.
The so-called leaders in the West and in the East have had ample opportunity and power to bring both sides in the Donbas war to the negotiating table. Their attempts to broker ceasefires and to implement the various Minsk agreements over the years were weak and half-hearted. Both sides, it seems, chose instead to play politics with Ukrainian lives. And both sides ultimately fuelled the conflict.
The West has done little but exacerbate the situation. And, though it faced a tough economic choice, the Russian government could certainly have leveraged its commanding position in the European energy market to better effect.
If, that is, avoiding war were the objective.
Whatever else it is, the war in Ukraine is the fulcrum for a transition in the balance of geopolitic power. Like the pseudopandemic that immediately preceded it, the war is accelerating the polarity shift. . . "
This pandemic treaty is the greatest power grab any of us has seen in our lifetime, says Neil Oliver
.
.
.
Anyone that really thinks the war is between the US and Russia, or the West and the East? Isn't really paying attention. IMO.
It is a small, unimportant capitalistic country. It is the money some kind of way.Really, for invading a tiny, unimportant country wanting to take back two small territories in it?
- Why didn't invading and taking the Crimea several years ago start WWIII then?
- Why didn't the Chinese start WWIII when they invaded and took over all of Tibet?
- Will they start WWIII when in a year or so they invade and take Taiwan?
- What about when the US took land from Mexico? WWIII?
- Certainly killing all the Indians, rounding up those left and herding them onto reservations under agreements they could not even read and were lied to about what was in them, certainly THAT started WWIII?
- But Biden leading NATO in a provocative military action sending everything but the kitchen sink into a NON-NATO country instead of trying to broker a peaceful deal, that had no bearing?
i'd say the dif isn't a stretch ToobReally, for invading a tiny, unimportant country wanting to take back two small territories in it?
- Why didn't invading and taking the Crimea several years ago start WWIII then?
- Why didn't the Chinese start WWIII when they invaded and took over all of Tibet?
- Will they start WWIII when in a year or so they invade and take Taiwan?
- What about when the US took land from Mexico? WWIII?
- Certainly killing all the Indians, rounding up those left and herding them onto reservations under agreements they could not even read and were lied to about what was in them, certainly THAT started WWIII?
- But Biden leading NATO in a provocative military action sending everything but the kitchen sink into a NON-NATO country instead of trying to broker a peaceful deal, that had no bearing?