Dropping white IQ just an accident?

[Street Juice]

If the Darwinian survival-of-the-fittest view of the world is accurate, then, among humans, the normal state of affairs is inter-group conflict. Genocide, far from being a moral failing, is a strategy for success. Nepotism is encouraged and admired and instilled in the young as a virtue. Someone advocating for universal human rights is an object of scorn in a Darwinian world.

Civilization is suppose to be raising us above such things.

I'm staunchly anti-genocide for moral reasons.

I see other means as possible for my goals.

Even so..

I hate to say it, but genocide isn't necessarily illogical... It's the most immoral action by far...However logic can support genocide by diminishing your enemies, gaining resources, and getting rid of degenerates.

Although some genocides might have killed a lot of geniuses too.

I.E Soviets targeted a lot of elites & so did Nazis.

Poland is responsible for most of the lowering of the white IQ.

I'd say WIC even more than Poland. But the massacre of the Katryn Forest--whatever it's called--by the Soviets was of the creme de le creme of Poland. Presumably, disproportionately among the most intelligent Poles. And in the Soviet Union itself, the intellectual classes, the university professors, the clergy, the successful, were all targeted--WITH THEIR CHILDREN. That sounds like intentional dysgenics, to me.

 

[Street Juice]

^^^^^^^ First sign of liberal indoctrination and brainwashing.

Lol, no. Your lack of critical thinking skills is a direct result of republicans have done to public education over the last 50 years or so.

Too bad for you that I skipped two grades then left public education altogether in the early 70s to go to a private high school, graduated in the Who's Who after two years to go to a university of my choice on a state-sponsored scholarship. But yep, I'm still working on my critical thinking having been held back by those damned republicans for so long!

Yeah yeah, sure sure.... All you conservatives are geniuses, I know.

You said it, I didn't. But like I thought you'd believe anything or that I care.
And you are they guy lecturing others on "critical thinking?"

That is an application of critical thinking. All of you conservatives cannot be wealthy job creating business moguls with huge stock portfolios that you manage yourselves because you are home/private schooled geniuses as well as being sniper/gunsmiths with multiple real estate investments, trophy wives, summer homes, and the biggest trucks. Yet all or most of these things are claimed by nearly every conservative.

Think about it.

Yet all or most of these things are claimed by nearly every conservative on the Internet.

Think about it.

 

[Street Juice]

Civilization is suppose to be raising us above such things.

I'm staunchly anti-genocide for moral reasons.

I see other means as possible for my goals.

Even so..

I hate to say it, but genocide isn't necessarily illogical... It's the most immoral action by far...However logic can support genocide by diminishing your enemies, gaining resources, and getting rid of degenerates.

Although some genocides might have killed a lot of geniuses too.

I.E Soviets targeted a lot of elites & so did Nazis.

Poland is responsible for most of the lowering of the white IQ.

Poland's IQ is 99 about the average of Europe.

But yours must be way lower, if I go by your avatar.

What does a person with a high IQ look like, exactly?

What does a person with a high IQ look like, exactly?

 

[Street Juice]

it's not just whites
A new report shows that IQ scores are falling across the board around the world.

Report: IQ Scores Are on the Decline

transforming them slowly into Marxist entities as we move towards universal egalitarianism.” – Max Horkheimer
​

Orwell's vision of the future was so dead on: a boot on a human face forever.

 

[Street Juice]

If the Darwinian survival-of-the-fittest view of the world is accurate, then, among humans, the normal state of affairs is inter-group conflict. Genocide, far from being a moral failing, is a strategy for success. Nepotism is encouraged and admired and instilled in the young as a virtue. Someone advocating for universal human rights is an object of scorn in a Darwinian world.

In our modern American culture, it is clear, our group has rejected that Darwinian world view. Genocide is condemned, nepotism is a vice, and even the mildest reservation expressed for the idea of universal human rights is sanctioned. We are thoroughly convinced by the obvious rightness of our group's position concerning other groups, and the idea that some other group might hold a different view is so fantastic it renders the other group too alien to even think about seriously. It should be obvious, however, that just because our group has taken the non-Darwinian stance to be self-evident, it doesn't necessarily mean all groups have.

It should also be obvious that humans can be grouped in many different ways. We can be grouped by nation, of course, and by ethnicity, race, language, religion, and so on. In fact, each of us is a member of multiple groups, which overlap each other in myriad ways. Until now, the nation grouping has seemed the most adaptable to encompassing the widest variety of members of other groups. But with nationalism under attack in the United States, nationalism is losing its holding power and flexibility; other groupings are rising to preeminence.

What if in the United States, among these rising groupings, there is some racial group, or ethnic group, or other kind of group that does not see the non-Darwinian view of the world that all men are created equal as self-evidently correct? What if this group holds the position that, in fact, it is self-evident all men are not created equal? That genocide is self-evidently a strategy for success? That nepotism is self-evidently a virtue? That the doctrine of universal humans rights is as self-evidently absurd as the belief among Chinese peasants that eating the penis of a clay religious icon will help a woman conceive?

If there were such a group, how would you identify it?

While all may be created and and start out equal some become lesser while some become more if given the freedom to do so. That's what capitalism is all about and is what made this country great.

BTW my average IQ score is 140. Above average but not that great however I am blessed with common sense which seems to be rapidly declining of late in this nation. Knowing lots of facts is not a measure of intelligence but knowing what to do with them is.

BTW my average IQ score is 140.
​

Average? over your split personalities?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

If the Darwinian survival-of-the-fittest view of the world is accurate, then, among humans, the normal state of affairs is inter-group conflict. Genocide, far from being a moral failing, is a strategy for success. Nepotism is encouraged and admired and instilled in the young as a virtue. Someone advocating for universal human rights is an object of scorn in a Darwinian world.

In our modern American culture, it is clear, our group has rejected that Darwinian world view. Genocide is condemned, nepotism is a vice, and even the mildest reservation expressed for the idea of universal human rights is sanctioned. We are thoroughly convinced by the obvious rightness of our group's position concerning other groups, and the idea that some other group might hold a different view is so fantastic it renders the other group too alien to even think about seriously. It should be obvious, however, that just because our group has taken the non-Darwinian stance to be self-evident, it doesn't necessarily mean all groups have.

It should also be obvious that humans can be grouped in many different ways. We can be grouped by nation, of course, and by ethnicity, race, language, religion, and so on. In fact, each of us is a member of multiple groups, which overlap each other in myriad ways. Until now, the nation grouping has seemed the most adaptable to encompassing the widest variety of members of other groups. But with nationalism under attack in the United States, nationalism is losing its holding power and flexibility; other groupings are rising to preeminence.

What if in the United States, among these rising groupings, there is some racial group, or ethnic group, or other kind of group that does not see the non-Darwinian view of the world that all men are created equal as self-evidently correct? What if this group holds the position that, in fact, it is self-evident all men are not created equal? That genocide is self-evidently a strategy for success? That nepotism is self-evidently a virtue? That the doctrine of universal humans rights is as self-evidently absurd as the belief among Chinese peasants that eating the penis of a clay religious icon will help a woman conceive?

If there were such a group, how would you identify it?

While all may be created and and start out equal some become lesser while some become more if given the freedom to do so. That's what capitalism is all about and is what made this country great.

BTW my average IQ score is 140. Above average but not that great however I am blessed with common sense which seems to be rapidly declining of late in this nation. Knowing lots of facts is not a measure of intelligence but knowing what to do with them is.

No equality at birth, head sizes differ among the races upon birth, as does birth weight.

Capitalism has imported a lot of the lower IQ people we have in this nation, including Blacks, and Latinos for their cheaper labor.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

If the Darwinian survival-of-the-fittest view of the world is accurate, then, among humans, the normal state of affairs is inter-group conflict. Genocide, far from being a moral failing, is a strategy for success. Nepotism is encouraged and admired and instilled in the young as a virtue. Someone advocating for universal human rights is an object of scorn in a Darwinian world.

Civilization is suppose to be raising us above such things.

I'm staunchly anti-genocide for moral reasons.

I see other means as possible for my goals.

Even so..

I hate to say it, but genocide isn't necessarily illogical... It's the most immoral action by far...However logic can support genocide by diminishing your enemies, gaining resources, and getting rid of degenerates.

Although some genocides might have killed a lot of geniuses too.

I.E Soviets targeted a lot of elites & so did Nazis.

Poland is responsible for most of the lowering of the white IQ.

I'd say WIC even more than Poland. But the massacre of the Katryn Forest--whatever it's called--by the Soviets was of the creme de le creme of Poland. Presumably, disproportionately among the most intelligent Poles. And in the Soviet Union itself, the intellectual classes, the university professors, the clergy, the successful, were all targeted--WITH THEIR CHILDREN. That sounds like intentional dysgenics, to me.

Poland must be doing something right, the #1 economic growth in Europe this year, and the #1 economic growth in Europe since 1990.

Poland resisted Islamic refugees the best in Europe, and is the only country in Europe to successfully resist the Holocaust industry.

 

[Crepitus]

Lol, no. Your lack of critical thinking skills is a direct result of republicans have done to public education over the last 50 years or so.

Too bad for you that I skipped two grades then left public education altogether in the early 70s to go to a private high school, graduated in the Who's Who after two years to go to a university of my choice on a state-sponsored scholarship. But yep, I'm still working on my critical thinking having been held back by those damned republicans for so long!

Yeah yeah, sure sure.... All you conservatives are geniuses, I know.

You said it, I didn't. But like I thought you'd believe anything or that I care.
And you are they guy lecturing others on "critical thinking?"

That is an application of critical thinking. All of you conservatives cannot be wealthy job creating business moguls with huge stock portfolios that you manage yourselves because you are home/private schooled geniuses as well as being sniper/gunsmiths with multiple real estate investments, trophy wives, summer homes, and the biggest trucks. Yet all or most of these things are claimed by nearly every conservative.

Think about it.

A). I haven't seen anyone claim all what you say.
B). I don't tell anything about myself that isn't true.
C). I used to own and run a business, but I have no huge stock portfolio, wouldn't manage it myself if I did, don't consider myself a genius though I have a high IQ, have a machine shop but never tried any gunsmithing, have no real estate investments other than my home, no trophy wife (divorced), no summer home, but I do have a 4X4 K1500 Silverado for a truck. I'm only on here so much because I retired last March due to health issues.

There are definitely some big bullshitters on USMB; the key is being able to tell them from the honest folk. Just because some people are full of it doesn't mean everyone is. Now you can believe or disbelieve that I really don't care.

The think is I don't believe any of them. And I'm not singling you out. My own story is far fetched enough I don't even bother to tell it most of the time. I doubt i would believe me if I hadn't lived it.

 

[Crepitus]

Lol, no. Your lack of critical thinking skills is a direct result of republicans have done to public education over the last 50 years or so.

Too bad for you that I skipped two grades then left public education altogether in the early 70s to go to a private high school, graduated in the Who's Who after two years to go to a university of my choice on a state-sponsored scholarship. But yep, I'm still working on my critical thinking having been held back by those damned republicans for so long!

Yeah yeah, sure sure.... All you conservatives are geniuses, I know.

You said it, I didn't. But like I thought you'd believe anything or that I care.
And you are they guy lecturing others on "critical thinking?"

That is an application of critical thinking. All of you conservatives cannot be wealthy job creating business moguls with huge stock portfolios that you manage yourselves because you are home/private schooled geniuses as well as being sniper/gunsmiths with multiple real estate investments, trophy wives, summer homes, and the biggest trucks. Yet all or most of these things are claimed by nearly every conservative.

Think about it.

Yet all or most of these things are claimed by nearly every conservative on the Internet.

Think about it.

That was kinda my point.