Kevin_Kennedy
Defend Liberty
- Aug 27, 2008
- 18,512
- 1,895
Because he's a Democrat. Is this really a difficult question for you?
In the primaries he was running against other Democrats.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Because he's a Democrat. Is this really a difficult question for you?
Man, I must have been confused all the time I spent following the primaries. Because I'm pretty sure that was a campaign I was watching.
True, but I don't think it was 90% in the primaries.In the primaries he was running against other Democrats.
Because he's a Democrat. Is this really a difficult question for you?
True, but I don't think it was 90% in the primaries.
Explain why Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton never came in the same time zone of 90 percent of the African American vote in the primaries when they ran.
A black guy got 364 electoral votes and won nationally by almost 7 points.
They didn't have the money that Obama or Hillary had. All other variables being equal, Obama was chosen by that demographic because of skin color.
heh...it does to him (elvis) I guess.So Obama bought the African American vote? I thought it was skin color that mattered?
With little to no experience. Funny how that happens.
So Obama bought the African American vote? I thought it was skin color that mattered?
You don't need to buy the African American vote if you're African American. You get it by default.
So Obama bought the African American vote? I thought it was skin color that mattered?
This dance again?
Get over it. You guys made that argument and it got you a 7 point loss.
This is untrue.
I already made the point that Sharpton and Jackson didn't get anywhere near the level of support that Obama did from the African American community.
Sgt. was suggesting that many people, such as yourself, voted for the man because of his skin color. He was voted in with a paper thin record and, associations about which we are just learning. If you know more about Obama, perhaps, you can enlighten Tom Brokaw and Charlie Rose, who, the Friday before the election admitted that they "know nothing about Obama."
[youtube]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SlEUMjowLDE&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SlEUMjowLDE&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/youtube]
Obama AND hillary raised more money than either of those two candidates. That means more ads, more signage. I think you understand.
Yeah, I understand that anybody who could raise as much money with Hillary could be competitive or even bear her.
That argument didn't cause a 7 point loss. The economy and Sarah Palin did.
Yes, but not 91-9 among African American voters without race being an issue. Imagine if the Caucasian vote had gone 91-9 in favor of Hillary. Everyone would be quoting Jeremiah Wright. "KKKA"