Email tells feds to make sequester as painful as promised [Mainstream Media Ignores]

[ScienceRocks]

Email tells feds to make sequester as painful as promised [Mainstream Media Ignores]

Email tells feds to make sequester as painful as promised - Washington Times

The Obama administration denied an appeal for flexibility in lessening the sequester’s effects, with an email this week appearing to show officials in Washington that because they already had promised the cuts would be devastating, they now have to follow through on that.

In the email sent Monday by Charles Brown, an official with the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service office in Raleigh, N.C., Mr. Brown asked “if there was any latitude” in how to spread the sequester cuts across the region to lessen the impacts on fish inspections.
He said he was discouraged by officials in Washington, who gave him this reply: “We have gone on record with a notification to Congress and whoever else that ‘APHIS would eliminate assistance to producers in 24 states in managing wildlife damage to the aquaculture industry, unless they provide funding to cover the costs.’ So it is our opinion that however you manage that reduction, you need to make sure you are not contradicting what we said the impact would be.”

What a heartless piece of shit this president is. I hate this son of a bitch with every ounch of my heart. Rotten to the core.

 

[tap4154]

Yes, I read this earlier.

IMHO impeachment charges need to be considered, very soon, for dereliction of duty over this, and Benghazi.

This man is not looking out for America, he's looking out for his agenda: which is to change America into a European-style nanny state, with as many folks as as possible dependent on and/or working for the government.

Obamacare was the foundation of his Big Government transformation of America, and the compliant mainstream media he has really makes stopping this travesty difficult.

Mitt was right about the 47%, and that number is only increasing as Obama's destructive policies continue to keep a dark PALL looming over our economy, and driving prices of everything from gas to groceries UP.

 

[OKTexas]

Yep, he's a shit head.

 

[uscitizen]

Obama is "officials in Washington"?

I do not dispute that Obama is a shithead, he is Bush III.
However your logic is non-existent on this.

 

[realinvestment]

Of course the big reason we got Obamacare was that individuals couldn't economically purchase health care insurance without being part of a group.... and if you went to the hospital without insurance, they charged you five times the regular rate.

 

[OKTexas]

Yes, I read this earlier.

IMHO impeachment charges need to be considered, very soon, for dereliction of duty over this, and Benghazi.

This man is not looking out for America, he's looking out for his agenda: which is to change America into a European-style nanny state, with as many folks as as possible dependent on and/or working for the government.

Obamacare was the foundation of his Big Government transformation of America, and the compliant mainstream media he has really makes stopping this travesty difficult.

Mitt was right about the 47%, and that number is only increasing as Obama's destructive policies continue to keep a dark PALL looming over our economy, and drive prices of everything from gas to groceries UP.

You seem to be forgetting that an impeachment trial would be held in the senate and requires a super-majority to convict, that ain't gonna happen. Also doing a shitty job is not impeachable anyways.

 

[konradv]

This seems similar to the Woodward "threat" story, RW media putting the worst possible spin on every story. Isn't that the kind of thing y'all bash HuffPo and Daily Kos for? *YAWN*

 

[tap4154]

Yes, I read this earlier.

IMHO impeachment charges need to be considered, very soon, for dereliction of duty over this, and Benghazi.

This man is not looking out for America, he's looking out for his agenda: which is to change America into a European-style nanny state, with as many folks as as possible dependent on and/or working for the government.

Obamacare was the foundation of his Big Government transformation of America, and the compliant mainstream media he has really makes stopping this travesty difficult.

Mitt was right about the 47%, and that number is only increasing as Obama's destructive policies continue to keep a dark PALL looming over our economy, and drive prices of everything from gas to groceries UP.

You seem to be forgetting that an impeachment trial would be held in the senate and requires a super-majority to convict, that ain't gonna happen. Also doing a shitty job is not impeachable anyways.

Bubba wasn't convicted in the Senate either, but he WAS impeached. And dereliction of duty IS an impeachable crime, depending upon the circumstances.

If it's proved he told General Ham to stand down for political reasons, and if it's proved that he's trying to harm America with HIS sequester for political reasons, he's toast!

 

[OKTexas]

Yes, I read this earlier.

IMHO impeachment charges need to be considered, very soon, for dereliction of duty over this, and Benghazi.

This man is not looking out for America, he's looking out for his agenda: which is to change America into a European-style nanny state, with as many folks as as possible dependent on and/or working for the government.

Obamacare was the foundation of his Big Government transformation of America, and the compliant mainstream media he has really makes stopping this travesty difficult.

Mitt was right about the 47%, and that number is only increasing as Obama's destructive policies continue to keep a dark PALL looming over our economy, and drive prices of everything from gas to groceries UP.

You seem to be forgetting that an impeachment trial would be held in the senate and requires a super-majority to convict, that ain't gonna happen. Also doing a shitty job is not impeachable anyways.

Bubba wasn't convicted in the Senate either, but he WAS impeached. And dereliction of duty IS an impeachable crime, depending upon the circumstances.

If it's proved he told General Ham to stand down for political reasons, and if it's proved that he's trying to harm America with HIS sequester for political reasons, he's toast!

IF, that and a buck will get ya cup of coffee at McDonalds.

 

[RoadVirus]

No matter. Obama will still come out of this squeaky clean. His butt buddies in the media will see to that.

 

[Desperado]

Email tells feds to make sequester as painful as promised [Mainstream Media Ignores]

Email tells feds to make sequester as painful as promised - Washington Times

The Obama administration denied an appeal for flexibility in lessening the sequester’s effects, with an email this week appearing to show officials in Washington that because they already had promised the cuts would be devastating, they now have to follow through on that.

In the email sent Monday by Charles Brown, an official with the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service office in Raleigh, N.C., Mr. Brown asked “if there was any latitude” in how to spread the sequester cuts across the region to lessen the impacts on fish inspections.
He said he was discouraged by officials in Washington, who gave him this reply: “We have gone on record with a notification to Congress and whoever else that ‘APHIS would eliminate assistance to producers in 24 states in managing wildlife damage to the aquaculture industry, unless they provide funding to cover the costs.’ So it is our opinion that however you manage that reduction, you need to make sure you are not contradicting what we said the impact would be.”

What a heartless piece of shit this president is. I hate this son of a bitch with every ounch of my heart. Rotten to the core.

Obama just wants to punish us for not jumping on his bandwagon.
He has absolutely no concern for the average citizen.

 

[Intense]

Email tells feds to make sequester as painful as promised [Mainstream Media Ignores]

Email tells feds to make sequester as painful as promised - Washington Times

The Obama administration denied an appeal for flexibility in lessening the sequester’s effects, with an email this week appearing to show officials in Washington that because they already had promised the cuts would be devastating, they now have to follow through on that.

In the email sent Monday by Charles Brown, an official with the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service office in Raleigh, N.C., Mr. Brown asked “if there was any latitude” in how to spread the sequester cuts across the region to lessen the impacts on fish inspections.
He said he was discouraged by officials in Washington, who gave him this reply: “We have gone on record with a notification to Congress and whoever else that ‘APHIS would eliminate assistance to producers in 24 states in managing wildlife damage to the aquaculture industry, unless they provide funding to cover the costs.’ So it is our opinion that however you manage that reduction, you need to make sure you are not contradicting what we said the impact would be.”

What a heartless piece of shit this president is. I hate this son of a bitch with every ounch of my heart. Rotten to the core.

Sometimes one would think they could not govern worse, if they tried, then reality kicks in. Why are they there again? Remind me?

 

[peach174]

This seems similar to the Woodward "threat" story, RW media putting the worst possible spin on every story. Isn't that the kind of thing y'all bash HuffPo and Daily Kos for? *YAWN*

No it's not.
They reported on an actual e- mail (evidence- caught in the act) not a spin like the HuffPo and Daily Kos do.

 

[Intense]

Of course the big reason we got Obamacare was that individuals couldn't economically purchase health care insurance without being part of a group.... and if you went to the hospital without insurance, they charged you five times the regular rate.

Why? What expenses were they making up for exactly? What mandates are they forced to comply with at their own expense? To what end?

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

That was the whole point of this nonsense to begin with. Make the sequester affect people as negatively as possible, blame the opposition, and the people will beg you to spend more and reelect you at the same time.

 

[Intense]

This seems similar to the Woodward "threat" story, RW media putting the worst possible spin on every story. Isn't that the kind of thing y'all bash HuffPo and Daily Kos for? *YAWN*

So having Integrity, makes one Right Wing....., no wait,.... Never mind.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Obama is "officials in Washington"?

I do not dispute that Obama is a shithead, he is Bush III.
However your logic is non-existent on this.

Agreed, sort of.
Precedent and agenda is derived from the top.
Middle managers and second level execs both imitate and carry out what comes from the top.
So while it is true that Obama had nothing to do with this specifically, generally he certainly did. It is his administrations policy that these people follow.

 

[Truthmatters]

dudes what does the sequester LAWS say?

it says 10% acrossed board cuts.


Are you suggesting they NOT follow what the republican house just made law?

 

[Truthmatters]

How is it you people confuse what following a law means?

 

[Truthmatters]

Yes, I read this earlier.

IMHO impeachment charges need to be considered, very soon, for dereliction of duty over this, and Benghazi.

This man is not looking out for America, he's looking out for his agenda: which is to change America into a European-style nanny state, with as many folks as as possible dependent on and/or working for the government.

Obamacare was the foundation of his Big Government transformation of America, and the compliant mainstream media he has really makes stopping this travesty difficult.

Mitt was right about the 47%, and that number is only increasing as Obama's destructive policies continue to keep a dark PALL looming over our economy, and driving prices of everything from gas to groceries UP.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH


impeachment for following the laws?


only in the mind of cons do things get so twisted up