Emails Show Bill Clinton Did Not Have Sex. . .With Some People(?)!

[mascale]

Apparently Conservatives are trying to show people do become less liberal as they get older. Emails of the Secretary of State finally prove that in fact the former President did not go everywhere he wanted to, and for money(?)!

ABC: Emails Show Bill Clinton Sought Approval For Paid Speeches Tied to Congo and North Korea

Donald Trump, contrasting, wants everyone to know that he is rich, and seems to be on good terms with a lot of the Mexican Drug Cartel members(?)!

Hippies appear to be winning, even again(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many juicy parts, maybe now get exposed!)

 

[DGS49]

These paid speeches are nothing more than bribes for exertion of political influence. NOBODY has any interest in what this man might have to say.

 

[mascale]

And apparently there is no legal or policy interest in Secretary Clinton's emails. . .or any interest from the fantasy and picture magazines.

National Geographic is interested: Not even(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great Half-Wit Father in Washington, mainly gets all the juicy, classified stuff--or Maybe Joe(?)--soon to be released(?)!!!)

 

[Avorysuds]

She should have not wiped the server, end of story... People have clearly rejected her for doing so, no matter if there was bad or good on the server, she proved to be incredibly secretive and nontransparent. It's done, and she will not be president.

 

[mascale]

The way servers seem to work, especially at the federal level, it was likely all hacked by more agencies than there are United Nations, at any rate. Some even suggest that the server company maybe even has the copies. Probably the better judgment is to keep this all out of the hands of the government agencies, to begin with. In the alternative, probably the Republicans want everyone to know that they intend to federalize everything, starting from day one of "persons born," under the Constitution. Constitutional language they do not seem to like, admittedly. The matter of applied Constitutional life is already law in America.

Anyone remembers the famous, ObamaCare, computer server roll-out. IT does not appear to be a strong skill at the federal level. Actually, others seem to have noticed(?). The California ACA site worked right from the start, so maybe not everybody noticed. Apparently even President Clinton, the first, appears to have not had sex with everybody.

Trump is rich, by comparison, and seems to want everyone to know that he even knows super-rich Mexicans, right there in Laredo, in the cartels.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
("Never say Never," even Ronald Reagan knew: A member formerly of Alcoholics Anonymous. We learn from this that, "Never," actually rolls off the tongue fairly easily, in English(?).)

 

[Muhammed]

Bill Clinton paid over $100,000 for sex with George Bush. Under threat of divorce the offer was declined by Hillary.

 

[mascale]

So the Republican Party has evolved into, "Who did they know, and when did they know them(?)!"

Even Trump had to clarify his early summer remarks. He would famously note that it was the drug cartels who were recruiting people to cross the border illegally with contraband for sale. He would explain that as a businessman, to the business community(?). So anyone sees that Trump understands his business background, and how that works(?). There seems to be a level of appeal among Republican business leaders.

Six years ago, Secretary Clinton was noting that bad business had even included the US managing to supply the cartels with weapons. It is not even clear it can easily be said that the Mexican government even controls large parts of its own country, impacted with the cartels. The escaped famous leader tweeted a death threat, noting the "whore words" of the Republican Party, heir apparent. These are likely different from the usually cemetery remarks, "For a four-score, dial. . . ." right there on the course(?)!

So business being business, it seems to have made sense to the Republican Party to explain the famous cartel business as a policy of the Mexican government(?). All the debate participants appear to be on board. Candidate Bush III has noted his own Mexican love affair. Maybe according to the Cartel leader, we know how he met her, and where(?).

The Republicans are bringing so much new perspective to the U. S. Domestic, and International Policy, arena.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many white eyes use marriage vows, at any rate, to start dating online(?)!)

 

[MathewSmith]

It should have been obvious that the invitations had to be declined because of where they came from and an ethical, moral person would have known that right away - oh wait, we're talking about the Clintons.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

The way servers seem to work, especially at the federal level, it was likely all hacked by more agencies than there are United Nations, at any rate. Some even suggest that the server company maybe even has the copies. Probably the better judgment is to keep this all out of the hands of the government agencies, to begin with. In the alternative, probably the Republicans want everyone to know that they intend to federalize everything, starting from day one of "persons born," under the Constitution. Constitutional language they do not seem to like, admittedly. The matter of applied Constitutional life is already law in America.

Anyone remembers the famous, ObamaCare, computer server roll-out. IT does not appear to be a strong skill at the federal level. Actually, others seem to have noticed(?). The California ACA site worked right from the start, so maybe not everybody noticed. Apparently even President Clinton, the first, appears to have not had sex with everybody.

Trump is rich, by comparison, and seems to want everyone to know that he even knows super-rich Mexicans, right there in Laredo, in the cartels.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
("Never say Never," even Ronald Reagan knew: A member formerly of Alcoholics Anonymous. We learn from this that, "Never," actually rolls off the tongue fairly easily, in English(?).)

She passed sensitive classified material on her private email run through her private server. Yes, she should be criminally indicted. What patraeus was charged for is laughable compared to the illegal and deceptive activities of the hillary.

 

[mascale]

Ignorance of the concept, "Classified" is no excuse: Material not normally disclosed in public is the less than "sensitive" concept.

The useful comparison is with the public disclosure of the Emancipation Proclamation, or the various cover-ups found in the Watergate debacle of the Nixon Administration. Lincoln was suspending the Constitution in the allegedly Secessionist states. Republicans find that wonderful, even now. Republicans historically do not support the Constitution. The lack of support was not Classified. The use of "Classified," equated with "Cover-up," is more about the improper uses of government--that a Democratic Party administration would not be expected to support. Emails have other noted disclosure problems, especially if financial information is involved.

In fact, the Republicans now want the "Cover-Up" agenda kind of concept applied again: In the matter of the emails. Secretary Clinton was not doing a "Cover-up," but the Republicans appear to want the "Cover-Up" concept applied--especially well after the discovery of anything possibly worth covering up(?).

Contrast again with Trump's confusion of the Mexican Government, with Mexican Big Business--not approved by that government--along the border, and near the resorts. The Cartel business is contrary to laws. The Republicans, through Trump, fix the blame on the Mexican government offices. More actually the case, many of said offices are trying to suppress the "business-as-usual" agenda of the Republicans, and along the border. Like Trump, the GOP brand is a business-friendly brand. The Drug cartels are a business. Trump seems to know many of them personally.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Republicans saw value in the slaves--$2,000.00 per head--and became abolitionists. An acre of land, comparing, was almost as much as $1.00 per acre. So even Lincoln eventually took the property right away. The Republicans provided no reparations, like the allies after WWI--that latter a main central cause of WWII. The other matter is on the newscasts, even now.)