bendog
Diamond Member
- Mar 4, 2013
- 46,279
- 9,696
no it's not......use logic......god youre dumb
a professor says it so you don't ever question it?
wow, talk about a lemming or sheep
full now equals 95%
and we still haven't talked about the people not in the employment system, which brings the true unemployment rate higher.
Real Unemployment -- Department of Labor (U-6)
For example, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) does not count a person who desires work as unemployed if he or she is not working and has stopped looking for work over the past four weeks
NOPE, wrong again.
![]()
![]()
We are at full employment according to U6.
What is the “natural rate” for u6? | Jared Bernstein | On the Economy
Wrong how? you people aren't counted in unemployment searches....a lot of people......so I'm right
and full in any sense does not equal 95%
Dummy, U6 will ALWAYS be higher than U3, you cannot just swap in "full employment" number between them. U6 is considered "full employment" at about 8-8.5%.
And U2 is a great band....wtf.......you guys I deal with the real word, not hypothecial academic bullshit......
full to most people means 100%...........not 95%.........
Great. It's not measured that way though.
God dammit, Jim. Stop talking rationally!