Exclusive: First charges filed in Mueller investigation

His emails to high level campaign officials who were encouraging him to meet with Russians say otherwise, sycophant.
The emails that were soundly rebuked, Fawn?
They weren't rebuked, they were subpoenaed.
No stupid, even Manafort refused to entertain Popenfresh's overtures to the Russians.

{
Real collusion might be in the significant share of U.S. uranium sold to the Russians during Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state (she signed off on the deal), followed by a $500,000 fee paid to her husband for a speech in Moscow and the millions of dollars that subsequently flowed into the Clinton Foundation from uranium investors.
Special counsel Robert Mueller and Congress should investigate that Russian connection, along with the role of the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign (and the earlier Republican role) in creating an anti-Trump dossier that has been shown to be a fraud and yet was used to justify the appointment of Mueller. If the reason for Mueller's appointment is fraudulent, how can it be said that his investigation, which includes staff attorneys who made donations to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, is not tainted?

Among the many problems with this investigation is that it has no legal, subject or monetary limits. If Mueller and his associates are unable to prove collusion with the Russians, one can count on them coming up with something else. Far-left members of Congress, such as Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), openly state that their objective is to "take out" the president, and they don't mean to lunch.

There is also the matter of leaks from the grand jury. Not surprisingly, the details of the indictments matched the leak to CNN. Unless that network employs mind readers and engages in paranormal activity, those leaks are felonies and the leakers should be prosecuted.}

Indictments and Ham Sandwiches
 
He was a campiagn volunteer. That's totally meaningless.
His emails to high level campaign officials who were encouraging him to meet with Russians say otherwise, sycophant.
No they don't, retard.
LOL

You’re obviously not paying attention. :eusa_doh:


You're obviously lying.


gmc15377920171030081300.jpg
Senile old kook ... too bad you made a fool of yourself with that one instead of reading my next post which included a link confirming what I said.


So, you admit that you're lying and have nothing, Comrade? :thup:
 
Another person who worked for T pleaded guilty for lying to the FBI or how Bripat sees it... telling a smal fib

He was a campiagn volunteer. That's totally meaningless.
His emails to high level campaign officials who were encouraging him to meet with Russians say otherwise, sycophant.


The emails that were soundly rebuked, Fawn?
1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif


No, ya flaming moron -- the emails listed in the indictment to which Papadopoulos plead guilty.

List them, Herr Goebbels?
Try reading my posts again -- this time, for comprehension.
 
His emails to high level campaign officials who were encouraging him to meet with Russians say otherwise, sycophant.
The emails that were soundly rebuked, Fawn?
They weren't rebuked, they were subpoenaed.
The old fool is batshit senile. :cuckoo:


Ad Hom does little to cover the fact that you are once again lying, Fawn.

Popsnapplecrack was told to pound sand by everyone in the campaign. You lying won't alter that.
 
No they don't, retard.
LOL

You’re obviously not paying attention. :eusa_doh:


You're obviously lying.


gmc15377920171030081300.jpg
Senile old kook ... too bad you made a fool of yourself with that one instead of reading my next post which included a link confirming what I said.


So, you admit that you're lying and have nothing, Comrade? :thup:
No, I admit you're insane.

giphy.gif

You admit that logical fallacy is as close to logic as you ever get.

You never enter into the same universe as fact.

Try again, Herr Goebbles.
 
His emails to high level campaign officials who were encouraging him to meet with Russians say otherwise, sycophant.
The emails that were soundly rebuked, Fawn?
They weren't rebuked, they were subpoenaed.
No stupid, even Manafort refused to entertain Popenfresh's overtures to the Russians.

{
Real collusion might be in the significant share of U.S. uranium sold to the Russians during Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state (she signed off on the deal), followed by a $500,000 fee paid to her husband for a speech in Moscow and the millions of dollars that subsequently flowed into the Clinton Foundation from uranium investors.
Special counsel Robert Mueller and Congress should investigate that Russian connection, along with the role of the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign (and the earlier Republican role) in creating an anti-Trump dossier that has been shown to be a fraud and yet was used to justify the appointment of Mueller. If the reason for Mueller's appointment is fraudulent, how can it be said that his investigation, which includes staff attorneys who made donations to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, is not tainted?

Among the many problems with this investigation is that it has no legal, subject or monetary limits. If Mueller and his associates are unable to prove collusion with the Russians, one can count on them coming up with something else. Far-left members of Congress, such as Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), openly state that their objective is to "take out" the president, and they don't mean to lunch.

There is also the matter of leaks from the grand jury. Not surprisingly, the details of the indictments matched the leak to CNN. Unless that network employs mind readers and engages in paranormal activity, those leaks are felonies and the leakers should be prosecuted.}

Indictments and Ham Sandwiches

You dont seem to be following. They have already proven the intent and attempts of Trump campaign officials to collude with the Russians. What is left now is to show this was not limited to just Dickhead Junior and The Greek, but also involved the head of the campaign. And then there's the little matter of whether ot not Trump himself was either aware of or complicit in these efforts.

Geesh man, pick up a newspaper once in a while...
 
LOL

You’re obviously not paying attention. :eusa_doh:


You're obviously lying.


gmc15377920171030081300.jpg
Senile old kook ... too bad you made a fool of yourself with that one instead of reading my next post which included a link confirming what I said.


So, you admit that you're lying and have nothing, Comrade? :thup:
No, I admit you're insane.

giphy.gif

You admit that logical fallacy is as close to logic as you ever get.

You never enter into the same universe as fact.

Try again, Herr Goebbles.
Again, gramps, I already posted the evidence. Everyone here now gets to see just how crazy you are for not understanding that.
 
His emails to high level campaign officials who were encouraging him to meet with Russians say otherwise, sycophant.
The emails that were soundly rebuked, Fawn?
They weren't rebuked, they were subpoenaed.
No stupid, even Manafort refused to entertain Popenfresh's overtures to the Russians.

{
Real collusion might be in the significant share of U.S. uranium sold to the Russians during Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state (she signed off on the deal), followed by a $500,000 fee paid to her husband for a speech in Moscow and the millions of dollars that subsequently flowed into the Clinton Foundation from uranium investors.
Special counsel Robert Mueller and Congress should investigate that Russian connection, along with the role of the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign (and the earlier Republican role) in creating an anti-Trump dossier that has been shown to be a fraud and yet was used to justify the appointment of Mueller. If the reason for Mueller's appointment is fraudulent, how can it be said that his investigation, which includes staff attorneys who made donations to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, is not tainted?

Among the many problems with this investigation is that it has no legal, subject or monetary limits. If Mueller and his associates are unable to prove collusion with the Russians, one can count on them coming up with something else. Far-left members of Congress, such as Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), openly state that their objective is to "take out" the president, and they don't mean to lunch.

There is also the matter of leaks from the grand jury. Not surprisingly, the details of the indictments matched the leak to CNN. Unless that network employs mind readers and engages in paranormal activity, those leaks are felonies and the leakers should be prosecuted.}

Indictments and Ham Sandwiches

You dont seem to be following. They have already proven the intent and attempts of Trump campaign officials to collude with the Russians. What is left now is to show this was not limited to just Dickhead Junior and The Greek, but also involved the head of the campaign. And then there's the little matter of whether ot not Trump himself was either aware of or complicit in these efforts.

Geesh man, pick up a newspaper once in a while...

They have proven no such thing, you intellectually challenged nitwit. The rest of what you have to say can therefor be ignored.

Does every snowflake in here start out every post with a blantant lie?
 
His emails to high level campaign officials who were encouraging him to meet with Russians say otherwise, sycophant.
The emails that were soundly rebuked, Fawn?
They weren't rebuked, they were subpoenaed.
No stupid, even Manafort refused to entertain Popenfresh's overtures to the Russians.

{
Real collusion might be in the significant share of U.S. uranium sold to the Russians during Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state (she signed off on the deal), followed by a $500,000 fee paid to her husband for a speech in Moscow and the millions of dollars that subsequently flowed into the Clinton Foundation from uranium investors.
Special counsel Robert Mueller and Congress should investigate that Russian connection, along with the role of the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign (and the earlier Republican role) in creating an anti-Trump dossier that has been shown to be a fraud and yet was used to justify the appointment of Mueller. If the reason for Mueller's appointment is fraudulent, how can it be said that his investigation, which includes staff attorneys who made donations to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, is not tainted?

Among the many problems with this investigation is that it has no legal, subject or monetary limits. If Mueller and his associates are unable to prove collusion with the Russians, one can count on them coming up with something else. Far-left members of Congress, such as Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), openly state that their objective is to "take out" the president, and they don't mean to lunch.

There is also the matter of leaks from the grand jury. Not surprisingly, the details of the indictments matched the leak to CNN. Unless that network employs mind readers and engages in paranormal activity, those leaks are felonies and the leakers should be prosecuted.}

Indictments and Ham Sandwiches

You dont seem to be following. They have already proven the intent and attempts of Trump campaign officials to collude with the Russians. What is left now is to show this was not limited to just Dickhead Junior and The Greek, but also involved the head of the campaign. And then there's the little matter of whether ot not Trump himself was either aware of or complicit in these efforts.

Geesh man, pick up a newspaper once in a while...

They have proven no such thing, you intellectually challenged nitwit. The rest of what you have to say can therefor be ignored.

Does every snowflake in here start out every post with a blantant lie?

Yes, they have. All of it is fact. D Jr admitted his part, and the Greek pled guilty for his. None of your crybabying has any bearing on any of it. I suspect that you think it does.
 
His emails to high level campaign officials who were encouraging him to meet with Russians say otherwise, sycophant.
The emails that were soundly rebuked, Fawn?
They weren't rebuked, they were subpoenaed.
No stupid, even Manafort refused to entertain Popenfresh's overtures to the Russians.

{
Real collusion might be in the significant share of U.S. uranium sold to the Russians during Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state (she signed off on the deal), followed by a $500,000 fee paid to her husband for a speech in Moscow and the millions of dollars that subsequently flowed into the Clinton Foundation from uranium investors.
Special counsel Robert Mueller and Congress should investigate that Russian connection, along with the role of the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign (and the earlier Republican role) in creating an anti-Trump dossier that has been shown to be a fraud and yet was used to justify the appointment of Mueller. If the reason for Mueller's appointment is fraudulent, how can it be said that his investigation, which includes staff attorneys who made donations to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, is not tainted?

Among the many problems with this investigation is that it has no legal, subject or monetary limits. If Mueller and his associates are unable to prove collusion with the Russians, one can count on them coming up with something else. Far-left members of Congress, such as Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), openly state that their objective is to "take out" the president, and they don't mean to lunch.

There is also the matter of leaks from the grand jury. Not surprisingly, the details of the indictments matched the leak to CNN. Unless that network employs mind readers and engages in paranormal activity, those leaks are felonies and the leakers should be prosecuted.}

Indictments and Ham Sandwiches

You dont seem to be following. They have already proven the intent and attempts of Trump campaign officials to collude with the Russians. What is left now is to show this was not limited to just Dickhead Junior and The Greek, but also involved the head of the campaign. And then there's the little matter of whether ot not Trump himself was either aware of or complicit in these efforts.

Geesh man, pick up a newspaper once in a while...

They have proven no such thing, you intellectually challenged nitwit. The rest of what you have to say can therefor be ignored.

Does every snowflake in here start out every post with a blantant lie?
LOLOL

You're such an idiot, it's actually amusing.

I just posted the contents of an email from a senior Trump campaign official, encouraging Papadopoulos to meet with Russians and you're still exhibiting such immense abject ignorance, you're just not capable of comprehending.

That's ok, Shortbus, you're special, I understand.

:itsok:
 
What's evolving is that the stuff on Clintons is coming in so bad that thumping on Trump is looking silly
 

Forum List

Back
Top