Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well you could start with distinguishing the words existential from existentialism. that is not everything that may be existential to any "thing" or "person" is related to the philosophy of existentialism.There is no one too educated and experienced not to be corrupted. Funny thing, when the color of money and the glitter of power get close to the hands, the mind and heart fall to greed like rain. This is true at all strata of human interaction. Those that lead walk a long way in front of those that follow giving them a distinct advantage. But if they lose sight of followers they may find those followers went a different way. That's what happened in 2016 when Trump who already had more wealth than he'll ever need said follow me; there's a better way for you to go; the way that made us great. What they are doing is too little too late-they underestimated their followers.
We’ve been hearing a lot about “existential” threats lately so we might want to think about what an existential threat is. The word seems to come from “existentialism” which is a philosophy that gained traction in the mid 1940’s largely though the works of Jean-Paul Sartre, a brilliant, neurotic, French playwright and communist admirer.
Existentialism is based on the precept that a thinking individual can never know what is truly right or truly wrong because existence is too complex to encompass a complete understanding of the physical or metaphysical world. The angst involved is apparently perplexing, so individuals struggle to find a path that they alone are responsible to follow.
People who sit around with too much time on their hands are generally regarded as philosophers and their idle thinking is often adopted and discussed ad nauseum by others who think a lot with too much time on their hands. Though Sartre never advocated for forcing his existential philosophy on the masses, others were all too willing to misuse existential thinking to bolster new movements. Karl Marx was one of those people and so was Adolf Hitler who, like Sartre, spent extended amounts of time locked up and probably should have remained that way.
Taken to the next step, philosophy becomes righteous thinking or weaponized philosophy defined as religion or political ideology and in contemporary society those lines are blurred. When something is described as an “existential threat”, it conveys a fearful warning that followers of a movement may be lost and the movement itself may perish under the light of reexamination.
This is what is happening today in the US with a presidential impeachment. The notion that a nation can only be led by highly educated intellectuals endowed with a special wokeness is being torn asunder by a populist messenger proving through direct concrete action that the notion is a fraud.
At a time when destructive political winds have been blowing the US middle class into a timid globalist sellout, the president has revived the “Big Stick” foreign policy of Teddy Roosevelt and its working. The existential threat is not to the constitution or the people it’s to a parasitic status quo that thinks we are too dumb to fathom a four-syllable-word like Existential.
Impeachment is a political assassination not to save us but to save themselves. If there’s an existential threat its them not the president.
I'm not sure what you mean by "educated" or "formal education." Truman had post-HS training as a bookkeeper. Eisenhower of course was a West Point grad. Reagan was public school kid and avg student at Eureka College. W had a world class prep and Ivy League pedigree, but it was wasted (pun) on him.I do blame us. We get the government we deserve.While all politicians lie, I don't blame them, I blame us. We don't want to hear the truth. We want a single, simple, bumper-sticker-sized solution to every complex problem. We get what we deserve, not what we want.And when you want to be lied to, you ask a professional politician.
However, I just happen to have a fundamental disagreement with the notion that only the educated can or should be running the government. There are millions of people who have no formal education, yet can run circles around the 'elite' with just native intelligence and integrity. Today, the educated are not so much educated as they are indoctrinated (at least in terms of political philosophy). So, it isn't a matter of anti-intellectualism as it is the fact that the 'educated elite' have proven themselves to be base and untrustworthy.
He's wrong. Look it up. An existential threat is a threat to your existance, nothing to do with existentialism.Well Crep, Ray gave us a excellent explanation of "existential threats" now you come here and say he is wrong without explaining why? Crep you are nothing but a trollI hate to break it to you kiddo, but existential threats don't have anything to do with existentialism. You are badly confused.We’ve been hearing a lot about “existential” threats lately so we might want to think about what an existential threat is. The word seems to come from “existentialism” which is a philosophy that gained traction in the mid 1940’s largely though the works of Jean-Paul Sartre, a brilliant, neurotic, French playwright and communist admirer.
Existentialism is based on the precept that a thinking individual can never know what is truly right or truly wrong because existence is too complex to encompass a complete understanding of the physical or metaphysical world. The angst involved is apparently perplexing, so individuals struggle to find a path that they alone are responsible to follow.
People who sit around with too much time on their hands are generally regarded as philosophers and their idle thinking is often adopted and discussed ad nauseum by others who think a lot with too much time on their hands. Though Sartre never advocated for forcing his existential philosophy on the masses, others were all too willing to misuse existential thinking to bolster new movements. Karl Marx was one of those people and so was Adolf Hitler who, like Sartre, spent extended amounts of time locked up and probably should have remained that way.
Taken to the next step, philosophy becomes righteous thinking or weaponized philosophy defined as religion or political ideology and in contemporary society those lines are blurred. When something is described as an “existential threat”, it conveys a fearful warning that followers of a movement may be lost and the movement itself may perish under the light of reexamination.
This is what is happening today in the US with a presidential impeachment. The notion that a nation can only be led by highly educated intellectuals endowed with a special wokeness is being torn asunder by a populist messenger proving through direct concrete action that the notion is a fraud.
At a time when destructive political winds have been blowing the US middle class into a timid globalist sellout, the president has revived the “Big Stick” foreign policy of Teddy Roosevelt and its working. The existential threat is not to the constitution or the people it’s to a parasitic status quo that thinks we are too dumb to fathom a four-syllable-word like Existential.
Impeachment is a political assassination not to save us but to save themselves. If there’s an existential threat its them not the president.
An existential threat is a threat to your existance.What DO you take them to mean, Crepitus?I hate to break it to you kiddo, but existential threats don't have anything to do with existentialism. You are badly confused.We’ve been hearing a lot about “existential” threats lately so we might want to think about what an existential threat is. The word seems to come from “existentialism” which is a philosophy that gained traction in the mid 1940’s largely though the works of Jean-Paul Sartre, a brilliant, neurotic, French playwright and communist admirer.
Existentialism is based on the precept that a thinking individual can never know what is truly right or truly wrong because existence is too complex to encompass a complete understanding of the physical or metaphysical world. The angst involved is apparently perplexing, so individuals struggle to find a path that they alone are responsible to follow.
People who sit around with too much time on their hands are generally regarded as philosophers and their idle thinking is often adopted and discussed ad nauseum by others who think a lot with too much time on their hands. Though Sartre never advocated for forcing his existential philosophy on the masses, others were all too willing to misuse existential thinking to bolster new movements. Karl Marx was one of those people and so was Adolf Hitler who, like Sartre, spent extended amounts of time locked up and probably should have remained that way.
Taken to the next step, philosophy becomes righteous thinking or weaponized philosophy defined as religion or political ideology and in contemporary society those lines are blurred. When something is described as an “existential threat”, it conveys a fearful warning that followers of a movement may be lost and the movement itself may perish under the light of reexamination.
This is what is happening today in the US with a presidential impeachment. The notion that a nation can only be led by highly educated intellectuals endowed with a special wokeness is being torn asunder by a populist messenger proving through direct concrete action that the notion is a fraud.
At a time when destructive political winds have been blowing the US middle class into a timid globalist sellout, the president has revived the “Big Stick” foreign policy of Teddy Roosevelt and its working. The existential threat is not to the constitution or the people it’s to a parasitic status quo that thinks we are too dumb to fathom a four-syllable-word like Existential.
Impeachment is a political assassination not to save us but to save themselves. If there’s an existential threat its them not the president.
An existential threat is a threat to your existance.What DO you take them to mean, Crepitus?I hate to break it to you kiddo, but existential threats don't have anything to do with existentialism. You are badly confused.We’ve been hearing a lot about “existential” threats lately so we might want to think about what an existential threat is. The word seems to come from “existentialism” which is a philosophy that gained traction in the mid 1940’s largely though the works of Jean-Paul Sartre, a brilliant, neurotic, French playwright and communist admirer.
Existentialism is based on the precept that a thinking individual can never know what is truly right or truly wrong because existence is too complex to encompass a complete understanding of the physical or metaphysical world. The angst involved is apparently perplexing, so individuals struggle to find a path that they alone are responsible to follow.
People who sit around with too much time on their hands are generally regarded as philosophers and their idle thinking is often adopted and discussed ad nauseum by others who think a lot with too much time on their hands. Though Sartre never advocated for forcing his existential philosophy on the masses, others were all too willing to misuse existential thinking to bolster new movements. Karl Marx was one of those people and so was Adolf Hitler who, like Sartre, spent extended amounts of time locked up and probably should have remained that way.
Taken to the next step, philosophy becomes righteous thinking or weaponized philosophy defined as religion or political ideology and in contemporary society those lines are blurred. When something is described as an “existential threat”, it conveys a fearful warning that followers of a movement may be lost and the movement itself may perish under the light of reexamination.
This is what is happening today in the US with a presidential impeachment. The notion that a nation can only be led by highly educated intellectuals endowed with a special wokeness is being torn asunder by a populist messenger proving through direct concrete action that the notion is a fraud.
At a time when destructive political winds have been blowing the US middle class into a timid globalist sellout, the president has revived the “Big Stick” foreign policy of Teddy Roosevelt and its working. The existential threat is not to the constitution or the people it’s to a parasitic status quo that thinks we are too dumb to fathom a four-syllable-word like Existential.
Impeachment is a political assassination not to save us but to save themselves. If there’s an existential threat its them not the president.
Come on TT, shake yourself. There's no crime here. And if this attempt falls through there will be another fabricated travesty to take it's place, just like they did with the Russia thing. The truth is, Democrats will hold onto their impeachment dream till the bitter end. If justice is finally served, and that isCriminals do what criminals do. Trump is being held to account for his illegal activities. If he hadnt done it we wouldnt be here.We’ve been hearing a lot about “existential” threats lately so we might want to think about what an existential threat is. The word seems to come from “existentialism” which is a philosophy that gained traction in the mid 1940’s largely though the works of Jean-Paul Sartre, a brilliant, neurotic, French playwright and communist admirer.
Existentialism is based on the precept that a thinking individual can never know what is truly right or truly wrong because existence is too complex to encompass a complete understanding of the physical or metaphysical world. The angst involved is apparently perplexing, so individuals struggle to find a path that they alone are responsible to follow.
People who sit around with too much time on their hands are generally regarded as philosophers and their idle thinking is often adopted and discussed ad nauseum by others who think a lot with too much time on their hands. Though Sartre never advocated for forcing his existential philosophy on the masses, others were all too willing to misuse existential thinking to bolster new movements. Karl Marx was one of those people and so was Adolf Hitler who, like Sartre, spent extended amounts of time locked up and probably should have remained that way.
Taken to the next step, philosophy becomes righteous thinking or weaponized philosophy defined as religion or political ideology and in contemporary society those lines are blurred. When something is described as an “existential threat”, it conveys a fearful warning that followers of a movement may be lost and the movement itself may perish under the light of reexamination.
This is what is happening today in the US with a presidential impeachment. The notion that a nation can only be led by highly educated intellectuals endowed with a special wokeness is being torn asunder by a populist messenger proving through direct concrete action that the notion is a fraud.
At a time when destructive political winds have been blowing the US middle class into a timid globalist sellout, the president has revived the “Big Stick” foreign policy of Teddy Roosevelt and its working. The existential threat is not to the constitution or the people it’s to a parasitic status quo that thinks we are too dumb to fathom a four-syllable-word like Existential.
Impeachment is a political assassination not to save us but to save themselves. If there’s an existential threat its them not the president.
It's a definition. Those aren't open to interpretation.I hate to break it to you kiddo, but existential threats don't have anything to do with existentialism. You are badly confused.We’ve been hearing a lot about “existential” threats lately so we might want to think about what an existential threat is. The word seems to come from “existentialism” which is a philosophy that gained traction in the mid 1940’s largely though the works of Jean-Paul Sartre, a brilliant, neurotic, French playwright and communist admirer.
Existentialism is based on the precept that a thinking individual can never know what is truly right or truly wrong because existence is too complex to encompass a complete understanding of the physical or metaphysical world. The angst involved is apparently perplexing, so individuals struggle to find a path that they alone are responsible to follow.
People who sit around with too much time on their hands are generally regarded as philosophers and their idle thinking is often adopted and discussed ad nauseum by others who think a lot with too much time on their hands. Though Sartre never advocated for forcing his existential philosophy on the masses, others were all too willing to misuse existential thinking to bolster new movements. Karl Marx was one of those people and so was Adolf Hitler who, like Sartre, spent extended amounts of time locked up and probably should have remained that way.
Taken to the next step, philosophy becomes righteous thinking or weaponized philosophy defined as religion or political ideology and in contemporary society those lines are blurred. When something is described as an “existential threat”, it conveys a fearful warning that followers of a movement may be lost and the movement itself may perish under the light of reexamination.
This is what is happening today in the US with a presidential impeachment. The notion that a nation can only be led by highly educated intellectuals endowed with a special wokeness is being torn asunder by a populist messenger proving through direct concrete action that the notion is a fraud.
At a time when destructive political winds have been blowing the US middle class into a timid globalist sellout, the president has revived the “Big Stick” foreign policy of Teddy Roosevelt and its working. The existential threat is not to the constitution or the people it’s to a parasitic status quo that thinks we are too dumb to fathom a four-syllable-word like Existential.
Impeachment is a political assassination not to save us but to save themselves. If there’s an existential threat its them not the president.
It's my interpretation; I stand by it.
Thanks.
An existential threat is a threat to your existance.What DO you take them to mean, Crepitus?I hate to break it to you kiddo, but existential threats don't have anything to do with existentialism. You are badly confused.We’ve been hearing a lot about “existential” threats lately so we might want to think about what an existential threat is. The word seems to come from “existentialism” which is a philosophy that gained traction in the mid 1940’s largely though the works of Jean-Paul Sartre, a brilliant, neurotic, French playwright and communist admirer.
Existentialism is based on the precept that a thinking individual can never know what is truly right or truly wrong because existence is too complex to encompass a complete understanding of the physical or metaphysical world. The angst involved is apparently perplexing, so individuals struggle to find a path that they alone are responsible to follow.
People who sit around with too much time on their hands are generally regarded as philosophers and their idle thinking is often adopted and discussed ad nauseum by others who think a lot with too much time on their hands. Though Sartre never advocated for forcing his existential philosophy on the masses, others were all too willing to misuse existential thinking to bolster new movements. Karl Marx was one of those people and so was Adolf Hitler who, like Sartre, spent extended amounts of time locked up and probably should have remained that way.
Taken to the next step, philosophy becomes righteous thinking or weaponized philosophy defined as religion or political ideology and in contemporary society those lines are blurred. When something is described as an “existential threat”, it conveys a fearful warning that followers of a movement may be lost and the movement itself may perish under the light of reexamination.
This is what is happening today in the US with a presidential impeachment. The notion that a nation can only be led by highly educated intellectuals endowed with a special wokeness is being torn asunder by a populist messenger proving through direct concrete action that the notion is a fraud.
At a time when destructive political winds have been blowing the US middle class into a timid globalist sellout, the president has revived the “Big Stick” foreign policy of Teddy Roosevelt and its working. The existential threat is not to the constitution or the people it’s to a parasitic status quo that thinks we are too dumb to fathom a four-syllable-word like Existential.
Impeachment is a political assassination not to save us but to save themselves. If there’s an existential threat its them not the president.
conservatives are an existential threat
An existential threat is a threat to your existance.What DO you take them to mean, Crepitus?I hate to break it to you kiddo, but existential threats don't have anything to do with existentialism. You are badly confused.We’ve been hearing a lot about “existential” threats lately so we might want to think about what an existential threat is. The word seems to come from “existentialism” which is a philosophy that gained traction in the mid 1940’s largely though the works of Jean-Paul Sartre, a brilliant, neurotic, French playwright and communist admirer.
Existentialism is based on the precept that a thinking individual can never know what is truly right or truly wrong because existence is too complex to encompass a complete understanding of the physical or metaphysical world. The angst involved is apparently perplexing, so individuals struggle to find a path that they alone are responsible to follow.
People who sit around with too much time on their hands are generally regarded as philosophers and their idle thinking is often adopted and discussed ad nauseum by others who think a lot with too much time on their hands. Though Sartre never advocated for forcing his existential philosophy on the masses, others were all too willing to misuse existential thinking to bolster new movements. Karl Marx was one of those people and so was Adolf Hitler who, like Sartre, spent extended amounts of time locked up and probably should have remained that way.
Taken to the next step, philosophy becomes righteous thinking or weaponized philosophy defined as religion or political ideology and in contemporary society those lines are blurred. When something is described as an “existential threat”, it conveys a fearful warning that followers of a movement may be lost and the movement itself may perish under the light of reexamination.
This is what is happening today in the US with a presidential impeachment. The notion that a nation can only be led by highly educated intellectuals endowed with a special wokeness is being torn asunder by a populist messenger proving through direct concrete action that the notion is a fraud.
At a time when destructive political winds have been blowing the US middle class into a timid globalist sellout, the president has revived the “Big Stick” foreign policy of Teddy Roosevelt and its working. The existential threat is not to the constitution or the people it’s to a parasitic status quo that thinks we are too dumb to fathom a four-syllable-word like Existential.
Impeachment is a political assassination not to save us but to save themselves. If there’s an existential threat its them not the president.
and end blue collar jobs for climate change. Creepy, sleepy said so last night on the debate. ouch!!!! hurry folks, everyone should back old creepy, sleepy because he wants you unemployed and begging him for money. And Ukraine and China gave him plenty of money. Now that's extortion babyToo many people throw the term "existential threat" to the US around way too frequently, and these are the people that want to cut the DOD budget and give $billions to terrorist supporting states like Iran. Calling Trump an "existential threat" most likely means to "the establishment" drones bought and paid for by K-Street PACs, and/or the Wall Street hacks that want to move another 66,000 US factories to China.
An existential threat is a threat to your existance.What DO you take them to mean, Crepitus?I hate to break it to you kiddo, but existential threats don't have anything to do with existentialism. You are badly confused.We’ve been hearing a lot about “existential” threats lately so we might want to think about what an existential threat is. The word seems to come from “existentialism” which is a philosophy that gained traction in the mid 1940’s largely though the works of Jean-Paul Sartre, a brilliant, neurotic, French playwright and communist admirer.
Existentialism is based on the precept that a thinking individual can never know what is truly right or truly wrong because existence is too complex to encompass a complete understanding of the physical or metaphysical world. The angst involved is apparently perplexing, so individuals struggle to find a path that they alone are responsible to follow.
People who sit around with too much time on their hands are generally regarded as philosophers and their idle thinking is often adopted and discussed ad nauseum by others who think a lot with too much time on their hands. Though Sartre never advocated for forcing his existential philosophy on the masses, others were all too willing to misuse existential thinking to bolster new movements. Karl Marx was one of those people and so was Adolf Hitler who, like Sartre, spent extended amounts of time locked up and probably should have remained that way.
Taken to the next step, philosophy becomes righteous thinking or weaponized philosophy defined as religion or political ideology and in contemporary society those lines are blurred. When something is described as an “existential threat”, it conveys a fearful warning that followers of a movement may be lost and the movement itself may perish under the light of reexamination.
This is what is happening today in the US with a presidential impeachment. The notion that a nation can only be led by highly educated intellectuals endowed with a special wokeness is being torn asunder by a populist messenger proving through direct concrete action that the notion is a fraud.
At a time when destructive political winds have been blowing the US middle class into a timid globalist sellout, the president has revived the “Big Stick” foreign policy of Teddy Roosevelt and its working. The existential threat is not to the constitution or the people it’s to a parasitic status quo that thinks we are too dumb to fathom a four-syllable-word like Existential.
Impeachment is a political assassination not to save us but to save themselves. If there’s an existential threat its them not the president.
conservatives are an existential threat
Yup.
To the average national IQ.
Why would you say they don't have the skills? Because their training is in something else? Leadership, native intelligence (common sense), integrity, and a willingness to be open-minded are far more qualifying skills and traits than any number of degrees provided by a University.I'm not sure what you mean by "educated" or "formal education." Truman had post-HS training as a bookkeeper. Eisenhower of course was a West Point grad. Reagan was public school kid and avg student at Eureka College. W had a world class prep and Ivy League pedigree, but it was wasted (pun) on him.I do blame us. We get the government we deserve.While all politicians lie, I don't blame them, I blame us. We don't want to hear the truth. We want a single, simple, bumper-sticker-sized solution to every complex problem. We get what we deserve, not what we want.And when you want to be lied to, you ask a professional politician.
However, I just happen to have a fundamental disagreement with the notion that only the educated can or should be running the government. There are millions of people who have no formal education, yet can run circles around the 'elite' with just native intelligence and integrity. Today, the educated are not so much educated as they are indoctrinated (at least in terms of political philosophy). So, it isn't a matter of anti-intellectualism as it is the fact that the 'educated elite' have proven themselves to be base and untrustworthy.
But HS civics, as it used to be, and how a bill becomes a law, and how to read bills and financial documents …… I mean there's no degree in "president." I don't think a Teamster or Electrician really has the skills … unless they move into management or something beyond what those kinds of professions entail. Not to disparage them. I wouldn't want Obama or Trump to wire my house.
I have no problem with a educated, professional bureaucracy. Like the generals in the army they know how to fight a war (or execute a program). What they shouldn't do, and what they don't do, is decide when and who to fight. That is what presidents and congressmen are for.I do blame us. We get the government we deserve.While all politicians lie, I don't blame them, I blame us. We don't want to hear the truth. We want a single, simple, bumper-sticker-sized solution to every complex problem. We get what we deserve, not what we want.And when you want to be lied to, you ask a professional politician.
However, I just happen to have a fundamental disagreement with the notion that only the educated can or should be running the government. There are millions of people who have no formal education, yet can run circles around the 'elite' with just native intelligence and integrity. Today, the educated are not so much educated as they are indoctrinated (at least in terms of political philosophy). So, it isn't a matter of anti-intellectualism as it is the fact that the 'educated elite' have proven themselves to be base and untrustworthy.
Yes, but we weren't talking about the Military. They train and study war so they should be very good at it. I have no problem with that, just like you. I also agree that they must always be subservient to the Civilian leadership of the country.I have no problem with a educated, professional bureaucracy. Like the generals in the army they know how to fight a war (or execute a program). What they shouldn't do, and what they don't do, is decide when and who to fight. That is what presidents and congressmen are for.I do blame us. We get the government we deserve.While all politicians lie, I don't blame them, I blame us. We don't want to hear the truth. We want a single, simple, bumper-sticker-sized solution to every complex problem. We get what we deserve, not what we want.And when you want to be lied to, you ask a professional politician.
However, I just happen to have a fundamental disagreement with the notion that only the educated can or should be running the government. There are millions of people who have no formal education, yet can run circles around the 'elite' with just native intelligence and integrity. Today, the educated are not so much educated as they are indoctrinated (at least in terms of political philosophy). So, it isn't a matter of anti-intellectualism as it is the fact that the 'educated elite' have proven themselves to be base and untrustworthy.
We’ve been hearing a lot about “existential” threats lately so we might want to think about what an existential threat is. The word seems to come from “existentialism” which is a philosophy that gained traction in the mid 1940’s largely though the works of Jean-Paul Sartre, a brilliant, neurotic, French playwright and communist admirer.
Existentialism is based on the precept that a thinking individual can never know what is truly right or truly wrong because existence is too complex to encompass a complete understanding of the physical or metaphysical world. The angst involved is apparently perplexing, so individuals struggle to find a path that they alone are responsible to follow.
People who sit around with too much time on their hands are generally regarded as philosophers and their idle thinking is often adopted and discussed ad nauseum by others who think a lot with too much time on their hands. Though Sartre never advocated for forcing his existential philosophy on the masses, others were all too willing to misuse existential thinking to bolster new movements. Karl Marx was one of those people and so was Adolf Hitler who, like Sartre, spent extended amounts of time locked up and probably should have remained that way.
Taken to the next step, philosophy becomes righteous thinking or weaponized philosophy defined as religion or political ideology and in contemporary society those lines are blurred. When something is described as an “existential threat”, it conveys a fearful warning that followers of a movement may be lost and the movement itself may perish under the light of reexamination.
This is what is happening today in the US with a presidential impeachment. The notion that a nation can only be led by highly educated intellectuals endowed with a special wokeness is being torn asunder by a populist messenger proving through direct concrete action that the notion is a fraud.
At a time when destructive political winds have been blowing the US middle class into a timid globalist sellout, the president has revived the “Big Stick” foreign policy of Teddy Roosevelt and its working. The existential threat is not to the constitution or the people it’s to a parasitic status quo that thinks we are too dumb to fathom a four-syllable-word like Existential.
Impeachment is a political assassination not to save us but to save themselves. If there’s an existential threat its them not the president.
There is definitely a crime here. You know it and I know it. If you give him a pass on this then the next crooked democrat will do the same. In fact it gives a pass to crooked politicians at all levels to do so.Come on TT, shake yourself. There's no crime here. And if this attempt falls through there will be another fabricated travesty to take it's place, just like they did with the Russia thing. The truth is, Democrats will hold onto their impeachment dream till the bitter end. If justice is finally served, and that isCriminals do what criminals do. Trump is being held to account for his illegal activities. If he hadnt done it we wouldnt be here.We’ve been hearing a lot about “existential” threats lately so we might want to think about what an existential threat is. The word seems to come from “existentialism” which is a philosophy that gained traction in the mid 1940’s largely though the works of Jean-Paul Sartre, a brilliant, neurotic, French playwright and communist admirer.
Existentialism is based on the precept that a thinking individual can never know what is truly right or truly wrong because existence is too complex to encompass a complete understanding of the physical or metaphysical world. The angst involved is apparently perplexing, so individuals struggle to find a path that they alone are responsible to follow.
People who sit around with too much time on their hands are generally regarded as philosophers and their idle thinking is often adopted and discussed ad nauseum by others who think a lot with too much time on their hands. Though Sartre never advocated for forcing his existential philosophy on the masses, others were all too willing to misuse existential thinking to bolster new movements. Karl Marx was one of those people and so was Adolf Hitler who, like Sartre, spent extended amounts of time locked up and probably should have remained that way.
Taken to the next step, philosophy becomes righteous thinking or weaponized philosophy defined as religion or political ideology and in contemporary society those lines are blurred. When something is described as an “existential threat”, it conveys a fearful warning that followers of a movement may be lost and the movement itself may perish under the light of reexamination.
This is what is happening today in the US with a presidential impeachment. The notion that a nation can only be led by highly educated intellectuals endowed with a special wokeness is being torn asunder by a populist messenger proving through direct concrete action that the notion is a fraud.
At a time when destructive political winds have been blowing the US middle class into a timid globalist sellout, the president has revived the “Big Stick” foreign policy of Teddy Roosevelt and its working. The existential threat is not to the constitution or the people it’s to a parasitic status quo that thinks we are too dumb to fathom a four-syllable-word like Existential.
Impeachment is a political assassination not to save us but to save themselves. If there’s an existential threat its them not the president.
what we want, they'll need plenty of jail cells for Comey, Brennen, Strzok, Page. Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein andthe other deep state POSs.
What is the crime, since you know it?There is definitely a crime here. You know it and I know it. If you give him a pass on this then the next crooked democrat will do the same. In fact it gives a pass to crooked politicians at all levels to do so.Come on TT, shake yourself. There's no crime here. And if this attempt falls through there will be another fabricated travesty to take it's place, just like they did with the Russia thing. The truth is, Democrats will hold onto their impeachment dream till the bitter end. If justice is finally served, and that isCriminals do what criminals do. Trump is being held to account for his illegal activities. If he hadnt done it we wouldnt be here.We’ve been hearing a lot about “existential” threats lately so we might want to think about what an existential threat is. The word seems to come from “existentialism” which is a philosophy that gained traction in the mid 1940’s largely though the works of Jean-Paul Sartre, a brilliant, neurotic, French playwright and communist admirer.
Existentialism is based on the precept that a thinking individual can never know what is truly right or truly wrong because existence is too complex to encompass a complete understanding of the physical or metaphysical world. The angst involved is apparently perplexing, so individuals struggle to find a path that they alone are responsible to follow.
People who sit around with too much time on their hands are generally regarded as philosophers and their idle thinking is often adopted and discussed ad nauseum by others who think a lot with too much time on their hands. Though Sartre never advocated for forcing his existential philosophy on the masses, others were all too willing to misuse existential thinking to bolster new movements. Karl Marx was one of those people and so was Adolf Hitler who, like Sartre, spent extended amounts of time locked up and probably should have remained that way.
Taken to the next step, philosophy becomes righteous thinking or weaponized philosophy defined as religion or political ideology and in contemporary society those lines are blurred. When something is described as an “existential threat”, it conveys a fearful warning that followers of a movement may be lost and the movement itself may perish under the light of reexamination.
This is what is happening today in the US with a presidential impeachment. The notion that a nation can only be led by highly educated intellectuals endowed with a special wokeness is being torn asunder by a populist messenger proving through direct concrete action that the notion is a fraud.
At a time when destructive political winds have been blowing the US middle class into a timid globalist sellout, the president has revived the “Big Stick” foreign policy of Teddy Roosevelt and its working. The existential threat is not to the constitution or the people it’s to a parasitic status quo that thinks we are too dumb to fathom a four-syllable-word like Existential.
Impeachment is a political assassination not to save us but to save themselves. If there’s an existential threat its them not the president.
what we want, they'll need plenty of jail cells for Comey, Brennen, Strzok, Page. Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein andthe other deep state POSs.
Take your pick. Misuse of public funds and various crimes linked to that. You cant use public money to your own benefit in any democracy, only in a dictatorship. You know that but your corrupt soul cant admiit it.What is the crime, since you know it?There is definitely a crime here. You know it and I know it. If you give him a pass on this then the next crooked democrat will do the same. In fact it gives a pass to crooked politicians at all levels to do so.Come on TT, shake yourself. There's no crime here. And if this attempt falls through there will be another fabricated travesty to take it's place, just like they did with the Russia thing. The truth is, Democrats will hold onto their impeachment dream till the bitter end. If justice is finally served, and that isCriminals do what criminals do. Trump is being held to account for his illegal activities. If he hadnt done it we wouldnt be here.We’ve been hearing a lot about “existential” threats lately so we might want to think about what an existential threat is. The word seems to come from “existentialism” which is a philosophy that gained traction in the mid 1940’s largely though the works of Jean-Paul Sartre, a brilliant, neurotic, French playwright and communist admirer.
Existentialism is based on the precept that a thinking individual can never know what is truly right or truly wrong because existence is too complex to encompass a complete understanding of the physical or metaphysical world. The angst involved is apparently perplexing, so individuals struggle to find a path that they alone are responsible to follow.
People who sit around with too much time on their hands are generally regarded as philosophers and their idle thinking is often adopted and discussed ad nauseum by others who think a lot with too much time on their hands. Though Sartre never advocated for forcing his existential philosophy on the masses, others were all too willing to misuse existential thinking to bolster new movements. Karl Marx was one of those people and so was Adolf Hitler who, like Sartre, spent extended amounts of time locked up and probably should have remained that way.
Taken to the next step, philosophy becomes righteous thinking or weaponized philosophy defined as religion or political ideology and in contemporary society those lines are blurred. When something is described as an “existential threat”, it conveys a fearful warning that followers of a movement may be lost and the movement itself may perish under the light of reexamination.
This is what is happening today in the US with a presidential impeachment. The notion that a nation can only be led by highly educated intellectuals endowed with a special wokeness is being torn asunder by a populist messenger proving through direct concrete action that the notion is a fraud.
At a time when destructive political winds have been blowing the US middle class into a timid globalist sellout, the president has revived the “Big Stick” foreign policy of Teddy Roosevelt and its working. The existential threat is not to the constitution or the people it’s to a parasitic status quo that thinks we are too dumb to fathom a four-syllable-word like Existential.
Impeachment is a political assassination not to save us but to save themselves. If there’s an existential threat its them not the president.
what we want, they'll need plenty of jail cells for Comey, Brennen, Strzok, Page. Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein andthe other deep state POSs.
Swamp Queen Peliser is blackmailing the country, that’s a crime and an abuse of power
Misuse of public funds? What is that statute big guy? Make believe huh? Btw he has authority to hold money, ask creepy if you don’t fire the prosecutor you don’t get the billion joe! Too. I’d like to know how you go through life with so much conflict in your own head?Take your pick. Misuse of public funds and various crimes linked to that. You cant use public money to your own benefit in any democracy, only in a dictatorship. You know that but your corrupt soul cant admiit it.What is the crime, since you know it?There is definitely a crime here. You know it and I know it. If you give him a pass on this then the next crooked democrat will do the same. In fact it gives a pass to crooked politicians at all levels to do so.Come on TT, shake yourself. There's no crime here. And if this attempt falls through there will be another fabricated travesty to take it's place, just like they did with the Russia thing. The truth is, Democrats will hold onto their impeachment dream till the bitter end. If justice is finally served, and that isCriminals do what criminals do. Trump is being held to account for his illegal activities. If he hadnt done it we wouldnt be here.We’ve been hearing a lot about “existential” threats lately so we might want to think about what an existential threat is. The word seems to come from “existentialism” which is a philosophy that gained traction in the mid 1940’s largely though the works of Jean-Paul Sartre, a brilliant, neurotic, French playwright and communist admirer.
Existentialism is based on the precept that a thinking individual can never know what is truly right or truly wrong because existence is too complex to encompass a complete understanding of the physical or metaphysical world. The angst involved is apparently perplexing, so individuals struggle to find a path that they alone are responsible to follow.
People who sit around with too much time on their hands are generally regarded as philosophers and their idle thinking is often adopted and discussed ad nauseum by others who think a lot with too much time on their hands. Though Sartre never advocated for forcing his existential philosophy on the masses, others were all too willing to misuse existential thinking to bolster new movements. Karl Marx was one of those people and so was Adolf Hitler who, like Sartre, spent extended amounts of time locked up and probably should have remained that way.
Taken to the next step, philosophy becomes righteous thinking or weaponized philosophy defined as religion or political ideology and in contemporary society those lines are blurred. When something is described as an “existential threat”, it conveys a fearful warning that followers of a movement may be lost and the movement itself may perish under the light of reexamination.
This is what is happening today in the US with a presidential impeachment. The notion that a nation can only be led by highly educated intellectuals endowed with a special wokeness is being torn asunder by a populist messenger proving through direct concrete action that the notion is a fraud.
At a time when destructive political winds have been blowing the US middle class into a timid globalist sellout, the president has revived the “Big Stick” foreign policy of Teddy Roosevelt and its working. The existential threat is not to the constitution or the people it’s to a parasitic status quo that thinks we are too dumb to fathom a four-syllable-word like Existential.
Impeachment is a political assassination not to save us but to save themselves. If there’s an existential threat its them not the president.
what we want, they'll need plenty of jail cells for Comey, Brennen, Strzok, Page. Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein andthe other deep state POSs.
Swamp Queen Peliser is blackmailing the country, that’s a crime and an abuse of power
