Exposed: Insane AGWCult Pathological Lies About Everest

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
May 20, 2009
146,869
70,012
2,330
Remember the Everest avalanche that was caused by Manmade Global Warming (Aka: Climate change, Climate Disruption).

Guess what?

The AGWCult lied. Again.

Caught with their thumb on the scale. Again.

They just don't give a fuck how many times they get caught

"The Khumbu Icefall is the first major obstacle to climbing Everest and one of the mountain’s most relentless killers. Over time, as it migrates downhill from Camp I (19,900 feet) to Base Camp (17,600) at a rate of a few feet per day, the Khumbu Glacier fractures into towering columns, crumbling ice ledges, and deep crevasses that are constantly moving and whose walls are prone to collapsing. Each year, a group of Sherpas known as the Icefall Doctors are hired by Nepal’s government, through the Sagarmatha Pollution Control Committee. The Doctors are responsible for a single, dangerous job: snaking a route through the Icefall, stringing ropes and placing aluminum ladders over the crevasses and up the cliffs.

Rising directly above the Icefall is Everest’s west shoulder, a mile-high face that supports a giant hanging glacier. As that glacier creeps downward, it regularly calves, sending ice blocks rocketing toward the route. In recent years, the route to Camp I has run up the left side of the Icefall, directly under the overhang, because of unstable conditions through the middle."

Everest's Darkest Year | Mountaineering | OutsideOnline.com
 
Frank, why do you think global warming caused that specific avalanche on Everest? I didn't see anyone else mentioning that argument, only you.

As usual, you have decisively refuted your own strawman. It's a pity you can't address the issue honestly, or any issue for that matter.
 
Every village has an idiot, and Frankie serves the function well here.

Actually this village is filled with AGW cult members that if you molded their brains together would still have no mass. And obviously they serve their function well so Al Gore can afford his 10th non-environmental friendly mansion.
 
And what has Al Gore to do with disapearing glaciers and a warming atmosphere and ocean? Note that Gore specifically stated that all he was doing was putting into layman's terms what the scientists were saying. If you wish to understand what is being presented about the present warming, you read peer reviewed scientific journals, you do not referance obese junkies on the AM radio.
 
Lets face it......virtually any "event" that happens globally is blamed on AGW by the climate religion. In fact, one will notice that when a news report of such an event happens, it is soon followed by some AGW related entity tagging it with the AGW theme. Like clockwork........

No level of selectivity applied.

Which is exactly why 80% of the country thinks the scientists don't know shit about shit.......and which is exactly why public policy in the area of AGW is laughable. Its not even debatable. When you throw out a billion predictions that end up falling on your face, people don't take you seriously. INdeed, over time, people end up saying, "What the fuck?":up::eusa_dance::eusa_dance:


That's the way it works in Realville. That's the way it will always work. People eventually snuff out fraud when they finally see it.......exactly what is happening with this fraud president of ours. When you lie enough, most people end up coming around to seeing it for what it is. The fringe religion will always exist......but this whole AGW concept has been effectively marginalized.......LMAO.....by themselves!!!:up::gay::gay:
 
Frank, why do you think global warming caused that specific avalanche on Everest? I didn't see anyone else mentioning that argument, only you.

As usual, you have decisively refuted your own strawman. It's a pity you can't address the issue honestly, or any issue for that matter.

Your Cult took credit for the avalance
 
USS Consensus struck amidship and listing badly to port

MAYDAY! MAYDAY!
 

That article predates the avalanche, and has nothing to do with it.

Again, you are the only person declaring that particular avalanche was caused by global warming.

So, you're busted for making up yet another one of your famous dishonest strawmen. And your feeble flailing to cover up your failure is quite amusing. Why don't you just admit you got caught making shit up again? It's not like you're fooling anyone.
 

That article predates the avalanche, and has nothing to do with it.

Again, you are the only person declaring that particular avalanche was caused by global warming.

So, you're busted for making up yet another one of your famous dishonest strawmen. And your feeble flailing to cover up your failure is quite amusing. Why don't you just admit you got caught making shit up again? It's not like you're fooling anyone.

How about these?

Climate change played role in Everest avalanche, scientists say

Climate change played role in Everest avalanche, scientists say | Al Jazeera America


"I am at Everest Basecamp right now and things are dire because of climate change," John All, a climber, scientist, and professor of geography at Western Kentucky University, told me by email. "The ice is melting at unprecedented rates and [that] greatly increases the risk to climbers."

"You could say [that] climate change closed Mt. Everest this year," he added.
The Year Climate Change Closed Everest - Svati Kirsten Narula - The Atlantic

The 18 April avalanche, in which ice and snow swept away 16 Nepali sherpa guides, was the deadliest disaster on the 8,850-m (29,035-ft) Mount Everest and shocked the global mountaineering community.

It was not the only disaster that could be linked to melting glaciers and the impact of climate change.
Global warming threatens more deadly Everest-like avalanches: report | Reuters
 

That headline is not supported by anything in the article. Bad editing by Al Jazeera.

"You could say [that] climate change closed Mt. Everest this year," he added.
The Year Climate Change Closed Everest - Svati Kirsten Narula - The Atlantic

Yeah, the pop scientist climber. Kind of a dumbass glory hound. Tends to fall into crevasses.

It was not the only disaster that could be linked to melting glaciers and the impact of climate change.
Global warming threatens more deadly Everest-like avalanches: report | Reuters

And some Nepalese dude.

So, congratulations. You've found two people who agree with Frank. I stand corrected, and should not have said "nobody". Just no actual AGW scientists, or people on this board.
 

That headline is not supported by anything in the article. Bad editing by Al Jazeera.

"You could say [that] climate change closed Mt. Everest this year," he added.
The Year Climate Change Closed Everest - Svati Kirsten Narula - The Atlantic

Yeah, the pop scientist climber. Kind of a dumbass glory hound. Tends to fall into crevasses.

It was not the only disaster that could be linked to melting glaciers and the impact of climate change.
Global warming threatens more deadly Everest-like avalanches: report | Reuters

And some Nepalese dude.

So, congratulations. You've found two people who agree with Frank. I stand corrected, and should not have said "nobody". Just no actual AGW scientists, or people on this board.



LMAO......could I be laughing any harder???



s0n.......there are exactly 2 AGW ( 3 if you include Old Rocks.....but he's not obsessed ) assholes in this forum. You......and Crick. s0n.....that's laughable in an ENVIRONMENT forum. This place is dominate by SKEPTICS.......more than a dozen regularly post in here.



:DlOsInG:D
 

That headline is not supported by anything in the article. Bad editing by Al Jazeera.



Yeah, the pop scientist climber. Kind of a dumbass glory hound. Tends to fall into crevasses.

It was not the only disaster that could be linked to melting glaciers and the impact of climate change.
Global warming threatens more deadly Everest-like avalanches: report | Reuters

And some Nepalese dude.

So, congratulations. You've found two people who agree with Frank. I stand corrected, and should not have said "nobody". Just no actual AGW scientists, or people on this board.



LMAO......could I be laughing any harder???



s0n.......there are exactly 2 AGW ( 3 if you include Old Rocks.....but he's not obsessed ) assholes in this forum. You......and Crick. s0n.....that's laughable in an ENVIRONMENT forum. This place is dominate by SKEPTICS.......more than a dozen regularly post in here.



:DlOsInG:D

What's even more funny is that they have conceded the 120 PPM CO2 claim. None of them have any evidence. Match Point won by the skeptics. Nothing really more to argue when your entire concept is blown up.
 

Did you actually have to post this three times before you figured out how to correctly and honestly quote the title of the article you were linking to?

Climate Change Could Make Everest Unclimbable

does not have same meaning as

Could Climate Change Make Everest Unclimbable

The latter is the actual title of the article to which you refer, yet in two chances out of three, you used the former.
 

Forum List

Back
Top