Two things -Cause it is not...
This is Administrative law trying to interfere with Judicial Law....
Judicial Law wins all day and always does...
There is a possibility the Supreme Court could curb Administrative Arrests until this is sorted out.
"Administrative arrests, which are detentions by administrative entities rather than law enforcement, are generally not directly addressed in the U.S. Constitution. However, they are subject to constitutional protections, particularly the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, which safeguard against unreasonable searches and seizures, and protect against self-incrimination, respectively. While the Constitution doesn't explicitly define "administrative arrest," these protections apply to any detention or restraint of a person's freedom, including those by administrative bodies"
This could be the pissing fight the judiciary are waiting for... It is coming up...
This could be the overreach...
Administrative arrests, which are detentions by administrative entities rather than law enforcement, are generally not directly addressed in the U.S. Constitution. However, they are subject to constitutional protections, particularly the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, which safeguard against unreasonable searches and seizures, and protect against self-incrimination, respectively. While the Constitution doesn't explicitly define "administrative arrest," these protections apply to any detention or restraint of a person's freedom, including those by administrative bodies
These are meant to be used sparingly for Terrorism, Trump leveraging into a police state is going to get push back.
1) Wrong person answered
2) You've mouth frothed about Trump, the focus of my question is on the judge.
So your post was irrelevant and a waste of time for both of us. Please be more useful in future.