FBI Director Says a Judge Accused of Helping Someone Evade Immigration Agents Has Been Arrested

Cause it is not...

This is Administrative law trying to interfere with Judicial Law....

Judicial Law wins all day and always does...

There is a possibility the Supreme Court could curb Administrative Arrests until this is sorted out.

"Administrative arrests, which are detentions by administrative entities rather than law enforcement, are generally not directly addressed in the U.S. Constitution. However, they are subject to constitutional protections, particularly the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, which safeguard against unreasonable searches and seizures, and protect against self-incrimination, respectively. While the Constitution doesn't explicitly define "administrative arrest," these protections apply to any detention or restraint of a person's freedom, including those by administrative bodies"
This could be the pissing fight the judiciary are waiting for... It is coming up...
This could be the overreach...

Administrative arrests, which are detentions by administrative entities rather than law enforcement, are generally not directly addressed in the U.S. Constitution. However, they are subject to constitutional protections, particularly the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, which safeguard against unreasonable searches and seizures, and protect against self-incrimination, respectively. While the Constitution doesn't explicitly define "administrative arrest," these protections apply to any detention or restraint of a person's freedom, including those by administrative bodies

These are meant to be used sparingly for Terrorism, Trump leveraging into a police state is going to get push back.
Two things -

1) Wrong person answered

2) You've mouth frothed about Trump, the focus of my question is on the judge.

So your post was irrelevant and a waste of time for both of us. Please be more useful in future.
 
Just remember, the most important aspect of it is the show of power against the court system by the extreme right.

I can say that and still be impartial. I'm a bit surprised over your position you're taking on this issue.
Why surprised? A leftist judge is helping an illegal alien evade the law.
 
ask them,,

fact remains you dont need a warrant to arrest/detain someone in the commission of a crime,,

being here unlawfully is a crime,,
You must first determine they are here illegally, only after that can you arrest them. They can't just stop someone ar random and demand they prove they are citizens.
 
9rzctx.jpg
You, Trump, and I obey the Constitution, little bub.

That's the way it is.
 
Law enforcement doesn't need a warrant to arrest someone. They need probable cause.
Newly uncovered guidance from the Justice Department claims the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) allows federal law enforcement officers to enter the houses of suspected gang members without a warrant and remove them from the country without any judicial review.

which means we can use the ICE tip line to send them to maga neighbors.
 
Uh...charges have already been 'filed'.
The gist of them is that the Govt. alleges that the judge learned of the impending arrest and went back into her chambers..alerted the person in question, and led them out a seldom used door.

If these facts are true..then the judge fucked up...simple as that.

You don't get to break the law..no matter your principles. A judge above all must set the standard.
If the facts are as they allege--she is guilty.
A show arrest was made. No charges filed.
 
They need provable cause to stop and search a vehicle. They can’t arrest you based on suspicion. If they find something illegal in the car then an arrest can occur
You are normally right on the mark but surprisingly off on this one
they don't need to "prove" in a stop and search...suspicion will spur that...

If they let them go, it proves their suspicions were meritless...
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom