FBI took records from Mar A Lago covered by attorney client privilege.

What federal crime applies to a POTUS on the issue? He took them while still POTUS, so what crime? He had a standing order that classified documents were declassified when taken with him, as did GW, as did Øbama.

And don't give us the MSM bullshit that they keep pumping into your head. Give us a real crime (there is no criminal penalty involved in the FRA). And the Espionage Act does not apply to a POTUS or a former POTUS, or Carter, Clinton, GW, and Øbama are all in deep trouble too.
Credible link to GW and Obama's standing orders?
 
What federal crime applies to a POTUS on the issue? He took them while still POTUS, so what crime? He had a standing order that classified documents were declassified when taken with him, as did GW, as did Øbama.

And don't give us the MSM bullshit that they keep pumping into your head. Give us a real crime (there is no criminal penalty involved in the FRA). And the Espionage Act does not apply to a POTUS or a former POTUS, or Carter, Clinton, GW, and Øbama are all in deep trouble too.
He took them when he left the White House therefore was no longer president.
 
Trump said the FBI stole the passports. You avoided that point entirely.

Then you completely missed the point although the point was made clear to everyone else.
/——/ Libtards claimed Trump “stole” classified documents. So, what’s your point?
 
Passports and privileged docs, Simp.


But the MSM said the FBI didn't take passports until they had to say they did.

And the leftoids still cling to every pronouncement the MSM sends forth, double that if it involves Trump.

Hell, they were yapping that Trump took nuclear codes!!! OMG! Old out-of-date codes.

Then they yammered that Trump put the nuclear codes in a fundraising email.

Meanwhile, Clinton lost the nuclear codes:

 
Big fucking deal. Øbama has millions of pages under his control. Fact.

And the PRA has no criminal provision.

All former Presidents take papers and files with them.
And all former presidents have procedures to have those papers approved to be taken. If the wrong papers are mistakenly taken, the mistake is quickly and easily found and corrected.
 
And all former presidents have procedures to have those papers approved to be taken. If the wrong papers are mistakenly taken, the mistake is quickly and easily found and corrected.


Not. No one knows over 5-years later what papers Øbama has.
 
/——/ Libtards claimed Trump “stole” classified documents. So, what’s your point?
7l314wk4r9i91.jpg

its unauthorized retention or disclosure of information related to national defense that could harm the United States or aid its enemies.
 
Big fucking deal. Øbama has millions of pages under his control. Fact.

And the PRA has no criminal provision.

All former Presidents take papers and files with them.
I thought we were talking about Trump and his pending indictments.
 
Making shit up as usual. The only time authorities order anybody away if they feel a person is a threat.
You're the one making shit up.
Usually, the people in the dwelling are a threat, getting in the way and obstructing their search.
Police take that into consideration.

Apparently they felt this way about Trump's lawyers being there; not because of physical threat either.
They're just like anyone else once the search warrant is shown to them and they read it, then give permission.
A nuisance.
 
What federal crime applies to a POTUS on the issue?
The presidential records act violation.
He took them while still POTUS, so what crime?
See above.
He had a standing order that classified documents were declassified when taken with him
No such fucking thing.

“Documents must be declassified page by page; in fact, if TS/SCI [Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information] line by line. The document then is marked declassified (often sanitized) by the authorizing agent along with the date. Consequently, former President Trump’s claim is to me implausible.”
, as did GW, as did Øbama.
You're FOS.

BOTH turned their documents over to the national archivist, THEN, THEY released them back to the president, with a request by the president, either before they leave or mailed after they exit the office
And don't give us the MSM bullshit that they keep pumping into your head. Give us a real crime (there is no criminal penalty involved in the PRA).
YES, there were.
Even if the documents weren't classified,they are NOT his.
And the Espionage Act does not apply to a POTUS or a former POTUS, or Carter, Clinton, GW, and Øbama are all in deep trouble too.
You don't know WTF you're talking about.
 
You're the one making shit up.
Usually, the people in the dwelling are a threat, getting in the way and obstructing their search.
Police take that into consideration.

A female lawyer is of no threat. They wanted nobody around when they did whatever it is they wanted to do, like steal his personal papers and passports.
 
A female lawyer is of no threat. They wanted nobody around when they did whatever it is they wanted to do, like steal his personal papers and passports.
YEP, every single agent, was a democrat, Clinton supporter and loved George Soros.
 
The presidential records act violation.

See above.

No such fucking thing.

“Documents must be declassified page by page; in fact, if TS/SCI [Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information] line by line. The document then is marked declassified (often sanitized) by the authorizing agent along with the date. Consequently, former President Trump’s claim is to me implausible.”

You're FOS.

BOTH turned their documents over to the national archivist, THEN, THEY released them back to the president, with a request by the president, either before they leave or mailed after they exit the office

YES, there were.
Even if the documents weren't classified,they are NOT his.

You don't know WTF you're talking about.
/-----/ You don't know WTF you're talking about

"The President, after all, is the ‘Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States’" according to Article II of the Constitution, the USSC’s majority wrote. "His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security ... flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant." 1988 USSC Majority Ruling.
 
/-----/ You don't know WTF you're talking about

"The President, after all, is the ‘Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States’" according to Article II of the Constitution, the USSC’s majority wrote. "His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security ... flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant." 1988 USSC Majority Ruling.

No, shit RETARD.

There is a protocol, number one, you have to tell someone.
Who did Trump tell?
Eric?

A president can't claim a standing order declassification, as Trump attempted to do.

Sounds just like Nixon: "When the president does it, that means it is not illegal."
 

Forum List

Back
Top