Federal charges in the Breonna Taylor case.

[pknopp]

Probably not. All they have to do is trot Kenneth and Jamarcus into that court and see what kind of utter dirtbags she was spreading her legs for.

I'm not even sure Trump would go that low. You've hit a low one might not think attainable.

 

[JoeB131]

I'm not even sure Trump would go that low. You've hit a low one might not think attainable.

Reality is a low?

Hey, the reality is you don't want Kenneth Walker or Jamarcus Glover moving in next door to you any more than I do. Yet these are the guys she picked, and as a result, she got on Police Radar.

 

[pknopp]

Reality is a low?

Hey, the reality is you don't want Kenneth Walker or Jamarcus Glover moving in next door to you any more than I do. Yet these are the guys she picked, and as a result, she got on Police Radar.

As the father of daughters, I'd trust them more as neighbors than Bill C.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Looks like the Biden administration isn't going to make the same error the Obama administration did with the Eric Garner case.

Four current, former Louisville police officers federally charged in Breonna Taylor's death

Four current and former Louisville police officers involved in the deadly raid on Breonna Taylor's home -- including detectives who worked on the search warrant and the ex-officer accused of firing blindly into her home -- have been charged with civil rights violations and other counts, Attorney...

amp.cnn.com

The cops identified themselves!!! Her pimp bf used her as a human shield

 

[pknopp]

The cops identified themselves!!! Her pimp bf used her as a human shield

Identify themselves or not the warrant was illegally gained. Anything after that becomes the fault of those who did that.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

More kindling

 

[2aguy]

Looks like the Biden administration isn't going to make the same error the Obama administration did with the Eric Garner case.

Four current, former Louisville police officers federally charged in Breonna Taylor's death

Four current and former Louisville police officers involved in the deadly raid on Breonna Taylor's home -- including detectives who worked on the search warrant and the ex-officer accused of firing blindly into her home -- have been charged with civil rights violations and other counts, Attorney...

amp.cnn.com

This is all bullshit.......but the democrats persecute the innocent, and cops, while they free the actual criminals...

Here is a real look at the case against these officers....

Conviction on these charges would require that prosecutors prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Hankison’s use of force was not justified as lawful defense of himself and his fellow officers being subject to the gunfire of Kenneth Walker. This argument has already been made in Kentucky state court, and found lacking before that court’s jury, resulting in Hankison’s acquittal in that case.
-----

The biggest challenges to conviction of Goodlett on these counts appears to me to lay in the ambiguity of the claims of the indictment—all such ambiguity undercuts the proof beyond a reasonable doubt required for conviction.

For example, the indictment claims Goodlett knew to be false the claim by fellow detective Jaynes that he had “verified” from a Postal Inspector that criminal target J.G. was receiving packages at Taylor’s apartment. Even if we assume Jaynes’ claim to be false, however, the indictment provides no evidence to suggest that Goodlett knew the claim to be false.

The indictment then claims that Goodlett had falsely added to the search warrant affidavit that detectives had “verified” (scare quotes in indictment) from databases that criminal target J.G. was using Taylor’s apartment as his “current home address” (again, scare quotes in indictment).

I note first that all these “scare quotes” around material claims of this indictment raise cause for concern because of the resultant ambiguity. What does “verified” mean in this context? What does “current home address” mean?

If J.G. had an existing dwelling that was his primary residence apart from Taylor’s apartment, but was communicating to others that he was currently staying at her apartment, could this communication reasonably (even if mistakenly) perceived by law enforcement as “verification” that J.G. was using Taylor’s apartment as his “current home address”?

Then we have the alleged count of conspiracy based on the meeting between Goodlett and Jaynes, where they purportedly agreed to falsely claim that LMPD Sergeant J.B. had told them in January 2020 that criminal target J.G. was receiving packages that Taylor’s apartment—a statement that J.M. would later deny having made.

This claim is made entirely in the absence of evidence. There is no indication that either Goodlett or Jaynes concedes to this purported conspiracy, and there’s no indicated source of evidence—even presented in anonymized fashion—showing this purported conspiracy. Is it merely a speculation on the part of the prosecutors?
----

CHALLENGES TO FEDERAL CONVICTION OF JAYNES & MEANY​

As with Goodlett, the biggest challenges to conviction of either Meany or Jaynes on these counts appears to me to lay in the ambiguity of the claims of the indictment—again, all such ambiguity undercuts the proof beyond a reasonable doubt required for conviction.

For example, with respect to count one, directed at both Jaynes Meany, deprivation of rights under color of law, and punishable by execution on these facts, the count simply summarily alleges that both men knew “at the time that the affidavit contained false and misleading statements, omitted material information, relied on stale information, and was not supported by probable cause.”

Evidence for any of this? None is presented within count one. That said, in fairness, perhaps the necessary “evidence” is described in the following counts, two through four, so let’s take a look at what’s there.

In cont two, conspiracy by Jaynes, alleging three violation of Federal statutes good for 20 years, 20 years, and 5 years, respectively, it is alleged that Jayne falsely claimed that LMPD Sergeant J.M. had informed him that criminal target J.G. was receiving packages at Taylor’s apartment, a claim J.M. denies. Specifically, J.M. claims now that he was unaware of whether J.G. was receiving packages at Taylor’s apartment.

In any case, this kind of informal verbal communication, claimed by Jaynes to have occurred in January 2020, months prior to the service of the search warrant, is precisely the kind that is prone to ambiguity and reasonable error. Once again there is no documentation of any of this communication.

Feds Indict Officers In Breonna Taylor Death, Including Brett Hankison Found Not Guilty In State Trial

Merrick Garland wants what state prosecutors were unable to achieve, convictions in the raid where police responded to gunfire from Breonna Taylor's boyfriend, accidentally killing her.

legalinsurrection.com

 

[2aguy]

A Maoist left charged the officers before?

They were sleeping and he was a legal gun owner protecting his apartment.

And both his shooting at the police and their returning fire were both legal acts....going after the officer who were defending themselves from someone actually shooting at them first.....isn't a fucking crime, you leftist asshat....

 

[2aguy]

Identify themselves or not the warrant was illegally gained. Anything after that becomes the fault of those who did that.

Wrong...

This is all very ambiguous, however. Might J.G. have had a primary dwelling elsewhere than Taylor’s apartment, and also have spent substantial time at Taylor’s apartment, such that he was for all practical purposes “residing” from time to time in both locations?

The indictment also alleges that a “Postal Inspector”—presumably an employee of the United States Postal Service—had announced months after the service of the search warrant that criminal target J.G. had not received packages at Taylor’s address.

Even assuming this is verifiably correct for delivery of USPS packages, however, how exactly would a USPS Postal Inspector have personal knowledge about whether J.G. had received packages delivered by alternative means, such as Federal Express, or even just personal delivery? Such deliveries by non-USPS means would be fully relevant for the purposes of the search warrant.
---
It is notable that the indictment does not assert that it is demonstrably the case that J.G. never received packages at Taylor’s apartment delivered by any means whatever. Why not? If any packages were received by J.G. at Taylor’s apartment by any means, then arguably Jaynes’ statements to that effect were entirely truthful.

Similarly, count three of this indictment alleges that Jaynes made false statements to the FBI, but the falsity of these statements is based on the same ambiguous premise already covered above that Jaynes was outright lying about criminal target J.G. receiving packages at Taylor’s apartment.

Feds Indict Officers In Breonna Taylor Death, Including Brett Hankison Found Not Guilty In State Trial

Merrick Garland wants what state prosecutors were unable to achieve, convictions in the raid where police responded to gunfire from Breonna Taylor's boyfriend, accidentally killing her.

legalinsurrection.com

 

[2aguy]

No one at that apt was dealing drugs.......but you know that. It's obviously not going to stop you though.

Wrong....she was connected to drug dealers and got herself killed because of it.......

 

[pknopp]

Wrong...

This is all very ambiguous, however. Might J.G. have had a primary dwelling elsewhere than Taylor’s apartment, and also have spent substantial time at Taylor’s apartment, such that he was for all practical purposes “residing” from time to time in both locations?

The indictment also alleges that a “Postal Inspector”—presumably an employee of the United States Postal Service—had announced months after the service of the search warrant that criminal target J.G. had not received packages at Taylor’s address.

Even assuming this is verifiably correct for delivery of USPS packages, however, how exactly would a USPS Postal Inspector have personal knowledge about whether J.G. had received packages delivered by alternative means, such as Federal Express, or even just personal delivery? Such deliveries by non-USPS means would be fully relevant for the purposes of the search warrant.
---
It is notable that the indictment does not assert that it is demonstrably the case that J.G. never received packages at Taylor’s apartment delivered by any means whatever. Why not? If any packages were received by J.G. at Taylor’s apartment by any means, then arguably Jaynes’ statements to that effect were entirely truthful.

Similarly, count three of this indictment alleges that Jaynes made false statements to the FBI, but the falsity of these statements is based on the same ambiguous premise already covered above that Jaynes was outright lying about criminal target J.G. receiving packages at Taylor’s apartment.

Feds Indict Officers In Breonna Taylor Death, Including Brett Hankison Found Not Guilty In State Trial

Merrick Garland wants what state prosecutors were unable to achieve, convictions in the raid where police responded to gunfire from Breonna Taylor's boyfriend, accidentally killing her.

legalinsurrection.com

This has all been settled. The officer was previously fired and he even appealed and was denied. He pissed the judge off he lied to. You can come up with whatever conspiracy sites you want to but there is no longer any controversy over the facts of his lie to obtain the warrant.

 

[pknopp]

Wrong....she was connected to drug dealers and got herself killed because of it.......

Trump was connected to a pedophile...........

 

[2aguy]

This has all been settled. The officer was previously fired and he even appealed and was denied. He pissed the judge off he lied to. You can come up with whatever conspiracy sites you want to but there is no longer any controversy over the facts of his lie to obtain the warrant.

No conspiracy site, Legal Insurrection is one of the best legal sites out there........

 

[2aguy]

Trump was connected to a pedophile...........

You mean clinton...and epstein....as well as quite a few other democrats......which is why her records have been "disappeared."

 

[pknopp]

No conspiracy site, Legal Insurrection is one of the best legal sites out there........

Obviously not.

 

[pknopp]

You mean clinton...and epstein....as well as quite a few other democrats......which is why her records have been "disappeared."

Yes, I mean that also but I guess you miss the point.

 

[pknopp]

"Incorrect" is another way of admitting he lied.


Louisville police detective Joshua Jaynes, who obtained the search warrant for Breonna Taylor’s apartment, admitted some language is “incorrect” in the affidavit for that search warrant, according to a filing submitted Friday.

In the new document filed in a civil case filed by Taylor’s boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, Jaynes’ lawyer wrote that his client admits that it wasn’t correct to say the United States Postal Inspector confirmed certain packages were going to Taylor’s home.

LMPD Officer Admits Part Of Breonna Taylor Warrant Was 'Incorrect'

 

[pknopp]

LMPD detective fired for lying on Breonna Taylor search warrant application loses second employment appeal – 89.3 WFPL News Louisville

Judge Mitch Perry sided with the Police Merit Board, which said LMPD was right to fire Joshua Jaynes for “untruthfulness.”

wfpl.org

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Yeah, fuck that concept of Double Jeopardy.

While the cops did a lot of things that were wrong in this case, the proximate cause of this tragedy was Kenneth Walker firing through a door at officers.

Wrong.

Breonna Taylor’s death was the consequence of a search warranted obtained based on lies:

‘Jaynes and Meany stand accused of willfully depriving Taylor of her constitutional rights by drafting and approving a false affidavit to obtain a search warrant, while knowing "the affidavit contained false and misleading statements, omitted material facts, relied on stale information, and was not supported by probable cause," the DOJ statement said. Both men "knew that the execution of the search warrant would be carried out by armed LMPD officers, and could create a dangerous situation both for those officers and for anyone who happened to be in Taylor's home," it said.

Goodlett conspired with Jaynes and Meany to "falsify the search warrant for Taylor's home and to cover up their actions afterward," the statement said.’ ibid

 

[JoeB131]

As the father of daughters, I'd trust them more as neighbors than Bill C.

Right. I don't think that Bill C is going to get into a shootout with cops or other drug dealers.