FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[qyote=stan]Do It .. Do IT DO IT !!!! [/quote]

I post images of the core that existed, not play games.

southcorestands.gif


The images confirm the statements of authority such as a structural engineer working for FEMA making a safety report for ground zero. He is certified in 12 states.

No engineer of that status would generate a safety report for a site like the WTC without having access to the bonafied, approved final drawings. Doenload his published .pdf, read chapter 2.1. You will find a simple statement, "concrete core".

August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE.
 
ChristoPharter said:
The images confirm the statements of authority such as a structural engineer working for FEMA making a safety report for ground zero. He is certified in 12 states.

No engineer of that status would generate a safety report for a site like the WTC without having access to the bonafied, approved final drawings. Doenload his published .pdf, read chapter 2.1. You will find a simple statement, "concrete core".

August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE.

As you know Chris the person was employed to look at disaster management and on site observation of that in situ..

He made hearsay comments based on nothing. He admits it too. but I guess a quote would be nothing more than worthless text ?

.. sorry that's only worthless text. !!

The only thing which is true is Christ o Fear Aaaargh ..

Enjoy life .. the recipes sound good .. except the Spam one .. I hate that stuff.

Stann
 
ChristoPharter said:
The images confirm the statements of authority such as a structural engineer working for FEMA making a safety report for ground zero. He is certified in 12 states.

No engineer of that status would generate a safety report for a site like the WTC without having access to the bonafied, approved final drawings. Doenload his published .pdf, read chapter 2.1. You will find a simple statement, "concrete core".

August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE.

As you know Chris the person was employed to look at disaster management and on site observation of that in situ..

He made hearsay comments based on nothing. He admits it too. but I guess a quote would be nothing more than worthless text ?

.. sorry that's only worthless text. !!

The only thing which is true is Christ o Fear Aaaargh ..

Enjoy life .. the recipes sound good .. except the Spam one .. I hate that stuff.

Stann
ROFLMAO

ChristoPHARTER

CLASSIC
 
The agents are distinguished by their refusal to recognize violations of law by the infiltrators or unlawful government as a whole, and by their total lack of independently verifiable evidence.

guiliani took the WTC documents and the courts protect their hiding, a violation of NYS FOIL laws. He did it to help conceal the true nature of the Towers core structure, concrete.

The end view of the west core wall of WTC 1 after the north core wall has gone down.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg
 
The agents are distinguished by their refusal to recognize violations of law by the infiltrators or unlawful government as a whole, and by their total lack of independently verifiable evidence.

guiliani took the WTC documents and the courts protect their hiding, a violation of NYS FOIL laws. He did it to help conceal the true nature of the Towers core structure, concrete.

The end view of the west core wall of WTC 1 after the north core wall has gone down.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg

You post a bunch of worthless bullshit and lies and you know it agent!

now here is something worthwhile;

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C18LKOI81Kc]YouTube - Pink Fairies - Do It![/ame]


agent chrissy is the one in the leather vest......


(thanks to stanrod)
 
As usual the opposite of what the agent says is closer to the truth.

You chose to NOT recognize a violation of law which puts you on the side of treason as you attempt to bash verified truth which CAN protect the Constitution.

There are many people that would resent that, and they are learning about your kind.





sepember_11_boy_1.jpg


amd_sept11-wnbc.jpg
 
Again, you refuse to recognize the violations of law depriving the public of due process and an accurate cause of death in the murders of 3,000 innocent people.

Again, you refuse to recognize the violation of law, depriving me of equal protection of law, evidence AND the public of information useful to creating appropriate medical treatments, something required by law, CHS 1370.4

Again you refuse to recognize that such a deprivation estoppes the county from collecting and the court from ANY finding in the family law case.

Of course you have no evidence for the steel core columns and so support secret methods of mass murder.

I prove the concrete core over and over.
 
Again, you refuse to recognize the violations of law depriving the public of due process and an accurate cause of death in the murders of 3,000 innocent people.

Again, you refuse to recognize the violation of law, depriving me of equal protection of law, evidence AND the public of information useful to creating appropriate medical treatments, something required by law, CHS 1370.4

Again you refuse to recognize that such a deprivation estoppes the county from collecting and the court from ANY finding in the family law case.

Of course you have no evidence for the steel core columns and so support secret methods of mass murder.

I prove the concrete core over and over.
you were not deprived of due process, dipshit
you were GUILTY
 
An agent of the infiltrators who work to destroy the Constitution is not expected to recognize Constitutional rights.

Accordingly, an agent will feel that failure to appear on subpoena by a governmental entity is acceptable.

subdengif.gif


The agent specifically working to conceal the methods of mass murder used on 9-11 will fail to recognize the violation of law and deprival of due process associated with guilianis taking of the WTC documents from the city offices.

Forensic analysis of collapse cannot be conducted WITHOUT the buildings plans and NIST never says they had them. They do provide a RIDICULOUS disclaimer.

nist.disclaimer3_4.jpg


The agents typically lie and misrepresent that the WTC documents were returned. They have not been. Had they been a link to them with certification of their official source would be available.
 
An agent of the infiltrators who work to destroy the Constitution is not expected to recognize Constitutional rights.

Accordingly, an agent will feel that failure to appear on subpoena by a governmental entity is acceptable.



The agent specifically working to conceal the methods of mass murder used on 9-11 will fail to recognize the violation of law and deprival of due process associated with guilianis taking of the WTC documents from the city offices.

Forensic analysis of collapse cannot be conducted WITHOUT the buildings plans and NIST never says they had them. They do provide a RIDICULOUS disclaimer.



The agents typically lie and misrepresent that the WTC documents were returned. They have not been. Had they been a link to them with certification of their official source would be available.

you are a proven LIAR and a dipshit
 
As usual the opposite of what the agent says is closer to the truth.

You chose to NOT recognize a violation of law which puts you on the side of treason as you attempt to bash verified truth which CAN protect the Constitution.

There are many people that would resent that, and they are learning about your kind.

there are no secret agents. there is no failure of people to recognize the law. there is no treason.

there is you saying stupid shit and everyone else tell you how fucking stupid you are. :cuckoo:
 
Considering you have no evidence from independent sources supporting the claim you so often DO NOT MAKE, that there were steel core columns in the core area, which cannot be evidenced (consistent = no steel core) and statements of independent authority, your assertions are empty.

CONCRETE

southcorestands.gif


Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
 
Considering you have no evidence from independent sources supporting the claim you so often DO NOT MAKE, that there were steel core columns in the core area, which cannot be evidenced (consistent = no steel core) and statements of independent authority, your assertions are empty.

CONCRETE

southcorestands.gif


Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
 
Considering you have no evidence from independent sources supporting the claim you so often DO NOT MAKE, that there were steel core columns in the core area, which cannot be evidenced (consistent = no steel core) and statements of independent authority, your assertions are empty.

CONCRETE

southcorestands.gif


Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

all this shit has been debunked already.

you lie about robertson claiming it was concrete. all people need to do is read your link. you are a completely delusional moron that thinks the world is full of hypnotized people.:cuckoo:

here is a better picture of your "concrete core" and you can see it is made out of STEEL.
corecloseupbest.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top