Originally posted by CorpMediaSux
I'm GAY and I know that's bullshit. Written by a man who's never been in love clearly.
I understand this reaction totally. And not only do I understand it... I also share this feeling.
As a human being, sexual pleasure is a subjective value for me too. I think the sexual act should be a pleasurable activity for both man and woman, like everybody on this board. But this begs the question:
Does Nature give a rat’s ass about my wishes?
I wish cancer didn’t exist but my wish didn’t prevent this terrible disease that brings so much pain to the whole family, from striking our online friend Redstatesrules.
I’d like the human life span to be 300 years or longer but my wish couldn’t save a lovely member of this board, Merlin1047 from his untimely death (he was only in his 50’s, if I’m not mistaken).
Just as nature totally disregards our wishes about cancer and the human life span, it also solemnly ignores our phantasies and illusions about female sexuality.
Since sexual pleasure has a great subjective value for us humans, it’s extremely hard and painful for everybody to come to terms with the truth about female sexuality I exposed here, including me.
So I’m fully aware of the uneasiness, the discomfort these ideas generate.
99,99% of humanity understand sexuality as an integral part of all human beings, therefore, the idea that women have a fairly limited sexuality sounds like an attempt to rob them of part of their humanity. It sounds like I was diminishing their value as human beings.
I am under no illusions that I can change this false perception most members of the board share about my ideas:
The perception that when I state women are not being primarily sexual beings I’m expressing something inherently disparaging, degrading to them.
Even though I know it is a hopelessly losing battle I will try to be Nature’s advocate in my next post, since we all are the advocates of human desires on female sexuality, including me when I speak for myself : )