Who is putting the huge focus on allowing men and boys on female teams, female locker rooms, and female bathrooms? Democrats, and only the most radical of them. Normal people wish it had never come up. This is an 80/20 issue.
Or a failure of America.
Does it? It certainly doesn't prevent hurricanes but was it supposed to?
If Ding honestly identifies as a woman, I'd say fine.
Yes, due to other liberal policies along with those promoted by the DOE.
It was supposed to improve education and stated that it would ensure equal access to education. That was more than fifty years ago. Men with family histories of heart disease have been born and died of natural causes in the time it has been in existence. When is it going to get to the busines of equality of access?
Fine.
I think first America has to decide what equality of access means. You and I don't seem to agree.
We don't?
Yes, you want inequality of access with men invading women's spaces.
To me 'access' means every child has a path to a high-quality education regardless of geography, demography, race, ethnicity, or gender.
Yeah, the path is to move to a white neighborhood. Kids who cannot afford that, do not have access to a high-quality education. Do you seriously not know that?
No reason to think those programs will not continue temporarily, while Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration sharply reduces the need.
You are way more racist and have way more faith in Trump than I do.
Okay, let me make sure I understand that statement. Your claim is that it is literally racist to want to control and reduce illegal immigration, correct?
No, but saying the only way for a Black child to receive a good education is to move to a White neighborhood is racist.
Okay, I misunderstood you.
Your 'facts' are. You say White schools perform better than Black schools. The implication is that White schools are better BECAUSE they are White. That is racist. Are better because they are more affluent, or because they are more homogeneous, or because they are in a state that gives less money to poor schools, or because they have fewer non-English speakers, or because they have an ethnicity that doesn't value education, etc.?
They do.
Nope. Never said that. It would be nice if there was a study to find out why, but that would not be politically correct, I suppose.
Nope, it's facts.
It cannot be the part about the state giving less money. We know for - a fact - that the schools that get the most government money from all levels perform the worst.
Hmmmmm.
I'm sure there have been some, but the way our political idiocy stifles real inquiry is depressing. The same thing happened with COVID. Is still happening. We can't seem to have sober conversations about important social problems without it turning into partisan poo-flinging.
So there is no study that says some schools are better than others solely on the basis of race. So again you claim white schools are better than black ones. Sounds racist to me.
Chicken and egg issue. Which came first, poor school performance or additional government money? I'd bet on the former.
Cultural diversity can be a factor. Cultures that value education, e.g., Asian and Jewish, generally do better in school. Any school.
"Disaster" or insufficient money to offset the impoverished school budget.
I think we just disagree on the reasons black schools perform so poorly. Since I don't see race as a factor in intelligence, as apparently you do, I believe any differences are either social or economic.
There are hundreds, if not thousands. Here is a small, random sample:
www.epi.org
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
You could very well be right. But the DOE has been pumping increasing amounts of funds into failing public schools since its inception and the schools have only failed worse.
Which cultures do not value education?
You're reading arguments into my words that do not exist. You made the claim that the Department of Education has been successful in providing equal access to education for all. Clearly that is not the case.
