Serious discussion on "Diversity, Equity, Inclusion"

[konradv]

Not so. Those fired have not been showing up for work and/or haven't been working when they do show up and/or the agency they work for has produced nothing of value for years. We cannot continue to support a bloated and unmanageable government that exists for its own sake and no longer serves the people. If 10 people can efficiently and effectively do the work that 100 employees were doing before, 90 people should find other jobs.

MAGA lies.

 

[Foxfyre]

MAGA lies.

State your evidence for how they are lies or you are just trolling.

 

[Foxfyre]

Don't you see Fox, they want everything to be taken before the leftist judge, and that's exactly why they put those judges in place. It was to protect their minion's, and to protect their agenda through judgefare.

For sure the left is using a corrupt court system to make it as difficult as possible for the current administration and congress to govern. But they have formidable opposition from the President and his team who are determined to fix what is broken as much as possible, restore government to its intended function to serve the people instead of sustaining itself.

 

[konradv]

State your evidence for how they are lies or you are just trolling.

MAGA lies about all the deportees having been vetted as “terrorists” or “gang members”. There were no such hearings. If you think so, provide proof other than administration press releases. It can easily be shown that lawyers are filing motions in support of very ordinary people caught up in Trump’s attempt at a fascist takeover.

 

[Foxfyre]

MAGA lies about all the deportees having been vetted as “terrorists” or “gang members”. There were no such hearings. If you think so, provide proof other than administration press releases. It can easily be shown that lawyers are filing motions in support of very ordinary people caught up in Trump’s attempt at a fascist takeover.

Show your evidence or you're still just trolling and spewing leftist propaganda and assigned talking points. Not to mention you just changed the subject because you couldn't back up your previous propaganda?

 

[konradv]

Show your evidence or you're still just trolling and spewing leftist propaganda and assigned talking points. Not to mention you just changed the subject because you couldn't back up your previous propaganda?

Saying I’m trolling is a dodge. Prove it.

 

[Lisa558]

Show your evidence or you're still just trolling and spewing leftist propaganda and assigned talking points. Not to mention you just changed the subject because you couldn't back up your previous propaganda?

That’s his pattern when he can’t refute the point. He says “MAGA lies” and then changes the subject.

 

[Correll]

Your assumption that the woman with 20 years of government experience, having been elected and re-elected to every office she's ever held, for more than 20 years, including being AG of California, makes her "less qualified" than JD Vance who spent 2 years in the Senate is laughable.

Kamala is the MOST qualified candidate for the Oval Office since Hillary Clinton. Who you also voted against in favour of the lying criminal conman. You have a pattern of picking the guy who both completely unqualified for the job, and who is out to destroy the nation. Why is that Correll???

I actually said nothing about Kamala's qualifications. You invented all of that.

It is worth noting that YOU had not been discussing qualifications either.

We had been discussing how DEI is implemented. You were pushing the theoritical way it is supposed to be done, ie "simply removing the assumption that the white guy is the better candidate, thus allowing people to compete equally" while I brought up a real life example, for serious discussion purposes.

You see how that argument utterly falls apart when you try it???

Well, first of all I didn't make that argument, so there is that. Also, qualifications of a POLITICIAN is inherently SUBJECTIVE, which is why you tried to change the subject away from how DEI is actually implemented.

You made a claim about how it is implemented in theory, as I just repeated above.

I asked a question of you, based on the real life example of Kamala Harris.


You did not answer my question, and instead tried to pivot to a new subject, ie your good opinion of Harris.


Here is a link proving my claim, that your claim about how dei is implemented is false.

Joe Biden Definitively Vows to Pick a Woman Vice President

In the first one-on-one Democratic primary debate Sunday, former Vice President Joe Biden vowed to pick a woman Vice President.

time.com

Also, the pressure he was under BEFORE he picked, to pick a black woman.

"Women of color are the core": Biden challenged to pick a black woman as running mate

"Knowing the support that we have always given to this party. We have carried this party for as long as I can remember," said Congresswoman Alma Adams.

www.cbsnews.com

DEI in this case, did NOT lead to what you said, but led to what I said.

They did not choose the best candiate from everyone, they decided to create a pool LMITED BY SEX AND RACE, FIRST, and then picked from that.

Thus never considering for a second, any men. And probably no whites, if I recall correctly.

That is you being wrong. DO you have the balls to admit that.