flacaltenn
Diamond Member
This is actually an idea I wrote up into a Libertarian candidate white paper. And has already been adopted by the Johnson/Weld ticket last year and many other LParty candidates. And that is to stage and host a series of technical debates at a high visibility in Washington D.C. and encourage the public to view them. It's a very thing to have open debate on the subject EVER. And most of time, very questionable folks (like the Science Guy) ruin the decorum..
Trumpās EPA Chief Promises āRed Teamā Climate Debate Sometime Next Year
EPA Chief Scott Pruitt said Thursday that the agencyās much-discussed red tam vs blue team climate debate could happen as soon as January.
The agencyās plan to pit climate scientists against one another on a public forum could come to fruition early next year after the review process is concluded, Pruitt said before lawmakers on the Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Environment. Democrats have railed against the idea.
Environmentalists and scientists are not buying Pruittās argument. They believe itās ādangerousā to elevate dissenting voices, and argue an existing peer-review process works better than a āred team vs. blue teamā project.
Stay tuned. We'll all meet here for the viewing !!! I'll cater the affair. The whining is ALREADY epic. Every excuse in the book NOT to discuss and debate the science. Not happy that Heartland is a player. I hope that gets fixed. Because there are DOZENS of better choices. Especially folks like Bray, vonStorch (moderates on the issue), Christy and Spencer at UAHuntsville, several former disgruntlled IPCC chairs, and superstars like Judith Curry.
"Bout time. The "Romp in the Swamp" grudge match is ON !!!!![happy-1 :happy-1: :happy-1:](/styles/smilies/happy-1.gif)
Trumpās EPA Chief Promises āRed Teamā Climate Debate Sometime Next Year
EPA Chief Scott Pruitt said Thursday that the agencyās much-discussed red tam vs blue team climate debate could happen as soon as January.
The agencyās plan to pit climate scientists against one another on a public forum could come to fruition early next year after the review process is concluded, Pruitt said before lawmakers on the Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Environment. Democrats have railed against the idea.
Environmentalists and scientists are not buying Pruittās argument. They believe itās ādangerousā to elevate dissenting voices, and argue an existing peer-review process works better than a āred team vs. blue teamā project.
Stay tuned. We'll all meet here for the viewing !!! I'll cater the affair. The whining is ALREADY epic. Every excuse in the book NOT to discuss and debate the science. Not happy that Heartland is a player. I hope that gets fixed. Because there are DOZENS of better choices. Especially folks like Bray, vonStorch (moderates on the issue), Christy and Spencer at UAHuntsville, several former disgruntlled IPCC chairs, and superstars like Judith Curry.
"Bout time. The "Romp in the Swamp" grudge match is ON !!!!
![happy-1 :happy-1: :happy-1:](/styles/smilies/happy-1.gif)