Fix Is In: House Committee on ‘Russian Hacking’ Includes Only DNC-Hired Tech Experts

[easyt65]

I wonder if the List of Democrat Tech 'Experts' will include Paul Combetta (computer specialist who deleted Hillary Clinton’s emails despite orders from Congress to preserve them), Bryan Pagliano (Hillary IT Tech given immunity then refused to testify), and / or the 3 Awan Brothers (3 Pakistani Brothers hired by Democrats who had illegal access to House e-mails and classified info)?!

---------------------------------

THE SNOWFLAKE 'THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE ELECTION' FIX IS IN:

A list of witnesses scheduled to appear at a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Open Hearing on “Russian Active Measures” contains a glaring problem: the only technical experts scheduled to testify are from CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is a firm hired by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and has become the primary source of the narrative about “Russian hacking” of the 2016 election and has acted as a mouthpiece for the Democrats since last June.

Fix Is In: House Committee on 'Russian Hacking' Includes Only DNC-Hired Tech Experts

 

[The Original Tree]

Again, Why has NOT ONE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, or THE DOJ, FBI or anyone subpoened this damn server?

We keep relying on a firm paid to create a narrative in an election, who's assessment was the sum total of

"Well, it Could Be but we have no proof"

"It looks like, but we can't be sure."

And then neglected to display one shred of evidence in their report to even back up a weak claim.

So if you keep using the same corrupt sources and refuse to look in to this yourself, exactly how the phuck are you going to get to the bottom of this?
The IT tech who covered for Hillary's ass was given immunity and plead the 5th 256 consecutive times.

This is going to be a waste of taxpayer money.

You'll get no where with these folks.

You have to do your own Forensics.

 

[easyt65]

Again, Why has NOT ONE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, or THE DOJ, FBI or anyone subpoened this damn server?

For the same reason every expert is a Democrat / Democrat-supporter....

 

[IcebergSlim]

I wonder if the List of Democrat Tech 'Experts' will include Paul Combetta (computer specialist who deleted Hillary Clinton’s emails despite orders from Congress to preserve them), Bryan Pagliano (Hillary IT Tech given immunity then refused to testify), and / or the 3 Awan Brothers (3 Pakistani Brothers hired by Democrats who had illegal access to House e-mails and classified info)?!

---------------------------------

THE SNOWFLAKE 'THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE ELECTION' FIX IS IN:

A list of witnesses scheduled to appear at a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Open Hearing on “Russian Active Measures” contains a glaring problem: the only technical experts scheduled to testify are from CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is a firm hired by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and has become the primary source of the narrative about “Russian hacking” of the 2016 election and has acted as a mouthpiece for the Democrats since last June.

Fix Is In: House Committee on 'Russian Hacking' Includes Only DNC-Hired Tech Experts

This is the GOP majority House?

Do you think they may all be idiots?

Or do you think Breitbart is playing you like a tin whistle again?

 

[IcebergSlim]

Again, Why has NOT ONE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, or THE DOJ, FBI or anyone subpoened this damn server?

We keep relying on a firm paid to create a narrative in an election, who's assessment was the sum total of

"Well, it Could Be but we have no proof"

"It looks like, but we can't be sure."

And then neglected to display one shred of evidence in their report to even back up a weak claim.

So if you keep using the same corrupt sources and refuse to look in to this yourself, exactly how the phuck are you going to get to the bottom of this?
The IT tech who covered for Hillary's ass was given immunity and plead the 5th 256 consecutive times.

This is going to be a waste of taxpayer money.

You'll get no where with these folks.

You have to do your own Forensics.

You have to do your own Forensics.


Haven't you idiots been doing that for a while now?

 

[The Original Tree]

Again, Why has NOT ONE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, or THE DOJ, FBI or anyone subpoened this damn server?

We keep relying on a firm paid to create a narrative in an election, who's assessment was the sum total of

"Well, it Could Be but we have no proof"

"It looks like, but we can't be sure."

And then neglected to display one shred of evidence in their report to even back up a weak claim.

So if you keep using the same corrupt sources and refuse to look in to this yourself, exactly how the phuck are you going to get to the bottom of this?
The IT tech who covered for Hillary's ass was given immunity and plead the 5th 256 consecutive times.

This is going to be a waste of taxpayer money.

You'll get no where with these folks.

You have to do your own Forensics.

You have to do your own Forensics.


Haven't you idiots been doing that for a while now?

We've been using LOGIC, which Liberals don't seem to understand.

The only way to do Forensics is to have possession of the server. The last time that happened THE FBI took possession of Hillary's "BLEACH BITTED" server and made an assessment.

They also destroyed two laptops to apparently cover up for some damaging evidence which may have lead to The President.

 

[IcebergSlim]

Again, Why has NOT ONE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, or THE DOJ, FBI or anyone subpoened this damn server?

We keep relying on a firm paid to create a narrative in an election, who's assessment was the sum total of

"Well, it Could Be but we have no proof"

"It looks like, but we can't be sure."

And then neglected to display one shred of evidence in their report to even back up a weak claim.

So if you keep using the same corrupt sources and refuse to look in to this yourself, exactly how the phuck are you going to get to the bottom of this?
The IT tech who covered for Hillary's ass was given immunity and plead the 5th 256 consecutive times.

This is going to be a waste of taxpayer money.

You'll get no where with these folks.

You have to do your own Forensics.

You have to do your own Forensics.


Haven't you idiots been doing that for a while now?

We've been using LOGIC, which Liberals don't seem to understand.

The only way to do Forensics is to have possession of the server. The last time that happened THE FBI took possession of Hillary's server and made an assessment.
They also destroyed two laptops to apparently cover up for some damaging evidence which may have lead to The President.

Logic called......demands that you stop defaming it by claiming association.....

 

[whitehall]

The DNC refused to allow the government's help. Since Wikileaks revealed that the CIA often hacks sites and leaves bogus evidence to implicate other countries, is it possible that the CIA hacked the election and blamed Russia?

 

[The Original Tree]

Again, Why has NOT ONE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, or THE DOJ, FBI or anyone subpoened this damn server?

We keep relying on a firm paid to create a narrative in an election, who's assessment was the sum total of

"Well, it Could Be but we have no proof"

"It looks like, but we can't be sure."

And then neglected to display one shred of evidence in their report to even back up a weak claim.

So if you keep using the same corrupt sources and refuse to look in to this yourself, exactly how the phuck are you going to get to the bottom of this?
The IT tech who covered for Hillary's ass was given immunity and plead the 5th 256 consecutive times.

This is going to be a waste of taxpayer money.

You'll get no where with these folks.

You have to do your own Forensics.

You have to do your own Forensics.


Haven't you idiots been doing that for a while now?

We've been using LOGIC, which Liberals don't seem to understand.

The only way to do Forensics is to have possession of the server. The last time that happened THE FBI took possession of Hillary's server and made an assessment.
They also destroyed two laptops to apparently cover up for some damaging evidence which may have lead to The President.

Logic called......demands that you stop defaming it by claiming association.....

I'll consider your wisecrack as your surrender since you refused to address anything I said.

 

[easyt65]

This is the GOP majority House? Do you think they may all be idiots? Or do you think Breitbart is playing you like a tin whistle again?

My money is on either A) There is only a partial list of experts / witnesses out right now, and Breitbart is attempting to get attention by posting the incomplete list OR B) There are a lot of Idiot Republicans in the House.

 

[BlackFlag]

Try the witnesses for perjury then Republicans. Do it. I'd love to see you look like even bigger fools.

 

[depotoo]

And lost a few other things, such as phones, hard drives...

Again, Why has NOT ONE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, or THE DOJ, FBI or anyone subpoened this damn server?

We keep relying on a firm paid to create a narrative in an election, who's assessment was the sum total of

"Well, it Could Be but we have no proof"

"It looks like, but we can't be sure."

And then neglected to display one shred of evidence in their report to even back up a weak claim.

So if you keep using the same corrupt sources and refuse to look in to this yourself, exactly how the phuck are you going to get to the bottom of this?
The IT tech who covered for Hillary's ass was given immunity and plead the 5th 256 consecutive times.

This is going to be a waste of taxpayer money.

You'll get no where with these folks.

You have to do your own Forensics.

You have to do your own Forensics.


Haven't you idiots been doing that for a while now?

We've been using LOGIC, which Liberals don't seem to understand.

The only way to do Forensics is to have possession of the server. The last time that happened THE FBI took possession of Hillary's "BLEACH BITTED" server and made an assessment.

They also destroyed two laptops to apparently cover up for some damaging evidence which may have lead to The President.

 

[The Original Tree]

This is the GOP majority House? Do you think they may all be idiots? Or do you think Breitbart is playing you like a tin whistle again?

My money is on either A) There is only a partial list of experts / witnesses out right now, and Breitbart is attempting to get attention by posting the incomplete list OR B) There are a lot of Idiot Republicans in the House.

Or C.) There are still a lot of "Corrupt Establishment Republicans" in Government.

 

[depotoo]

Can't wait until they get a subpoena for that server.

Try the witnesses for perjury then Republicans. Do it. I'd love to see you look like even bigger fools.

 

[The Original Tree]

And lost a few other things, such as phones, hard drives...

Again, Why has NOT ONE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, or THE DOJ, FBI or anyone subpoened this damn server?

We keep relying on a firm paid to create a narrative in an election, who's assessment was the sum total of

"Well, it Could Be but we have no proof"

"It looks like, but we can't be sure."

And then neglected to display one shred of evidence in their report to even back up a weak claim.

So if you keep using the same corrupt sources and refuse to look in to this yourself, exactly how the phuck are you going to get to the bottom of this?
The IT tech who covered for Hillary's ass was given immunity and plead the 5th 256 consecutive times.

This is going to be a waste of taxpayer money.

You'll get no where with these folks.

You have to do your own Forensics.

You have to do your own Forensics.


Haven't you idiots been doing that for a while now?

We've been using LOGIC, which Liberals don't seem to understand.

The only way to do Forensics is to have possession of the server. The last time that happened THE FBI took possession of Hillary's "BLEACH BITTED" server and made an assessment.

They also destroyed two laptops to apparently cover up for some damaging evidence which may have lead to The President.

17 devices in all were destroyed\lost by Hillary Clinton who claimed she only used 1 device during her tenure as SOS.

 

[easyt65]

Try the witnesses for perjury then Republicans. Do it. I'd love to see you look like even bigger fools.

Only if they actually Perjure themselves on the stand....like Koshkinen, Holder, etc did...

 

[IcebergSlim]

This is the GOP majority House? Do you think they may all be idiots? Or do you think Breitbart is playing you like a tin whistle again?

My money is on either A) There is only a partial list of experts / witnesses out right now, and Breitbart is attempting to get attention by posting the incomplete list OR B) There are a lot of Idiot Republicans in the House.

You forgot

C) Breitbart wouldn't exist but for credulous imbeciles...

 

[easyt65]

Can't wait until they get a warrant for that server.

Try the witnesses for perjury then Republicans. Do it. I'd love to see you look like even bigger fools.

It has been such a long time now you can BET that server has been wiped...besides subpoenas mean nothing to Libs. Remember how Hillary had her IT Tech wipe her server / delete e-mails AFTER she had gotten the subpoena fr them?

 

[BlackFlag]

Try the witnesses for perjury then Republicans. Do it. I'd love to see you look like even bigger fools.

Only if they actually Perjure themselves on the stand....like Koshkinen, Holder, etc did...

Ah so they have to perjure themselves in your imagination

 

[easyt65]

C) Breitbart wouldn't exist but for credulous imbeciles...

Nah, that's as false as 'The Russians hacked the election'.