Forget the Russians: It’s the Federal Reserve Seeking to Meddle in Our Elections

[Toddsterpatriot]

The first Congress was not the founding fathers. Idk why you 2 keep implying that.
The "father" of the constitution was against it...

And yet Madison signed into law the SECOND bank of the United States.

So much for 'being against it'. In point of fact, Madison signed a Central Bank into law.

Nowhere in the enumerated powers does it give the fed gov to establish a central bank. That is a states job.
Skylar, it also wasnt the first session of the first congress. It was the third session.

The Founders disagreed. With Hamilton, Washington, and the 1st congress by a ratio of nearly 2 to 1 all eager for a Central Bank. And affirming its constitutionality.

Madison signed it into law because of the war. He even backed out when peace negotiations started. But then the economy worsened and banks stopped redeeming notes.
It's not because he just changed his mind, as you so implied.
Still, that makes it no more constitutional. Again, implied powers was made up in thin air by one of the biggest statists in history

Still, that makes it no more constitutional.

Obviously, why expect the Founders would have a grasp on the Constitution?

 

[TNHarley]

The first Congress was not the founding fathers. Idk why you 2 keep implying that.
The "father" of the constitution was against it...

And yet Madison signed into law the SECOND bank of the United States.

So much for 'being against it'. In point of fact, Madison signed a Central Bank into law.

Nowhere in the enumerated powers does it give the fed gov to establish a central bank. That is a states job.
Skylar, it also wasnt the first session of the first congress. It was the third session.

The Founders disagreed. With Hamilton, Washington, and the 1st congress by a ratio of nearly 2 to 1 all eager for a Central Bank. And affirming its constitutionality.

Madison signed it into law because of the war. He even backed out when peace negotiations started. But then the economy worsened and banks stopped redeeming notes.
It's not because he just changed his mind, as you so implied.
Still, that makes it no more constitutional. Again, implied powers was made up in thin air by one of the biggest statists in history

Still, that makes it no more constitutional.

Obviously, why expect the Founders would have a grasp on the Constitution?

Dude, our second president used Congress to suspend the first amendment.
Your arguments align to worshipping your superiors.
YES, statist, they can be wrong.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The first Congress was not the founding fathers. Idk why you 2 keep implying that.
The "father" of the constitution was against it...

And yet Madison signed into law the SECOND bank of the United States.

So much for 'being against it'. In point of fact, Madison signed a Central Bank into law.

Nowhere in the enumerated powers does it give the fed gov to establish a central bank. That is a states job.
Skylar, it also wasnt the first session of the first congress. It was the third session.

The Founders disagreed. With Hamilton, Washington, and the 1st congress by a ratio of nearly 2 to 1 all eager for a Central Bank. And affirming its constitutionality.

Madison signed it into law because of the war. He even backed out when peace negotiations started. But then the economy worsened and banks stopped redeeming notes.
It's not because he just changed his mind, as you so implied.
Still, that makes it no more constitutional. Again, implied powers was made up in thin air by one of the biggest statists in history

Still, that makes it no more constitutional.

Obviously, why expect the Founders would have a grasp on the Constitution?

Dude, our second president used Congress to suspend the first amendment.
Your arguments align to worshipping your superiors.
YES, statist, they can be wrong.

You're more originalist than the Founders, good job!

 

[TNHarley]

The first Congress was not the founding fathers. Idk why you 2 keep implying that.
The "father" of the constitution was against it...

And yet Madison signed into law the SECOND bank of the United States.

So much for 'being against it'. In point of fact, Madison signed a Central Bank into law.

Nowhere in the enumerated powers does it give the fed gov to establish a central bank. That is a states job.
Skylar, it also wasnt the first session of the first congress. It was the third session.

The Founders disagreed. With Hamilton, Washington, and the 1st congress by a ratio of nearly 2 to 1 all eager for a Central Bank. And affirming its constitutionality.

Madison signed it into law because of the war. He even backed out when peace negotiations started. But then the economy worsened and banks stopped redeeming notes.
It's not because he just changed his mind, as you so implied.
Still, that makes it no more constitutional. Again, implied powers was made up in thin air by one of the biggest statists in history

Still, that makes it no more constitutional.

Obviously, why expect the Founders would have a grasp on the Constitution?

Dude, our second president used Congress to suspend the first amendment.
Your arguments align to worshipping your superiors.
YES, statist, they can be wrong.

You're more originalist than the Founders, good job!

God forbid people read, right?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And yet Madison signed into law the SECOND bank of the United States.

So much for 'being against it'. In point of fact, Madison signed a Central Bank into law.

The Founders disagreed. With Hamilton, Washington, and the 1st congress by a ratio of nearly 2 to 1 all eager for a Central Bank. And affirming its constitutionality.

Madison signed it into law because of the war. He even backed out when peace negotiations started. But then the economy worsened and banks stopped redeeming notes.
It's not because he just changed his mind, as you so implied.
Still, that makes it no more constitutional. Again, implied powers was made up in thin air by one of the biggest statists in history

Still, that makes it no more constitutional.

Obviously, why expect the Founders would have a grasp on the Constitution?

Dude, our second president used Congress to suspend the first amendment.
Your arguments align to worshipping your superiors.
YES, statist, they can be wrong.

You're more originalist than the Founders, good job!

God forbid people read, right?

Lots of people who read are ignorant of what the Founders favored.

 

[beautress]

Madison signed it into law because of the war. He even backed out when peace negotiations started. But then the economy worsened and banks stopped redeeming notes.
It's not because he just changed his mind, as you so implied.
Still, that makes it no more constitutional. Again, implied powers was made up in thin air by one of the biggest statists in history

Still, that makes it no more constitutional.

Obviously, why expect the Founders would have a grasp on the Constitution?

Dude, our second president used Congress to suspend the first amendment.
Your arguments align to worshipping your superiors.
YES, statist, they can be wrong.

You're more originalist than the Founders, good job!

God forbid people read, right?

Lots of people who read are ignorant of what the Founders favored.

I like what the Founders favored.

Who'da thunk that when a woman took over the Congress at its speaker she would brag about how she's the most important person in the world and used every trick in the book to use her office as a political hack to annihilate other Americans who didn't see eye to eye with her? The Founders gave voting and office-holding to men. And they didn't have no Nancy Pelosi spewing vomitus at them 24-7-365, either. Not all of us women like what women in Congress do. Maxine Waters wants someone in her group to kill somebody in the Trump Administration while she works to assassinate his character. I think I'm gonna be sick just thinkin' about what these women have done to promote what the Founders thought as being pretty on the mark.

 

[TNHarley]

Madison signed it into law because of the war. He even backed out when peace negotiations started. But then the economy worsened and banks stopped redeeming notes.
It's not because he just changed his mind, as you so implied.
Still, that makes it no more constitutional. Again, implied powers was made up in thin air by one of the biggest statists in history

Still, that makes it no more constitutional.

Obviously, why expect the Founders would have a grasp on the Constitution?

Dude, our second president used Congress to suspend the first amendment.
Your arguments align to worshipping your superiors.
YES, statist, they can be wrong.

You're more originalist than the Founders, good job!

God forbid people read, right?

Lots of people who read are ignorant of what the Founders favored.

I agree. Including your Congress you worship

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Still, that makes it no more constitutional.

Obviously, why expect the Founders would have a grasp on the Constitution?

Dude, our second president used Congress to suspend the first amendment.
Your arguments align to worshipping your superiors.
YES, statist, they can be wrong.

You're more originalist than the Founders, good job!

God forbid people read, right?

Lots of people who read are ignorant of what the Founders favored.

I agree. Including your Congress you worship

I don't worship Congress.

 

[TNHarley]

Dude, our second president used Congress to suspend the first amendment.
Your arguments align to worshipping your superiors.
YES, statist, they can be wrong.

You're more originalist than the Founders, good job!

God forbid people read, right?

Lots of people who read are ignorant of what the Founders favored.

I agree. Including your Congress you worship

I don't worship Congress.

Evidently you do

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You're more originalist than the Founders, good job!

God forbid people read, right?

Lots of people who read are ignorant of what the Founders favored.

I agree. Including your Congress you worship

I don't worship Congress.

Evidently you do

You're lying.

 

[MisterBeale]

Copyright © 2019 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.


The US Constitution never granted the federal government authority to create a central bank. The Founders, having lived through hyperinflation themselves, understood that government should never have a printing press at its disposal. But from the very beginning of America’s founding, the desire for a crony central bank was strong.

In fact, two attempts were made at creating a permanent central bank in America prior to the creation of the Fed. Fortunately, the charter for The First Bank was allowed to expire in 1811, and President Andrew Jackson closed down the Second Bank in 1833.

But, unfortunately, a third attempt was successful and the Federal Reserve was unconstitutionally created by Congress in 1913. Americans have been living under a corrupt and immoral monetary system ever since. The Federal Reserve is the printing press that has financed the creation of the largest government to ever exist. Endless welfare and endless military spending are both made possible by the Federal Reserve. The Fed can just print the money for whatever the US establishment wants, so those of us who long for a Constitutional and limited government have few tools at our disposal.

Despite all the propaganda claiming “independence,” the Fed has always been a deeply political institution. Because the Fed is a government-created monopoly with key government-appointed employees, its so-called “independence” is a mere fiction. However, the US Congress created the Fed with legislation; it can also abolish the Fed with legislation.

Last week, the facade of Federal Reserve “independence” was dealt a severe blow. Ironically, the person who broadcast to the world that the Fed is anything but “independent” was ex-New York Fed President Bill Dudley. Dudley wrote that, “Trump’s re-election arguably presents a threat to the United States’ and global economy, and if the goal of monetary policy is to achieve the best long-term economic outcome, the Fed’s officials should consider how their decisions would affect the political outcome of 2020.”

The timing of Dudley’s threats to use Fed monetary policy to affect the outcome of a US election couldn’t come at a more striking time. After all, for more than two solid years Americans have been bombarded with fabricated stories about Russians rigging our elections. And yet here is a Federal Reserve official threatening to do the same exact thing - but this time for real!

Whether it’s the mainstream media, the CIA, the FBI, or now the Federal Reserve, more and more Americans are waking up to the fact that there is a Deep State in America and its interests have nothing to do with American liberty. In fact, our liberty is what the Deep State wants to abolish.

When it comes to the Federal Reserve, I stand firmly by my conviction that it needs to be audited and then ended as soon as possible.

America’s Founders were not perfect. They were human beings just as capable of error as we are. But they had a remarkable understanding of the ideas of liberty. They understood that liberty cannot exist with a government that has access to a printing press. Sound money and liberty go hand-in-hand. If we want to enjoy the blessings of Liberty, we must audit and then end the Federal Reserve!

Source - Forget the Russians: It’s the Federal Reserve Seeking to Meddle in Our Elections - written by Ron Paul Monday September 2, 2019


Emphasis is mine.

The Fed's "Doomsday Book" Has Been Revealed​

The Fed's "Doomsday Book" Has Been Revealed

by James Corbett corbettreport.com May 26, 2024 Back in 2011, shareholders of insurance giant American International Group (AIG) filed a $40 billion class action lawsuit against the US government over the terms of its controversial bailout of AIG during the 2008 financial crisis.

corbettreport.substack.com

". . . The court was eventually able to pry the relevant documents out of the Fed's clutches, but the Doomsday Book has remained under court seal for years . . . until now.

Late last year, an enterprising researcher managed to get his hands on a copy of the elusive book. And what that book contains should shock you (if you're paying attention).

The very first thing to note about the "Doomsday Book" is that you can now read it for yourself! . . . kind of. I'll get into that qualification in a bit. But first, I do recommend you download the publicly available content for yourself. You can download it as a PDF file from The Wall Street Journal website HERE.

And, since Corbett Reporteers might not like to give WSJ their traffic (and because these types of files have a pesky habit of disappearing down the internet rabbit hole), I've also gone ahead and preserved a copy on my server HERE! (You're welcome!) Still, you never know when/if/how information online will go missing or become inaccessible, so don't dither. Download it now, while you can!

Alright, now that you have a copy saved locally, here's the first question: what is the doomsday book, exactly?

The short answer—taken from an article announcing its release last December—is that the doomsday book is "an internal document used to guide the Federal Reserve’s actions during emergencies."

https://www.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/DoomsdayBook.pdf

 

[Skylar]

The Fed's "Doomsday Book" Has Been Revealed​

View attachment 952774

The Fed's "Doomsday Book" Has Been Revealed

by James Corbett corbettreport.com May 26, 2024 Back in 2011, shareholders of insurance giant American International Group (AIG) filed a $40 billion class action lawsuit against the US government over the terms of its controversial bailout of AIG during the 2008 financial crisis.

corbettreport.substack.com

". . . The court was eventually able to pry the relevant documents out of the Fed's clutches, but the Doomsday Book has remained under court seal for years . . . until now.

Late last year, an enterprising researcher managed to get his hands on a copy of the elusive book. And what that book contains should shock you (if you're paying attention).

The very first thing to note about the "Doomsday Book" is that you can now read it for yourself! . . . kind of. I'll get into that qualification in a bit. But first, I do recommend you download the publicly available content for yourself. You can download it as a PDF file from The Wall Street Journal website HERE.

And, since Corbett Reporteers might not like to give WSJ their traffic (and because these types of files have a pesky habit of disappearing down the internet rabbit hole), I've also gone ahead and preserved a copy on my server HERE! (You're welcome!) Still, you never know when/if/how information online will go missing or become inaccessible, so don't dither. Download it now, while you can!

Alright, now that you have a copy saved locally, here's the first question: what is the doomsday book, exactly?

The short answer—taken from an article announcing its release last December—is that the doomsday book is "an internal document used to guide the Federal Reserve’s actions during emergencies."

https://www.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/DoomsdayBook.pdf

James Corbett.....the guy who's area of expertise if FIFA?

 

[MisterBeale]

James Corbett.....the guy who's area of expertise if FIFA?

 

[Skylar]

Why would an expert on FIFA be a credible source on the federal reserve?

Should I consult my lawn guy on FED fiscal policy as well?

 

[MisterBeale]

Why would an expert on FIFA be a credible source on the federal reserve?

Should I consult my lawn guy on FED fiscal policy as well?

Are you talking about soccer?

He has never written a damn thing on soccer. I don't have the first idea what the hell you are talking about TBH.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Copyright © 2019 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.


The US Constitution never granted the federal government authority to create a central bank. The Founders, having lived through hyperinflation themselves, understood that government should never have a printing press at its disposal. But from the very beginning of America’s founding, the desire for a crony central bank was strong.

In fact, two attempts were made at creating a permanent central bank in America prior to the creation of the Fed. Fortunately, the charter for The First Bank was allowed to expire in 1811, and President Andrew Jackson closed down the Second Bank in 1833.

But, unfortunately, a third attempt was successful and the Federal Reserve was unconstitutionally created by Congress in 1913. Americans have been living under a corrupt and immoral monetary system ever since. The Federal Reserve is the printing press that has financed the creation of the largest government to ever exist. Endless welfare and endless military spending are both made possible by the Federal Reserve. The Fed can just print the money for whatever the US establishment wants, so those of us who long for a Constitutional and limited government have few tools at our disposal.

Despite all the propaganda claiming “independence,” the Fed has always been a deeply political institution. Because the Fed is a government-created monopoly with key government-appointed employees, its so-called “independence” is a mere fiction. However, the US Congress created the Fed with legislation; it can also abolish the Fed with legislation.

Last week, the facade of Federal Reserve “independence” was dealt a severe blow. Ironically, the person who broadcast to the world that the Fed is anything but “independent” was ex-New York Fed President Bill Dudley. Dudley wrote that, “Trump’s re-election arguably presents a threat to the United States’ and global economy, and if the goal of monetary policy is to achieve the best long-term economic outcome, the Fed’s officials should consider how their decisions would affect the political outcome of 2020.”

The timing of Dudley’s threats to use Fed monetary policy to affect the outcome of a US election couldn’t come at a more striking time. After all, for more than two solid years Americans have been bombarded with fabricated stories about Russians rigging our elections. And yet here is a Federal Reserve official threatening to do the same exact thing - but this time for real!

Whether it’s the mainstream media, the CIA, the FBI, or now the Federal Reserve, more and more Americans are waking up to the fact that there is a Deep State in America and its interests have nothing to do with American liberty. In fact, our liberty is what the Deep State wants to abolish.

When it comes to the Federal Reserve, I stand firmly by my conviction that it needs to be audited and then ended as soon as possible.

America’s Founders were not perfect. They were human beings just as capable of error as we are. But they had a remarkable understanding of the ideas of liberty. They understood that liberty cannot exist with a government that has access to a printing press. Sound money and liberty go hand-in-hand. If we want to enjoy the blessings of Liberty, we must audit and then end the Federal Reserve!

Source - Forget the Russians: It’s the Federal Reserve Seeking to Meddle in Our Elections - written by Ron Paul Monday September 2, 2019


Emphasis is mine.

End the Fed

Right now, the Fed is propping up the entire banking system from collapsing under higher interest rates to combat Bidenflation

 

[MisterBeale]

End the Fed

Right now, the Fed is propping up the entire banking system from collapsing under higher interest rates to combat Bidenflation

Agreed. We have now crossed the Rubicon into insanity. It is destroying the nation.

US federal budget crosses grim milestone as interest payments overtake defense spending​

Wed, May 22, 2024 5 min read

US federal budget crosses grim milestone as interest payments overtake defense spending

Interest payments on the national debt are set to eclipse defense spending this year for the first time ever.

finance.yahoo.com

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Agreed. We have now crossed the Rubicon into insanity. It is destroying the nation.

US federal budget crosses grim milestone as interest payments overtake defense spending​

Wed, May 22, 2024 5 min read

US federal budget crosses grim milestone as interest payments overtake defense spending

Interest payments on the national debt are set to eclipse defense spending this year for the first time ever.

finance.yahoo.com

And the Cloward Piven Domestic enemies keep voting for more spending