FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!
Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that
However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos
Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.
you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.
You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
And what do you think that means, if anything, in regards to personal ownership of arms?
We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!
So you're just rambling then?



Okay.
I was being literal.
No, you were being a dick.
You are simply ignorant of the whole concept but still want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth" simply because you are on the right wing.
Not really.

You are just being a dick, is all.
Yes, really. You are being more of a Dick by being so Ignorant yet wanting to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth"; only right wingers do that.
Excuse me; you're being a rambling dick, I should have said.
Says the guy who understands nothing, and doesn't feel any need whatsoever, to care. How right-wing of you.
you're a parrot that keeps repeating the same old shit. And really doesn't comprehend what he's repeating
Ad hominems is all right wingers are capable of.
 
Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!
Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that
However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos
Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.
you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.
You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
So you think the government should have only access to firearms?
The People are the Militia.
 
Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!
Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that
However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos
Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.
you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.
You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
So you think the government should have only access to firearms?
The People are the Militia.
but you're saying the government should regulate the people. Hitler regulated the people also using his brownshirts.
 
Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!
Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that
However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos
Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.
you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.
You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
And what do you think that means, if anything, in regards to personal ownership of arms?
We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!
So you're just rambling then?



Okay.
I was being literal.
No, you were being a dick.
You are simply ignorant of the whole concept but still want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth" simply because you are on the right wing.
Not really.

You are just being a dick, is all.
Yes, really. You are being more of a Dick by being so Ignorant yet wanting to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth"; only right wingers do that.
Excuse me; you're being a rambling dick, I should have said.
Says the guy who understands nothing, and doesn't feel any need whatsoever, to care. How right-wing of you.
you're a parrot that keeps repeating the same old shit. And really doesn't comprehend what he's repeating
Ad hominems is all right wingers are capable of.
stop being a parrot and repeating the same old shit that you have no comprehension of what it means
 
Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!
Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that
However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos
Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.
you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.
You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
So you think the government should have only access to firearms?
The People are the Militia.
but you're saying the government should regulate the people. Hitler regulated the people also using his brownshirts.
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
 
Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!
Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that
However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos
Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.
you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.
You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
So you think the government should have only access to firearms?
The People are the Militia.
but you're saying the government should regulate the people. Hitler regulated the people also using his brownshirts.
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
you keep showing that you have no clue what the reason we have a second amendment
you are showing that you believe the government is the only one that has a right to firearms
 
Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!
Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that
However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos
Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.
you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.
You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
So you think the government should have only access to firearms?
The People are the Militia.
but you're saying the government should regulate the people. Hitler regulated the people also using his brownshirts.
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
you keep showing that you have no clue what the reason we have a second amendment
you are showing that you believe the government is the only one that has a right to firearms
You have no idea what you are talking about. The People are the militia.
 
Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!
Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that
However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos
Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.
you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.
You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
So you think the government should have only access to firearms?
The People are the Militia.
but you're saying the government should regulate the people. Hitler regulated the people also using his brownshirts.
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
you keep showing that you have no clue what the reason we have a second amendment
you are showing that you believe the government is the only one that has a right to firearms
You have no idea what you are talking about. The People are the militia.
ok but do you know what that actually means
Without parroting what you have repeatedly said
 
Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!
Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that
However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos
Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.
you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.
You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
So you think the government should have only access to firearms?
The People are the Militia.
but you're saying the government should regulate the people. Hitler regulated the people also using his brownshirts.
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
you keep showing that you have no clue what the reason we have a second amendment
you are showing that you believe the government is the only one that has a right to firearms
You have no idea what you are talking about. The People are the militia.
ok but do you know what that actually means
Without parroting what you have repeatedly said
Yes, I do. I it is you who is clueless and Causeless.
 
Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!
Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that
However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos
Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.
you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.
You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
So you think the government should have only access to firearms?
The People are the Militia.
but you're saying the government should regulate the people. Hitler regulated the people also using his brownshirts.
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
you keep showing that you have no clue what the reason we have a second amendment
you are showing that you believe the government is the only one that has a right to firearms
You have no idea what you are talking about. The People are the militia.
ok but do you know what that actually means
Without parroting what you have repeatedly said
Yes, I do. I it is you who is clueless and Causeless.
ok you say you know what it means
WHAT DOES IT MEAN?
 
It means what it says and says what it means. That is how Good of a job our Founding Fathers did at the convention with our federal Constitution.
you keep repeating that but have yet to tell me in your own words what it means
Here's what you have said

"the people are the militia"

"The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia."

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788"

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia."

Here's what George Washington said about armed citizens
"A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies."
 
Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!
Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that
However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos
Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.
you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.
You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
And what do you think that means, if anything, in regards to personal ownership of arms?
We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!
So you're just rambling then?



Okay.
I was being literal.
No, you were being a dick.


I never block people because I believe in everyone being able to speak their mind....I never read his posts anymore...that is an action I will take...
 
It means what it says and says what it means. That is how Good of a job our Founding Fathers did at the convention with our federal Constitution.
you keep repeating that but have yet to tell me in your own words what it means
Here's what you have said

"the people are the militia"

"The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia."

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788"

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia."

Here's what George Washington said about armed citizens
"A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies."
It is all unambiguous and clear and supports my reasoning and not yours.
 
FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights
4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?


An AR-15, or just rifles in general?

The AR-15 is a great gun for home defense versus the shotgun.....and it is also used for hunting...it is good for hunting wild hogs....I am told......and it is used in competition by shooters of all ages and both sexes......

It also helps keep the democrat party terrorist groups, blm and antifa, from burning down your store when they are burning and looting black neighborhoods for the democrat party just before elections.......

You have never used it for defense of your home and never will. That's propaganda. How often do you go hinting hogs? Honestly. Very rarely.
Used in a gun club? Possibly.

As for shooting rioters, that stupid kid found himself in jail when he opened fire on people.

So don't give me your pathetic justifications for ownership. The truth is you have guns because you can. You will never use them for defense because you haven't the guts to go out. Where were you when BLM did their thing? Cowering in the shed?

How do you know what he's used for home defense? You been casing his house for a robbery?

Hunters in southern Arizona hunt for wild hogs quite a bit. Damned javelinas are everywhere.

As for "Well, we threw Kyle in jail for defending himself", your intense desire to persecute people for self-defense in no way creates an obligation in us to stop defending ourselves.

So don't give US your pathetic dismissals of "I don't want you to have reasons, therefore your reasons are no good." Yeah, we have guns because we can, and we can because we need to.
 
Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!
Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

Blue states do everything in their power to ensure civil rights like self-defense are limited only to the wealthy, who can afford the burdensome fees and taxes DemoKKKrats put on our civil rights.
 
FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights
4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.
What’s interesting is this illustrates the dishonesty and hypocrisy of the inconsistent right with regard to “states’ rights” dogma.

Clearly Benitez is a tyrant in black robes, legislating from the bench, ignoring the will of the people of the State of California.

Californians never voted on the AWCA. It was hatched by anti-civil rights elected DemoKKKrats and pushed through with an assist from the anti-civil rights leftmedia.

 
FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights
4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?


An AR-15, or just rifles in general?

The AR-15 is a great gun for home defense versus the shotgun.....and it is also used for hunting...it is good for hunting wild hogs....I am told......and it is used in competition by shooters of all ages and both sexes......

It also helps keep the democrat party terrorist groups, blm and antifa, from burning down your store when they are burning and looting black neighborhoods for the democrat party just before elections.......

You have never used it for defense of your home and never will. That's propaganda. How often do you go hinting hogs? Honestly. Very rarely.
Used in a gun club? Possibly.

As for shooting rioters, that stupid kid found himself in jail when he opened fire on people.

So don't give me your pathetic justifications for ownership. The truth is you have guns because you can. You will never use them for defense because you haven't the guts to go out. Where were you when BLM did their thing? Cowering in the shed?


If I don't use a rifle, that doesn't mean that millions of others don't use the rifle...are you really this dumb?


Someone I know uses an AR-15 to kill hogs......the ability to follow up is important because they are mean and dangerous.

The store owners who used the AR-15 rifles to keep the democrat party terrrorists in blm and antifa from burning their stores are really glad they had them...

Millions of others do not use thise weapon at all. Like yourself, you have them because you can to inflate your tough guy image and build testosterone.

I never witnessed any store owners mowing people down with automatic weapons and neither did you. You are a liar.

You're digging yourself a hole son. Your excuses don't gel with anything in reality.

So who do you think is looking dumb now? It's certainly not me dickhead.

"Lots of people don't use them, so that means you don't need them! You just want to feel manly, because that's what I want to believe! I never witnessed any need for them, so that means there isn't any need for them ever! You're a liar because you're not saying what I want to hear! You look really dumb, because I've decided my words are brilliant!"

How many posts full of self-serving circle-jerk assertions are you planning to impose on us before you either say something a real adult wouldn't be embarrassed by, or just go away to sob into your pillow because no one values your existence, and you can't force them to?
 
FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights
4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?





The guns are to PREVENT a communist takeover.

Duh.


Well, I've used my guns for pest control, killing birds, coyotes, beaver, Antelope, deer, hog, Elk using everything in my collection from 12 gauge, .22 cal, 5.56mm, 6mm, 7.62x39 mm, 30-30 cal and 30.06 including self protection, but I've never shoot a Communist unless it was in Nam and in the bush.
Even then I was using an "Assault Shotgun" in 12 gauge double 00 Buck shot.... gifted to me by a Marine at the Siagon Embassy. But I never used a M-16.
Therefore should all 12 gauge shotguns be banned from civilian use since they were used in battle during WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Syria.





BFD. The Founders wrote the 2nd to deal with an illegitimate government. The Bill of Rights is 9 limitations on what government can do to the individual, and one final option.

The founders did note do that. At those times for everyone to have th e right to have a gun was basically the country had something to protect itself with.
There was never an intention for illegitimate governments. That favourite catch cry was invented by those who wanted to stock the armoury for ego reasons.

As a Republican, you would have been bellowing about Biden being illegitimate etc. Why haven't you done something about him? No courage of your convictions? You said you have a right under the 2nd to do it so do it. See how good your are against the American military, tough guy.

They also said Obama wasn't even American also. That would have made him illegitimate also but no one fire a shot. The lot of you are all piss and wind.

Well, here's what the Founders had to say about it:

"To disarm the people…s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster

“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” – James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434

“…the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone…” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” – Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention


So now, who should I believe about what the Founding Fathers did and didn't intend? The Founding Fathers themselves, or the anti-gun crying pantywaist on the Internet?
 
Last edited:
FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights
4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?


An AR-15, or just rifles in general?

The AR-15 is a great gun for home defense versus the shotgun.....and it is also used for hunting...it is good for hunting wild hogs....I am told......and it is used in competition by shooters of all ages and both sexes......

It also helps keep the democrat party terrorist groups, blm and antifa, from burning down your store when they are burning and looting black neighborhoods for the democrat party just before elections.......

You have never used it for defense of your home and never will. That's propaganda. How often do you go hinting hogs? Honestly. Very rarely.
Used in a gun club? Possibly.

As for shooting rioters, that stupid kid found himself in jail when he opened fire on people.

So don't give me your pathetic justifications for ownership. The truth is you have guns because you can. You will never use them for defense because you haven't the guts to go out. Where were you when BLM did their thing? Cowering in the shed?


If I don't use a rifle, that doesn't mean that millions of others don't use the rifle...are you really this dumb?


Someone I know uses an AR-15 to kill hogs......the ability to follow up is important because they are mean and dangerous.

The store owners who used the AR-15 rifles to keep the democrat party terrrorists in blm and antifa from burning their stores are really glad they had them...

Millions of others do not use thise weapon at all. Like yourself, you have them because you can to inflate your tough guy image and build testosterone.

I never witnessed any store owners mowing people down with automatic weapons and neither did you. You are a liar.

You're digging yourself a hole son. Your excuses don't gel with anything in reality.

So who do you think is looking dumb now? It's certainly not me dickhead.


You truly are a child...

It was the mere presence of store owners armed with AR-15s that kept the democrat party terrorists in blm and antifa from burning and looting their stores and murdering their employees....you idiot.....they didn't have to shoot anyone.....it was the mere existence of those weapons and the ability to use them that stopped the democrat party terrorists in blm and antifa from engaging in burning, looting and murder...

They were a decisive deterrent against the democrat party....

Frankly, just the way Pantyboy here is wailing and frothing at the mouth over the idea of people owning them tells you what a great Democrat deterrent they are. Like sunlight to vampires.
 

Forum List

Back
Top