From Downunder

[Old Rocks]

A very disturbing report from Australia. Page 5, if the math is correct, for any one of the curves spells disaster. Geometric progressions increase very rapidly after the first three or four doublings.

http://www.countercurrents.org/glikson290511.pdf

Had the proposed Australian reduction of 5 percent in the rate of carbon
emissions by 2020 relative to 2000 [9] been a figure adopted world-side, global
emissions would be reduced from ~24,000 million tons/year to 22,500 million
tons/year, hardly causing a dent in the current trajectory above 393 ppm CO2
toward levels at which the polar ice sheets are further destabilized (Figure 3).

It is not clear whether deep reduction in carbon emissions will be sufficient to
stem the amplifying feedbacks associated with greenhouse gas warming and
ice/melt water interactions. Barring an indefinite maintenance of sulphur aerosol
emissions, deep emission cuts need to be accompanied by atmospheric CO2
draw-down by means of fast-track tree planting, application of biochar methods
and chemical CO2 sequestration. As shown by the intensifying spate of extreme
weather events around the globe (Figure 7) the alternative bears no
contemplation.

 

[percysunshine]

The sky is falling! The sky is falling!

 

[dilloduck]

The sky is falling! The sky is falling!

for the millionth time-----even a hacked server didn't slow him down.

 

[daveman]

 

[skookerasbil]

A very disturbing report from Australia. Page 5, if the math is correct, for any one of the curves spells disaster. Geometric progressions increase very rapidly after the first three or four doublings.

http://www.countercurrents.org/glikson290511.pdf

Had the proposed Australian reduction of 5 percent in the rate of carbon
emissions by 2020 relative to 2000 [9] been a figure adopted world-side, global
emissions would be reduced from ~24,000 million tons/year to 22,500 million
tons/year, hardly causing a dent in the current trajectory above 393 ppm CO2
toward levels at which the polar ice sheets are further destabilized (Figure 3).

It is not clear whether deep reduction in carbon emissions will be sufficient to
stem the amplifying feedbacks associated with greenhouse gas warming and
ice/melt water interactions. Barring an indefinite maintenance of sulphur aerosol
emissions, deep emission cuts need to be accompanied by atmospheric CO2
draw-down by means of fast-track tree planting, application of biochar methods
and chemical CO2 sequestration. As shown by the intensifying spate of extreme
weather events around the globe (Figure 7) the alternative bears no
contemplation.

You're a hysterical k00k Rocks.....................

You read posts from this guy and you'd think weather just started in the last year or two.

But........in fact.........extreme fcukked up weather has been happening for a long long time.........some decades more extreme than others but, attributable to random planetary trends.

Hundreds and hundreds here s0ns........the link the k00ks dont want you to know about OR are too stupid to realize weather didnt just start a few years ago. The 1930's were particularly fcukked up. You know the 1930's............when SUV's were dominating American roads!!

Chronology of Extreme Weather

 

[skookerasbil]

And here Old Rocks posted up this thread and for a few minutes was feeling real proud of himself...............

Then came Sk00ks..........taking a quick late night gandor in here and...............

 

[skookerasbil]

 

[Old Rocks]

Self portrait, Daveboy

 

[Old Rocks]

A very disturbing report from Australia. Page 5, if the math is correct, for any one of the curves spells disaster. Geometric progressions increase very rapidly after the first three or four doublings.

http://www.countercurrents.org/glikson290511.pdf

Had the proposed Australian reduction of 5 percent in the rate of carbon
emissions by 2020 relative to 2000 [9] been a figure adopted world-side, global
emissions would be reduced from ~24,000 million tons/year to 22,500 million
tons/year, hardly causing a dent in the current trajectory above 393 ppm CO2
toward levels at which the polar ice sheets are further destabilized (Figure 3).

It is not clear whether deep reduction in carbon emissions will be sufficient to
stem the amplifying feedbacks associated with greenhouse gas warming and
ice/melt water interactions. Barring an indefinite maintenance of sulphur aerosol
emissions, deep emission cuts need to be accompanied by atmospheric CO2
draw-down by means of fast-track tree planting, application of biochar methods
and chemical CO2 sequestration. As shown by the intensifying spate of extreme
weather events around the globe (Figure 7) the alternative bears no
contemplation.

You're a hysterical k00k Rocks.....................

You read posts from this guy and you'd think weather just started in the last year or two.

But........in fact.........extreme fcukked up weather has been happening for a long long time.........some decades more extreme than others but, attributable to random planetary trends.

Hundreds and hundreds here s0ns........the link the k00ks dont want you to know about OR are too stupid to realize weather didnt just start a few years ago. The 1930's were particularly fcukked up. You know the 1930's............when SUV's were dominating American roads!!

Chronology of Extreme Weather

For sure a self portrait.