Gabby Giffords Turns Slimewad

[TemplarKormac]

Well, it was bound to happen.

Giffords is now utilizing her elevated position and all the sympathy she can muster to run ads against those who support the constitution.

Go figure.

She was never that good before and obviously isn't getting any better.

STFU Gabby.

Mad Gabby Former Congresswoman Unleashes Nasty Ads Against Pro-Second Amendment Candidates - Matt Vespa

Holy shit, can you imagine it? Gabby Giffords supporting real background checks on people before they buy a gun, so that insane mother fuckers can't just buy a gun. Unfortunately it's a bit late for that, because we have millions of insane idiots in possession of all sorts of firearms already. You idiots on the right are so concerned that the boogie man is going to take your guns away that you don't give a shit who can buy a gun, even if that person may end up using it to kill you or one of your family.

Its one thing to support background checks, its another to accuse one of the candidates of murder because they don't support it. Apparently you don't care about common decency after she made those atrocious claims against McSally. Basically Giffords said she was an accomplice to murder by not supporting background checks which would have prevented a psychopathic stalker from killing the daughter of a woman named Vicki. The thing is, McSally was in fact a victim of stalking herself.

So, is a worldview so important that we disregard the truth altogether, or slander someone in the name of politics? More and more liberals like you in this thread are hanging off of her coattails. Despicable. In this regard you lack any moral credibility.

On a side note, McSally now has a good case to sue Giffords and her PAC for slander. I hope she pursues it.

 

[TooTall]

Pulling ads means the assertions they made were lies. People will outright lie to voters to get into office. Everyone does it. It isn't rocket science.

you dont know the reason the ads were pulled. That could be a reason, it could be another...People leave up ads with lies in them as well.

Sort of like Obama did accusing Romney of giving people cancer? Yeah, funny how you don't point that out.

Your response suggested you didn't care why the ads were pulled. "So what" you said. You are full of double standards, PB.

sort of like Mittens accusing jeep of moving over to china fully and somehow that was obama's fault.Even though they never moved.

More like so what, your opinion does not make fact, show me why they where pulled.

Not really, since it wasn't a lie.

"Public expressed collective outrage"? That's essentially wishcasting on the part of PolitiFact, nor are they accurately representing what Mitt Romney said in the ad. In fact, here's PolitiFact's original "fact check" on the matter:
[Mitt Romney] Says Barack Obama "sold Chrysler to Italians who are going to build Jeeps in China" at the cost of American jobs.
Ok. Now here's what the Reuters reported earlier this week:

Fiat (FIA.MI) and its U.S. unit Chrysler expect to roll out at least 100,000 Jeeps in China when production starts in 2014 as they seek to catch up with rivals in the world's biggest car market. ...
"We expect production of around 100,000 Jeeps per year which is expandable to 200,000," [Chrysler CEO Sergio] Marchionne, who is also CEO of Chrysler, said on the sidelines of a conference, adding production could start in 18 months.
So, yes, it's confirmed that Jeep will be producing cars in China.According to theToledo Bladelast November:
Currently, Jeeps sell in more than 120 countries around the world, including China. They're nearly all built in factories in the United States.

By expanding Jeep production to China, instead of increasing Jeep production in the U.S., it's safe to say Jeep (or more properly, Fiat, which now owns Chrysler) is choosing to create more jobs overseas instead of in America where taxpayers bailed the company out.

um....no

um...yes

This is a fact: Fiat (FIA.MI) and its U.S. unit Chrysler expect to roll out at least 100,000 Jeeps in China when production starts in 2014 as they seek to catch up with rivals in the world's biggest car market. ...
By expanding Jeep production to China, instead of increasing Jeep production in the U.S., it's safe to say Jeep (or more properly, Fiat, which now owns Chrysler) is choosing to create more jobs overseas instead of in America where taxpayers bailed the company out.

 

[TooTall]

Using emotions to take away Constitutional rights is like a parent caving in to a screaming child in the toy aisle as to avoid embarrassment.

You mean like repugs pushing the patriot act?

Really!

When the United States Senate voted on the USA PATRIOT Act in 2001,the vote was 98-1 with one abstention. That meansonly one senator voted against it.

 

[Wildman]

being shot in the head will do that..Looks more like the Op is scum. But we knew this

Speaking of scum.....how long has it been since your last welfare fix?

No idea...but i did get a raise at work again....

>>>>>>>>>
2 Cents an hour..., exactly what you are worth..., or was that 2 Cents a day ?

 

[zeke]

Using emotions to take away Constitutional rights is like a parent caving in to a screaming child in the toy aisle as to avoid embarrassment.

You mean like repugs pushing the patriot act?

Really!

When the United States Senate voted on the USA PATRIOT Act in 2001,the vote was 98-1 with one abstention. That meansonly one senator voted against it.

98 Senators allowed their fears to be used to encourage them to vote for terrible legislation. One Senator had enough sense to not vote for terrible legislation based on fear.

What was your point? Fear sells. Well yes it does.

 

[Freewill]

Truthfully what in the hell do you expect?

SHE is the VICTIM of gun violence for no reason that I can see.

What do you expect her to say, it was just an accidental discharge of a weapon no big deal?

What would you say if your head was opened up by some gun toting lunatic?

Sorry but posts like this do a disservice to those who want to own guns responsibly. What the NRA and second amendment rights groups need to do is figure out, if possible, how to keep guns out of the hands of lunatics and criminals.

I don't think that is even possible but tearing down a person who is a victim of a gun crime does not really help the cause of gun ownership one bit.

 

[rightwinger]

that doesn't make her a hero SFB. that makes her a victim

people don't spit on her but assholes think her fraudulent claims should not be challenged

she's a took of her husband.

A woman who nearly had her brains blown out is a fraud for wanting sensible gun controls

Do you guys ever get tired of looking like idiots?

As a liberal you insult the intelligence of normal people every time you speak, but does this grave offense against dignity warrant you being denied the right to speak?

I didn't do anything to Gabbie Giffords, so why do you feel it proper to strip me of my rights? Should you have your free speech rights stripped from you when Obama says something stupid?

RW should define "sensible" before he starts playing with the 2nd Amendment rights of others. How would he like it if we started violating his constitutional rights because of how we felt? He would be objecting just the same. Liberals look to rule based on emotion, not on facts.

Given that no gun related legislation will ever be "sensible" to NRA bots, I fully expect what your response will be

But let's look at what Gabby Giffords considers to be sensible

We don't want crazies getting guns. If we don't check their background, we can't verify if they are a criminal or nutjob

There is no "sensible" reason you need a 30 round magazine

 

[Wildman]

Why would anyone call Gabby Giffords a slimewad?

It shows how sick the gun nuts are

Attacking a woman who took a bullet to the head and wants to stop it from happening to someone else

>>>>>>>>
i notice everyone says "took a bullet to the head".., is that because she never had a brain ? not even a half of one ? .... .... .... .... she and scumbag Kelly are full of

 

[Stephanie]

She attacks my freedoms I'll attack her, bullet or not

she is no better than any of us

 

[Wildman]

that doesn't make her a hero SFB. that makes her a victim

people don't spit on her but assholes think her fraudulent claims should not be challenged

she's a took of her husband.

A woman who nearly had her brains blown out is a fraud for wanting sensible gun controls

Do you guys ever get tired of looking like idiots?

As a liberal you insult the intelligence of normal people every time you speak, but does this grave offense against dignity warrant you being denied the right to speak?

I didn't do anything to Gabbie Giffords, so why do you feel it proper to strip me of my rights? Should you have your free speech rights stripped from you when Obama says something stupid?

RW should define "sensible" before he starts playing with the 2nd Amendment rights of others. How would he like it if we started violating his constitutional rights because of how we felt? He would be objecting just the same. Liberals look to rule based on emotion, not on facts.

Given that no gun related legislation will ever be "sensible" to NRA bots, I fully expect what your response will be

But let's look at what Gabby Giffords considers to be sensible

We don't want crazies getting guns. If we don't check their background, we can't verify if they are a criminal or nutjob

There is no "sensible" reason you need a 30 round magazine

>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"sensible" has nothing to do with it, i am certain that you do not know that in "sensible" states an AR-15 and similar semi-autos come standard with a 30 round Mag.

just curious, why are you against free trade among private citizens whether at at a gun show or in the parking lot, at home or even a shooting range ??

RightWhigger.., try for once in your life to be "SENSIBLE" and quit throwing in all your posts.., OK ?

oooooooh ! i almost forgot.......

................. ...............................

 

[rightwinger]

Using emotions to take away Constitutional rights is like a parent caving in to a screaming child in the toy aisle as to avoid embarrassment.

You mean like repugs pushing the patriot act?

Really!

When the United States Senate voted on the USA PATRIOT Act in 2001,the vote was 98-1 with one abstention. That meansonly one senator voted against it.

98 Senators allowed their fears to be used to encourage them to vote for terrible legislation. One Senator had enough sense to not vote for terrible legislation based on fear.

What was your point? Fear sells. Well yes it does.

In post 9-11 America, no senator had the balls to vote against something called the Patriot act

 

[Plasmaball]

The ad

you dont know the reason the ads were pulled. That could be a reason, it could be another...People leave up ads with lies in them as well.

Sort of like Obama did accusing Romney of giving people cancer? Yeah, funny how you don't point that out.

Your response suggested you didn't care why the ads were pulled. "So what" you said. You are full of double standards, PB.

sort of like Mittens accusing jeep of moving over to china fully and somehow that was obama's fault.Even though they never moved.

More like so what, your opinion does not make fact, show me why they where pulled.

Not really, since it wasn't a lie.

"Public expressed collective outrage"? That's essentially wishcasting on the part of PolitiFact, nor are they accurately representing what Mitt Romney said in the ad. In fact, here's PolitiFact's original "fact check" on the matter:
[Mitt Romney] Says Barack Obama "sold Chrysler to Italians who are going to build Jeeps in China" at the cost of American jobs.
Ok. Now here's what the Reuters reported earlier this week:

Fiat (FIA.MI) and its U.S. unit Chrysler expect to roll out at least 100,000 Jeeps in China when production starts in 2014 as they seek to catch up with rivals in the world's biggest car market. ...
"We expect production of around 100,000 Jeeps per year which is expandable to 200,000," [Chrysler CEO Sergio] Marchionne, who is also CEO of Chrysler, said on the sidelines of a conference, adding production could start in 18 months.
So, yes, it's confirmed that Jeep will be producing cars in China.According to theToledo Bladelast November:
Currently, Jeeps sell in more than 120 countries around the world, including China. They're nearly all built in factories in the United States.

By expanding Jeep production to China, instead of increasing Jeep production in the U.S., it's safe to say Jeep (or more properly, Fiat, which now owns Chrysler) is choosing to create more jobs overseas instead of in America where taxpayers bailed the company out.

um....no

um...yes

This is a fact: Fiat (FIA.MI) and its U.S. unit Chrysler expect to roll out at least 100,000 Jeeps in China when production starts in 2014 as they seek to catch up with rivals in the world's biggest car market. ...
By expanding Jeep production to China, instead of increasing Jeep production in the U.S., it's safe to say Jeep (or more properly, Fiat, which now owns Chrysler) is choosing to create more jobs overseas instead of in America where taxpayers bailed the company out.

The ad stated jeep was moving all production to china, which is a lie. Yes they where moving some production to China but they where also expanding here as well.

So no.

 

[Plasmaball]

being shot in the head will do that..Looks more like the Op is scum. But we knew this

Speaking of scum.....how long has it been since your last welfare fix?

No idea...but i did get a raise at work again....

>>>>>>>>>
2 Cents an hour..., exactly what you are worth..., or was that 2 Cents a day ?

Still more than you.

 

[NYcarbineer]

being shot in the head will do that..Looks more like the Op is scum. But we knew this

So what is your excuse ?

Being shot in the head will do what ?

Cause you to take a personal tragedy and play it up for political clout ?

You go Gabby...right down the toilet. Along with Lakhota.

What makes a personal tragedy off-limits politically, if that personal tragedy involves a political issue?

 

[Freewill]

Using emotions to take away Constitutional rights is like a parent caving in to a screaming child in the toy aisle as to avoid embarrassment.

You mean like repugs pushing the patriot act?

Really!

When the United States Senate voted on the USA PATRIOT Act in 2001,the vote was 98-1 with one abstention. That meansonly one senator voted against it.

98 Senators allowed their fears to be used to encourage them to vote for terrible legislation. One Senator had enough sense to not vote for terrible legislation based on fear.

What was your point? Fear sells. Well yes it does.

In post 9-11 America, no senator had the balls to vote against something called the Patriot act

If that be the case then they were voting in what they perceived was the majority of opinion of their constituents.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Quite ironic that Mrs. Giffords likely has contingent of armed bodyguards around her at any given time. Quite ironic indeed.

Do you think it's appropriate for such armed bodyguards to undergo background checks?

 

[Stephanie]

This is how they beat you down

they use this woman's injuries to guilt you into shutting you up of your oponions

it's a classic tactic used by the left/dem/progressive/commies

 

[rightwinger]

being shot in the head will do that..Looks more like the Op is scum. But we knew this

So what is your excuse ?

Being shot in the head will do what ?

Cause you to take a personal tragedy and play it up for political clout ?

You go Gabby...right down the toilet. Along with Lakhota.

What makes a personal tragedy off-limits politically, if that personal tragedy involves a political issue?

I can't understand the NRAbots.....

The woman takes a bullet in the head, is nearly killed and has her life destroyed

Then they accuse her of " exploiting" the attack when she wants to do something to prevent it from happening to someone else

 

[NYcarbineer]

It's sad, and comical in a way too, to see the gun rights extremists fighting so desperately to protect loopholes in the background check system in this country.

You HAVE to be deranged to do that.

 

[rightwinger]

It's sad, and comical in a way too, to see the gun rights extremists fighting so desperately to protect loopholes in the background check system in this country.

You HAVE to be deranged to do that.

They protect the loopholes making legislation ineffective, then mock you

See? We told you background checks don't work