Generals conclude Obama backed al-Qaida

PGreen

Active Member
Nov 24, 2014
263
44
33
NEW YORK – The Obama White House and the State Department under the management of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “changed sides in the war on terror” in 2011 by implementing a policy of facilitating the delivery of weapons to the al-Qaida-dominated rebel militias in Libya attempting to oust Moammar Gadhafi from power, the Citizens Commission on Benghazi concluded in its interim report.

Generals conclude Obama backed al-Qaida

Honestly, I'm tired of reading all the reasons why Obama, Hillary, Biden, Pelosi, and the Congress, the judiciary and the executive branch should be removed from office. I want to know when it will begin?
 
Just Obama?

"Facilitate delivery of Weapons"? That merely includes Benghazi. Take a look at what the US is doing in the Ukraine.

The US government (via the CIA) also helps to ship drugs into this country but hey, who really cares? We're more concerned with deflated footballs.
 
Just Obama?

"Facilitate delivery of Weapons"? That merely includes Benghazi. Take a look at what the US is doing in the Ukraine.

The US government (via the CIA) also helps to ship drugs into this country but hey, who really cares? We're more concerned with deflated footballs.
Well, deflated footballs could have helped Indy score at least 2 more touchdowns.
 
NEW YORK – The Obama White House and the State Department under the management of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “changed sides in the war on terror” in 2011 by implementing a policy of facilitating the delivery of weapons to the al-Qaida-dominated rebel militias in Libya attempting to oust Moammar Gadhafi from power, the Citizens Commission on Benghazi concluded in its interim report.

Generals conclude Obama backed al-Qaida

Honestly, I'm tired of reading all the reasons why Obama, Hillary, Biden, Pelosi, and the Congress, the judiciary and the executive branch should be removed from office. I want to know when it will begin?

You are destined to be frustrated. You haven't the stones to stand up for YOUR principles......so you will not get your desired outcome.
 
That's nothing, BIg Foot is now traveling to Iraq and the Great Pumpkin is undecided whether Frozen was just fictional.
 
Not even one legit source cited but that won't stop the right from turning this into fact.

Somebody needs to tell Darrell Isis.

:rolleyes:
 
From the WND article:

“In early 2011, before Gadhafi was deposed, Christopher Stevens came to Benghazi in a cargo ship, and his title at the time was envoy to the Libyan rebels,’ which basically means Christopher Stevens was America’s very first envoy to al-Qaida,"

Ah, so now you clowns have decided that Chris Stevens was a traitor?

Then doesn't that mean he got what he deserved?
 
calm down folks-----supporting the alquaida dogs in Libya who were working on getting rid of the disgusting monster
Khadaffy duck is not actually a general endorsement of
al quaida. It was a means to a good end. Not a particularly good means------but that's politics. I could never be a politician. If it is true that the US gives some aid and comfort to
the various interest groups in the Middle east who want to get rid of the Baathist pig ASSAD-------same thing. Our support of the Taliban was like that----admittedly a big mistake----
probably bigger than helping some of the more shitty of the
anti dog assad groups in the middle east and Stalin during world war II
 
calm down folks-----supporting the alquaida dogs in Libya who were working on getting rid of the disgusting monster
Khadaffy duck is not actually a general endorsement of
al quaida. It was a means to a good end. Not a particularly good means------but that's politics. I could never be a politician. If it is true that the US gives some aid and comfort to
the various interest groups in the Middle east who want to get rid of the Baathist pig ASSAD-------same thing. Our support of the Taliban was like that----admittedly a big mistake----
probably bigger than helping some of the more shitty of the
anti dog assad groups in the middle east and Stalin during world war II

No, it was a stupid policy. The zionists went ahead and wanted to get rid of Khadafy, so they manipulated the US and EU into backing these assholes, who were pretty obvioulsy from the start part of Al Qaeda, and then we act all surprised when they turn on us.

It's another case of sticking our dicks into the hornet's nest and wondering why we get stung.
 
Just Obama?

"Facilitate delivery of Weapons"? That merely includes Benghazi. Take a look at what the US is doing in the Ukraine.

The US government (via the CIA) also helps to ship drugs into this country but hey, who really cares? We're more concerned with deflated footballs.
<><><><><><><>

soooo...., you are OK with cheating ? just like the worthless whelps on welfare !
 
calm down folks-----supporting the alquaida dogs in Libya who were working on getting rid of the disgusting monster
Khadaffy duck is not actually a general endorsement of
al quaida. It was a means to a good end. Not a particularly good means------but that's politics. I could never be a politician. If it is true that the US gives some aid and comfort to
the various interest groups in the Middle east who want to get rid of the Baathist pig ASSAD-------same thing. Our support of the Taliban was like that----admittedly a big mistake----
probably bigger than helping some of the more shitty of the
anti dog assad groups in the middle east and Stalin during world war II
Gadaffi was one of the most popular politician ever and President of the African Union. Then he was murdered by CIA-Qaedas that have been armed and supported via US tax money.
 
calm down folks-----supporting the alquaida dogs in Libya who were working on getting rid of the disgusting monster
Khadaffy duck is not actually a general endorsement of
al quaida. It was a means to a good end. Not a particularly good means------but that's politics. I could never be a politician. If it is true that the US gives some aid and comfort to
the various interest groups in the Middle east who want to get rid of the Baathist pig ASSAD-------same thing. Our support of the Taliban was like that----admittedly a big mistake----
probably bigger than helping some of the more shitty of the
anti dog assad groups in the middle east and Stalin during world war II

No, it was a stupid policy. The zionists went ahead and wanted to get rid of Khadafy, so they manipulated the US and EU into backing these assholes, who were pretty obvioulsy from the start part of Al Qaeda, and then we act all surprised when they turn on us.

It's another case of sticking our dicks into the hornet's nest and wondering why we get stung.

How fascinating----I never met a "Zionist" who advocated the USA support of the Taliban---yet joe insists that "the Zionists" forced the USA to do so. The prime directive of
AL QAEIDA is "death to the jooos" yet Joe insists that
"the Zionists" -----created al quaeda just as "the Zionists"
created adolf hitler. Joe-----try something new-----I read
your stuff when I was just short of ten years old----not long
after DA JOOOOOS created World War II and the
Z I P codes. How long do you think it will take for the WASPS of the world to stop doing everything THE ZIONISTS tell them to do------you schmucks
 
calm down folks-----supporting the alquaida dogs in Libya who were working on getting rid of the disgusting monster
Khadaffy duck is not actually a general endorsement of
al quaida. It was a means to a good end. Not a particularly good means------but that's politics. I could never be a politician. If it is true that the US gives some aid and comfort to
the various interest groups in the Middle east who want to get rid of the Baathist pig ASSAD-------same thing. Our support of the Taliban was like that----admittedly a big mistake----
probably bigger than helping some of the more shitty of the
anti dog assad groups in the middle east and Stalin during world war II
Gadaffi was one of the most popular politician ever and President of the African Union. Then he was murdered by CIA-Qaedas that have been armed and supported via US tax money.

good-----it proves the Talmudic dictum-----there is nothing
in the world that is ENTIRELY evil------all of the creation is
for a purpose.------even captain blei. Khadaffy duck was a material supporter of terrorism -----good that he is dead
 
calm down folks-----supporting the alquaida dogs in Libya who were working on getting rid of the disgusting monster
Khadaffy duck is not actually a general endorsement of
al quaida. It was a means to a good end. Not a particularly good means------but that's politics. I could never be a politician. If it is true that the US gives some aid and comfort to
the various interest groups in the Middle east who want to get rid of the Baathist pig ASSAD-------same thing. Our support of the Taliban was like that----admittedly a big mistake----
probably bigger than helping some of the more shitty of the
anti dog assad groups in the middle east and Stalin during world war II
Gadaffi was one of the most popular politician ever and President of the African Union. Then he was murdered by CIA-Qaedas that have been armed and supported via US tax money.

good-----it proves the Talmudic dictum-----there is nothing
in the world that is ENTIRELY evil------all of the creation is
for a purpose.------even captain blei. Khadaffy duck was a material supporter of terrorism -----good that he is dead

Album: Gadaffi and those who stabbed his back!

gaddafi-sarkozy.jpg


041210_kaddafi.jpg


berlusconi-gaddafi.jpg


Nicolas Sarkozy DID take 50 million of Muammar Gaddafi s cash French judge is told - Europe - World - The Independent
Gaddafi was killed by French secret serviceman on orders of Nicolas Sarkozy sources claim Daily Mail Online

Amnesty International Hero of Human Rights:
ai-hr-mg.jpg

Muammar Gaddafi Voted Amnesty International 8217 s Human Rights Hero Libya 360 Archive
 
Last edited:
Ahhhhhhhh nothing like giving Libya to AQ jihadists who now control one fifth of the world's oil supplies and are partying hardy at the American Embassy in Tripoli.

Well done Obama!

th
 
Granny says, "Dat's right - Obama's parting shot to al-Qaida...
icon_grandma.gif

US Airstrike Said to Kill 100-Plus Al-Qaida in Syria
Jan 20, 2017 | WASHINGTON — The Syria strike was carried out by one B-52 bomber and an undisclosed number of U.S. aerial drones.
U.S. warplanes bombed an al-Qaida training camp in Syria, killing more than 100 militants, marking the second major U.S. counterterrorism strike in the final hours of Barack Obama's presidency, a defense official said Friday.

b-52-stratofortress_001-ts600.jpg

B-52 Stratofortress​

The Syria strike was carried out by one B-52 bomber and an undisclosed number of U.S. aerial drones, the official said. The official, who was not authorized to publicly announce the operation and so spoke on condition of anonymity, said it happened at about noon Washington time on Thursday, less than 24 hours after a combination of B-2 stealth bombers and drones struck two military camps in a remote part of Libya, killing 80 to 90 Islamic State militants. Obama specifically authorized the Libya strike. It was not immediately clear whether the Syria strike required his direct approval.

The militants killed in the Syria attack were described by the official as "core" al-Qaida members, among a number who had moved to Syria early last year to establish a foothold. The U.S. defense official distinguished these militants from members of the group formerly known as the Nusra Front, which is an al-Qaida affiliate in Syria. The al-Qaida training camp struck on Thursday is situated in Idlib province west of Aleppo, not far from the Turkish border, the official said, adding that the Pentagon believes no civilians were killed in the attack.

US Airstrike Said to Kill 100-Plus Al-Qaida in Syria | Military.com
 

Forum List

Back
Top