Georgia poll workers targeted by Trump are cleared of false election fraud claims

[Chillicothe]

Dems always say "fake news" when someone is pointing out how the election was stolen.

Did you watch 2000 Mules?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, good poster Lenny, do you think your much-heralded Cyber Ninjas watched '2000 Mules'?
If they had, one would think they could have picked up some tips on investigating a 'stolen election'.
What happened there, Lenny?
Did you back the wrong horse (horses)?
Didja send 'em money to help them prove that Joe Biden got more votes in Arizona than was originally stated? And that he won by an even wider margin?
Thank you Cyber Ninjas!

(ps....how much money didja send?)


ps#2....Lenny please never leave this site and go to, say, the Q-Anon site, Great Awakenings. I like you here. You are one of my favs. You and EMH. As a 2-man tag-team, you guys ---ARE----entertainment!!

Attaboy!!

 

[Slade3200]

Did you watch 2000 Mules?

Did you watch Star Wars? I hate to spoil it for you but Darth is not Luke’s father in real life.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Post an actual fact that the Big Squeal can tout.

you are barking up the wrong tree here, otto.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Like the 2020 stolen election.

So you defend a pig that denied his grand daughter?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yes I did.
The whacky 2000 Mules theory has already been thoroughly debunked.
D’Souza's credibility is shot.
Or didn't you know that?
Why are Trumptard MAGAts always the LAST ones to learn information?

The movie suggests Democrat-organized “mules” were paid to illegally collect and drop off ballots in key battleground states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

The movie’s evidence is a combination of anonymous accounts and improper analysis of cell phone location data, which is not precise enough to confirm that somebody deposited a ballot into a drop box.

2000 MULES | JANUARY 6TH

Dinesh D'Souza's new film, 2000 Mules, suggests election fraud in the 2020 election without bringing any solid evidence.

www.jan-6.com

Less evidence was presented in Trump's impeachment and Trump was impeached

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Tired tropes are for dopes on the ropes.

find a real argument.

Collusion cultists you have no argument it's weak.

 

[Slade3200]

Less evidence was presented in Trump's impeachment and Trump was impeached

Impeachment is a congressional process not judicial. And actual transcripts of trumps actual words were used. That’s real evidence. The stolen election lie never held up in count because there was no evidence to back it up. Just conspiracy theories that dupes like yourself rallied behind. Have some self respect and wake up

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Impeachment is a congressional process not judicial. And actual transcripts of trumps actual words were used. That’s real evidence. The stolen election lie never held up in count because there was no evidence to back it up. Just conspiracy theories that dupes like yourself rallied behind. Have some self respect and wake up

It's still a trial regardless how you want to ignore what happened compared to things around the biden's

 

[Rumpole]

Collusion cultists you have no argument it's weak.

Find a real argument.

 

[MagicMike]

Less evidence was presented in Trump's impeachment and Trump was impeached

Well the difference might be that the evidence presented in both of Trump's impeachments was uh....REAL while D'Souza's garbage isn't.

 

[Slade3200]

It's still a trial regardless how you want to ignore what happened compared to things around the biden's

Yes it’s a trial. And evidence was presented. Transcripts of Trumps actual words. No evidence for your stolen election. Not even trump judges could take those claims seriously. Y’all are a joke

 

[Faun]

Did you watch 2000 Mules?

Aren't they being sued for defamation over lying about one of their "mules" committing a crime he didn't actually commit?

 

[otto105]

So you defend a pig that denied his grand daughter?

Yes.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Find a real argument.

Collusion cultist your whole argument has no basis in reality

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Well the difference might be that the evidence presented in both of Trump's impeachments was uh....REAL while D'Souza's garbage isn't.

Horse shit heresy is not evidencev

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yes it’s a trial. And evidence was presented. Transcripts of Trumps actual words. No evidence for your stolen election. Not even trump judges could take those claims seriously. Y’all are a joke

Heresy is not evidence and that's all you had

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yes.

Of course an immoral piece shit like you would do that

 

[MagicMike]

Horse shit heresy is not evidencev

That will be up to Trump's juries to decide.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

That will be up to Trump's juries to decide.

No it's what the law says

 

[MagicMike]

No it's what the law says

Actually fool, Trump has been (and will be) charged with numerous felonies.
Like any other American these cases will each be heard and judged by juries of his peers.
Guilty...or not guilty....on each felony count.
Once charged then it is ALL up to the jury.
In his case multiple juries.