G'head.... Impeach you cowards....

[justoffal]

AOC is right about the Dems.. (she really isn't one of them) they are cowards.

It's like the old saying goes a lion never needs to tell you that he's a lion.
An impeachment process means nothing for as long as it is endlessly advertised and never pursued.

Hopefully they get their shit together
and go for it! IMO.....NO BALLS.

JO

 

[Sunsettommy]

They are trying a new tack on finding a reason to impeach the President, it is leftist ugliness out in the open, from The Refuge

It’s Deja-Vu All Over Again – The Ukraine Effort is Simply “Obstruction 2.0″…

Posted on September 22, 2019 by sundance

EXCERPT:

"To assemble a quick elevator explanation of the Muh Russia obstruction construction, and to better understand the end goal of the political objective which encompassed the use of the FISA court, CTH previously said:

To get impeachment, they needed obstruction. To get obstruction, they needed an investigation. To get the investigation, they needed evidence. To change dossier from oppo-research to evidence they needed a FISA. To get a FISA they needed a target. The target was Carter Page.

While assembling the more recent deployment of Adam Schiff’s Ukraine story, I recognize something familiar:

To get impeachment Schiff needs obstruction. To get obstruction, Schiff needs an investigation. To get an investigation Schiff needs evidence. To change political innuendo into evidence, Schiff needs a ‘whistle-blower’. To use a ‘whistle-blower’ they need a report… And guess where we are?

In the 2016/2017 Muh Russia operation we notice the same general cast of characters were involved. •Embeds in the intelligence apparatus; •Lawfare allies -inside and outside government- constructing the narrative for media absorption and distribution; and •politicians working to utilize their constructs."

=============================

I am considering voting for Trump because of all the bullcrap leftist democrats are cooking up. I know of democrats who are weary of it too, even say they are going to vote for Trump.

Democrats are dying slowly, a death they deserve because they are slowly turning into Socialists, then eventually Communist, which is their goal. They don't show real love for America anymore, Hubert Humphrey is spinning in the grave, the man who loved America would be saddened to see the party go far to the Socialist left.

 

[tigerred59]

AOC is right about the Dems.. (she really isn't one of them) they are cowards.

It's like the old saying goes a lion never needs to tell you that he's a lion.
An impeachment process means nothing for as long as it is endlessly advertised and never pursued.

Hopefully they get their shit together
and go for it! IMO.....NO BALLS.

JO

They're not just cowards, they're typical politicians who worry more about their gotdmaned jobs than what is right for this nation. I live for the day, any politician put this country and the american people first...we all are long over due for some real love from these bastards after our votes.

 

[tigerred59]

They are trying a new tack on finding a reason to impeach the President, it is leftist ugliness out in the open, from The Refuge

It’s Deja-Vu All Over Again – The Ukraine Effort is Simply “Obstruction 2.0″…

Posted on September 22, 2019 by sundance

EXCERPT:

"To assemble a quick elevator explanation of the Muh Russia obstruction construction, and to better understand the end goal of the political objective which encompassed the use of the FISA court, CTH previously said:

To get impeachment, they needed obstruction. To get obstruction, they needed an investigation. To get the investigation, they needed evidence. To change dossier from oppo-research to evidence they needed a FISA. To get a FISA they needed a target. The target was Carter Page.

While assembling the more recent deployment of Adam Schiff’s Ukraine story, I recognize something familiar:

To get impeachment Schiff needs obstruction. To get obstruction, Schiff needs an investigation. To get an investigation Schiff needs evidence. To change political innuendo into evidence, Schiff needs a ‘whistle-blower’. To use a ‘whistle-blower’ they need a report… And guess where we are?

In the 2016/2017 Muh Russia operation we notice the same general cast of characters were involved. •Embeds in the intelligence apparatus; •Lawfare allies -inside and outside government- constructing the narrative for media absorption and distribution; and •politicians working to utilize their constructs."

=============================

I am considering voting for Trump because of all the bullcrap leftist democrats are cooking up. I know of democrats who are weary of it too, even say they are going to vote for Trump.

Democrats are dying slowly, a death they deserve because they are slowly turning into Socialists, then eventually Communist, which is their goal. They don't show real love for America anymore, Hubert Humphrey is spinning in the grave, the man who loved America would be saddened to see the party go far to the Socialist left.

If any party is dying a slow death, its the republican party......listen, what this country desperately needs and should consider in 2020....IS RIDDING OURSELVES OF THESE OLD POLITICIANS WHO SERVE NO ONE BUT THEMSELVES. ITS TIME VOTERS TAKE A CHANCE FOR ONCE IN OUR PATHETIC LIVES AND LET GO OF THE PAST ONCE AND FOR ALL AND EMBRACE A NEW GENERATION OF POLITICIANS AND GIVE ANYBODY OVER THAT AGE OF 65 THE FUCKIN BOOT...

 

[Zorro!]

ALL THEY HAD TO DO IS NOT BE CRAZY, AND THEY CAN’T EVEN DO THAT. Nancy Pelosi just made one of the most colossal blunders in modern American politics.

She announced the beginning of formal impeachment proceedings against President Trump on the basis of a third-hand rumor about a phone call with the president of a Eurasian republic.

OBSESSED: Legacy TV Networks Mention Impeachment 73 Times in 26 Hours.

 

[JimBowie1958]

I really do hope the Democrats take a roll call vote for this thing, lol.

BTW, the 'whistleblower', who isn't really a whistleblower since he does not KNOW a damned thing, has lawyered up.

He got his lawyers from Team Clinton, roflmao.

 

[theHawk]

The MSM and Dems are in complete panic mode. They need something, and something now, to bitch about for the next year. They know they can’t win on election issues or the economy. Impeachment is all they got.

 

[JimBowie1958]

The MSM and Dems are in complete panic mode. They need something, and something now, to bitch about for the next year. They know they can’t win on election issues or the economy. Impeachment is all they got.

But it is like the old Road Runner gag, where Wile E. Coyote has this intricate trap set up, but it always blows up on him.

Impeachment will only guarantee that Republicans take back the house next year.

 

[Crepitus]

The MSM and Dems are in complete panic mode. They need something, and something now, to bitch about for the next year. They know they can’t win on election issues or the economy. Impeachment is all they got.

Don't be silly, tRump has given us enough material for a decade and shows no inclination to even slow down, much less stop. The lies just keep flowing......

 

[petro]

They are trying a new tack on finding a reason to impeach the President, it is leftist ugliness out in the open, from The Refuge

It’s Deja-Vu All Over Again – The Ukraine Effort is Simply “Obstruction 2.0″…

Posted on September 22, 2019 by sundance

EXCERPT:

"To assemble a quick elevator explanation of the Muh Russia obstruction construction, and to better understand the end goal of the political objective which encompassed the use of the FISA court, CTH previously said:

To get impeachment, they needed obstruction. To get obstruction, they needed an investigation. To get the investigation, they needed evidence. To change dossier from oppo-research to evidence they needed a FISA. To get a FISA they needed a target. The target was Carter Page.

While assembling the more recent deployment of Adam Schiff’s Ukraine story, I recognize something familiar:

To get impeachment Schiff needs obstruction. To get obstruction, Schiff needs an investigation. To get an investigation Schiff needs evidence. To change political innuendo into evidence, Schiff needs a ‘whistle-blower’. To use a ‘whistle-blower’ they need a report… And guess where we are?

In the 2016/2017 Muh Russia operation we notice the same general cast of characters were involved. •Embeds in the intelligence apparatus; •Lawfare allies -inside and outside government- constructing the narrative for media absorption and distribution; and •politicians working to utilize their constructs."

=============================

I am considering voting for Trump because of all the bullcrap leftist democrats are cooking up. I know of democrats who are weary of it too, even say they are going to vote for Trump.

Democrats are dying slowly, a death they deserve because they are slowly turning into Socialists, then eventually Communist, which is their goal. They don't show real love for America anymore, Hubert Humphrey is spinning in the grave, the man who loved America would be saddened to see the party go far to the Socialist left.

If any party is dying a slow death, its the republican party......listen, what this country desperately needs and should consider in 2020....IS RIDDING OURSELVES OF THESE OLD POLITICIANS WHO SERVE NO ONE BUT THEMSELVES. ITS TIME VOTERS TAKE A CHANCE FOR ONCE IN OUR PATHETIC LIVES AND LET GO OF THE PAST ONCE AND FOR ALL AND EMBRACE A NEW GENERATION OF POLITICIANS AND GIVE ANYBODY OVER THAT AGE OF 65 THE FUCKIN BOOT...

So.
That would be a no for Sanders and Corn Pop?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Maisie HIrono said Trump was too smart to try to intimidate the Ukrainian president because he knows his calls are monitored.
But then she said he should be impeached anyway. It all makes zero sense.

 

[Zorro!]

WASHINGTON POST: Democrats’ Double Standard On Ukraine.

We don’t yet know whether President Trump delayed some military aid to Ukraine as leverage to get Ukraine’s president to reopen an investigation into Hunter Biden. But if we are concerned about U.S. officials inappropriately threatening aid to Ukraine, then there are others who have some explaining to do.​

In May, CNN reported that Sens. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) and Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) wrote a letter to Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Yuriy Lutsenko, expressing concern at the closing of four investigations they said were critical to the Mueller probe. In the letter, they communicated that their support for U.S. assistance to Ukraine was at stake.​

So, it’s okay for Democratic senators to encourage Ukraine to investigate Trump, but it’s not okay for the president to allegedly encourage Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden?
​

That’s different because shut up. Plus:

And then there is Joe Biden. In 2016, the then-vice president threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees to Ukraine if the government did not immediately fire the country’s top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin. According to the New York Times, “Among those who had a stake in the outcome was Hunter Biden … who at the time was on the board of an energy company owned by a Ukrainian oligarch who had been in the sights of the fired prosecutor general.” It is clear that Biden bragged about getting him fired, declaring last year: “I looked at them and said, ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’ Well, son of a b—-. He got fired.”​

Biden told reporters, “I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings.” That is flatly untrue. Hunter admitted in an interview with the New Yorker that his father expressed concern about the Burisma post: “Dad said, ‘I hope you know what you are doing,’ and I said, ‘I do.’” Moreover, the New Yorker reports that, “In December, 2015, as Joe Biden prepared to return to Ukraine, his aides braced for renewed scrutiny of Hunter’s relationship with Burisma. Amos Hochstein, the Obama Administration’s special envoy for energy policy, raised the matter with Biden.” That same month, the New York Times published an article about how Hunter’s business dealings in Ukraine undermined the vice president’s anti-corruption message.​

So, Biden was fully aware of his son’s involvement with Burisma when he pressured Ukraine to fire the prosecutor in 2016. Using U.S. aid as leverage to force the prosecutor’s dismissal is a conflict of interest. Federal ethics regulations require “all employees to recuse themselves from participating in an official matter if their impartiality would be questioned.” Biden violated these rules. Imagine if Trump pressured Ukraine to fire a prosecutor who was investigating a company that employed Donald Trump Jr. as a board member. No one would be giving Trump a pass.​

Again, that’s different because shut up.

 

[Zorro!]

How Long Can Dems Live on a Diet of Nothingburgers? “This flailing has to be exhausting for them but, bless their little hearts, they don’t seem to be wearing down yet.”

 

[JimBowie1958]

How Long Can Dems Live on a Diet of Nothingburgers? “This flailing has to be exhausting for them but, bless their little hearts, they don’t seem to be wearing down yet.”

 

[JimBowie1958]

WASHINGTON POST: Democrats’ Double Standard On Ukraine.

We don’t yet know whether President Trump delayed some military aid to Ukraine as leverage to get Ukraine’s president to reopen an investigation into Hunter Biden. But if we are concerned about U.S. officials inappropriately threatening aid to Ukraine, then there are others who have some explaining to do.​

In May, CNN reported that Sens. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) and Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) wrote a letter to Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Yuriy Lutsenko, expressing concern at the closing of four investigations they said were critical to the Mueller probe. In the letter, they communicated that their support for U.S. assistance to Ukraine was at stake.​

So, it’s okay for Democratic senators to encourage Ukraine to investigate Trump, but it’s not okay for the president to allegedly encourage Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden?
​

That’s different because shut up. Plus:

And then there is Joe Biden. In 2016, the then-vice president threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees to Ukraine if the government did not immediately fire the country’s top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin. According to the New York Times, “Among those who had a stake in the outcome was Hunter Biden … who at the time was on the board of an energy company owned by a Ukrainian oligarch who had been in the sights of the fired prosecutor general.” It is clear that Biden bragged about getting him fired, declaring last year: “I looked at them and said, ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’ Well, son of a b—-. He got fired.”​

Biden told reporters, “I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings.” That is flatly untrue. Hunter admitted in an interview with the New Yorker that his father expressed concern about the Burisma post: “Dad said, ‘I hope you know what you are doing,’ and I said, ‘I do.’” Moreover, the New Yorker reports that, “In December, 2015, as Joe Biden prepared to return to Ukraine, his aides braced for renewed scrutiny of Hunter’s relationship with Burisma. Amos Hochstein, the Obama Administration’s special envoy for energy policy, raised the matter with Biden.” That same month, the New York Times published an article about how Hunter’s business dealings in Ukraine undermined the vice president’s anti-corruption message.​

So, Biden was fully aware of his son’s involvement with Burisma when he pressured Ukraine to fire the prosecutor in 2016. Using U.S. aid as leverage to force the prosecutor’s dismissal is a conflict of interest. Federal ethics regulations require “all employees to recuse themselves from participating in an official matter if their impartiality would be questioned.” Biden violated these rules. Imagine if Trump pressured Ukraine to fire a prosecutor who was investigating a company that employed Donald Trump Jr. as a board member. No one would be giving Trump a pass.​

Again, that’s different because shut up.

As Chris Plant says, if Democrats did not have double standards, then they wouldn't have any standards at all.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

They don’t want impeachment. They, along with their democrat MSM, just want to keep the conversation in the public consciousness to sway peripherally involved (most) voters.

 

[playtime]

today was only the beginning...........

 

[RealDave]

WASHINGTON POST: Democrats’ Double Standard On Ukraine.

We don’t yet know whether President Trump delayed some military aid to Ukraine as leverage to get Ukraine’s president to reopen an investigation into Hunter Biden. But if we are concerned about U.S. officials inappropriately threatening aid to Ukraine, then there are others who have some explaining to do.​

In May, CNN reported that Sens. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) and Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) wrote a letter to Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Yuriy Lutsenko, expressing concern at the closing of four investigations they said were critical to the Mueller probe. In the letter, they communicated that their support for U.S. assistance to Ukraine was at stake.​

So, it’s okay for Democratic senators to encourage Ukraine to investigate Trump, but it’s not okay for the president to allegedly encourage Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden?
​

That’s different because shut up. Plus:

And then there is Joe Biden. In 2016, the then-vice president threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees to Ukraine if the government did not immediately fire the country’s top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin. According to the New York Times, “Among those who had a stake in the outcome was Hunter Biden … who at the time was on the board of an energy company owned by a Ukrainian oligarch who had been in the sights of the fired prosecutor general.” It is clear that Biden bragged about getting him fired, declaring last year: “I looked at them and said, ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’ Well, son of a b—-. He got fired.”​

Biden told reporters, “I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings.” That is flatly untrue. Hunter admitted in an interview with the New Yorker that his father expressed concern about the Burisma post: “Dad said, ‘I hope you know what you are doing,’ and I said, ‘I do.’” Moreover, the New Yorker reports that, “In December, 2015, as Joe Biden prepared to return to Ukraine, his aides braced for renewed scrutiny of Hunter’s relationship with Burisma. Amos Hochstein, the Obama Administration’s special envoy for energy policy, raised the matter with Biden.” That same month, the New York Times published an article about how Hunter’s business dealings in Ukraine undermined the vice president’s anti-corruption message.​

So, Biden was fully aware of his son’s involvement with Burisma when he pressured Ukraine to fire the prosecutor in 2016. Using U.S. aid as leverage to force the prosecutor’s dismissal is a conflict of interest. Federal ethics regulations require “all employees to recuse themselves from participating in an official matter if their impartiality would be questioned.” Biden violated these rules. Imagine if Trump pressured Ukraine to fire a prosecutor who was investigating a company that employed Donald Trump Jr. as a board member. No one would be giving Trump a pass.​

Again, that’s different because shut up.

Biden was acting in the best interest of the US and other countries wanted that prosecutor removed.

Hunter Biden did not own the company in question & there is no proof he was under investigation.

You assfucks need to quit lying & admit what a piece of shit Ttrump is.

 

[RealDave]

How Long Can Dems Live on a Diet of Nothingburgers? “This flailing has to be exhausting for them but, bless their little hearts, they don’t seem to be wearing down yet.”

Nothing urger:

Trump withholds military funding from the Ukraine and uses it to get the President of the Ukraine to provide dirt on Trump's political foe. White House officials listening in recognize this & try to bury the transcript.

This would be Watergate & Nixon swas the one who broke in. You have the crime & then the cover up. Trump is in both.

The only questions left are these:

1) When will Trump resign

2) When will Republicans in the Senate tell trump to resign or they will vote for conviction

3) Besides Pence & Barr, who else will be tied into this conspiracy

4) Will Republicans running for Congress rreach that tipping point to cut bait?

 

[Roudy]

The Dems are throwing all kinds of shit and Schiff at the wall hoping that something sticks, because they know that come 2020 Trump will not only get reelected but possibly win the House back and get a greater majority in the Senate. Many a Leftard will commit suicide when Trump gets to pick RBG's replacement to the Supreme Court.