PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #61
Hussein Obama, greatest presidential liar in our history, appointed Singer as his 'science adviser.'
Science Advisor to the President - Wikipedia
John Holdren - Wikipedia
I donno. Your link didn't work and the only Peter Singer associated with the Obama Administration is this guy.
P. W. Singer - Wikipedia
"Singer served as coordinator of the Defense Policy Task Force for Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign. In addition to his work on conflict issues, Singer is a member of the State Department's Advisory Committee on International Communications and Information Policy."
You really are blind, huh????
Peter Singer Joins Obama's Health Care Administrators
http://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Am-Not-A-Fan-Of-Peter-Singer/657290
Barack Obama, voting in favor of infanticide, and hiring Peter Singer as his 'science adviser,' Singer repeated his familiar, but still disconcerting, belief that killing an intellectually disabled human being might be less wrong than killing an alert non-human animal:
… one might argue that to kill a normal human being who wants to go on living is more seriously wrong than killing a nonhuman animal. Whether this claim is or is not sound, it is not speciesist. But given that some human beings – most obviously, those with profound intellectual impairment – lack this capacity, or have it to a lower degree than some nonhuman animals, it would be speciesist to claim that it is always more seriously wrong to kill a member of the species Homo sapiens than it is to kill a nonhuman animal. BioEdge: Ever the controversialist: Peter Singer on speciesism
“1.…the Jesuit college Fordham University welcomed infanticide and bestiality advocate Peter Singer for a panel discussion on Friday.
2. According to Fordham’s media relations website, Singer, a tenured Princeton bioethics professor, spoke from 4 to 6 p.m. in a panel the university promised “will provoke Christians to think about other animals in new ways.”
3. Singer has long lamented the societal stigma against having sex with animals. “Not so long ago,” Singer wrote in one essay, “any form of sexuality not leading to the conception of children was seen as, at best, wanton lust, or worse, a perversion. One by one, the taboos have fallen. But … not every taboo has crumbled.”
4. In the essay, titled “Heavy Petting,” Singer concluded that “sex across the species barrier,” while not normal, “ceases to be an offence [sic] to our status and dignity as human beings.” “Occasionally mutually satisfying activities may develop” when humans have sex with their pets, he claimed.
5. In addition to supporting bestiality and immediately granting equal legal rights to animals, Singer has also advocated euthanizing the mentally ill and aborting disabled infants on utilitarian grounds.
6. In his 1993 essay “Taking Life,” Singer, in a section called “Justifying Infanticide and Non-Voluntary Euthanasia,” wrote that “killing a disabled infant is not morally equivalent to killing a person.”
7. “Very often it is not wrong at all,” he added, noting that a.
8. Both Singer and his supporters maintain that ethics experts must often confront taboo topics to arrive at greater philosophical truths.” Campus president condemns Coulter event, silent as professor who calls sex with animals potentially ‘satisfying’ speaks
Infanticide has become the mainstream policy of the Democrat Party.
Your link is blind. At least the dog could still see shadows and stuff....
Experience Project - Wikipedia
Is Health adviser a real position at the WH or is it something the SJWer Anti-Choice crowd made up?
Still waiting on the name of a state, any state, that has legalized infanticide.
Every state that allows abortion up to birth allows infanticide:
a. It would allow the slaughter as the child is partially out of the birth canal
b."The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother."
Virginia governor faces backlash over comments supporting late-term abortion bill - CNNPolitics
...allowed to quietly die: infanticide.
And that was Obama's position, too.
I'll assume that pretending not to understand this allows you to sleep at night.
Let not pretend you quoted Gov. Blackface's full statement. The entire quote reveals why the anti-Choice SJWers would take only the final sentence.
"You know, I wasn’t there, Julie, and I certainly can’t speak for Delegate Tran, but I would tell you — one, the first thing I would say is this is why decisions such as this should be made by [healthcare] providers, physicians, and the mothers and fathers that are involved. There are — you know when we talk about third-trimester abortions, these are done with the consent of, obviously, the mother, with the consent of the physicians, more than one physician by the way. And it’s done in cases where there may be severe deformities, there may be a fetus that’s non-viable. So in this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother."
So would you not sedate the infant to keep it comfortable after it's birth? Since it was born it can't be euthenised even it has fatal deformities. Would the doctor not discuss the future, short as it may be, of child, how it will be cared for, what to expect with the particular condition with the mother? WTF?
You lying sack of offal.
When is there ever a choice by one party to kill a separate and unique other party????????
When??????
The bill has nothing to do with fatal deformities....only with one person having the legal ability to kill another.
There are two irrefutable statements about abortion/infanticide:
a. one individual has no right to kill a separate and unique individual
b. nearly 100% of abortions are based on convenience.