Giuliani drops another Biden bomb: "Keep your eye on Romania'

[bripat9643]

You must be referring to Julie his two russian mob friends arrested today with a one way ticket at airport probably bought by your orange turd.

Trumps one and only 'crime' was in beating the Witch Hillary in 2016.

With any luck he'll get to do it again in 2020.

No way. Didn’t you see her recent video from the looney bin? Her daughter was visiting, and she claimed she could beat him again. She had to cut the interview short, cause it was close to dinner time.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dude. Put the drinks down and step away from the computer before you hurt yourself

It says right at the bottom of his post that he's using an iPhone, moron.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

On Tuesday we reported that a Ukrainian member of parliament revealed additional corruption involving former VP Joe Biden, who — according to the lawmaker — received upwards of $900,000 in laundered ‘lobbying’ money at a time when he was working on behalf of the Obama regime to undermine that country’s legitimate corruption investigations.

On Tuesday evening, Rudy Giuliani, legal counsel for President Trump, went on “Hannity” to explain in further detail the corruption allegation and add some additional details.

(Excerpt) Read more at thenationalsentinel.com ...

Russia, Ukraine, Romania......his son with CHINA! What next? Georgia, Moldova, Hungary or Bulgaria?

Let me guess. This is your 857th "bombshell" that we'll never hear about again, right?

 

[ThisIsMe]

The impeachment process begins in the House of Representatives where the House Judiciary Committee decides whether or not to even proceed with impeachment. Provided they do, the Chairman of the Committee proposes a resolution calling for a formal inquiry into the issue of impeachment.

What Are the Requirements to Impeach a President?

So, according to this, it's all up to judiciary, not the speaker. Notice it says the chairman of the committee has to call for a resolution for a formal inquiry. This means it has to be voted on

Nope
From NPR
Must the House vote to conduct an impeachment inquiry?

Cipollone wrote: "the House of Representatives has never attempted to launch an impeachment inquiry against the President without a majority of the House taking political accountability for that decision by voting to authorize such a dramatic constitutional step."

The House has taken such a formal step in the past, including most recently with the impeachment of then-President Bill Clinton.

Pelosi has not called for such a vote but announced last month that the House is conducting "an official impeachment inquiry."

POLITICS
Why Ukraine Is At The Center Of The Impeachment Inquiry

• " style="display: flex; -webkit-box-align: center; align-items: center; min-height: 35px; width: 115px; margin-top: 14px; padding: 5px 10px; border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; border-color: rgb(68, 68, 68); background: rgb(34, 34, 34); color: rgb(153, 153, 153); font-size: 1.2rem; user-select: all;">

However, a former senior House Republican aide told NPR that "there is a difference between what the House should do and what the House has to do."

The former aide, an expert on House rules who asked not to be identified because he is criticizing his own party, argued that it's best practice to have a vote of the full House.

But there is nothing in the Constitution or in the rules of the House that compel a full House vote to authorize an impeachment inquiry. Pelosi is breaking with precedent but not rules or the law.

What Are the Requirements to Impeach a President?

No, the full house doesnt need to vote, but the judiciary committee does

Nope. It does NOT have to begin in the Judiciary.

October 5, 1998
The House Judiciary Committee votes to launch a congressional impeachment inquiry against President Clinton.

Clinton impeachment timeline

House judiciary starts impeachment inquiry for bill Clinton.

The House Judiciary Committee set up an impeachment inquiry staff and began investigations into possible impeachable offenses by Richard Nixon, the 37th President of the United States

Impeachment process against Richard Nixon - Wikipedia

House judiciary starts impeachment inquiry for Nixon.

It's how the process work. Judiciary votes to start an impeachment inquiry, they write the articles of impeachment, and submit then to the full house where a vote is taken. If it passes, then impeachment moves forward.

 

[The Original Tree]

This is why the Dims are moving now to impeach Trump in the Kangaroo court that does not allow Trump due process and shuts the GOP out entirely.

If by some outrageous circumstance the Senate upholds the rigged impeachment in the House, there will be a civil war, do not doubt it.

If Trump is impeached by the House, he will get his due process in the Senate trial.

Then he can be put under oath and asked about his sex life, like Clinton was.

Let's do it!

Why do you care what Trump does outside of the oval office in his sex life ? Gay?

All the liberals on this forum if you read their posts closely are either gay, or are dirty old men who oggle children.

 

[The Original Tree]

The impeachment process begins in the House of Representatives where the House Judiciary Committee decides whether or not to even proceed with impeachment. Provided they do, the Chairman of the Committee proposes a resolution calling for a formal inquiry into the issue of impeachment.

What Are the Requirements to Impeach a President?

So, according to this, it's all up to judiciary, not the speaker. Notice it says the chairman of the committee has to call for a resolution for a formal inquiry. This means it has to be voted on

Nope
From NPR
Must the House vote to conduct an impeachment inquiry?

Cipollone wrote: "the House of Representatives has never attempted to launch an impeachment inquiry against the President without a majority of the House taking political accountability for that decision by voting to authorize such a dramatic constitutional step."

The House has taken such a formal step in the past, including most recently with the impeachment of then-President Bill Clinton.

Pelosi has not called for such a vote but announced last month that the House is conducting "an official impeachment inquiry."

POLITICS
Why Ukraine Is At The Center Of The Impeachment Inquiry

• " style="display: flex; -webkit-box-align: center; align-items: center; min-height: 35px; width: 115px; margin-top: 14px; padding: 5px 10px; border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; border-color: rgb(68, 68, 68); background: rgb(34, 34, 34); color: rgb(153, 153, 153); font-size: 1.2rem; user-select: all;">

However, a former senior House Republican aide told NPR that "there is a difference between what the House should do and what the House has to do."

The former aide, an expert on House rules who asked not to be identified because he is criticizing his own party, argued that it's best practice to have a vote of the full House.

But there is nothing in the Constitution or in the rules of the House that compel a full House vote to authorize an impeachment inquiry. Pelosi is breaking with precedent but not rules or the law.

What Are the Requirements to Impeach a President?

No, the full house doesnt need to vote, but the judiciary committee does

Nope. It does NOT have to begin in the Judiciary.

October 5, 1998
The House Judiciary Committee votes to launch a congressional impeachment inquiry against President Clinton.

Clinton impeachment timeline

House judiciary starts impeachment inquiry for bill Clinton.

The House Judiciary Committee set up an impeachment inquiry staff and began investigations into possible impeachable offenses by Richard Nixon, the 37th President of the United States

Impeachment process against Richard Nixon - Wikipedia

House judiciary starts impeachment inquiry for Nixon.

It's how the process work. Judiciary votes to start an impeachment inquiry, they write the articles of impeachment, and submit then to the full house where a vote is taken. If it passes, then impeachment moves forward.

It goes without saying that The Articles of Impeachment are based on The Special Counsels Recommendations for Indictment and Mad Moscow Mueller made none.

 

[BlindBoo]

No, the full house doesnt need to vote, but the judiciary committee does

How the House gets there is entirely up to the chamber itself to determine. There is no constitutional requirement that the House take two successful votes on impeachment, one to authorize some kind of inquiry and one to ratify whatever emerges from that inquiry. An impeachment inquiry is not “invalid” because there has been no vote to formally launch it, and any eventual impeachment would not be “invalid” because the process that led to it did not feature a floor vote authorizing a specific inquiry.

Of course, the House’s own rules might require such a vote, and the House must follow its own rules until it chooses to change them. But there is no rule requiring such an authorizing vote, and neither McCarthy nor Cipollone points to one. The House has changed its internal procedures dramatically over time. At one point, the House did not rely on standing committees but instead created select committees to handle many legislative tasks. Through much of its history, the House has limited the investigatory powers of its standing committees and required that those committees go to the floor to receive special authorization to issue subpoenas or spend substantial resources on staff. It no longer does so, and so it no longer needs to take such votes to specially authorize particular investigations. The House might want a select committee to pursue an impeachment inquiry, but it could also choose to rely on its standing committees to do the job with their preexisting jurisdiction and resources—and that is how the Democratic leadership has decided to approach the current impeachment inquiry. It is not up to the target of an impeachment to determine who will compose the committee that will draft the articles of impeachment or who will chair that committee.

Must the House Vote to Authorize an Impeachment Inquiry?

It goes without saying that The Articles of Impeachment are based on The Special Counsels Recommendations for Indictment and Mad Moscow Mueller made none.

Again, the Special Counsel Law has expired. Mueller worked for the Executive Branch and did not submit his findings and evidence to Congress.

 

[The Original Tree]

No, the full house doesnt need to vote, but the judiciary committee does

How the House gets there is entirely up to the chamber itself to determine. There is no constitutional requirement that the House take two successful votes on impeachment, one to authorize some kind of inquiry and one to ratify whatever emerges from that inquiry. An impeachment inquiry is not “invalid” because there has been no vote to formally launch it, and any eventual impeachment would not be “invalid” because the process that led to it did not feature a floor vote authorizing a specific inquiry.

Of course, the House’s own rules might require such a vote, and the House must follow its own rules until it chooses to change them. But there is no rule requiring such an authorizing vote, and neither McCarthy nor Cipollone points to one. The House has changed its internal procedures dramatically over time. At one point, the House did not rely on standing committees but instead created select committees to handle many legislative tasks. Through much of its history, the House has limited the investigatory powers of its standing committees and required that those committees go to the floor to receive special authorization to issue subpoenas or spend substantial resources on staff. It no longer does so, and so it no longer needs to take such votes to specially authorize particular investigations. The House might want a select committee to pursue an impeachment inquiry, but it could also choose to rely on its standing committees to do the job with their preexisting jurisdiction and resources—and that is how the Democratic leadership has decided to approach the current impeachment inquiry. It is not up to the target of an impeachment to determine who will compose the committee that will draft the articles of impeachment or who will chair that committee.

Must the House Vote to Authorize an Impeachment Inquiry?

It goes without saying that The Articles of Impeachment are based on The Special Counsels Recommendations for Indictment and Mad Moscow Mueller made none.

Again, the Special Counsel Law has expired. Mueller worked for the Executive Branch and did not submit his findings and evidence to Congress.

He could have. The President did it for him. There were no Recommendations for Indictment. So suck on that egg traitor.
Mueller is a big dummy, and a crook, but he isn't stupid enough to tie a noose around his own neck to hang an innocent man with such a high profile and ability to fight back.

Mueller was selected because he has put innocent men in jail multiple times, and is not an honest man. People like him are only honest when the whole world is watching, and that is why there were no recommendations for indictment.

Sucks to be you, looking to overturn an election and still not being able to launch a successful COUP three years in to your Rebellion.

 

[BlindBoo]

He could have. The President did it for him.

No, the charge was explicit as to who he reported to. Trumpybear has stonewalled and withheld nearly all the evidence Mueller gathered that Congress has requested. The report itself is damning to he unpatriotic president.

Mueller is a lifelong Republican. Combat hardened, hard charging Marine.

The only Coup that happened is Putin's Poop Coup, with Trumpybear as the lead. The country will have it's chance to overturn 2016 soon enough, well not soon enough for the our former allies, the Kurds who helped defeated ISIS with their lives.

 

[The Original Tree]

He could have. The President did it for him.

No, the charge was explicit as to who he reported to. Trumpybear has stonewalled and withheld nearly all the evidence Mueller gathered that Congress has requested. The report itself is damning to he unpatriotic president.

Mueller is a lifelong Republican. Combat hardened, hard charging Marine.

The only Coup that happened is Putin's Poop Coup, with Trumpybear as the lead. The country will have it's chance to overturn 2016 soon enough, well not soon enough for the our former allies, the Kurds who helped defeated ISIS with their lives.

There is no Evidence Being With Held.

Care to list what evidence is being with held? The President did not even have to release one page of The Mueller Toilet Paper Report.

What kind of dope are you smoking today? You smoking that THC Oil?

And why exactly do you want America involved in skirmishes 7,000 miles away between people who have been fighting with each other for 2,000 years?

Only The Deep State wants Endless War.

 

[BlindBoo]

There is no Evidence Being With Held.

Care to list what evidence is being with held?

The Justice Department told a federal judge that a House committee investigating President Donald Trump is not entitled to grand jury evidence from special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, saying it has failed to explain which specific testimony it needs access to or how it would help its investigation into potential obstruction by the president.

"There is this generalized notion that this is an important matter because of impeachment and, therefore, (the committee) should have access to everything," Elizabeth Shapiro, an attorney in the Justice Department's Civil Division, said during a two-hour hearing in federal court Tuesday. "It also needs to be particularized, and they shouldn't get a pass on that because of impeachment."

U.S. District Court Judge Beryl Howell heard arguments on whether the House Judiciary Committee should receive the underlying grand jury evidence behind Mueller’s report on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Impeachment inquiry doesn't entitle House committee to grand jury evidence in Mueller report, DOJ says

And why exactly do you want America involved in skirmishes 7,000 miles away between people who have been fighting with each other for 2,000 years?

Since the Great Obama masterfully allied with like minded forces in the region to contain and finally deny ISIS any territory, Trumpybear, has no use for historical or significant alliances. Ergodon probable said something like "You know Donnie, it would be a shame if something were to happen to those beautiful Trumpybear Towers we have. How about you remove your forces and let me bomb the shit out of your former Kurd Allies. (Knudge Knudge)

What kind of dope are you smoking today?

Purple Kush Kief why?

 

[BlindBoo]

The impeachment process begins in the House of Representatives where the House Judiciary Committee decides whether or not to even proceed with impeachment. Provided they do, the Chairman of the Committee proposes a resolution calling for a formal inquiry into the issue of impeachment.

What Are the Requirements to Impeach a President?

So, according to this, it's all up to judiciary, not the speaker. Notice it says the chairman of the committee has to call for a resolution for a formal inquiry. This means it has to be voted on

Nope
From NPR
Must the House vote to conduct an impeachment inquiry?

Cipollone wrote: "the House of Representatives has never attempted to launch an impeachment inquiry against the President without a majority of the House taking political accountability for that decision by voting to authorize such a dramatic constitutional step."

The House has taken such a formal step in the past, including most recently with the impeachment of then-President Bill Clinton.

Pelosi has not called for such a vote but announced last month that the House is conducting "an official impeachment inquiry."

POLITICS
Why Ukraine Is At The Center Of The Impeachment Inquiry

• " style="display: flex; -webkit-box-align: center; align-items: center; min-height: 35px; width: 115px; margin-top: 14px; padding: 5px 10px; border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; border-color: rgb(68, 68, 68); background: rgb(34, 34, 34); color: rgb(153, 153, 153); font-size: 1.2rem; user-select: all;">

However, a former senior House Republican aide told NPR that "there is a difference between what the House should do and what the House has to do."

The former aide, an expert on House rules who asked not to be identified because he is criticizing his own party, argued that it's best practice to have a vote of the full House.

But there is nothing in the Constitution or in the rules of the House that compel a full House vote to authorize an impeachment inquiry. Pelosi is breaking with precedent but not rules or the law.

What Are the Requirements to Impeach a President?

No, the full house doesnt need to vote, but the judiciary committee does

Nope. It does NOT have to begin in the Judiciary.

October 5, 1998
The House Judiciary Committee votes to launch a congressional impeachment inquiry against President Clinton.

Clinton impeachment timeline

House judiciary starts impeachment inquiry for bill Clinton.

The House Judiciary Committee set up an impeachment inquiry staff and began investigations into possible impeachable offenses by Richard Nixon, the 37th President of the United States

Impeachment process against Richard Nixon - Wikipedia

House judiciary starts impeachment inquiry for Nixon.

It's how the process work. Judiciary votes to start an impeachment inquiry, they write the articles of impeachment, and submit then to the full house where a vote is taken. If it passes, then impeachment moves forward.

That's how the process worked in the past. House procedures have changed. They don't need to call any special committee. The committees already have all the power they need to do the investigations.

 

[Unkotare]

This is why the Dims are moving now to impeach Trump in the Kangaroo court that does not allow Trump due process and shuts the GOP out entirely.

If by some outrageous circumstance the Senate upholds the rigged impeachment in the House, there will be a civil war, do not doubt it.

Give it a fucking rest crying “civil war!” all the damn time.

 

[Lesh]

The impeachment process begins in the House of Representatives where the House Judiciary Committee decides whether or not to even proceed with impeachment. Provided they do, the Chairman of the Committee proposes a resolution calling for a formal inquiry into the issue of impeachment.

What Are the Requirements to Impeach a President?

So, according to this, it's all up to judiciary, not the speaker. Notice it says the chairman of the committee has to call for a resolution for a formal inquiry. This means it has to be voted on

Nope
From NPR
Must the House vote to conduct an impeachment inquiry?

Cipollone wrote: "the House of Representatives has never attempted to launch an impeachment inquiry against the President without a majority of the House taking political accountability for that decision by voting to authorize such a dramatic constitutional step."

The House has taken such a formal step in the past, including most recently with the impeachment of then-President Bill Clinton.

Pelosi has not called for such a vote but announced last month that the House is conducting "an official impeachment inquiry."

POLITICS
Why Ukraine Is At The Center Of The Impeachment Inquiry

• " style="display: flex; -webkit-box-align: center; align-items: center; min-height: 35px; width: 115px; margin-top: 14px; padding: 5px 10px; border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; border-color: rgb(68, 68, 68); background: rgb(34, 34, 34); color: rgb(153, 153, 153); font-size: 1.2rem; user-select: all;">

However, a former senior House Republican aide told NPR that "there is a difference between what the House should do and what the House has to do."

The former aide, an expert on House rules who asked not to be identified because he is criticizing his own party, argued that it's best practice to have a vote of the full House.

But there is nothing in the Constitution or in the rules of the House that compel a full House vote to authorize an impeachment inquiry. Pelosi is breaking with precedent but not rules or the law.

What Are the Requirements to Impeach a President?

No, the full house doesnt need to vote, but the judiciary committee does

Nope. It does NOT have to begin in the Judiciary.

October 5, 1998
The House Judiciary Committee votes to launch a congressional impeachment inquiry against President Clinton.

Clinton impeachment timeline

House judiciary starts impeachment inquiry for bill Clinton.

The House Judiciary Committee set up an impeachment inquiry staff and began investigations into possible impeachable offenses by Richard Nixon, the 37th President of the United States

Impeachment process against Richard Nixon - Wikipedia

House judiciary starts impeachment inquiry for Nixon.

It's how the process work. Judiciary votes to start an impeachment inquiry, they write the articles of impeachment, and submit then to the full house where a vote is taken. If it passes, then impeachment moves forward.

That’s how the process worked 20 years ago - 50 years ago. The rules have changed

They were changed by the way... by Republicans

 

[ThisIsMe]

What Are the Requirements to Impeach a President?

So, according to this, it's all up to judiciary, not the speaker. Notice it says the chairman of the committee has to call for a resolution for a formal inquiry. This means it has to be voted on

Nope
From NPR
Must the House vote to conduct an impeachment inquiry?

Cipollone wrote: "the House of Representatives has never attempted to launch an impeachment inquiry against the President without a majority of the House taking political accountability for that decision by voting to authorize such a dramatic constitutional step."

The House has taken such a formal step in the past, including most recently with the impeachment of then-President Bill Clinton.

Pelosi has not called for such a vote but announced last month that the House is conducting "an official impeachment inquiry."

POLITICS
Why Ukraine Is At The Center Of The Impeachment Inquiry

• " style="display: flex; -webkit-box-align: center; align-items: center; min-height: 35px; width: 115px; margin-top: 14px; padding: 5px 10px; border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; border-color: rgb(68, 68, 68); background: rgb(34, 34, 34); color: rgb(153, 153, 153); font-size: 1.2rem; user-select: all;">

However, a former senior House Republican aide told NPR that "there is a difference between what the House should do and what the House has to do."

The former aide, an expert on House rules who asked not to be identified because he is criticizing his own party, argued that it's best practice to have a vote of the full House.

But there is nothing in the Constitution or in the rules of the House that compel a full House vote to authorize an impeachment inquiry. Pelosi is breaking with precedent but not rules or the law.

What Are the Requirements to Impeach a President?

No, the full house doesnt need to vote, but the judiciary committee does

Nope. It does NOT have to begin in the Judiciary.

October 5, 1998
The House Judiciary Committee votes to launch a congressional impeachment inquiry against President Clinton.

Clinton impeachment timeline

House judiciary starts impeachment inquiry for bill Clinton.

The House Judiciary Committee set up an impeachment inquiry staff and began investigations into possible impeachable offenses by Richard Nixon, the 37th President of the United States

Impeachment process against Richard Nixon - Wikipedia

House judiciary starts impeachment inquiry for Nixon.

It's how the process work. Judiciary votes to start an impeachment inquiry, they write the articles of impeachment, and submit then to the full house where a vote is taken. If it passes, then impeachment moves forward.

That’s how the process worked 20 years ago - 50 years ago. The rules have changed

They were changed by the way... by Republicans

There are no rules, actually, on how impeachments are to be conducted. However, we do have precedent, both in the clinton and Nixon impeachments.

 

[basquebromance]

Trump lawyer Giuliani got paid to lobby Romanian president

The former New York mayor’s letter goes against the State Department stance on corruption in Bucharest.

www.politico.eu