Global Warming? Nah! 120 Year Ice Age Coming!

longknife

longknife

Diamond Member
Sep 21, 2012
42,221
13,091
2,250
Sin City
Global-Weather-Oscillations-chart-1171334.jpg


Who is it on here who just loves coming up with graphs? Doesn't mean anything to me. Anyone?

ust think. 120 years of super cold winters. Anyhow, check it out @ ICE AGE EARTH: Global FREEZE lasting 120 YEARS threatens ‘more intense’ winters from 2019
 
longknife said:
Global-Weather-Oscillations-chart-1171334.jpg


Who is it on here who just loves coming up with graphs? Doesn't mean anything to me. Anyone?

ust think. 120 years of super cold winters. Anyhow, check it out @ ICE AGE EARTH: Global FREEZE lasting 120 YEARS threatens ‘more intense’ winters from 2019
Click to expand...
Some one points to the cyclical cycles of the earth in graph form, poses a reasonable hypothesis backed with empirical facts and they call them a hack... What should we call all of the climate scaremongers who claim they are scientists and use modelling that NEVER passes empirical review and yet somehow they are credible?
:lmao::lmao:
 
Ah, another thread for denial of factual reality.

All you cons who think Jesus rode a dinosaur and the world is flat here's another chance for you to commiserate with each other.

:cuckoo:
 
lol.........lets ask the folks in Times Square on New Years Eve about the warming world.:ack-1: At the end of the day, its all that matters in the big picture. Lets not forget.........all the science and graphs in the world will move nobody if they think they'll still be pulling out the winter parka's, gloves and mittens for 5 months every year. That's just the way it works in the world............no different than me marching down Main Street this weekend shaking a banana at people in my birthday suit warning of the end of the end of times.:boobies::boobies::coffee:
 
Deniers are some truly fanatical ice age cultists. They've been predicting their Holy Ice Age nonstop for over 40 years now. It never arrives, and it just keeps warming strongly instead, but that doeesn't affect them at all. It only makes their faith in the upcoming HolyIceAge even stronger.
 
Billy_Bob said:
Old Rocks said:
TIM_TSI_Reconstruction-1.png

http://lasp.colorado.edu/home/sorce/files/2011/09/TIM_TSI_Reconstruction-1.png

UAH_LT_1979_thru_November_2017_v6.jpg

http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_November_2017_v6.jpg

LOL Real graphs of what is presently happening. Does not look like cooling to me.
Click to expand...
View attachment 168046

I guess the solar input isn't dropping off.... Moron...


View attachment 168047

The unadjusted data sets say your full of shit... Cooling started back in 1997
Click to expand...
Now that was some cooling. Second highest point on Dr. Spencer's graph in 1998. Then we have 2016. LOL At this rate of cooling by 2025, we will have seen at least one month well above the 2 degrees C mark.

UAH_LT_1979_thru_November_2017_v6.jpg
 
Again, computer models are of no use for predicting future temperature. The IPCC admitted this in the early 1990's but by the mid-90's, they had removed such references in their summaries.


https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/26352-top-climate-alarmist-computer-models-wrong-skeptics-right-on-pause

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andrew-bolt/warmist-scientist-admits-our-models-were-wrong/news-story/2948bbe1be32e740e105c15e2341159f




"The IPCC concluded even as early as 2001 that their research and climate modeling can not be used for long-term predictions of the future climate. For the Panel's Third Assessment Report, paragraph 14.2.2.2 page 774 it says in my translation: "In research and modeling of the climate, we should be aware that we are dealing with a chaotic, nonlinear coupled system, and that long-term predictions of future climate states is not possible. "


https://forums.tesla.com/forum/forums/ipcc-admits-climate-models-fail-professor-stein-storli-bergmark-physicist
 
Let's see. For over 100 years the scientists have stated that the Earth is going to warm due to the impact of GHGs that mankind is putting into the atmosphere. So, what has happened. The earth has warmed. And, since about 1970, the denialists have denied that it is happening, and it has continued to warm. And will continue to warm. And we are already seeing the affects of that warming in extreme weather events we see every year now.

It is not the scientists that have been consistently wrong, but the denialists.
 
The Ice House world we live in today is a relatively recent development. For most of earth's history our planet has been a Green House world.

The same conditions which led to the transition from a green house world to an ice house world still exist today.

Over the last 500,000 years we have been cycling between glacial cycles - where significant ice accumulates over portions of North America - and interglacial cycles which is what we have today.

There is zero evidence to suggest that if all things were equal we wouldn't continue to experience these glacial - interglacial cycles.

So only an idiot would try to discount the risk or probability of another ice age. An idiot.
 
ding said:
The Ice House world we live in today is a relatively recent development. For most of earth's history our planet has been a Green House world.

The same conditions which led to the transition from a green house world to an ice house world still exist today.

Over the last 500,000 years we have been cycling between glacial cycles - where significant ice accumulates over portions of North America - and interglacial cycles which is what we have today.

There is zero evidence to suggest that if all things were equal we wouldn't continue to experience these glacial - interglacial cycles.

So only an idiot would try to discount the risk or probability of another ice age. An idiot.
Click to expand...


Nobody alive today can with any degree of certainty discount the possibility of a new ice age.........cannot discount the possibility of significantly warmer temps either. The plain fact is..........nobody walking knows for sure. Statements either way are pure fakery.:deal::eusa_dance::eusa_dance:
 
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Was the medievial warmer?

< Previous Thread

Fountain of Youth: Metropolitan Superstition(?)

Next Thread >

Similar threads

Seymour Flops
It is really strange that some have made an apocalyptic religion out of the warming that has occured since the Little Ice Age
2 3 4
Replies
61
Views
1K
HeyNorm
H
ChemEngineer
False Alarm by Bjorn Lomborg - My Notes From It
Replies
4
Views
276
EMH
EMH
Mikeoxenormous
So after the Snowbomb that is going to hit NY this Thanksgiving, you can bet the Marxists will be blaming Climate Change for what is coming next.
Replies
5
Views
216
ActionJackson
ActionJackson
Mikeoxenormous
Hey you Global Warming Believers, do you still believe that the Earth is burning up? If so, you might want to look at this..
2 3
Replies
46
Views
1K
ding
ding
Mikeoxenormous
I am going to see if anyone here, believes in the science.
Replies
10
Views
1K
ReinyDays
ReinyDays

Latest Discussions

Weatherman2020
Buttigieg confirms they were "ALL AWARE" of Biden's obvious cognitive impairment — including Kamala Harris — but lied to the American people anyway
Replies
17
Views
170
scruffy
S
RhodyPatriot
E-Bike Battery Explodes in Elevator & Cooks a Man
3 4 5
Replies
80
Views
267
The Duke
The Duke
BackAgain
Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!
624 625 626
Replies
13K
Views
1M
Blisterfinger
Blisterfinger
Procrustes Stretched
Gunman at Trump Rally Was Often a Step Ahead of the Secret Service -some law enforcement officers were aware of Thomas Crooks And he was aware of them
Replies
5
Views
29
Doc7505
Doc7505
S
The View’s Joy Behar Says Young WHITE Males Buying 50 Rounds of Ammo Should Be Reported
2
Replies
25
Views
148
scruffy
S
View more…

Forum List

Back
Top