Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 100,505
- 80,513
- 3,645
Then, you're welcome, I guess.Yes, that's what "empirical" means,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then, you're welcome, I guess.Yes, that's what "empirical" means,
What does your voluminous expertise in this area have to say about this, what conclusions does this empirical evidence lead you to:Then, you're welcome, I guess.
If you think I am going to pore over material in a link and try to suss out whatever point you imagine you are making, you are mistaken.What does your voluminous expertise in this area have to say about this:
![]()
What inferences can we make by looking at these two specimins?
For example, what might their nearest common ancestor look like? might their DNA be similar? if we found these only as fossils, what might we infer?www.usmessageboard.com
If the question frightens you, then sure, off you trot, perhaps a real, confident evolutionist will step up.If you think I am going to pore over material in a link and try to suss out whatever point you imagine you are making, you are mistaken.
Nothing personal.
Do get cozy and familiar with them. Idiot!
- No spamming. Multiple posting of the same thing, advertising, and/or links to other sites.
- No cross posting. Cross posting is posting the same content repeatedly or in multiple forums. Pick one.
See? You couldn't be honest if your life depended on it.If the question frightens you, then sure, off you trot, perhaps a real, confident evolutionist will step up.
A link to that thread.Not a link, it's another thread I started for evolutionists to show off their skills, something you obviously lack in this area.
the point is you are afraid to venture an opinion on these two skeletons. Look at them then answer these questions:Just make your point succinctly in your own words.
Nope. The interrogation is over. I am not here to teach remedial science or to be your assistant.the point is you are afraid to venture an opinion on these two skeletons. Look at them then answer these questions:
1. What might their common ancestor look like?
2. If we found these as fossils, what might we infer?
3. Might one be descended from the other?
4. What kind of animal might each of them be?
View attachment 1002768
You're afraid for good reason, you suspect a trap - it is, you suspect I'll catch you out, I will. Therefore like the coward you are you'll do all you can to avoid committing because you fear being wrong, if one fears being wrong one will never learn anything as you so well demonstrate.
If I did this to a class full of fourteen year old, they'd be clambering to get their opinions across, because they are open minded unlike you.
As I said you're clearly a coward, an intellectual fraudster. If I did this to a class full of fourteen year old, they'd be clambering to get their opinions across, because they are open minded unlike you, don't care if they might be wrong.Nope. The interrogation is over. I am not here to teach remedial science or to be your assistant.
Just make your point about the topic. Your points about me are irrelevant. My knowledge of evolution is not relevant to the truth of the theory.
And go.
I don't care. Neither does anyone else. Your useless appeals to emotion don't work here.As I said you're clearly a coward, an intellectual fraudster. If I did this to a class full of fourteen year old, they'd be clambering to get their opinions across, because they are open minded unlike you.
No, I've trapped you, you've been outwitted - we both know that.I don't care. Neither does anyone else. Your useless appeals to emotion don't work here.
I think maybe you're out of your element.
No, I've trapped you, you've been outwitted - we both know that.
The theory isn't a theory, you sense that else you'd answer my questions about the skeletons.When you are done prancing and preening, the theory of evolution will be waiting for you.
A very stupid and false statement.The theory isn't a theory
Here's Berlinski educating Krauss on what constitutes a hypothesis, theory, you might learn something here:A very stupid and false statement.
By the way, these two animals share many, many common ancestors.the point is you are afraid to venture an opinion on these two skeletons. Look at them then answer these questions:
1. What might their common ancestor look like?
2. If we found these as fossils, what might we infer?
3. Might one be descended from the other?
4. What kind of animal might each of them be?
View attachment 1002768
You're afraid for good reason, you suspect a trap - it is, you suspect I'll catch you out, I will. Therefore like the coward you are you'll do all you can to avoid committing because you fear being wrong, if one fears being wrong one will never learn anything as you so well demonstrate.
If I did this to a class full of fourteen year old, they'd be clambering to get their opinions across, because they are open minded unlike you.
Oh dear, kind of put your foot in your mouth again here. You should learn to use a search engine, its a good way of trapping bullshit statements before posting them and making yourself look like a dufus:Ask a high school 10th grader what the common ancestor of two different species is , and they will laugh you out of the room for asking such a stupid question.