There is an old testament in the Bible. Its more straight forward. It is not so progressive.Other than the Creed of the Apostles, doctrine does change with the times.If you want to say who could be more religious then another then Progs are less so. We all do our thigs, but changing Christian doctrine to fit the times is not Christianity. That includes me to.Outrageous and it illustrates how the democrats fall in line with marxist doctrine.
Godless Democrat Susan Rice Says It's "Problematic" that Secretary of State Pompeo Is "Overtly Religious" | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Democrats overtly drop God.www.thegatewaypundit.com
The headline is totally wrong. Rice is an Episcopalian Christian. She even went to the National Cathedral School. What she actually said was:
"Mike Pompeo has been an overtly religious secretary of state, which in itself is problematic because again he's supposed to represent all of America, all of our religions," Rice told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow.
Excerpt from: Susan Rice: 'Problematic' for Pompeo to be 'overtly religious' secretary of state
Putting aside the fact that pompeo should not have been speaking at the RNC at all, and certainly not on an official trip on the taxpayers' dime, I think that she was addressing the problem of public officials who conduct their official business in accordance with their own private faith, rather than as a representative of all Americans regardless of faith. A public official must serve all the people.
Secretary of State is not an elected position. But if a candidate for an elected position were to assert that they would conduct the business of this position in strict accordance with their particular faith, wouldn't that put voters who disagree with the tenets of the candidate's faith in the awkward position of having to reject that candidate solely on the basis of this disagreement to avoid living under the tenets of the candidate's faith?