Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When a opinion you find disagreeable is made (supported by link or not) it's incumbent upon you to put on your big boy pants and provide the counter-point, not ask for "mah links"......Otherwise you are just wasting site resources.Perhaps, but not as lazy as the person that refuses to support their claims.
People like you parrot the talking points you party gives you and could not back them up to save your life, thus you call people lazy when they ask you to.
When a opinion you find disagreeable is made (supported by link or not) it's incumbent upon you to put on your big boy pants and provide the counter-point, not ask for "mah links"......Otherwise you are just wasting site resources.
Negative, if it's your ox being gored it's up to you to disprove it.It is not opinions I ask to be supported, but claims of fact.
But you are also wrong, it is incumbent upon the person making the claims to support them, otherwise they are dismissed as fake.
When someone says for example "72 precincts stopped counting at the same time and later added votes for Biden" it is not incumbent upon me to prove this did not happen, it is incumbent upon the person making the claim to give the list of the precincts.
When someone says that the Biden Admin is banning books it is incumbent upon them to provide the list of books.
Negative, if it's your ox being gored it's up to you to disprove it.
Negative, if it's your ox being gored it's up to you to disprove it.
Has anyone else noted the new trend among members of this forum that when asked to provide some evidence to support their claims they now say "well Google is censoring it" or "well YouTube deleted it" or some variation of this.
This is a pretty convenient ploy, it is like a get out of jail free card for any claim made.
Don't waste your time with that dickhead. He's a Democrat shill hiding under the guise of being an "independent." For the whole 5 years he's been on this board, GG has done nothing but trying to discredit the GOP, Trump, and his supporters while at the same time, never, ever holding the Democrat's feet to the fire.
So you want them to use other sources that you will make fun of and declare fake newsI am questioning the use of it as an excuse to avoid supporting claims made.
Is that like the everything is a conspiracy ploy all the so called liberals (there are no liberals here , just intolerant assholes) use. You know the ones backed up by the word of liars but no facts. Like that?Has anyone else noted the new trend among members of this forum that when asked to provide some evidence to support their claims they now say "well Google is censoring it" or "well YouTube deleted it" or some variation of this.
This is a pretty convenient ploy, it is like a get out of jail free card for any claim made.
So you want them to use other sources that you will make fun of and declare fake news
Understood.
Is that like the everything is a conspiracy ploy all the so called liberals (there are no liberals here , just intolerant assholes) use. You know the ones backed up by the word of liars but no facts. Like that?
It has been proven GA. deleted or destroyed data pertaining to the election. Of course no one was charged.It is very much like the CTs you pass off and then say you cannot support the claims as the data has been hidden or deleted or some other such BS
It has been proven GA. deleted or destroyed data pertaining to the election.
Plus like the weasel you are you discount the CTs that turned out to be true. The Russia hoax.
Might as well close this thread, you are toast.
google is censoring it,,, its not a ploy,,Has anyone else noted the new trend among members of this forum that when asked to provide some evidence to support their claims they now say "well Google is censoring it" or "well YouTube deleted it" or some variation of this.
This is a pretty convenient ploy, it is like a get out of jail free card for any claim made.
How about actually checking out the news every now and then?I am questioning the use of it as an excuse to avoid supporting claims made.
if he did that he couldnt claim ignorance,,,How about actually checking out the news every now and then?
How about actually checking out the news every now and then?
