daveman
Diamond Member
Wonder why they stopped counting at 2007...?A major probe by the Justice Department between 2002 and 2007 failed to prosecute a single person for going to the polls and impersonating an eligible voter, which the anti-fraud laws are supposedly designed to stop.
Four NY Democrats Plead Guilty to Voter Fraud | The Gateway Pundit
Indiana GOP goes after election fraud; 65 indictments in southern Indiana | RedState
Voter Fraud | North Carolina | Voter ID Laws | The Daily Caller
Archived-Articles: Democrats and Vote Fraud: On the Road to Rigged Elections
The manipulation continued during the official recount, as the Minnesota Canvassing Board detected just enough "ballot errors" to put Franken over the top. John Lott later analyzed the Board's inconsistent decisions, nearly all of which favored the Democratic candidate.
Some 17,000 more ballots were counted in the Minnesota Senate election than there were recorded voters. Mark Ritchie had dismantled the state's ballot reconciliation program, which previously required voting districts to validate the number of votes cast against the number of ballots issued. Outside investigators also found that 1,400 convicted felons had voted illegally.
Some 17,000 more ballots were counted in the Minnesota Senate election than there were recorded voters. Mark Ritchie had dismantled the state's ballot reconciliation program, which previously required voting districts to validate the number of votes cast against the number of ballots issued. Outside investigators also found that 1,400 convicted felons had voted illegally.
It would be nice if Democrats didn't hold the democratic process in such contempt.